🇷🇺🇨🇳 “Russia’s military operation in Ukraine is very controversial. Yet its declared objective to overthrow the unipolar world order is widely understood and even supported by many countries, especially in the Global South. I call Russia a revolutionary.”
—Prof. Zhang Weiwei, Schiller Institute conference: A Beautiful Vision for Humanity in Times of Great Turbulence 🇷🇺🇨🇳 “European security must take into consideration Russia’s legitimate security concerns.” — Prof. Zhang Weiwei, Fudan University (Shanghai), Schiller Institute conference: A Beautiful Vision for Humanity in Times of Great Turbulence

The End of Sykes-Picot: Moving Beyond Colonialism
The Middle East in Context 🧵

In his May 4, 2009, lecture, “The End of Sykes-Picot: Moving Beyond Colonialism,” Lyndon LaRouche delivered a damning indictment: The so-called “Middle East conflict” is not some isolated regional dispute—it is the bloody legacy of British imperialism, a deliberate fragmentation of peoples to serve the geopolitical machinations of London and its enablers. The 1916 Sykes-Picot Agreement was not diplomacy; it was a criminal partition, carving up the Ottoman Empire into artificial client states to secure British oil dominance and crush any hope of true sovereignty.

LaRouche laid bare the empire’s blueprint. The British, in their rapacious drive to control oil for naval supremacy, turned the region into a perpetual warzone. He pointed to Mustafa Kemal Atatürk’s historic defiance—defeating British and French forces to forge an independent Turkey—as proof that resistance to colonial puppetry was possible. Yet the British strategy endured: divide, balkanize, and rule. The post-WWII narrative of an “Arab-Israeli conflict”? A smokescreen, obscuring the deeper truth—this is a manufactured crisis, a continuation of imperial manipulation to keep the region weak and exploitable.

The Middle East has been a battleground for millennia, but LaRouche identified the root of its modern suffering: the British Empire’s oil-fueled hegemony. His solution was uncompromising—dismantle the colonial borders, reject the Anglo-American oligarchy’s stranglehold, and recognize that the struggle for the Middle East is part of the global fight against financial imperialism. The age of Sykes-Picot must end, he argued—not with more Western intervention, but with true liberation.

Fifteen years later, LaRouche’s analysis remains prophetic. The fires burning across the region today are not accidents of history—they are the deliberate aftermath of empire. Only by breaking its chains can the Middle East finally move beyond colonialism. The Middle East Crucible: Where Humanity Fights for Its Future

The so-called “Middle East conflict” was never about borders or religions—it is the frontline in humanity’s war against its would-be destroyers. What makes us human? Fire. Not mere combustion, but the divine spark of reason that transforms matter, builds civilizations, and lifts our eyes from the dirt. This creative power—the noösphere made manifest—is what the Anglo-American oligarchy fears most. Their Sykes-Picot crime wasn’t just map-making; it was an attempt to extinguish the flame of human potential itself.

When the British Empire carved up the Ottoman carcass in 1916, they weren’t just stealing oil—they were committing an act of civilizational arson. Like Prometheus in reverse, these modern Titans sought to drag humanity back to the cave, replacing sovereign nations with puppet regimes, replacing culture with chaos, replacing progress with perpetual war. Atatürk’s Turkey proved the fire could be reclaimed—which is precisely why the oligarchy has spent a century ensuring no other Middle Eastern nation could follow suit.

Now watch their hands closely: The same financial predators who engineered this crisis now preach that humanity itself is the crisis. Their “climate emergency” dogma is just Sykes-Picot 2.0—a new set of artificial borders meant to cage human development. While they wail about CO2, the real threat looms: a solar minimum that demands nuclear-powered development and orbital sunshades—precisely the technologies their depopulation agenda forbids.

The Middle East’s agony was never inevitable. Those burning cities and refugee camps are not the product of ancient hatreds, but of very modern imperialism. The same London banks that financed the slave trade now design digital chains; the same Wall Street vampires who profited from war now sell “stakeholder capitalism” as humanity’s next cage.

But we are the fire-makers. We are the species that built pyramids during ice ages and raised cities from floodplains. The choice before us burns brighter than any explosion in Gaza or Baghdad: Will we let these technocratic arsonists reduce us to managed animals? Or will we unleash the creative inferno that awaits in every human mind?

The Middle East will be free—not when the last colonial border falls, but when the first fusion reactor lights the darkness, when the first space tower pierces the stratosphere, when we finally answer our birthright as the gods of flame. The cave or the cosmos—the oligarchy has made their choice. Now we must make ours.

The Bering Strait Tunnel: A Polemic for Progress Against the Forces of Obsolete Empire 🧵

The time for excuses is over. The Bering Strait Tunnel—the mega-project of the century, linking Eurasia and the Americas—is not just an engineering marvel but a litmus test for humanity’s future. Will we embrace a new paradigm of win-win cooperation, infrastructure-led development, and multipolar peace, or will we remain shackled to the failing Anglo-American unipolar order that thrives on division, war, and economic decay?

For 150 years, this vision has been stifled—first by British sabotage, then by Cold War paranoia, and now by the neocolonial technocrats who cling to NATO’s decaying hegemony. The same forces that assassinated Lincoln and Alexander II, that orchestrated the destruction of Henry Wallace’s statesmanship, and that today sanction, demonize, and provoke conflict with Russia and China, are the very ones terrified of this project’s success. Why? Because it shatters their control. The Grand Historical Vision vs. the Parasites of Empire

William Gilpin’s Cosmopolitan Railway was never just about steel and tracks—it was about uniting humanity under a shared destiny of progress. Lincoln’s allies, like Henry C. Carey, understood that the American System—a philosophy of high wages, industrialization, and sovereign development—was the antidote to Britain’s free-trade looting. Today, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Russia’s Northern Sea Route are the natural successors to this vision.

