Sergey Glazyev: The world has changed. Irreversibly. What we wrote about a decade and a half ago has come to pass. This publication is a continuation of the article “What is happening?” previously published on this channel. 1/84Image
Pax Americana is crumbling before our eyes, three decades after the collapse of the USSR. The transition to a new global economic order has been completed. 2/84
The center of the world economy has shifted to East and South Asia, where a bipolar core of the integral global economic order has formed, as expected, with two poles: communist China and democratic India. 3/84
The transition to a new technological order, which began with the global financial crisis of 2008, has also been completed. 4/84
Over the decade and a half of the Great Stagnation that followed, advanced countries have established the foundational industries of the new technological order. Their accelerated growth is propelling their economies onto a new long wave of economic expansion. 5/84
All of this is happening in full accordance with the theory of long-term economic development as a process of changing technological and global economic orders. 6/84
Unfortunately, the recommendations based on this theory were not implemented in our country, leading to years of economic stagflation and entanglement in the epicenter of a global hybrid war. 7/84
This war has predictably strengthened China, which has become the global leader in the production sector. 8/84
The current U.S. administration’s attempts to halt its rise are doomed to fail, as the economic development management system created in China is an order of magnitude more effective. 9/84
As predicted, the United States has been unable to win the global hybrid war it unleashed to maintain global leadership. 10/84
They followed Zbigniew Brzezinski’s unrealistic five-step strategy (to Nazify Ukraine against Russia, to separate the European Union from Russia, to provoke a coup in Russia and install a puppet regime, to destroy Iran, and to isolate China to induce famine). 11/84
After a decade of attempting to implement this strategy, they have only weakened Europe and strengthened China. However, as in the first two world wars, they have managed to offload their costs onto the Russian world. 12/84
By manipulating the leadership of the Central Bank of Russia, the American oligarchy has long benefited from capital flight from our country, with the total volume approaching $2 trillion over the post-Soviet period. 13/84
They have also managed to seize Russia’s currency reserves to finance military actions against Russia. 14/84
The Russian Central Bank continues to serve the interests of international financial speculators, allowing them to manipulate the ruble exchange rate, siphoning money from the real sector into the speculative sector and pushing it abroad. 15/84
The new U.S. administration is attempting to extricate itself from the global hybrid war initiated by Washington, offloading its negative consequences onto Europe and concentrating available resources on maintaining scientific and technological leadership. 16/84
Preserving this leadership is key to future prosperity and maintaining its position as one of the centers of the global economy. 17/84
Unlike our monetary authorities, the U.S. leadership fully understands the critical role of technological progress in driving modern economic growth and the importance of money as a tool for allocating resources to advanced areas of production. 18/84
The Trump administration is trying to jettison all excess from the slowing ship of American statehood, cutting unnecessary expenses and abandoning excessive commitments, focusing instead on modernizing the economy. 19/84
Theoretically, the U.S. might still manage to catch the long wave of growth of the new technological order before the dollar-based financial pyramid collapses, transforming devalued capital into investments in promising industries. 20/84
This is what the technocrats brought in by Trump are trying to organize. 21/84
It is worth noting that the renewed leadership of the USSR, faced with slowing economic growth in the early 1980s, also correctly began with a program to accelerate scientific and technological progress (STP). 22/84
However, showing impatience, it veered into poorly conceived reforms within the framework of the dogma of Scientific Communism, creating chaos in the economy that ultimately led to the collapse of the state. 23/84
Trump is also displaying impatience, taking rash actions that risk escalating chaos in the economy. The trade war he has initiated with major partners is unlikely to yield positive results for American producers, who are facing rising costs and disruptions in supply chains. 24/84
The legalization of private cryptocurrencies while simultaneously banning the Federal Reserve from issuing a digital dollar undermines the already shaky dollar-based financial pyramid, triggering the collapse of massive financial bubbles. 25/84
Since the 2008 global financial crisis, the dollar’s monetary base has quadrupled. 26/84
This allowed the U.S. economy to avoid the Great Depression typically associated with the transition between technological orders, transforming it instead into the Great Stagnation through flows of cheap credit to sustain economic activity. 27/84
However, the unrestrained issuance of dollars to finance the growth of U.S. national debt, which has long been refinanced on the principle of a financial pyramid, has fueled the inflation of financial bubbles. 28/84
These bubbles now far exceed their size on the eve of the 2008 financial crisis. The recent collapse of the U.S. stock market could escalate into a crash of the entire dollar-based financial system. 29/84
Perhaps the technocratic Trump administration is preparing for these shocks by attempting to create a parallel financial system based on cryptocurrencies and blockchain, which could ensure payments and settlements in the event of the collapse of the existing financial and… 30/84
