Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Mar 30 22 tweets 4 min read Read on X
🧵With the flurry of federal litigation, I thought it would be helpful for the non-lawyers to provide a brief lawsplainer of federal court system. So, here it goes: Article III of the constitution established 1 Supreme court and such inferior courts as Congress may establish. 1/
2/ Currently there are 94 "district courts" and 13 "courts of appeals," named by their circuit, 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Court of Appeals, through 11th Circuit. There is also a D.C. Circuit Court & a Federal Circuit.
3/ "District court" is the name of the trial court level, where trials are held and if there is a jury trial, where you would have the jury. In the state court system they are called something different in every state, such as New York it's called the "Supreme Court."
4/ Every state has at least one "district" court and some multiple. If you look at this map you can see Illinois has 3, a Northern District, a Central District, and a Southern District. In contrast, Michigan has an Eastern and Western district. uscourts.gov/about-federal-…
5/ At district court level nearly always, 1 judge presides over case & if there is a trial, there's where it happens. Judge is randomly assigned but in district courts have "divisions" and in some divisions there is only 1 judges, so you file in that division you get that judge.
6/ But you can't file anywhere: You can only file in a court that has "jurisdiction," i.e., power, over both the parties (personal jurisdiction) and the subject matter, i.e., type of case. Federal courts are courts of limited subject matter jurisdiction so you only certain cases
7/ can go to a federal court: Plaintiff suing over violation of federal constitution or federal statutes can go to federal court or plaintiff suing for violation of state laws (i.e., negligence, product's liability, etc.) where plaintiff & defendants are citizens of diff. states
8/ and damages > $75,000. (over simplification). All the Trump cases involve a federal question, either US constitution or federal statute so there is subject matter jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction, means jurisdiction over "person" which for federal officials would be
9/ basically every state. BUT then you need "venue" meaning "best" location of all the locations and that typically is division where Plaintiff or Defendant resides. That's why it's easy to bring these cases in D.C. District Court because government resides there.
10/ The district courts are the lowest level of federal courts. The losing party has a right to appeal to a federal appellate court, also called circuit courts, courts of appeals, or by their circuit name, i.e. 7th Circuit. Congress gave these appellate courts jurisdiction over
11/ appeals from district court's located within their borders. Again, look at the map. So the 7th Cir. (where I worked ~25 years) hears appeals from 7 district courts: E.D. WI, W.D. WI, N.D.ILL. C.D. Ill., S.D. Ill., and N.D. IN, & S.D. IN.uscourts.gov/about-federal-…
12/ Appellate courts decide appeals, typically through 3 judge panels. No witnesses, no juries, just lawyers arguing to judges. Sometimes "entire" court sits which is "en banc" although 9th circuit is so large en banc is larger group of judges (11ish--not all of 20-plus judges.)
13/ When a Court of Appeals issues a decision it is binding precedent and all lower courts within that circuit MUST follow the holding. So if the 5th Cir. decides a question, the N.D. of Texas must follow that holding but not the N.D. of IN. And 9th Cir. need not follow 3rd Cir.
14/ When circuit courts disagree on law, it is called a "split in the circuits" and typically that will prompt the Supreme Court granting certiorari ("cert") to decide the issue. Supreme Court doesn't need to take a case, though, as in nearly all cases review is discretionary.
15/ In addition to the circuits that hear appeals from district court, the federal circuit hears appeals regarding certain types of cases, like patents, or appeals from the "Court of Claims" (lawsuits against federal government for breach of contract).
16/ D.C. Circuit hears appeals from the D.C. District Court. Also, the Circuit Courts of Appeals hear appeals from agencies, so aliens challenging there removals go from the immigration proceedings to the 7th Cir. for instance, or from the NLRB a dispute of unfair labor practices
17/ goes to the 6th Cir. Weather sirens going off back.
18/ (Okay, just thunderstorm warning, no tornado.) So, to bring this home: There have been more than 100 cases filed against Trump Administration throughout US in district courts. We now have about 20 cases that are at the appellate level.
