🇸🇾🇺🇸 Richard Black, Former Virginia State Senator: Al-Qaeda has always been our proxy force on the ground; they, together with ISIS, have carried out the mission of the United States; we are supporters of al-Qaeda today where they’re bottled up in Idlib Province; we wanted to starve and we wanted to freeze to death the people of Syria; we wanted to take the wheat away to cause famine among the Syrian people; there was an organized campaign of rape across the nation of Syria; the highest prices went to the youngest children because there were a great number of pedophiles and the pedophiles wanted to possess small children; we cut off the medical supplies so that the women in Syria would die of breast cancer because they could not get the medications; the United States has a strategic policy of using proxies to engage in war; when we fight these wars we have no limits on the cruelty and the inhumanity that we’re prepared to impose on the people;

🔸 The war [in Syria] began in 2011 when the United States landed Central Intelligence operatives to begin coordinating with Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups;

🔸 We have been unwavering supporters of Al-Qaeda since before the war formally began;

🔸 We are supporters of Al-Qaeda today where they’re bottled up in Idlib Province;

🔸 The CIA supplied them under secret operation Timber Sycamore;

🔸 We gave them all of their anti-tank weapons and all of their anti-air missiles;

🔸 Al-Qaeda has always been our proxy force on the ground; they together with ISIS have carried out the mission of the United States together with a great number of affiliates that really are kind of interchangeable—you have the Free Syrian Army; soldiers move from ISIS to Al-Qaeda to Free Syrian Army rather fluidly;

🔸 The United States has a strategic policy of using proxies to engage in war;

🔸 Our objective was to overthrow the legitimate government of Syria and, in order to do that, we employed proxy soldiers who were the the most vile of all terrorists;

🔸 Something very similar is happening right now in Ukraine;

🔸 Plan B was the American seizure of the northern portion of Syria; it is the bread basket for all of the Syrian people; we wanted to take the wheat away to cause famine among the Syrian people; by stealing the oil and the gas we would be able to shut down the transportation system, and, at the same time, during the Syrian winters we could freeze to death the Syrian civilian population which, in many cases, were living in rubble where these terrorist armies with mechanized divisions had attacked and just totally destroyed these cities and left people just living in little pockets of rubble;

🔸 We wanted to starve and we wanted to freeze to death the people of Syria;

🔸 The Caesar sanctions were the most brutal sanctions ever imposed on ever any nation; during the Second World War sanctions were not nearly as strict as they were on Syria;

🔸 We devalued their currency through the SWIFT system for international payments making it impossible for them to purchase medications;

🔸 We cut off the medical supplies so that the women in Syria would die of breast cancer because they could not get the medications;

🔸 One of the last things that we did, and the evidence is vague on it, but there was a mysterious explosion in the harbor [of Beirut] in Lebanon; it was a massive explosion of a shipload of ammonium nitrate fertilizer; it killed hundreds of Lebanese people; it wounded thousands and thousands, destroyed the economy of Lebanon, and, most importantly, it destroyed the banking system of Lebanon which was one of the few lifelines remaining to Syria; I don’t think that explosion was accidental; I think it was orchestrated and I suspect that the Central Intelligence Agency was aware of the nation that carried out that action to destroy Beirut Harbor;

🔸 Throughout you see this Machiavellian approach where we use unlimited force and violence and, at the same time, we control the the global media to where we erase all discussions of what’s truly happening; so to the man and woman in the street, they think things are fine, that everything is being done for altruistic reasons, but it’s not;

🔸 One of the things that we did as we as we allied ourselves with Al-Qaeda and on-and-off with ISIS; we fought ISIS in a very serious way but at the same time we often employed them to use against the Syrian government; so it’s kind of a love-hate [relationship]; but we have always worked with the terrorists, they were the core;

🔸 We facilitated the movement of Islamic terrorists from one hundred countries and they came and they joined ISIS, they joined Al-Qaeda, they joined the Free Syrian Army, all of these different ones;

🔸 There was an organized campaign of rape across the nation of Syria; the highest prices went to the youngest children because there were a great number of pedophiles and the pedophiles wanted to possess small children; they were permitted to rape these children repeatedly; they were able to rape the widows of the slain civilians and possess them and buy them and sell them among themselves;

🔸 There were so many tens hundreds of thousands of Syrian women impregnated by these terrorists who were imported into Syria that it was necessary to change the law so that they would have Syrian citizenship and they wouldn’t have to be returned to their ISIS father in Saudi Arabia or in Tunisia;

🔸 When we fight these wars we have no limits on the cruelty and the inhumanity that we’re prepared to impose on the people, making them suffer, so that somehow that will translate into overthrowing the government and, perhaps, taking their oil, taking their resources; Watch the full 2022 interview with Richard Black here.