…banking system. To preserve it, the enormous volume of unbacked liabilities must be offloaded. 31/84
Some of these liabilities could be written off as war-related losses, as has already happened with U.S. obligations to Russia, Venezuela, Iran, and several other sanctioned countries. Some socially neutral government expenditures could also be cut. 32/84
However, all of this combined accounts for only a small percentage of the colossal financial bubbles of unbacked liabilities inflated by speculators. Their collapse is inevitable and will have severe economic and social consequences. 33/84
One way to escape the collapse of the dollar-based financial system is to nullify government obligations under the pretext of reorganizing the state itself. Perhaps this is what Trump has in mind with his proposal to merge the U.S. with Canada. 34/84
The annexation of Greenland, Panama, parts of Ukraine, and Gaza by Washington, accompanied by the genocide of local populations, would be blamed on the deep state of the old U.S. 35/84
The new state would have a new currency, and U.S. creditors would wait decades in line to recover their investments in the bonds of the vanished state. 36/84
The inevitable failure of Brzezinski’s aforementioned strategy to maintain U.S. global hegemony has not led to any realistic new strategy from Washington. 37/84
Perhaps, faced with a sharp decline in U.S. prestige and the erosion of its image as a superpower that even a tiny tribe like the Houthis no longer fears, Trump will abandon his imperial ambitions and truly focus on modernizing the American economy. 38/84
However, if he continues his attempts to intimidate everyone and everything, accompanied by trade wars, the U.S. will sink deeper into chaos, with escalating socio-political conflicts that could lead to the country’s disintegration. 39/84
The situation is even worse for the European satellites of the U.S. The more they resent Trump and the more they posture, the more reasons he has to send them packing, along with their obligations, including the return of their gold reserves stored in the U.S. 40/84
A conflict with Washington is deadly dangerous for Brussels. 41/84
Trump can easily discredit European leaders and Euro-bureaucrats by shifting the blame for the collapse of the trade and financial system onto them, presenting them with the bill for accumulated U.S. spending on NATO. 42/84
Therefore, the smarter ones among them are tucking their tails between their legs, gritting their teeth and agreeing to his demands for increased military spending. 43/84
Against the backdrop of rising costs due to the rejection of Russian energy resources and the adoption of the climate agenda, this accelerates the deterioration of the socio-economic situation in the EU. 44/84
European leaders and Euro-bureaucrats, who have bet on a war with Russia, are forced to push this line even more aggressively to neutralize voter dissatisfaction by invoking an external threat and to justify repressions against political opponents. 45/84
The Euro-bureaucracy is attempting to establish its dictatorship by orchestrating revolutions and repressions against nationally oriented leaders of member states. 46/84
The war in Ukraine against Russia has become the primary means for increasingly unpopular European leaders and Euro-bureaucrats to cling to power. 47/84
However, the irrationality of this war from the perspective of common sense and the interests of the peoples of European countries makes this approach highly unreliable. 48/84
Recently published theses by Orban could serve as a catalyst for the activation and unification of socio-political forces dissatisfied with the activities of the Euro-bureaucracy for various reasons. 49/84
The European bureaucratic empire is beginning to crack at the seams, losing legitimacy. 50/84
In all conflicts between the European Commission and the national interests of EU member states, the Euro-bureaucracy has so far emerged victorious, imposing and implementing unpopular reforms. 51/84
Based on this, the European Union should be called a Bureaucratic Empire serving the interests of transnational capital. The social base of the Euro-bureaucracy is increasingly becoming migrants, imported with its support, who back anti-national political forces. 52/84
By severing their economies from Russia and attempting to militarize them, calling on their populations to lay down their lives in yet another “Drang nach Osten” (Drive to the East), European leaders and Euro-bureaucrats are hastening the creation of a European caliphate… 53/84
…due to the progressive extinction of the indigenous population. To avoid such a fate, the peoples of European countries must either leave the EU or transform the Euro-bureaucratic structures, as Orban has called for. 54/84
Thus, the EU, following the U.S., is descending into chaos, accompanied by a worsening socio-economic situation. This leads to the degradation of the political system and the suppression of democratic institutions by security forces. 55/84
Unlike the anti-Semitic Nazi ideology that united Western Europe under Hitler during the Great Depression, today’s politicians and media in power in the EU are attempting to use Russophobia as a unifying force. 56/84
The role of the Führer is alternately filled by corrupt leaders of the European Commission. 57/84
Although they do not enjoy the trust of the masses, they have managed to pursue a Russophobic policy for over a decade, which has turned into a new ideology for European countries supporting Ukrainian Nazism. 58/84
Despite its negative economic consequences, undermining the EU’s competitiveness, they continue to pursue it. The question arises about the hidden motives behind this suicidal political course for Europe. 59/84
To understand them, it is necessary to uncover the forces interested in this, who are manipulating European politicians.