Yet, what stands in the way? Canada—a British colonial outpost masquerading as a nation, whose raw materials are forbidden from becoming finished goods by London’s financial cartels. The United States—a nation hijacked by Wall Street and the military-industrial complex, whose leaders would rather wage forever wars than build bridges to Eurasia.

🇧🇴 Bolivia’s 2025 Crisis: A Nation at the Crossroads

As Bolivia approaches its August 2025 elections, what began as political friction between President Luis Arce and former President Evo Morales has morphed into a full-blown crisis threatening the nation’s stability, sovereignty, and development prospects. The country now stands at a historic crossroads that will test whether it can complete its ambitious leap from being South America’s poorest nation to achieving an advanced, tech-driven future.

The volatile mix of political infighting, economic collapse, and grassroots mobilization is pushing Bolivia toward a dangerous tipping point. President Arce’s surprise withdrawal from the race on May 13, intended to calm tensions, has instead escalated the crisis as Morales—constitutionally barred from running—defiantly mobilizes his powerful base of indigenous and coca-growing supporters. This growing schism within the ruling MAS party threatens to unravel the stability achieved through years of progressive governance.

The political crisis unfolds against a backdrop of severe economic distress. Chronic fuel shortages have paralyzed La Paz, while dollar scarcity disrupts essential imports and agricultural production. Blockades by Morales’ rural supporters—primarily from coca-growing regions—have already cost over $2 billion in economic losses. Arce’s attempt to unify the party behind young Senate President Andrónico Rodríguez has failed to calm tensions, as Morales’ indigenous base organizes a potentially explosive caravan to La Paz.

This turmoil represents the latest chapter in Bolivia’s struggle that began with the 2019 coup against Morales, whose government achieved remarkable progress by empowering Bolivia’s indigenous majority. Between 2005-2019, poverty rates dropped from 38.2% to 15%, with particular gains in rural indigenous communities. These achievements explain Morales’ enduring support among Bolivia’s indigenous movements and cocalero unions, who now rally to his defense despite constitutional restrictions.

Central to Bolivia’s development vision is the Nuclear Technology Research Center in El Alto, set to open in 2025 with Russian assistance. This cutting-edge facility embodies the government’s slogan: “A people with a thousand years of history, with advanced technology, is invincible.” The project holds special significance for Morales’ base, representing the potential to merge ancestral knowledge with modern science. Similarly transformative is the Chinese-backed Mutún steel complex, promising to break Bolivia’s historic dependence on raw material exports.

As Bolivia approaches its electoral deadline, the stakes extend far beyond domestic politics. The outcome will determine whether the country can preserve its sovereignty and continue its development path, or succumb to forces of fragmentation and neoliberal regression that have undermined progress across Latin America. With Morales vowing to fight and Arce’s government struggling to maintain order, Bolivia’s immediate future hangs in the balance.

The 2025 elections represent a critical test of whether progressive projects in the Global South can withstand both internal divisions and external pressure. The outcome carries implications far beyond Bolivia’s borders, as foreign interests seek to diminish the nation’s sovereignty, control its rich natural resources, and prevent alternative political-economic models from taking root in Latin America.

Now at this decisive crossroads, Bolivia faces a choice between reclaiming its sovereign development path or surrendering to regression. For Morales’ mobilized base of cocaleros and indigenous communities, this is more than a political contest—it’s a fight to preserve their hard-won place in Bolivia’s future and prove that another developmental model is possible. The world watches as Bolivia becomes a test case for whether nations of the Global South can maintain their independent course amid mounting challenges. 🇧🇴 The Shadow of Neo-Nazi Networks in Bolivia’s Crisis

Behind 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s political turmoil lies a disturbing pattern of far-right destabilization that extends across Latin America, with the violent factions currently exacerbating the crisis—particularly the Santa Cruz Youth Union (UJC)—representing nodes in a regional network with deep ideological and operational ties to transnational neo-Nazi movements. The UJC’s 2022 strike, which paralyzed 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s economy for 36 days and caused over $1 billion in damages, demonstrated a modern adaptation of classic fascist tactics through economic strangulation, paramilitary intimidation, and ethno-nationalist rhetoric framing Santa Cruz’s wealthy elites as racially distinct from 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s indigenous majority.

This playbook bears striking resemblance to strategies seen in 🇺🇦 Ukraine’s Maidan uprising, where far-right groups like the Azov Battalion served as shock troops for regime change. The UJC’s historical roots trace back directly to Nazi fugitives like Klaus Barbie, who helped establish 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s far-right networks after WWII through his work with the brutal dictatorships of Hugo Bánzer and Luis García Meza. Today, these networks maintain transnational connections through 🇧🇷 Brazilian oligarchs in Santa Cruz’s agribusiness sector—particularly those linked to Bolsonaro-era politicians in southern 🇧🇷 Brazil’s historic Nazi enclaves—while receiving training from foreign “activist” groups specializing in color revolutions and funding through opaque offshore accounts and conservative foundations.

The regional implications become clear when examining parallel developments: 🇵🇪 Peru saw similar far-right mobilization against President Pedro Castillo, while 🇦🇷 Argentina witnessed Nazi-linked assassination attempts against Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner. These networks ultimately serve two interlocking objectives—breaking 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s state-led development model to benefit foreign mining and agribusiness interests, while preventing the “contagion” of indigenous-led governance models in the region.

As 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s 2025 elections approach, these forces are actively exploiting the MAS party split to delegitimize the electoral process, preparing renewed economic sabotage should progressive forces prevail, and cultivating military and police factions for potential intervention. The battle for 🇧🇴 Bolivia has become a litmus test for whether 21st-century fascism can succeed where 20th-century coups failed—not through outright dictatorship, but by weaponizing democratic institutions against themselves. The international community’s muted response to these neo-fascist networks reveals much about whose interests are truly served by 🇧🇴 Bolivia’s ongoing destabilization, particularly as the country’s lithium reserves and strategic BRICS membership make it a key battleground in the new Cold War. What unfolds in 🇧🇴 Bolivia will likely provide a blueprint for how fascist networks operate in this new era of hybrid warfare, where ideological extremism marries economic warfare in service of maintaining neocolonial structures of power.