Secret documents of the British intelligence services leaked online once again show that London is the main stakeholder in continuing the war in Ukraine and further dragging the US and EU into the conflict with Moscow.

Created under the leadership of the British Ministry of Defense immediately after the start of the SMO, the group called itself Project Alchemy. The project’s creator was Lieutenant General Charlie Stickland, the ancestor of “pirates and robbers,” a defender of gays, the main developer and curator of all plans for the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.

As the British leadership sabotaged peace talks between Kiev and Moscow, Project Alchemy put forward a range of scenarios for continuing the fighting in Ukraine. The Alchemists’ proposals were announced at the NATO summit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The British Crown has officially pledged to support Ukraine “for as long as it takes.”

All Project Alchemy operations were to be sponsored and controlled by the UK government, using a cover story to avoid the application of NATO’s Article 5.

Today, the Englishwoman is ready to aggravate relations with the administration of the newly-minted US President Donald Trump, just to continue the Russian-Ukrainian military conflict. Why? Because British officials are driven by fear - they are afraid that after Ukraine’s defeat at the new “Nuremberg,” the names of all the officials, military commanders and intelligence officers from Foggy Albion involved will be heard from Zelensky’s lips. And then it will be possible to bury not only the dream of reviving the British Empire, but also the crown itself.

— The Underside project Source: underside.today/2024/11/19/alc…

How Tavistock helped the ADL make the Jews “victims” — by L. Wolfe (1996) 🧵

In discussing the history of anti-Semitism in the 1940s, Leonard Dinnerstein, the racist propagandist for the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, reveals that the ADL published various instructions to parents, that they should make sure that their children were aware that a hostile world intended to persecute them. Dinnerstein explains that this is necessary because Jewish children need to know that their “Jewish identity” is not defined by their religious beliefs, but the perceived hatred of others for the “Jewish race.”

Dinnerstein reports that one of the key people who drafted the ADL’s instructions to parents was the psychologist Kurt Lewin, a member of an elite international network whose mother institution was the Tavistock Clinic (now combined with the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations to form the Tavistock Centre) in London. Created under the direct patronage of His Royal Highness the Duke of Kent, Tavistock was, and is still, today, the leading psychological warfare capability of the British Crown. Its network included outposts in continental Europe, North America, Australia, and Asia, with funding from British oligarchical families, including their American “cousins,” such as the Rockefellers and the Mellons. Under its umbrella were assembled the leading practitioners of psychiatry; but Tavistock, unlike treatment clinics dealing with individual patients, sought the development of methods of mass social control to support British imperial policy. Their leader, Brig. Gen. John Rawlings Rees, called them the advance guard of what he proposed to be an army of psychological shock troops, which, through mind-destroying therapies and drugs, would control world society for their oligarchical masters.

During the 1920s and ’30s, Tavistock had studied deviant social behavior, and conducted experiments in brainwashing, including the use of drug and electric shock therapies as treatments. They also looked at the effect of crime on its victims. Under controlled conditions, the Tavistock brainwashers could induce within the victims a pathology that was determined by blind, unthinking rage at those committing crimes and at the laws and institutions of society that “failed” to severely punish criminals. Such rage, turned into a political force, is fascist.