The tone for the new European “Drang nach Osten” (Drive to the East) is being set by Britain. 60/84
Despite the parade of foolish puppets taking turns as prime minister, they all adhere to the same Russophobic political line. For the English ruling elite, which has practiced the policy of “divide and rule” for centuries, inciting war in Europe is a familiar game. 61/84
Perhaps the old Russophobic instinct has resurfaced, the desire to finally resolve the “Russian question,” which has haunted Great Britain since the days when it was the “mistress of the seas.” 62/84
In any case, the war in Ukraine aimed at destroying the Russian world brings significant profits to the British oligarchy from confiscated Russian assets and capital fleeing war-torn Europe.

Playing second fiddle in the Euro-Russophobic orchestra is France. 63/84
It is led by a puppet of the Rothschilds, Macron, whose orientation remains ambiguous. According to sources close to him, he begins each working day by calling the head of the Rothschild house to ask what he can do for this powerful clan. 64/84
Some informed experts suspect this clan of intending to build a “New Jerusalem” on the right bank of the Dnieper, the foundation for which has already been laid in Dnipropetrovsk. 65/84
From there to Odesa stretch fertile lands that could accommodate millions of refugees from Israel in the event of an escalation of the perpetual conflict in the Middle East. 66/84
Zelensky has already cleared this territory of its male population, sending them to the front as cannon fodder.