19/ Generally you can only appeal after the case is finished at the trial level but you can also appeal from a preliminary injunction. TYPICALLY a TRO (temporary restraining order) cannot be appealed, which is why we haven't had many appeals yet.
20/ But as the TROs are turned into Preliminary Injunctions, they can be appealed. In reality though, the TROs are really Preliminary Injunctions which is Trump has tried to (and in some cases) succeeded on the appeals.
21/ With appeals now moving forward, the circuit courts will start issuing mandatory precedent which means that the district courts will be required to follow that precedent. And so every time an appellate court slaps down an injunction, other similar injunctions will fall.
22/ Obviously, there's much more detail to every point, but that summary should provide the basics. I'm open for questions. GO.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Apr 1
THREADETTE: THIS. AND we still don't know 2 key points: WHAT prompted Aspen Institute to run "table top exercise" to "prebunk" story amazingly similar to reality. AND why was Baltimore FBI agent running keyword searches to flag disinformation for Twitter? /1
2/ It wasn't merely FBI feeding "hack and leak" warnings to social media. THAT IS HUGE STORY & we need to know if folks doing that knew of Hunter Biden laptop OR were fed idea of hack and leak by someone who did. BUT also what/who prompted Aspen Institute's focus on Hunter.
3/ Here's my reporting on that aspect that I've yet to see anyone else pick up on. ALSO note that many "disinfo" experts say prebunking as MOST effective counter to folks believing disinformation, or here truth. thefederalist.com/2023/02/09/twi…
Read 5 tweets
Mar 31
🚨BREAKING: Harris seeks en banc review in D.C. Circuit after panel granted Trump stay, meaning he Harris stayed fired. More details available in other threads. 1/
3/ Here's a thread for the layman re court procedures:
Read 6 tweets
Mar 31
🚨Here's the docket for the appeal of the lower court's injunction requiring reinstatement of grants, employees, etc. of the Consumer Financial Protection Board. 1/
3/ Trump Administration just filed Motion to Stay injunction. This opener is 🔥🔥🔥 Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 31
🚨Trump Administration files 🔥reply brief in SCOTUS in Dept. of Educ. v. California case. Trump asks for stay & vacatur of order they reinstate grants they terminated. Entire brief is worth a read for those knee-deep. A few topline take-aways. 1/
2/ Brief highlights absolute abuse of TROs & details cases where orders entered and illustrates why district court's lack jurisdiction over broad swatch of cases & basically begs SCOTUS to put an end to it.
3/ That portion confirms my point that once SCOTUS (or appellate courts) establish precedent on specific issues the lawfare will be greatly reduced. And here, as I've stressed before, the issue is Plaintiffs manufacturing claims under Administrative Procedures Act.
Read 5 tweets
Mar 30
🚨Trump's response in opposition to stay notes another case had been filed recently challenging Trump's firing of an executive branch officials. In Slaughter v. Trump, Slaughter & Bedoya challenged Trump's firing of them from Federal Trade Commission. 1/
3/ Keep eye on how judges handle Slaughter & Grundmann cases now that D.C. Circuit Court has held Trump is likely to succeed in Harris & Wilcox cases which involved same issues. At minimum, Grundmann judge should grant Trump stay of injunction ordering Grundmann's reinstatement.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 29
NEW🧵of cases against Trump Administration where proceedings have reached Supreme Court. 1/
2/ Office of Personnel Management v. American Federation of Government Employees, 24A904: Trump Admin. seeks stay & vacatur of N.D. of Cal., injunction ordering ~ 6 agencies to offer to reinstate 16,000 fired probationary employees. supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?fi…
3/Trump v. New Jersey, 24A886: Trump Admin. seeks partial stay of D.Ct. of Mass. "nationwide" injunction prohibiting Trump from giving affect to his EOs denying birthright citizenship; requests SCOTUS limit injunction to district. supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?fi…
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(