With the outbreak of World War II, Tavistock took over the control of the psychological warfare apparatus on both sides of the Atlantic. Rees became the head of the British Psychological Warfare Directorate, while Lewin and others of the network in the United States went to work for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), profiling the effects of strategic bombing on enemy populations, but also profiling the effects of war and stress on soldiers and populations of allied nations. This led to studies of “discrimination” and prejudice in the military services, and, later, parallel studies of the Nazi experiment, which the British had put in power, but which had gone out of control.
Group brainwashing

Lewin had been one of a number of Jewish psychiatrists and others who had fled Nazi Germany in the 1930s. He had been helped out of the country by the American Jewish Committee (AJC) networks, and, upon arrival in the United States, had quickly developed a collaborative relationship with the ADL. (The association of psychiatry with the B’nai B’rith goes back to Freud and his early Vienna circle. Freud had recruited many of his followers from the B’nai B’rith, to which he had presented some of his initial papers. Freud, in his writings, rejects Judeo-Christian teachings and doctrine, but nonetheless maintains his “Jewishness,” which he claims to be derived from blood—a view of Judaism as a cult, shared by the B’nai B’rith.)

Lewin’s specialty that had attracted the interest of Tavistock, was the study of groups and the mechanisms by which they interact. In developing laws of what he called “group dynamics,” Lewin argued that all society could be divided into groups, whose members shared a set of assumptions about common experiences; if one wanted to control and manipulate society, then various groups could be played off against each other, by manipulating their perceptions.

The ADL applies Lewin’s theories in its dirty tricks operations. In order to control and manipulate Jews, it helps the formation of anti-Semitic groups, such as the neo-Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan, provoking them to attack Jews. It then uses these attacks to create a “reaction formation” among the “group” of Jews, which weds that group closer to the ADL. The question of defining prejudice as “psychological phenomena,” inherent in certain “personality types” or “learned through group experience,” is critical for covering up the dirty tricks of Tavistock and its ADL allies.

The instructions to Jewish parents, cited by Dinnerstein, are in a 1940 article written by Lewin for the ADL’s Menorah Journal. Titled “Bringing Up the Child,” it is a prescription for inducing paranoia: “The basic fact is that [your] child is going to be a member of a less-privileged minority group, and he will have to face this fact.” He urged parents to tell their children that even their best friends harbor anti-Semitic views, and that these might be “repressed” for a time, but will ultimately come out: “The problem is bound to arise some time, and the sooner it is faced, the better.” In about the fourth grade, parents should expect their child to be called “a dirty Jew”; worse persecution will occur in high school and college. The “certainty” of persecution should help parents “toughen” their children; they must develop a group pride in their experience, which they, in turn, must pass on to their children. That, he says, is how Jews survive.

A year later, Lewin published an essay in the Contemporary Jewish Record (June 1941) on “Self-Hatred Among Jews,” in which he argues that Jews, by denying their inferior status, were losing their sense of identity. Through cowardice and fear, Jews start feeling guilty about their “Jewishness,” and start to dislike their fellow group members. In the most extreme cases, he says, this leads to Jews discriminating against their fellow Jews, where they take on the personality of the anti-Semite. A better response, he indicates, would be to treat the oppressors of Jews the same way that they treat Jews-stopping just short of recommending Jewish Defense League-like “counter-violence” against “anti-Semites.”

(This same phenomenon was later to be described by psychologist Bruno Bettelheim, who became part of the extended Tavistock network. In his studies of concentration camp victims, published in The Informed Heart, Bettelheim discovered that, when moral judgment breaks down under conditions of extreme terror, a personality transformation takes place: Some prisoners take on the depraved outlook of their guards-the so-called Bettelheim syndrome).

Let us once and for all put an end to the rule of kings, queens, and oligarchs of all kinds! Let us fulfill the promise of the American Revolution, for all the peoples of this Earth!

https://x.com/apocalypseos/status/1550676587154051073

The plot to blow up Al-Aqsa Mosque and rebuild Solomon’s temple would unleash a bloodbath throughout the Middle East and likely even WWIII. It is the legacy of Anglo-American divide and conquer imperialism coming from 19th century British Freemasonry, British Israelism (and its derivative “Christian Zionism”), messianic bloodthirsty Jewish Zionism, and the neocons. Each has its own apocalyptic “End Times” ideology of some imagined utopia which they openly proclaim can only be achieved through war and horrific bloodshed.