British Israelism is a syncretic cult ideology claiming the Anglo-Saxon-Celtic peoples are the biblical “Lost Tribes of Israel,” that the British monarchy descends from King David, and that Britain is destined for global rule. Its modern influence is no accident—it was cultivated. The roots trace to Venetian psychological warfare. Paolo Sarpi, a 17th-century strategist, manipulated religion to divide Europe and suppress Renaissance science. Venice fueled the Protestant Reformation, hardened Catholic counter-reforms, and kept the continent in perpetual conflict.

Adam Smith was a fraud. His “pleasure-pain” economics enslaves you to bankers. The oligarchy hates progress—they want depopulation, decay, and dumbed-down serfs. Humanity’s destiny is anti-entropic—or it is nothing. Humanity’s future depends on one question: Will we embrace anti-entropic progress—great infrastructure, advanced energy, and true scientific discovery? Or will we let the oligarchy’s fake economics drag us into collapse? There is no third option. Break their system—or perish with it.

The Bank for International Fascism
by John Hoefle, EIR (2013)

In the aftermath of World War I, fascist movements sprang up all over Europe, and also in the United States. Considerable effort has been spent to portray these fascist movements as outgrowths of rampant nationalism, but that is a deliberate lie. The truth is that fascism is a political movement created and financed by the rentier/financier oligarchs of the Anglo-Dutch Liberal Empire, for the purpose of replacing the nation-state system with a global technocratic dictatorship.

Adam LeBor’s Tower of Basel sheds a useful light on how this process works, by telling the story of the Bank for International Settlements, known more commonly by its acronym, BIS. His book presents a detailed picture of the relationships between the Nazis and top international financiers, and the intelligence agencies. Along the way, we meet the leaders of the Bank of England, the titans of Wall Street, British and American spooks, and other financiers and industrialists, all of whom collectively made Hitler and Mussolini possible, and unleashed horror upon the world.

Some readers may be puzzled why such seemingly respectable institutions and individuals would work so closely with the Hitler regime, and wonder if they were somehow secret Nazis or Nazi sympathizers. But it is actually the inverse that is true. The Nazis were agents of the Empire! A Bank Above Nations

The BIS was founded in 1930, nominally for the purpose of handling the reparations payments imposed upon Germany after World War I. The founding members of the bank were the central banks of Britain, France, Germany, Italy, and Belgium, with Japan and the United States each represented by a consortium of domestic banks. In the U.S., the consortium consisted of three banks: J.P. Morgan & Co., the First National Bank of New York, and the First National Bank of Chicago.

The driving forces behind the founding were Montagu Norman, the Governor of the Bank of England, and Hjalmar Schacht, the head of the German central bank, the Reichsbank. While Schacht liked to refer to the BIS as “my bank,” the Dutch banker Johan Willem Beyen—himself a president of the BIS—put it more clearly: “Norman’s prestige was overwhelming. As the apostle of central bank cooperation, he made the central banker into a kind of archpriest of monetary religion. The BIS was, in fact, his creation.”

Beyen’s quote goes to the deeper motive behind the founding of the BIS, the creation of the bank as a base from which to create a new form of what was euphemistically called “transnational finance.” The archpriests of the Empire were laying the foundation for what became the globalized financial system of today, a system of financier-run corporate cartels and markets which is essentially a rerun of the methods of the British East India Company, combined with modern technology.

Under the treaty which founded the BIS, the bank was granted virtual sovereignty—although under the circumstances, it might be more accurate to say that it was granted immunity from the sovereignty of others. No nation was to have any say over how the bank conducted its affairs, nor would their laws apply. Although the BIS is located in Switzerland, it is exempt from Swiss laws, and Swiss authorities cannot enter its premises without permission.

According to LeBor, “[T]he BIS enjoys similar protections to those granted to the headquarters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and diplomatic embassies. . . . The BIS has the right to communicate in code and send and receive correspondence in bags covered by the same protection as embassies, meaning they cannot be opened.”

“The bank’s extraordinary legal privileges also extend to its staff and directors,” LeBor writes. “Senior managers enjoy a special status, similar to that of diplomats, while carrying out their duties in Switzerland, which means that their bags (unless there is evidence of a criminal act), and their papers are inviolable. The central bank governors traveling to Basel for the bimonthly meetings enjoy the same status while in Switzerland. All bank officials are immune under Swiss law, for life, for all the acts carried out during the discharge of their duties.”

This protected position was carefully crafted. If your goal were to take control of nations and incorporate them into a new corporatist dictatorship, you would take steps to protect against counterattack by the targets.

Sergey Glazyev: The world has changed. Irreversibly. What we wrote about a decade and a half ago has come to pass. This publication is a continuation of the article “What is happening?” previously published on this channel. 1/84 Pax Americana is crumbling before our eyes, three decades after the collapse of the USSR. The transition to a new global economic order has been completed. 2/84

“How British Financial Elites Fueled the Rise of Hitler: The Hidden Geopolitical Agenda Behind Nazi Germany’s Ascent” by Mike Billington (EIR) Let’s look back to where the original Nazis came from. In the 1920s and 1930s, there was the mobilization of various forces in Germany responding to the hideous impositions placed on Germany after World War I, where they were essentially burdened with massive reparations that destroyed any chance of their economic recovery from the war. This fostered the rise of radical institutions. The head of the Bank of England, Montague Norman, openly sponsored the rise to power of Adolf Hitler. He was a close personal friend of Hjalmar Schacht, Hitler’s economic minister, who became the Reichsminister under Hitler and implemented the Nazi policy of giving all economic power to the banks themselves. This policy diverted credit from anything other than the buildup of military forces to prepare for the onslaught, for Operation Barbarossa, and for what became the Second World War.

