🧵BOMBSHELL: Hamas’ new March 2025 fatality list quietly drops 3,400 fully “identified” deaths listed in its Aug & Oct 2024 reports—including 1,080 children. These "deaths" never happened. The numbers were falsified—again. Examples, analysis and evidence: 1/
What happened? How did 1000s of supposedly confirmed, fully identified deaths just vanish? Were some actually missing persons? Sloppy records? Intentional deception? Hamas’ Ministry of Health was never reliable. Expect Hamas' many “list defenders” to come up with excuses. 2/
Fact is, from day one, Hamas has gamed the fatality data—from including 471 fake “deaths” at al-Ahli Hospital in the official count, to claiming 70% of fatalities were women & children (then quietly backing off). Managed fakery, dressed up as precision—just like in past wars. 3/
When @HJS_Orgpublished “Questionable Counting” by @Mr_Andrew_Fox (to which I contributed), critics claimed the errors in Hamas’ lists were minor—not systemic. Now, with thousands more false deaths exposed, the errors are no doubt systemic. 4/ henryjacksonsociety.org/publications/q…
Is the March 2025 list suddenly credible? No. Dropping names doesn’t equal accuracy. It includes ~8,000 natural deaths; by now it's clear after 16 months Hamas is not keeping a separate list. Hamas may be adding real IDs to match fake casualty claims then removing them later. 5/
Hamas has falsified fatality data in past wars, as this thread shows—despite the claims of its defenders, who wrongly insist Hamas has always been accurate, and even falsely claim that Israel accepts Hamas data as reliable. 6/
For the skeptics: rest of thread shows screenshots of PDFs showing the ID numbers for all 1,080 fatalities of children fully identified by Hamas (names, full IDs, ages) in Aug & Oct 2024 lists (out of 3,374 total including adult deaths), that are now missing from Mar 2025 list:
More of the 1080 children who were removed from the fatality list: END
For the record on this thread: Days after this post, a Sky New journalist with direct access to the "Ministry of Health" appears to have asked them why were these names removed. I doubt this would have happened if my thread did not get international coverage, mainly from The Telegraph and then many other news outlets (e.g. Fox News). The answer is detailed in the Sky News article linked below. The answer, according to the MoH official, is the inclusion of natural deaths and other deaths that were "false claims" by families and other people found to be alive. The removal of 1000s of names that was uncovered in my post was thus affirmed. So it may in fact be the case that some of the deaths on the list that were removed did happen (meaning the person did die), just not due to the war, but from natural causes. The admission of natural deaths by the MoH is a massive change in the narrative of Hamas' fatality counts, as for 18 months this was vehemently denied, and Hamas' "list defenders" went along with this, insisting that no way, no how, was Hamas including natural deaths. The lack of a separate list after 18 months should by now tell us that the cause of death has not been known for many of the deaths, and all deaths in Gaza were added to the lists since day 1. According to some sources, Hamas will release a "natural death" list in the next month -- but if they know who is a war death, then by definition they know who is a natural death, so why wait 18 months? Because the lists are all gamed and curated to tell the story Hamas wants to tell. news.sky.com/story/thousand…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵INTENTIONAL STARVATION by Israel is among Gaza’s core blood libels. UN's own data proves food entering during war matched pre-war levels; Israeli data shows far more especially during ceasefire. But no matter the evidence, the lie persists. Here are the facts. Sources⬇️1/
UN OCHA itself—not Israel nor “hasbaraists”—affirmed that 40,655 trucks of aid entered Gaza 10/2023-12/2024, about 80% food. That’s ~75 trucks/day of only food, matching pre-war levels. See source & UN chart for truck data: 2/ ochaopt.org/content/report…
But UN admits, in same source, that it did not count private sector trucks. COGAT records 63,700 total trucks with 49,600 of food from 10/2023-12/2024. That's ~110 trucks/day or 50% ABOVE pre-war levels. Simply impossible to claim starvation strategy. 3/ gaza-aid-data.gov.il/main/
đź§µEconomist released article claiming perhaps 109,000 Gaza deaths based on Jan 2025 "study" in Lancet. The study's "capture-recapture" analysis has proven flawed. Also, 900 deaths relied upon by the Lancet study were removed by Hamas in March 2025, invalidating the results. 1/
Lancet study used Hamas' June 2024 fatality list to match up deaths with 2 other lists, a sensitive analysis that matches deaths. But in March 2025 Hamas removed ~900 deaths from the June list which the study relied upon. The study is no longer valid. 2/
This thread highlights another set of major flaws in the "capture-recapture" analysis and the inside information that the study's authors received directly from Hamas' Ministry of Health. 3/
🧵Hamas→ Al Jazeera→ Int'l media reported that an IDF airstrike hit the Thai restaurant in Gaza yesterday killing many. But entire incident is FAKE, easily proven, as the restaurant, under a white tent, is fully intact. Videos show "fatalities" moving. Evidence & sources: 1/
Middle East Eye issued a video of strike's aftermath, killing “women & infants” inside the place according to “witnesses.” Somehow tent roofing isn't even torn, mounted TVs & lighting are intact after an airstrike hit this exact location. Here are some still shots from video. 2/
Other videos (sources at end of thread) show lots of “dead” men inside, none with any visible injuries, not even torn clothes—yet mortally wounded after an airstrike. Worker recounts how he could not tell how many bodies were pulled out of restaurant. But the curtains are OK. 3/
🧵Hamas' human shield strategy is exposed in a groundbreaking new report by @HJS_Org. All NGO & UN reports omits this "missing chapter" because it proves Hamas is to blame for civilian harm in Gaza. @Mr_Andrew_Fox and I co-authored. Some key details: 1/ henryjacksonsociety.org/publications/h…
Hamas’ human shield strategy encompasses 10 distinct strategies, overlapping, that by design blur the line between combatant & civilian, so that the presence of civilians impede IDF attacks. It is intended to result in civilian casualties when Israel strikes Hamas targets. 2/
Most importantly in the report, massive & detailed evidence has been provided for each element of the strategy which is why it runs to 87 pages. The evidence is indisputable—very often from Hamas’ own videos. Only Hamas supporters & apologists will continue to deny it. 3/
Right now we're supposed to believe that breastfed infants are literally dying of starvation because Israel did not allow food into Gaza, while nearby gourmet cake shops & restaurants are actively serving Gazans. There are dozens of these videos daily, it's not an anomaly.
Here is an example of a fake claim of infant death by supposedly literal starvation, I won't show photo. Whatever happened is likely from pre-existing condition unrelated to literal lack of food. ~50 of these out of 60,000 births in Gaza in last 12 months have been recorded.
Several UN and NGO sources confirm about 60,000 births in Gaza in last 12 months, equal to or above pre-war pace.
đź§µNew report by @HJS_Org further evidences Hamas faked Gaza fatality numbers and hid combatants killed (specific evidence shown). Even so, Hamas data shows IDF targeted combatants. Also: foreign doctors working in Gaza lied to media about what they saw. Some key revelations: 1/
It’s already been shown that 72% of combat aged fatalities were men. New report offers more data, such as for Khan Younes deaths only. Adult men were killed at a 5x rate versus adult women – again proving no indiscriminate attacks by Israel (if so, it would be close to 1:1). 2/
As the war went on, the IDF "hit rate" on combatants went up significantly. From Oct 24 to Mar 25, 76% of new fatalities reported were male, with a large majority combat age, as chart below shows. 3/