Read the full report: citizensparty.org.au/sites/default/…

https://twitter.com/apocalypseos/status/1720653325958533560

NETANYAHU’S GODFATHER: How British Imperialists Created the Fascist Jabotinsky

by Steven P. Meyer

Vladimir Ze’ev Jabotinsky (1880-1940), the patron-saint of Israel’s Likud party who also created Revisionist Zionism, and Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952), the decades-long chairman of the World Zionist Organization who was seen as the prime minister-in-exile of a Jewish Palestine, were both witting champions of the British Empire. They were instruments of Lord Alfred Milner and Leo Stennet Amery, the final authors of the Balfour Declaration, who craftily used them to secure British rule over Palestine as part of the 1916 Sykes-Picot agreements.

The British also controlled the leaders of the Arab nationalist movements, which they created and funded. They owned Haj Amin al-Husseini, a young radical, whom they chose as Mufti of Jerusalem. They funded his religious network and social organizations, and to give him status among all of the Islamic faith, they created the post of Grand Mufti for him.

The armed conflict in Israel today, which threatens to become World War III, is the continuation of almost a century of British-staged armed conflict between Arab and Jew that dates back to the Nebi Musa riots of 1920, just months after the close of World War I, as the British settled in to occupy Palestine. Eyewitness intelligence reports proved that British military operatives encouraged and facilitated the Arab rioting, lead by Haj Amin al-Husseini, against the Jews.

The Jewish armed response was led by Jabotinsky, and a British-trained Zionist military force that had been placed in Palestine at the end of the war. The Jewish Legion, as it was called, had no military significance. Its creation was opposed by the world’s Jewish community, including the small Zionist movement that then existed. But it was a major propaganda tool created by Milner and Amery to back up Sykes-Picot. When the war ended and the Legion demobilized in Palestine, it became a deadly weapon to be used for violent bloody confrontations with the Arabs.

The Nebi Musa riots lasted several days. Five Jews and four Arabs were killed, and 216 Jews and 23 Arabs were wounded. Both Jabotinsky and Husseini were made public heroes by their British controllers, and the results gave them the capability to recruit followers that would be used for future confrontations. The die was cast, but the stage for the conflict had already been set decades before.


1. Modern Zionism and the British Empire

Palestine had been a necessary imperial target of acquisition for consolidation of the Empire for more than half a century before the Sykes-Picot agreements, dating back to the 1830s and the efforts of Lord Shaftsbury, a leading Tory politician, and Lord Palmerston, his stepfather-in-law. Palmerston served as Foreign Minister from 1830-51 and was destined to become prime minister and master of cultural and political warfare.

Shaftsbury was a Christian Zionist and British Israelite, who believed that the Jews must return to Zion before there could be a second coming of Christ. Although he opposed Jewish civil emancipation in England, and was indeed anti-Semitic, he believed it was Britain’s destiny to establish Zion. Shaftesbury wrote: “though admittedly a stiff-necked, dark-hearted people, and sunk in moral degradation, obduracy, and ignorance of the Gospel, [the Jews] were not only worth of salvation but also vital to Christianity’s hope of salvation.” Shaftesbury’s writings appeared in the The History of London Society for the Propagation of Christianity among the Jews. Shaftesbury was a member of the society and, in 1848, served as its president.

In 1838, an Arab revolt took place in Greater Syria, run by Muhammad Ali, the Ottoman viceroy of Egypt. British Foreign Secretary Palmerston offered the Sultan of Turkey British help in putting down the revolt, and in return, Britain was given the right to establish a vice-consulate in Jerusalem. Once this beachhead for the Empire was secured, the British decided to use a fledgling Zionist movement as their proxy, to increase their presence in the Holy Land.

In 1840, Palmerston sent a letter to the British ambassador in Constantinople, instructing him to contact the Sultan: “There exists at the present time among the Jews dispersed over Europe, a strong notion that the time is approaching when their nation is to return to Palestine... It would be of manifest importance to the Sultan to encourage the Jews to return and settle in Palestine because the wealth which they would bring with them would increase the resources of the Sultan’s dominions; and the Jewish people, if returning under the sanction and protection and at the invitation of the Sultan, would be a check upon any future evil designs of Muhammad Ali or his successor. I have to instruct Your Excellency strongly to recommend the Turkish government to hold out every just encouragement to the Jews of Europe to return to Palestine.”