🇩🇪 Friedrich Merz, BlackRock’s candidate for German Chancellor, has won. Merz was the long-time lawyer for American locust investors in Germany, and is fully committed to neoliberal financial policy to destroy nation-states and sovereign credit systems. “BlackRock’s Candidate for German Chancellor, Friedrich Merz” by Helga Zepp-LaRouche and Dr. Werner Rügemer

Helga Zepp-LaRouche: Yes, good evening. I wholeheartedly welcome you to the Civil Rights Movement Solidarity weekly webcast. And I am particularly pleased to have a very special guest today, namely Dr. Werner Rügemer, who is a very renowned author and has written many books, all of which are extremely interesting.

He is currently in the process of publishing a new book, which deals with a very current topic. And I am particularly pleased that we are speaking today, because as of a few hours ago, or yes, much more recently, there was a vote in the Bundestag on a proposed law by Friedrich Merz, which he introduced on behalf of the CDU-CSU [Christian Democratic Union–Christian Social Union], to change the asylum law.

It went through with a very narrow majority, with the support of the AfD [Alternative for Germany]. There was a lot of commotion beforehand that this was a breach of the dyke and that the firewall between the establishment parties and the AfD had now been torn down.

In any case, there is a possibility that Friedrich Merz, leader of the Christian Democratic Union, will become the next Federal Chancellor. Against this backdrop it is perhaps very important to consider what implications this has.

We have an incredibly dramatic world situation. United States President Donald Trump has only been in office for nine days and has already caused a lot of commotion: Panama, Canada, Greenland—I could go on and on. The situation in the Middle East: At first there was hope that the ceasefire might bring about an improvement. But now he wants to resettle all the Palestinians to Egypt, Jordan and even Indonesia. So, we have a lot of topics to discuss, and that’s why my very first question is: we are four weeks or a little more than three weeks away from the Bundestag election on February 23. What should voters know about what they will face if they give their vote to Mr. Merz?

Dr. Werner Rügemer: With his even more direct turn to the right toward the AfD, Merz has done what his former boss at BlackRock, Lawrence Fink, did before the election in the U.S.A. He also supported the Democratic Party for a long time. BlackRock grew up with the Democratic Party. But even before the election, BlackRock CEO Fink said, we don’t care who wins the election; we are in talks with both candidates. And then it turned out that BlackRock advised Trump on his choice of Treasury Secretary….

Zepp-LaRouche: Before we look at the different regions of the world, it would perhaps be good for our viewers if you explained what BlackRock is. People think that it’s just one of many multinationals, but that’s not exactly the case. Since you’re probably the best expert on the subject in Germany, can you give a brief outline of why BlackRock is such a problem?

Lyndon LaRouche (2002): There is a faction that has existed for a long time. It was started by H.G. Wells and Bertrand Russell back in the 1920s and 1930s. It’s a very powerful, very influential faction in international circles, especially English-speaking circles. This faction, which we call the utopians, believed from the beginning that the existence of thermonuclear weapons—or nuclear weapons alone—would create weapons so terrible that nations would give up their sovereignty and submit to a world government rather than face the prospect of having to fight wars with such weapons.

Elena Panina: Trump’s “Mighty Dollar” and “Great Economy” Need Crutches and Protection 🧵

In another emotional post, the US President voiced his complaints about BRICS, concerns about the fate of the dollar, and threats to those who try to abandon it. Since Trump managed to include Spain in BRICS earlier, the number of addressees of his threats remains uncertain. As for the rest, the “mighty” dollar, it turns out, is not so mighty, since it has to be strengthened by blackmail and banal racketeering. As is the US economy.

Sergey Glazyev: Based on the analysis of Trump’s first initiatives in the economic sphere, we can state his desire to ride a long wave of economic growth based on a new technological order. 1/19 🧵 The US is a leader in this area, and he is seeking to consolidate this leadership against the backdrop of the accelerated development of China, which has already surpassed the US in terms of output, high-tech exports, and is rapidly reducing the technological gap, achieving technological sovereignty. 2/19

“All international terrorism today is coordinated by the Israeli Mossad. It is impossible to neutralize combined ‘right’ and ‘left’ terrorism in the US without expelling the Mossad and crushing the Zionist lobby at the top levels.” — EIR (1978) The Rothschild roots of the Ku Klux Klan (EIR, 1978)

The political evolution of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan was a direct outcome of policies initiated during the first half of the 19th century by the British aristocracy and their court Jews, the Rothschilds. The combined capabilities of the key secret societies controlled by these circles - the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, the B’nai B’rith (Order of the Sons of the Covenant), and the Jesuits (Society of Jesus) - allowed the British and allied Black Guelph circles to nearly destroy the foundations of the United States republic through assassinations (including that of Abraham Lincoln), terrorist operations, and general subversive activity culminating in the War Between The States.

The starting point for unraveling this vast conspiratorial apparatus is the Knights of the Golden Circle.

The Knights of the Golden Circle combined the network of individuals associated directly with the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, B’nai B’rith, and the Jesuits. Practically the entire Confederate leadership belonged to the KGC at the point of the secessionist crisis in 1860. It is through tracing the lineage of the KGC that the Ku Klux Klan becomes an understandable phenomenon.

However, to make fully comprehensible the significance of the combined relationship of these secret societies, a short historical backdrop is first necessary.

Prior to and during the American Revolutionary War, and significantly afterwards, the British initiated an intensive subversion effort aimed at taking over and destroying the Franklin-organized Freemason networks that functioned as the organizing body for the revolution. The explicit counteroperation was the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, under the control of the British-Black Guelph-Knights of Malta organization. It was because of this effort that many of the individuals who served the British in the KGC were also members of the Scottish Rite.