An important participant in the Russophobic orchestra is Germany. 67/84
If we discard revanchist motives, what remains are the interests of the American deep state, which controls the media, politicians, and major industries in this country. 68/84
Its interests were tied to the implementation of Brzezinski’s aforementioned strategy, which has predictably failed and is no longer supported by Washington. 69/84
The rise to power of a puppet of big American business will soon clarify how interested Germany is in continuing its Russophobic policy. 70/84
If the new chancellor shows common sense and a business-oriented approach, Germany could pivot toward Russia, as only the restoration of Russian energy supplies and access to the Russian market can save the country from further degradation. 71/84
The insane politicians of Poland, the Czech Republic, and the Baltics can be disregarded, as during their years of independence, they have always acted against the interests of their own peoples, drowning in Russophobia and the blood of their subjects. 72/84
They have always been puppets of major European powers and the U.S. Trump may still be tempted to use them against Russia. However, common sense tells him that every day of Russophobic Europe’s war against Russia strengthens China, which he rightly considers his main rival. 73/84
The main issue on today’s agenda—ending hostilities and holding elections in Ukraine—terrifies European politicians who have committed to the war against Russia. 74/84
Following the inevitable fall of Zelensky’s criminal regime, the fog of lies they have pumped into public consciousness will dissipate, and they will have to answer for the millions of dead and destitute Ukrainians, not to mention their own voters who have been… 75/84
…impoverished by this war. Therefore, they will do everything in their power to torpedo peace talks and continue the war until the last Ukrainian. 76/84
In doing so, they will worsen the socio-economic situation in their own countries, where Islamist political forces are gaining increasing influence. They are hastening the decline of Europe, which only countries with patriotic leadership can avoid. 77/84
Currently, there are only two such countries in Europe—Hungary and Slovakia. Western Europe, it seems, has already passed the point of no return. The current political elite of the EU is in a state of zugzwang, where every move worsens its position. 78/84
This does not automatically mean an improvement in Russia’s position. 79/84
The monetary policy pursued by the Central Bank of Russia is leading to the transformation of its economy into a resource periphery for China and other countries implementing their own development strategies. 80/84
Unlike Western countries, China and India continue to experience stable, rapid growth based on the new technological paradigm. 81/84
This is achieved through a more effective management system that combines socialist ideology, market competition regulated in the interests of public welfare, and the pursuit of national interests in foreign economic activities. 82/84
To join the core of the new global economic order, to propel the country’s economy onto a new long wave of economic growth, and to withstand the confrontation with the agonizing West, it is essential to swiftly transition to a modern management system and implement the… 83/84
…program “Social Justice and Economic Growth,” which we have developed and which has been approved by the Russian Economic Forum. 84/84

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @apocalypseos

Feb 28
“How British Financial Elites Fueled the Rise of Hitler: The Hidden Geopolitical Agenda Behind Nazi Germany’s Ascent” by Mike Billington (EIR) Image
Let’s look back to where the original Nazis came from. In the 1920s and 1930s, there was the mobilization of various forces in Germany responding to the hideous impositions placed on Germany after World War I, where they were essentially burdened with massive reparations that destroyed any chance of their economic recovery from the war. This fostered the rise of radical institutions. The head of the Bank of England, Montague Norman, openly sponsored the rise to power of Adolf Hitler. He was a close personal friend of Hjalmar Schacht, Hitler’s economic minister, who became the Reichsminister under Hitler and implemented the Nazi policy of giving all economic power to the banks themselves. This policy diverted credit from anything other than the buildup of military forces to prepare for the onslaught, for Operation Barbarossa, and for what became the Second World War.
They were so close—Montague Norman and Hjalmar Schacht—that Schacht’s children had Montague Norman, the head of the Bank of England, as their godfather. Norman was even passing gold to the Nazis after the war began. So, why did they give rise to the Nazis? Well, you could say a lot of things. You could say they basically agreed with the Malthusian idea that certain lesser races should be exterminated. Maybe they didn’t say it was the Jews; maybe they said it was the Blacks or the Indians. Keep in mind, the British believed emphatically, publicly, and openly in eugenics and race science—that there were lesser races and superior races—and guess who the superior race was. So, maybe that was why. But in geopolitical terms, they were anxious to see Germany and Russia destroy each other. This was the geopolitics of Mackinder and Haushofer and the people who knew that you did not want to allow any force in the East or West to control the heartland, so that the British Empire—which was based on the financial institutions controlling world trade and finances—could continue their looting and genocidal policies against the colonies around the world. So, they supported Hitler and put him in power.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 24
🇩🇪 Friedrich Merz, BlackRock’s candidate for German Chancellor, has won. Merz was the long-time lawyer for American locust investors in Germany, and is fully committed to neoliberal financial policy to destroy nation-states and sovereign credit systems. Image
“BlackRock’s Candidate for German Chancellor, Friedrich Merz” by Helga Zepp-LaRouche and Dr. Werner Rügemer

Helga Zepp-LaRouche: Yes, good evening. I wholeheartedly welcome you to the Civil Rights Movement Solidarity weekly webcast. And I am particularly pleased to have a very special guest today, namely Dr. Werner Rügemer, who is a very renowned author and has written many books, all of which are extremely interesting.