In 1845, Edward Ledwich Mitford, one of Palmerston’s collaborators in the Foreign Service and a political supporter, published “An appeal in Behalf of the Israel Nation in Connection with the British Policy in the Levant.” The piece called for the “final establishment of the Jewish nation in Palestine as a protected state under the guardianship of Great Britain.” Mitford reasoned that such a state would “place the management of our steam communication entirely in our hands and would place us in a commanding position in the Levant from whence to check the process of encroachment, to overawe open enemies and, if necessary, to repel their advance.”

With the introduction of the steamship in the 1840s, the most efficient route to India and other parts of Asia was through what the British call the Near East. Britain’s dominant shipping route now went from London, through the Mediterranean to Alexandria and Cairo by steamship, overland to Suez, and then continued by steamship to points east. Britain was no longer dependent upon the Atlantic currents and the whims of nature to circumnavigate Africa to reach India.

The opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 massively increased the efficiency and shortened the time of travel, putting an even higher premium on Britain’s securing a base of operations in Palestine, as a northern defense of the canal. One of Britain’s motives in starting World War I was to finally secure Palestine, and they did that with Sykes-Picot and the breakup of the Ottoman Empire. No longer would the British have to entreat the Turks to accept the Jewish immigrants, which in British eyes were only surrogates for their empire.

Jabotinsky’s Imperial Roots

Every Likud prime minister in Israel has been an avowed promoter of the policies of Vladimir Ze’ev Jabotinsky. Some were personal protégés, others extremist leaders within his movement. The father of current Likud leader and candidate for prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was Jabotinsky’s personal secretary.

The Likud prime ministers are considered an elite grouping. They are often referred to as Jabotinsky’s Princes, and to this day, Jabotinsky is omnipresent within the Jewish right wing. His picture adorns the Likud website, and U.S. Anti-Defamation League director Abe Foxman has had a framed photo of him on his desk.

Jabotinsky was a wholly owned and created asset of the British Empire. He was controlled by a political network led by Leo Stennet Amery, who became Britain’s most prominent Imperial spokesman and political organizer. Amery’s circle included the greatest names of British imperialism: Cecil John Rhodes, the self-avowed enemy of the American republic; the Coefficients group; and Alfred Milner, Rhodes’ mentor, who ran Rhodes’ secret society.

Jabotinsky and the creation of a Jewish Legion became Amery’s number one project, as the British moved to take over Palestine at the close of World War I.

Amery’s vision was that of Rhodes, who, in 1877, wrote his first Last Will and Testament. Only a bit more than a decade had passed since the British plan to dismember the United States in a Civil War had failed, bitterly. Rhodes, a rabid British race imperialist, had amassed his fortune through the exploration and mining of gold in Africa. Rhodes wrote that the purpose of his Will was: “To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom, and of colonisation by British subjects of all lands ... and especially the ... entire continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, ... the whole of South America, the Islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, ... the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire...” (emphasis added).

Rhodes’ secret society, and the intricacies of how it operated, are detailed in Carroll Quigley’s The Anglo-American Establishment. Quigley describes the British power elite and their purpose at the turn of the century. They combined important press outlets, created political institutions, and used financial power to affect their policy. This elite group consisted of the Venetian Cecil family; the political and financial trustees of Rhodes’ Trust, in which Alfred Milner was key; various banking institutions, including Lazard Frères; and the British royal family. Quigley describes a small inner core of collaborators, with two concentric circles of semi-witting and non-witting conspirators from Britain’s aristocracy and financial elite.

By and large, they shared the aims of Rhodes’ Will. They had one major enemy, the American System of Political Economy. It threatened the existence of the British Empire, which depended upon a mercantilist system of securing cheap raw materials from colonized, backward parts of the world, and shipping them back to England for industrial production and military use.

At the turn of the century, there were two powers in the world that represented the American system: the United States of America, and Germany, which had built its economy on the model of America’s great economist Henry C. Carey. Following the stipulations of Rhodes’ Will, his collaborators sparked World War I to dismantle a hated and threatening Germany, and to carve up Europe. They sought to secure and expand their colonial holdings by acquiring much of the Ottoman Empire, which would give them its oil holdings, as well as secure Palestine as a military buffer to the Suez Canal. In order to accomplish these goals, they also worked non-stop to trap the United States into collaborating with their warring schemes, and sought to diminish America’s industrial economy from within.