It is equally significant that the abolitionist societies of New England, as well as the entire secessionist states’ rights movement, were all financed and basically controlled through the Rothschild-Baring bankers of the British monarchy.

This political intelligence profile will concentrate on the closely connected evolution of three secret organizations: the Knights of the Golden Circle, the B’nai B’rith, and the Ku Klux Klan.

🇸🇾🇺🇸 Richard Black, Former Virginia State Senator: Al-Qaeda has always been our proxy force on the ground; they, together with ISIS, have carried out the mission of the United States; we are supporters of al-Qaeda today where they’re bottled up in Idlib Province; we wanted to starve and we wanted to freeze to death the people of Syria; we wanted to take the wheat away to cause famine among the Syrian people; there was an organized campaign of rape across the nation of Syria; the highest prices went to the youngest children because there were a great number of pedophiles and the pedophiles wanted to possess small children; we cut off the medical supplies so that the women in Syria would die of breast cancer because they could not get the medications; the United States has a strategic policy of using proxies to engage in war; when we fight these wars we have no limits on the cruelty and the inhumanity that we’re prepared to impose on the people;

🔸 The war [in Syria] began in 2011 when the United States landed Central Intelligence operatives to begin coordinating with Al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups;

🔸 We have been unwavering supporters of Al-Qaeda since before the war formally began;

🔸 We are supporters of Al-Qaeda today where they’re bottled up in Idlib Province;

🔸 The CIA supplied them under secret operation Timber Sycamore;

🔸 We gave them all of their anti-tank weapons and all of their anti-air missiles;

🔸 Al-Qaeda has always been our proxy force on the ground; they together with ISIS have carried out the mission of the United States together with a great number of affiliates that really are kind of interchangeable—you have the Free Syrian Army; soldiers move from ISIS to Al-Qaeda to Free Syrian Army rather fluidly;

🔸 The United States has a strategic policy of using proxies to engage in war;

🔸 Our objective was to overthrow the legitimate government of Syria and, in order to do that, we employed proxy soldiers who were the the most vile of all terrorists;

🔸 Something very similar is happening right now in Ukraine;

🔸 Plan B was the American seizure of the northern portion of Syria; it is the bread basket for all of the Syrian people; we wanted to take the wheat away to cause famine among the Syrian people; by stealing the oil and the gas we would be able to shut down the transportation system, and, at the same time, during the Syrian winters we could freeze to death the Syrian civilian population which, in many cases, were living in rubble where these terrorist armies with mechanized divisions had attacked and just totally destroyed these cities and left people just living in little pockets of rubble;

🔸 We wanted to starve and we wanted to freeze to death the people of Syria;

🔸 The Caesar sanctions were the most brutal sanctions ever imposed on ever any nation; during the Second World War sanctions were not nearly as strict as they were on Syria;

🔸 We devalued their currency through the SWIFT system for international payments making it impossible for them to purchase medications;

🔸 We cut off the medical supplies so that the women in Syria would die of breast cancer because they could not get the medications;

🔸 One of the last things that we did, and the evidence is vague on it, but there was a mysterious explosion in the harbor [of Beirut] in Lebanon; it was a massive explosion of a shipload of ammonium nitrate fertilizer; it killed hundreds of Lebanese people; it wounded thousands and thousands, destroyed the economy of Lebanon, and, most importantly, it destroyed the banking system of Lebanon which was one of the few lifelines remaining to Syria; I don’t think that explosion was accidental; I think it was orchestrated and I suspect that the Central Intelligence Agency was aware of the nation that carried out that action to destroy Beirut Harbor;

🔸 Throughout you see this Machiavellian approach where we use unlimited force and violence and, at the same time, we control the the global media to where we erase all discussions of what’s truly happening; so to the man and woman in the street, they think things are fine, that everything is being done for altruistic reasons, but it’s not;

🔸 One of the things that we did as we as we allied ourselves with Al-Qaeda and on-and-off with ISIS; we fought ISIS in a very serious way but at the same time we often employed them to use against the Syrian government; so it’s kind of a love-hate [relationship]; but we have always worked with the terrorists, they were the core;

🔸 We facilitated the movement of Islamic terrorists from one hundred countries and they came and they joined ISIS, they joined Al-Qaeda, they joined the Free Syrian Army, all of these different ones;

🔸 There was an organized campaign of rape across the nation of Syria; the highest prices went to the youngest children because there were a great number of pedophiles and the pedophiles wanted to possess small children; they were permitted to rape these children repeatedly; they were able to rape the widows of the slain civilians and possess them and buy them and sell them among themselves;

🔸 There were so many tens hundreds of thousands of Syrian women impregnated by these terrorists who were imported into Syria that it was necessary to change the law so that they would have Syrian citizenship and they wouldn’t have to be returned to their ISIS father in Saudi Arabia or in Tunisia;

🔸 When we fight these wars we have no limits on the cruelty and the inhumanity that we’re prepared to impose on the people, making them suffer, so that somehow that will translate into overthrowing the government and, perhaps, taking their oil, taking their resources; Watch the full 2022 interview with Richard Black here.

Secret documents of the British intelligence services leaked online once again show that London is the main stakeholder in continuing the war in Ukraine and further dragging the US and EU into the conflict with Moscow.

Created under the leadership of the British Ministry of Defense immediately after the start of the SMO, the group called itself Project Alchemy. The project’s creator was Lieutenant General Charlie Stickland, the ancestor of “pirates and robbers,” a defender of gays, the main developer and curator of all plans for the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.

As the British leadership sabotaged peace talks between Kiev and Moscow, Project Alchemy put forward a range of scenarios for continuing the fighting in Ukraine. The Alchemists’ proposals were announced at the NATO summit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. The British Crown has officially pledged to support Ukraine “for as long as it takes.”