He is currently in the process of publishing a new book, which deals with a very current topic. And I am particularly pleased that we are speaking today, because as of a few hours ago, or yes, much more recently, there was a vote in the Bundestag on a proposed law by Friedrich Merz, which he introduced on behalf of the CDU-CSU [Christian Democratic Union–Christian Social Union], to change the asylum law.

It went through with a very narrow majority, with the support of the AfD [Alternative for Germany]. There was a lot of commotion beforehand that this was a breach of the dyke and that the firewall between the establishment parties and the AfD had now been torn down.

In any case, there is a possibility that Friedrich Merz, leader of the Christian Democratic Union, will become the next Federal Chancellor. Against this backdrop it is perhaps very important to consider what implications this has.

We have an incredibly dramatic world situation. United States President Donald Trump has only been in office for nine days and has already caused a lot of commotion: Panama, Canada, Greenland—I could go on and on. The situation in the Middle East: At first there was hope that the ceasefire might bring about an improvement. But now he wants to resettle all the Palestinians to Egypt, Jordan and even Indonesia. So, we have a lot of topics to discuss, and that’s why my very first question is: we are four weeks or a little more than three weeks away from the Bundestag election on February 23. What should voters know about what they will face if they give their vote to Mr. Merz?

Dr. Werner Rügemer: With his even more direct turn to the right toward the AfD, Merz has done what his former boss at BlackRock, Lawrence Fink, did before the election in the U.S.A. He also supported the Democratic Party for a long time. BlackRock grew up with the Democratic Party. But even before the election, BlackRock CEO Fink said, we don’t care who wins the election; we are in talks with both candidates. And then it turned out that BlackRock advised Trump on his choice of Treasury Secretary….

Zepp-LaRouche: Before we look at the different regions of the world, it would perhaps be good for our viewers if you explained what BlackRock is. People think that it’s just one of many multinationals, but that’s not exactly the case. Since you’re probably the best expert on the subject in Germany, can you give a brief outline of why BlackRock is such a problem?
The Rise of BlackRock in Germany

Dr. Rügemer: BlackRock has been the largest of these multinationals since the 1990s due to the deregulation that began under U.S. President William Clinton. These new up-and-comers, with today’s BlackRock as the largest, became bigger and initially spread out across the U.S.A. After the turn of the millennium, and particularly after the financial crisis, they gradually established themselves in Europe: in France, Switzerland, England, and also in Germany.

In Germany, these multinationals are the majority shareholders in the most important, let’s say 100 German stock corporations, each with a three, four, five, six, seven, eight percent share in these corporations. So, as a group, BlackRock, along with Vanguard and State Street and Fidelity and Wellington, in different compositions, have a majority stake in about all 40 DAX [German blue-chip index on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange—ed.] companies in Germany. In this capacity, they have contributed to the deindustrialization in Germany that has been going on for years, with large German corporations relocating jobs to China, the U.S.A., or even partly to Eastern Europe, because this outsourcing, naturally, increases the profits for BlackRock and company [i.e., the other multinationals].

Zepp-LaRouche: What would you say to a normal, medium-sized business owner in Germany who says, “but it’s good to have someone like Merz, who at least knows what he’s talking about, who is well connected, so that’s good for medium-sized businesses”? What would you say in response to that?

Dr. Rügemer: Merz in particular was bad for owners of medium-sized companies in Germany, extremely so, because he had resigned from his position as parliamentary group leader of the CDU in the German Bundestag in 2004, and then became the co-owner of an American business law firm, Mayer Brown, in their branch in Düsseldorf. And that was important because at the turn of the millennium … came the so-called, later so-called locust investors, private equity investors from the U.S.A. They bought up the non-stock listed companies, i.e. the good German medium-sized companies, restructured them, as you called it, i.e., closed down the unused parts, resold them and so on.

This law firm, in which Merz not only worked as a lawyer but also as a co-owner, advised these locust investors on how they could best buy and exploit German medium-sized companies. And, of course, Merz was a very suitable choice because, as a CDU politician, he knew best the medium-sized companies that constituted the backbone of the CDU for decades.

Zepp-LaRouche: Can you describe that? BlackRock, for example, has also acquired a large share in the large housing companies. What effect has this restructuring or takeover had on the housing sector?