Lord Alfred Milner, who ran Rhodes’ Trust, was central to the secret cabal. He had been British High Commissioner for Africa, had won the Boer War, and had united South Africa as one political entity under British rule. That act gave Britain looting rights for the most important raw materials on the continent, and he derived much power from these accomplishments.

At the close of the Boer War, Milner recruited a group of the best and the brightest from Oxford University to assist him in establishing British rule in Africa. He recruited them to his philosophy and became each and every one’s mentor. Known as Milner’s Kindergarten or The Kindergarten, these individuals returned to London and would play a major role in both World War I and World War II.

As World War I approached, Rhodes’ secret society, under the direction of Milner and various other collaborators, went to work. Both Liberal and Conservative, they held in common a rabid racial imperialism. Their own writings detail their thoughts and aims. For propaganda purposes, they created the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), but they also purchased the Times of London and ran other crucial press organs to rally the public behind their aims.

Milner’s personal protégé was Leo Stennet Amery. Quigley describes their relationship: “Amery can be regarded as Milner’s political heir. From the beginning of his own political career in 1906 to the death of Milner in 1925, he was more closely associated with Milner’s active political life than any other person ... his associations with Milner became steadily more intimate. In his last years of public office, Milner was generally assisted by Amery (1917-1921), and when he died it was Amery who arranged the public memorial service and controlled the distribution of tickets."

To understand today’s Likud and the rest of the right wing in Israel, one must understand Amery and Milner and their role in shaping the British Empire. They used Zionism to secure the oilfields of the Middle East and defense of the Suez Canal. They stated this openly, as did their Christian Zionist supporters. This was geopolitics in the mode of Sykes-Picot.

David Lifschultz: In what may be regarded as one of the greatest strategic moves in history, the uprising in Palestine by two million Palestinians may bring down the entire world economy.
As forces from Gaza approach the west bank to link up, the United States has announced that they will despatch the Gerald R. Ford Aircraft Carrier Task Force to the area.

“Humanity has entered a turning point, a new period in world history. This is not just about changing the world order, reformatting the system of international relations, and the evolution of the doctrines and values that underlie the world architecture.” — Nikolai Patrushev “Today, profound, truly tectonic changes are taking place. We are witnessing the final breakdown of the Western-centered colonial world order, which originated during the Crusades and took shape during the Great Geographical Discoveries.” — Nikolai Patrushev

A very remarkable analysis of the events in Niger was made by the political scientist Konstantin Dvinsky. The expert drew attention to several details, starting with the general economic situation in Europe and ending with military affairs.

— Tsargrad After the start of the SMO, the Anglo-Saxons “ate” the EU, first forcing them to participate in the sanctions war, and then finishing off the main economy of the union - Germany. The Nord Streams were blown up. And you don’t have to be a detective to figure out how it happened:

The US has set Africa on fire. Now African countries are looking at Russia with hope. Projects in Africa will also become a catalyst for the development of Russian technology and industry. The US is venomous in an attempt to prevent this. A short thread: 🇰🇪 In Kenya, an attempt at another “orange revolution.” This disgrace began after President Ruto firmly told Macron that African countries are not obliged to use dollars in trade settlements, but have every right to use their national currencies.

“A good geopolitical analysis of enemy plans. Lifshultz exposes ostriches ruling the US and EU as enemies of humanity.” — Sergey Glazyev

THE STRAUSSIANS SULLIVAN, BLINKEN, AND NULAND ARE THE ENEMY
by David K. Lifschultz Kosovo was broken away from Serbia by NATO and the leader of Serbia has nothing to say of any meaning. When I was in Bosnia the leaders told me that the Serbian President Vucic was an enemy to Serbia.