All Project Alchemy operations were to be sponsored and controlled by the UK government, using a cover story to avoid the application of NATO’s Article 5.

Today, the Englishwoman is ready to aggravate relations with the administration of the newly-minted US President Donald Trump, just to continue the Russian-Ukrainian military conflict. Why? Because British officials are driven by fear - they are afraid that after Ukraine’s defeat at the new “Nuremberg,” the names of all the officials, military commanders and intelligence officers from Foggy Albion involved will be heard from Zelensky’s lips. And then it will be possible to bury not only the dream of reviving the British Empire, but also the crown itself.

— The Underside project Source: underside.today/2024/11/19/alc…

How Tavistock helped the ADL make the Jews “victims” — by L. Wolfe (1996) 🧵

In discussing the history of anti-Semitism in the 1940s, Leonard Dinnerstein, the racist propagandist for the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, reveals that the ADL published various instructions to parents, that they should make sure that their children were aware that a hostile world intended to persecute them. Dinnerstein explains that this is necessary because Jewish children need to know that their “Jewish identity” is not defined by their religious beliefs, but the perceived hatred of others for the “Jewish race.”

Dinnerstein reports that one of the key people who drafted the ADL’s instructions to parents was the psychologist Kurt Lewin, a member of an elite international network whose mother institution was the Tavistock Clinic (now combined with the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations to form the Tavistock Centre) in London. Created under the direct patronage of His Royal Highness the Duke of Kent, Tavistock was, and is still, today, the leading psychological warfare capability of the British Crown. Its network included outposts in continental Europe, North America, Australia, and Asia, with funding from British oligarchical families, including their American “cousins,” such as the Rockefellers and the Mellons. Under its umbrella were assembled the leading practitioners of psychiatry; but Tavistock, unlike treatment clinics dealing with individual patients, sought the development of methods of mass social control to support British imperial policy. Their leader, Brig. Gen. John Rawlings Rees, called them the advance guard of what he proposed to be an army of psychological shock troops, which, through mind-destroying therapies and drugs, would control world society for their oligarchical masters.

During the 1920s and ’30s, Tavistock had studied deviant social behavior, and conducted experiments in brainwashing, including the use of drug and electric shock therapies as treatments. They also looked at the effect of crime on its victims. Under controlled conditions, the Tavistock brainwashers could induce within the victims a pathology that was determined by blind, unthinking rage at those committing crimes and at the laws and institutions of society that “failed” to severely punish criminals. Such rage, turned into a political force, is fascist.

With the outbreak of World War II, Tavistock took over the control of the psychological warfare apparatus on both sides of the Atlantic. Rees became the head of the British Psychological Warfare Directorate, while Lewin and others of the network in the United States went to work for the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), profiling the effects of strategic bombing on enemy populations, but also profiling the effects of war and stress on soldiers and populations of allied nations. This led to studies of “discrimination” and prejudice in the military services, and, later, parallel studies of the Nazi experiment, which the British had put in power, but which had gone out of control.
Group brainwashing

Lewin had been one of a number of Jewish psychiatrists and others who had fled Nazi Germany in the 1930s. He had been helped out of the country by the American Jewish Committee (AJC) networks, and, upon arrival in the United States, had quickly developed a collaborative relationship with the ADL. (The association of psychiatry with the B’nai B’rith goes back to Freud and his early Vienna circle. Freud had recruited many of his followers from the B’nai B’rith, to which he had presented some of his initial papers. Freud, in his writings, rejects Judeo-Christian teachings and doctrine, but nonetheless maintains his “Jewishness,” which he claims to be derived from blood—a view of Judaism as a cult, shared by the B’nai B’rith.)

Lewin’s specialty that had attracted the interest of Tavistock, was the study of groups and the mechanisms by which they interact. In developing laws of what he called “group dynamics,” Lewin argued that all society could be divided into groups, whose members shared a set of assumptions about common experiences; if one wanted to control and manipulate society, then various groups could be played off against each other, by manipulating their perceptions.

The ADL applies Lewin’s theories in its dirty tricks operations. In order to control and manipulate Jews, it helps the formation of anti-Semitic groups, such as the neo-Nazis and the Ku Klux Klan, provoking them to attack Jews. It then uses these attacks to create a “reaction formation” among the “group” of Jews, which weds that group closer to the ADL. The question of defining prejudice as “psychological phenomena,” inherent in certain “personality types” or “learned through group experience,” is critical for covering up the dirty tricks of Tavistock and its ADL allies.

The instructions to Jewish parents, cited by Dinnerstein, are in a 1940 article written by Lewin for the ADL’s Menorah Journal. Titled “Bringing Up the Child,” it is a prescription for inducing paranoia: “The basic fact is that [your] child is going to be a member of a less-privileged minority group, and he will have to face this fact.” He urged parents to tell their children that even their best friends harbor anti-Semitic views, and that these might be “repressed” for a time, but will ultimately come out: “The problem is bound to arise some time, and the sooner it is faced, the better.” In about the fourth grade, parents should expect their child to be called “a dirty Jew”; worse persecution will occur in high school and college. The “certainty” of persecution should help parents “toughen” their children; they must develop a group pride in their experience, which they, in turn, must pass on to their children. That, he says, is how Jews survive.

A year later, Lewin published an essay in the Contemporary Jewish Record (June 1941) on “Self-Hatred Among Jews,” in which he argues that Jews, by denying their inferior status, were losing their sense of identity. Through cowardice and fear, Jews start feeling guilty about their “Jewishness,” and start to dislike their fellow group members. In the most extreme cases, he says, this leads to Jews discriminating against their fellow Jews, where they take on the personality of the anti-Semite. A better response, he indicates, would be to treat the oppressors of Jews the same way that they treat Jews-stopping just short of recommending Jewish Defense League-like “counter-violence” against “anti-Semites.”