Dr. Rügemer: It was the case that, as I said, from the turn of the millennium onwards, it was initially not BlackRock and company who came along, but rather the second league, so to speak, the private equity investors, i.e., Blackstone and KKR and Carlyle and so on. They started by buying up the medium-sized companies, including tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of apartments, public apartments in individual cities, and also from companies, from large corporations in the Ruhr area, that also had their own housing companies.
Read 11 tweets
Feb 17
Lyndon LaRouche (2002): There is a faction that has existed for a long time. It was started by H.G. Wells and Bertrand Russell back in the 1920s and 1930s. It’s a very powerful, very influential faction in international circles, especially English-speaking circles. Image
This faction, which we call the utopians, believed from the beginning that the existence of thermonuclear weapons—or nuclear weapons alone—would create weapons so terrible that nations would give up their sovereignty and submit to a world government rather than face the prospect of having to fight wars with such weapons.Image
This faction, which took over control of U.S. military policy once Eisenhower ended his term as president, caused a great crisis around the world between 1961 and 1965—assassinations, high-level coups, and other terrible events.
Read 20 tweets
Feb 4
Elena Panina: Trump’s “Mighty Dollar” and “Great Economy” Need Crutches and Protection 🧵

In another emotional post, the US President voiced his complaints about BRICS, concerns about the fate of the dollar, and threats to those who try to abandon it.Image
Since Trump managed to include Spain in BRICS earlier, the number of addressees of his threats remains uncertain. As for the rest, the “mighty” dollar, it turns out, is not so mighty, since it has to be strengthened by blackmail and banal racketeering. As is the US economy.
▪️ However, as far as we know, BRICS did not particularly plan to create its own currency, so in this part, Trump is fighting with thin air. However, if the opportunity arises, the White House can now declare that BRICS does not have a single currency precisely because it is afraid of Trump.
Read 27 tweets
Jan 25
Sergey Glazyev: Based on the analysis of Trump’s first initiatives in the economic sphere, we can state his desire to ride a long wave of economic growth based on a new technological order. 1/19 🧵 Image
The US is a leader in this area, and he is seeking to consolidate this leadership against the backdrop of the accelerated development of China, which has already surpassed the US in terms of output, high-tech exports, and is rapidly reducing the technological gap, achieving technological sovereignty. 2/19
Trump is prevented from solving this problem by the financial system, controlled by the leading shareholders of the Federal Reserve System and focused on generating superprofits by inflating financial bubbles by speculators. 3/19
Read 21 tweets
Dec 21, 2024
“All international terrorism today is coordinated by the Israeli Mossad. It is impossible to neutralize combined ‘right’ and ‘left’ terrorism in the US without expelling the Mossad and crushing the Zionist lobby at the top levels.” — EIR (1978)
The Rothschild roots of the Ku Klux Klan (EIR, 1978)

The political evolution of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan was a direct outcome of policies initiated during the first half of the 19th century by the British aristocracy and their court Jews, the Rothschilds. The combined capabilities of the key secret societies controlled by these circles - the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, the B’nai B’rith (Order of the Sons of the Covenant), and the Jesuits (Society of Jesus) - allowed the British and allied Black Guelph circles to nearly destroy the foundations of the United States republic through assassinations (including that of Abraham Lincoln), terrorist operations, and general subversive activity culminating in the War Between The States.

The starting point for unraveling this vast conspiratorial apparatus is the Knights of the Golden Circle.

The Knights of the Golden Circle combined the network of individuals associated directly with the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, B’nai B’rith, and the Jesuits. Practically the entire Confederate leadership belonged to the KGC at the point of the secessionist crisis in 1860. It is through tracing the lineage of the KGC that the Ku Klux Klan becomes an understandable phenomenon.

However, to make fully comprehensible the significance of the combined relationship of these secret societies, a short historical backdrop is first necessary.