“Russia’s goal is to go to a new world, new international relations within the framework of a new world geopolitical balance through the prism of a multipolar world, where each state treats others with respect.” — Retired French General Dominique Delawarde “Russia has good reasons not to trust the leaders we currently have. And I don’t think that Russia can negotiate with them. We cannot negotiate without trust, and I don’t think Russia will negotiate.” — Retired French General Dominique Delawarde

🇪🇷🇷🇺 “I am convinced that the Russian Federation will play its part in this mission of all mankind on the path to solidarity and cooperation among free peoples,” President of Eritrea, Isaias Afwerki, said at a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow. 🇪🇷🇷🇺 President of Eritrea, Isaias Afwerki, emphasized that nations across the globe should advocate for the allocation of the necessary resources for the transition to a new, civilized international order based on mutual respect, cooperation, and prosperity.

“Our Western opponents are trying by persuasion, various promises & blackmail to force many of our partners to curtail their beneficial cooperation with Russia. At the same time, they do not care what losses this will bring to the respective states and their peoples.” — Putin “We are pursuing a course to reduce the share of currencies of unfriendly countries in mutual settlements and intend to work even more actively with partners around the world, including the Eurasian Economic Community, for a full transition to national currencies.” — Putin

The September 11 attacks that changed the course of world history were organized by the CIA and other US security agencies. They needed Arab terrorists as a cover to deflect accusations of killing almost three thousand and injuring more than six thousand. — Tsargrad The document that appeared on the SpyTalk website is genuine. From it - on many specific examples - it is clearly seen how the US CIA prepared the September 11 attacks, doing everything to ensure that they took place.
spytalk.co/p/exclusive-fb…

“Profound changes are now taking place on the world stage. More & more countries are taking a course toward strengthening national sovereignty. Russia will continue to work on the transition to national currencies. Western countries are trying to prevent this process.” — Putin The Second Eurasian Economic Forum began its work in Moscow. Vladimir Putin spoke about the priorities of the EAEU: the scenario according to which the experts “abroad” promised Russia a collapse of the economy will clearly not come true;

“China’s participation in restoration of relations between Saudi Arabia & Iran caused a painful reaction from the US & Britain,” said Naryshkin, Director of Russian Foreign Intelligence. He advised the “Anglo-Saxons” to get out of the Middle East “with their old buddy the devil.” The end of Western countries “will be according to their deeds,” and it will lead to sad consequences, Sergey Naryshkin, director of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service, said at an international meeting of high-ranking security officials.

“The roots of the neocon policy network go back to the Trotskyite cell at City University of New York in the 1930s. They were anti-Stalin but not anti-Soviet, became so-called anti-communist & also adopted revisionist Zionism as their political ideology.” — Dr. Clifford Kiracofe “The intellectual roots of the neocons are first seen in Jabotinsky (Netanyahu’s father was Jabotinsky’s secretary) and then from Jabotinsky to Mussolini, who he admired, and then back to Nietzsche. That’s where we come to this idea of the Beast Man.” — Dr. Clifford Kiracofe

🇯🇵 By mid-May 1945 it was clear to all who wished to see: Japan was on the brink of surrendering. The real purpose of the decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japanese cities was not to win the war, but rather to shape the contours of the post-war world. #G7Summit #Hiroshima In his 1928 opus “The Open Conspiracy: Blueprint for a World Revolution” H.G. Wells, the Fabian Society leader, called for the establishment of a “world government” which would supersede the nation-state as the primary form of human social and political existence.

🇷🇺 The “Russia-Islamic World” international forum opened in Kazan with a prayer. Its participants are thousands of big businessmen from 85 countries. Kazan is the fifth-largest city in Russia. Patriarch of Moscow and All Rus' Kirill took part in the forum. “Our meeting is taking place in Kazan, the capital of Tatarstan. And, like perhaps no other place in Russia, it visibly symbolizes the fruitful interaction of people of different beliefs,” the patriarch noted.

🇰🇿 Today, at the Kazakh-Chinese investment forum in Xi'an, Kassym-Jomart Tokayev, President of Kazakhstan, said that Kazakhstan intends to increase the capacity of the Trans-Caspian international transport route connecting China, Central Asia, and Europe. Railway crossing will appear on the Kazakh-Chinese border: Kazakhstan will continue to actively participate in the implementation of the joint construction of the Belt and Road. This was stated by Kassym-Jomart Tokayev at the first Central Asia-China Summit in Xi'an.