(This same phenomenon was later to be described by psychologist Bruno Bettelheim, who became part of the extended Tavistock network. In his studies of concentration camp victims, published in The Informed Heart, Bettelheim discovered that, when moral judgment breaks down under conditions of extreme terror, a personality transformation takes place: Some prisoners take on the depraved outlook of their guards-the so-called Bettelheim syndrome).

Let us once and for all put an end to the rule of kings, queens, and oligarchs of all kinds! Let us fulfill the promise of the American Revolution, for all the peoples of this Earth!

https://x.com/apocalypseos/status/1550676587154051073

The plot to blow up Al-Aqsa Mosque and rebuild Solomon’s temple would unleash a bloodbath throughout the Middle East and likely even WWIII. It is the legacy of Anglo-American divide and conquer imperialism coming from 19th century British Freemasonry, British Israelism (and its derivative “Christian Zionism”), messianic bloodthirsty Jewish Zionism, and the neocons. Each has its own apocalyptic “End Times” ideology of some imagined utopia which they openly proclaim can only be achieved through war and horrific bloodshed.

Read the full report: citizensparty.org.au/sites/default/…

https://twitter.com/apocalypseos/status/1720653325958533560

NETANYAHU’S GODFATHER: How British Imperialists Created the Fascist Jabotinsky

by Steven P. Meyer

Vladimir Ze’ev Jabotinsky (1880-1940), the patron-saint of Israel’s Likud party who also created Revisionist Zionism, and Chaim Weizmann (1874-1952), the decades-long chairman of the World Zionist Organization who was seen as the prime minister-in-exile of a Jewish Palestine, were both witting champions of the British Empire. They were instruments of Lord Alfred Milner and Leo Stennet Amery, the final authors of the Balfour Declaration, who craftily used them to secure British rule over Palestine as part of the 1916 Sykes-Picot agreements.

The British also controlled the leaders of the Arab nationalist movements, which they created and funded. They owned Haj Amin al-Husseini, a young radical, whom they chose as Mufti of Jerusalem. They funded his religious network and social organizations, and to give him status among all of the Islamic faith, they created the post of Grand Mufti for him.

The armed conflict in Israel today, which threatens to become World War III, is the continuation of almost a century of British-staged armed conflict between Arab and Jew that dates back to the Nebi Musa riots of 1920, just months after the close of World War I, as the British settled in to occupy Palestine. Eyewitness intelligence reports proved that British military operatives encouraged and facilitated the Arab rioting, lead by Haj Amin al-Husseini, against the Jews.

The Jewish armed response was led by Jabotinsky, and a British-trained Zionist military force that had been placed in Palestine at the end of the war. The Jewish Legion, as it was called, had no military significance. Its creation was opposed by the world’s Jewish community, including the small Zionist movement that then existed. But it was a major propaganda tool created by Milner and Amery to back up Sykes-Picot. When the war ended and the Legion demobilized in Palestine, it became a deadly weapon to be used for violent bloody confrontations with the Arabs.

The Nebi Musa riots lasted several days. Five Jews and four Arabs were killed, and 216 Jews and 23 Arabs were wounded. Both Jabotinsky and Husseini were made public heroes by their British controllers, and the results gave them the capability to recruit followers that would be used for future confrontations. The die was cast, but the stage for the conflict had already been set decades before.


1. Modern Zionism and the British Empire

Palestine had been a necessary imperial target of acquisition for consolidation of the Empire for more than half a century before the Sykes-Picot agreements, dating back to the 1830s and the efforts of Lord Shaftsbury, a leading Tory politician, and Lord Palmerston, his stepfather-in-law. Palmerston served as Foreign Minister from 1830-51 and was destined to become prime minister and master of cultural and political warfare.

Shaftsbury was a Christian Zionist and British Israelite, who believed that the Jews must return to Zion before there could be a second coming of Christ. Although he opposed Jewish civil emancipation in England, and was indeed anti-Semitic, he believed it was Britain’s destiny to establish Zion. Shaftesbury wrote: “though admittedly a stiff-necked, dark-hearted people, and sunk in moral degradation, obduracy, and ignorance of the Gospel, [the Jews] were not only worth of salvation but also vital to Christianity’s hope of salvation.” Shaftesbury’s writings appeared in the The History of London Society for the Propagation of Christianity among the Jews. Shaftesbury was a member of the society and, in 1848, served as its president.

In 1838, an Arab revolt took place in Greater Syria, run by Muhammad Ali, the Ottoman viceroy of Egypt. British Foreign Secretary Palmerston offered the Sultan of Turkey British help in putting down the revolt, and in return, Britain was given the right to establish a vice-consulate in Jerusalem. Once this beachhead for the Empire was secured, the British decided to use a fledgling Zionist movement as their proxy, to increase their presence in the Holy Land.

In 1840, Palmerston sent a letter to the British ambassador in Constantinople, instructing him to contact the Sultan: “There exists at the present time among the Jews dispersed over Europe, a strong notion that the time is approaching when their nation is to return to Palestine... It would be of manifest importance to the Sultan to encourage the Jews to return and settle in Palestine because the wealth which they would bring with them would increase the resources of the Sultan’s dominions; and the Jewish people, if returning under the sanction and protection and at the invitation of the Sultan, would be a check upon any future evil designs of Muhammad Ali or his successor. I have to instruct Your Excellency strongly to recommend the Turkish government to hold out every just encouragement to the Jews of Europe to return to Palestine.”

In 1845, Edward Ledwich Mitford, one of Palmerston’s collaborators in the Foreign Service and a political supporter, published “An appeal in Behalf of the Israel Nation in Connection with the British Policy in the Levant.” The piece called for the “final establishment of the Jewish nation in Palestine as a protected state under the guardianship of Great Britain.” Mitford reasoned that such a state would “place the management of our steam communication entirely in our hands and would place us in a commanding position in the Levant from whence to check the process of encroachment, to overawe open enemies and, if necessary, to repel their advance.”