Prior to and during the American Revolutionary War, and significantly afterwards, the British initiated an intensive subversion effort aimed at taking over and destroying the Franklin-organized Freemason networks that functioned as the organizing body for the revolution. The explicit counteroperation was the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, under the control of the British-Black Guelph-Knights of Malta organization. It was because of this effort that many of the individuals who served the British in the KGC were also members of the Scottish Rite.

It is equally significant that the abolitionist societies of New England, as well as the entire secessionist states’ rights movement, were all financed and basically controlled through the Rothschild-Baring bankers of the British monarchy.

This political intelligence profile will concentrate on the closely connected evolution of three secret organizations: the Knights of the Golden Circle, the B’nai B’rith, and the Ku Klux Klan.Image
1. The Knights of the Golden Circle (EIR, 1978)

“I hear a good deal about the association called the Knights of the Golden Circle, a Protestant association for securing the Gulf provinces and states, including which has been largely developed by recent times... in the Southern confederacy, and creating them into an independent government.”

The above is taken from William Howard Russell’s book My Diary North and South, written in 1866 by the London Times war correspondent. Russell had gotten this assignment at a meeting on May 5, 1861, with Confederate leader General Pierre Beauregard, a leader of the KGC. Russell himself was serving his Queen as a top British Secret Intelligence Service agent, profiling the 1861 crisis situation in the United States and reporting back to the Rothschild owner of the London Times.

Originating out of the 1828-32 Nullification Crisis, the KGC was not officially established until 1854 under the direction of Dr. George William Lamb Bickley. Bickley had been trained in Botany at the University of London in the 1840s, then redeployed back into the U.S.

Prior to the official surfacing of the KGC, however, the Southern Rights Clubs were established during the height of Andrew Jackson’s presidency. Their structure was identical with that of the southern branch of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry with its prime political focus centered on a three-point program. As stated in the KGC’s manual, the three points were:

(1) Reestablish the slave trade;
(2) Acquire new slave territory;
(3) Destroy the U.S. Constitution as a “tyrannical document.”

Two of the leaders of the SRC were Robert Toombs and William Landes Yancey. Each was to play a significant role in the Confederate government. Toombs, a so-called Southern Whig, was personally responsible for financing several attempts to kidnap Africans and bring them to the South. Significantly, the SRCs served British intelligence by providing a functioning political infrastructure for the secessionist movement and for the creation of other secret societies.

Two of the main centers of the SRC, and later the Knights of the Golden Circle, were New Orleans and Charleston. S.C. Secret orders such as the Order of the Lone Star were also set up, then later merged directly into the KGC. Key in organizing the New Orleans operations was Judah P. Benjamin, later to be the Secretary of State of the Confederacy, of whom more below.

In 1854, Bickley surfaced with the organization known as the Knights of the Golden Circle. Under the banner of creating a “Democratic Monarchy in North America,” its first operation was to organize paramilitary terrorism in Central America, Mexico, and Cuba, the purpose of which was to instigate a war between the U.S. and Spain. One of its most successful early ventures was under the direction of William Walker, who organized a military coup in Nicaragua in 1855.

The next phase of the KGC’s activity was to organize a military coup in the U.S. before Lincoln could be inaugurated. The KGC was used primarily as the main terror force to ensure that the key Southern states voted for secession. Its stated organizational purpose indicates the extent of its intentions at the time of the 1860 election of Lincoln:

(1) Secure all U.S. arsenals;
(2) Sabotage reconciliation between North and South;
(3) Concentrate on the border states: (a) coerce state legislatures or governors into voting for secession; (b) elect legislators to vote for secession; (c) bring armed men from the cotton states:
(4) Set up Knights of the Safety Guards, watch over men who are doubtful about secession;
(5) Organize guerrilla bands to harass union troops, under the direction of the Knights Gallant, the elite corps within the Knights;
(6) Northern members were instructed to play “hypocrite roles” by loudly supporting Union efforts
in order to act as spies;
(7) Raise militias in the North, turn arms over to the South, and send Confederate ladies to spy in the North;
(8) Assassination and terror. “In short, the intention of the secessionist is to have a more powerful monarchy than England.” according to KGC member Jim Pumfrey.

