Whenever two shitlib pet issues clash with each other, there are always giddy spectators who pop some popcorn and fantasize about the clash bamboozling shitlibs.
As though the shitlib will be confused as to “which side” to take when their ideological toys are fighting.
But they won't. The formula for determining which side the shitlib will support is really very simple: the victor will always be whatever identity causes the most social harm.
Black nurse versus racist, pedophilic troon? Immediate KO, the troon wins. Doesn't matter that he's a "bigot." The black nurse might have had a fighting chance if she were a troon too, but alas.
Woman raped or assaulted by Persons of Houselessness? You already know.
A few months ago there were some lesbians beaten up by a gang of Syrian refugees in Canada. Guess who won that idpol showdown? The Syrians, with ease.
The shitlib hierarchy is not purely based on identity, it is based on the net social harm caused by that identity.
This logic works even if the calculation is more complex. Take an immigrant hijabi aesthetician who is religiously prohibited from touching the body of a man, and a racist white troon targets her shop and demands she wax his ball hairs.
The example might sound familiar to some, because it really did happen. And the troon ultimately won, as far as the shitlib ideological showdown is concerned.
It doesn’t matter that the hijabi had multiple shitlib credit points (Muslim, brown, female). The troon causes more net social harm on the whole, even if he gets deductions for race and racism.
Criminals, terrorists, and the omnirace swarm will top almost every battle against a generally non-harmful entity. Doesn't matter if they're domestic abusers, or pedophiles, or racists, or sexists, or homophobes... whoever causes the most net social harm will win. Hence why we frequently see truly bizarre outcomes we think would be contradictory to the shitlib ideology but are allowed to thrive without issue - like libfems defending rapists or breadtubers being misogynist or racist. There is no real contradiction so long as the social harm is appropriately ranked.
The only consistent challenger to EVERY potential opponent, even another shitlib pet, is the troon... and I don't mean a preened and relatively "normal" troon - I mean a hairy, fetishistic, porn addicted, pedophile lumberjack in a skirt.
He's currently the overpowered final boss in the shitlib pet issue matchups because he is social harm personified.
We should all fear who or what he will eventually be dethroned by.
As though the shitlib will be confused as to “which side” to take when their ideological toys are fighting.
But they won't. The formula for determining which side the shitlib will support is really very simple: the victor will always be whatever identity causes the most social harm.
Black nurse versus racist, pedophilic troon? Immediate KO, the troon wins. Doesn't matter that he's a "bigot." The black nurse might have had a fighting chance if she were a troon too, but alas.
Woman raped or assaulted by Persons of Houselessness? You already know.
A few months ago there were some lesbians beaten up by a gang of Syrian refugees in Canada. Guess who won that idpol showdown? The Syrians, with ease.
The shitlib hierarchy is not purely based on identity, it is based on the net social harm caused by that identity.
This logic works even if the calculation is more complex. Take an immigrant hijabi aesthetician who is religiously prohibited from touching the body of a man, and a racist white troon targets her shop and demands she wax his ball hairs.
The example might sound familiar to some, because it really did happen. And the troon ultimately won, as far as the shitlib ideological showdown is concerned.
It doesn’t matter that the hijabi had multiple shitlib credit points (Muslim, brown, female). The troon causes more net social harm on the whole, even if he gets deductions for race and racism.
Criminals, terrorists, and the omnirace swarm will top almost every battle against a generally non-harmful entity. Doesn't matter if they're domestic abusers, or pedophiles, or racists, or sexists, or homophobes... whoever causes the most net social harm will win. Hence why we frequently see truly bizarre outcomes we think would be contradictory to the shitlib ideology but are allowed to thrive without issue - like libfems defending rapists or breadtubers being misogynist or racist. There is no real contradiction so long as the social harm is appropriately ranked.
The only consistent challenger to EVERY potential opponent, even another shitlib pet, is the troon... and I don't mean a preened and relatively "normal" troon - I mean a hairy, fetishistic, porn addicted, pedophile lumberjack in a skirt.
He's currently the overpowered final boss in the shitlib pet issue matchups because he is social harm personified.
We should all fear who or what he will eventually be dethroned by.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