With the introduction of the steamship in the 1840s, the most efficient route to India and other parts of Asia was through what the British call the Near East. Britain’s dominant shipping route now went from London, through the Mediterranean to Alexandria and Cairo by steamship, overland to Suez, and then continued by steamship to points east. Britain was no longer dependent upon the Atlantic currents and the whims of nature to circumnavigate Africa to reach India.

The opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 massively increased the efficiency and shortened the time of travel, putting an even higher premium on Britain’s securing a base of operations in Palestine, as a northern defense of the canal. One of Britain’s motives in starting World War I was to finally secure Palestine, and they did that with Sykes-Picot and the breakup of the Ottoman Empire. No longer would the British have to entreat the Turks to accept the Jewish immigrants, which in British eyes were only surrogates for their empire.

Jabotinsky’s Imperial Roots

Every Likud prime minister in Israel has been an avowed promoter of the policies of Vladimir Ze’ev Jabotinsky. Some were personal protégés, others extremist leaders within his movement. The father of current Likud leader and candidate for prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, was Jabotinsky’s personal secretary.

The Likud prime ministers are considered an elite grouping. They are often referred to as Jabotinsky’s Princes, and to this day, Jabotinsky is omnipresent within the Jewish right wing. His picture adorns the Likud website, and U.S. Anti-Defamation League director Abe Foxman has had a framed photo of him on his desk.

Jabotinsky was a wholly owned and created asset of the British Empire. He was controlled by a political network led by Leo Stennet Amery, who became Britain’s most prominent Imperial spokesman and political organizer. Amery’s circle included the greatest names of British imperialism: Cecil John Rhodes, the self-avowed enemy of the American republic; the Coefficients group; and Alfred Milner, Rhodes’ mentor, who ran Rhodes’ secret society.

Jabotinsky and the creation of a Jewish Legion became Amery’s number one project, as the British moved to take over Palestine at the close of World War I.

Amery’s vision was that of Rhodes, who, in 1877, wrote his first Last Will and Testament. Only a bit more than a decade had passed since the British plan to dismember the United States in a Civil War had failed, bitterly. Rhodes, a rabid British race imperialist, had amassed his fortune through the exploration and mining of gold in Africa. Rhodes wrote that the purpose of his Will was: “To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom, and of colonisation by British subjects of all lands ... and especially the ... entire continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, ... the whole of South America, the Islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, ... the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire...” (emphasis added).

Rhodes’ secret society, and the intricacies of how it operated, are detailed in Carroll Quigley’s The Anglo-American Establishment. Quigley describes the British power elite and their purpose at the turn of the century. They combined important press outlets, created political institutions, and used financial power to affect their policy. This elite group consisted of the Venetian Cecil family; the political and financial trustees of Rhodes’ Trust, in which Alfred Milner was key; various banking institutions, including Lazard Frères; and the British royal family. Quigley describes a small inner core of collaborators, with two concentric circles of semi-witting and non-witting conspirators from Britain’s aristocracy and financial elite.

By and large, they shared the aims of Rhodes’ Will. They had one major enemy, the American System of Political Economy. It threatened the existence of the British Empire, which depended upon a mercantilist system of securing cheap raw materials from colonized, backward parts of the world, and shipping them back to England for industrial production and military use.

At the turn of the century, there were two powers in the world that represented the American system: the United States of America, and Germany, which had built its economy on the model of America’s great economist Henry C. Carey. Following the stipulations of Rhodes’ Will, his collaborators sparked World War I to dismantle a hated and threatening Germany, and to carve up Europe. They sought to secure and expand their colonial holdings by acquiring much of the Ottoman Empire, which would give them its oil holdings, as well as secure Palestine as a military buffer to the Suez Canal. In order to accomplish these goals, they also worked non-stop to trap the United States into collaborating with their warring schemes, and sought to diminish America’s industrial economy from within.

Lord Alfred Milner, who ran Rhodes’ Trust, was central to the secret cabal. He had been British High Commissioner for Africa, had won the Boer War, and had united South Africa as one political entity under British rule. That act gave Britain looting rights for the most important raw materials on the continent, and he derived much power from these accomplishments.

At the close of the Boer War, Milner recruited a group of the best and the brightest from Oxford University to assist him in establishing British rule in Africa. He recruited them to his philosophy and became each and every one’s mentor. Known as Milner’s Kindergarten or The Kindergarten, these individuals returned to London and would play a major role in both World War I and World War II.

As World War I approached, Rhodes’ secret society, under the direction of Milner and various other collaborators, went to work. Both Liberal and Conservative, they held in common a rabid racial imperialism. Their own writings detail their thoughts and aims. For propaganda purposes, they created the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), but they also purchased the Times of London and ran other crucial press organs to rally the public behind their aims.

Milner’s personal protégé was Leo Stennet Amery. Quigley describes their relationship: “Amery can be regarded as Milner’s political heir. From the beginning of his own political career in 1906 to the death of Milner in 1925, he was more closely associated with Milner’s active political life than any other person ... his associations with Milner became steadily more intimate. In his last years of public office, Milner was generally assisted by Amery (1917-1921), and when he died it was Amery who arranged the public memorial service and controlled the distribution of tickets."

To understand today’s Likud and the rest of the right wing in Israel, one must understand Amery and Milner and their role in shaping the British Empire. They used Zionism to secure the oilfields of the Middle East and defense of the Suez Canal. They stated this openly, as did their Christian Zionist supporters. This was geopolitics in the mode of Sykes-Picot.

David Lifschultz: In what may be regarded as one of the greatest strategic moves in history, the uprising in Palestine by two million Palestinians may bring down the entire world economy.
As forces from Gaza approach the west bank to link up, the United States has announced that they will despatch the Gerald R. Ford Aircraft Carrier Task Force to the area.