The belief structure of the KGC was the following. Its symbols were the glowing sun and 15 stars emblazened on a crescent, with a triangle with the numbers 3, 7 and 5 placed in each angle with R-61 in the middle of the triangle. The R meant ‘revolution,’ and the 61 meant 1861, in other words, Revolution in 1861. Meetings took place in “castles” or lodges, which were organized on the local, state, and national level. On the state level they were referred to as “Grand State Castles,” with a delegate body sent to the “Grand United States Castle” or “American Legion.”

In its organizational hierarchy, as reported by the Daily Louisville Democrat in 1861, the KGC was divided into three degrees or levels. The first degree was the Foreign and Home Guards, the second degree was Commercial and Financial, and the third or highest degree was the political governing body, the American Legion. Each degree was divided into divisions which were in turn divided into departments. The 10 departments comprising a division were Agriculture, Education, Manufacturing, Finance, Religion, Police, War, Navigation, Law, and a Foreign Office.

Thus, when the Confederate government was established, the KGC was its ready-made leadership body. With 65,000 KGC members in the South, and several members of President Buchanan’s cabinet also members of the KGC, the plot to pull off a military coup nearly succeeded.

Central in the plot was the assassination of President-elect Abraham Lincoln. In February 1861 a plot to kill Lincoln was in place in Baltimore, Md. There, under a subunit known as the Palmetto Guards, the KGC planned the murder of Lincoln. It was only due to the efforts of General Winfield Scott, that the plan did not succeed - until four years later.

During the Civil War, the KGC was used to run subversion through the Democratic Party faction known as the Copperheads, or antiwar Democrats. With a plan for provoked outbreaks of violence and terror combined with Confederate military operations, in Missouri, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Kentucky, Tennesee, and the cities of Chicago and New York, the Confederacy aimed to destroy the North’s ability to fight. Draft riots aided by Jesuit priests, with the cooperation of the Mayors of New York and Chicago, Fernando Wood and Edward Walsh, as key conspirators, were designed to stop the war by forcing a negotiated settlement.

All espionage and terror operations deployed into the North were under the direction of the Confederate Secretary of State, Judah P. Benjamin. Benjamin, a former U.S. Senator from Louisiana, was born in the British West Indies in 1811 and remained a British subject throughout his career in the U.S. Under the Confederacy Benjamin became first Attorney General, then Secretary of War, and last and most important, Secretary of State.

The plot to destroy the Union remained the foremost theme of Benjamin’s activity. Central to the insurrections to be run in the North and in the border states was the Confederate espionage operation functioning in Canada, with its headquarters in Montreal. Not coincidentally, the hotel in Montreal, St. Lawrence Hall, that headquartered the Confederate Secret Service also was the headquarters of the British military mission.

The head of Confederate espionage was Jacob Thompson, a former Secretary of the Interior under Buchanan and a member of the KGC. Through Thompson and another top British operative operating in Canada named George Sanders, the plan to assassinate Lincoln was finalized.

The assassination was carried out by John Wilkes Booth, a member of the KGC, along with John Harrison Surratt who had been trained by Jesuits at Jesuit Georgetown College (now known as Georgetown University). The two were under the immediate direction of Benjamin and Thompson.

Most of the intelligence garnered and reported by Union counterespionage operations was suppressed at the Lincoln assassination trial by Secretary of War Edwin Stanton. Stanton had known Benjamin quite intimately since 1850, when both were deployed by the U.S. government as members of the California Land Commission: Stanton headed up the commission and had Benjamin as his able assistant.

It is now known that not only did John Harrison Surratt escape capture through the efforts of two Jesuit priests and wound up in the Papal Zouaves, but that Booth also escaped. The coverup “killing” of Booth at Garrett’s farm was carried out by Union officers who were highest-degree members of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. Even the head of the National Detective Bureau, Lafayette C. Baker, who was later poisoned to death, revealed in documents only recently published that he knew that the individual found in the burned-out barn was not Booth.

The KGC underwent several face lifts to prevent detection, and rechristened itself. The Order of the American Knights and The Sons of Liberty were two new names it took before it became the Ku Klux Klan.Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(