Singapore created the world's most efficient healthcare system from scratch in one generation.
They spend $4,000 per person on healthcare. We spend $15,000.
Their secret?
The exact opposite of what American "experts" recommend: 🧵
2/ First, the stats that matter for context:
• Pre-1960: Singapore had <50 medical specialists for 2M residents
• 1964: GDP of $0.89B
• 1983: GDP grew to $18B
• 2011: Nearly $279.4B
This economic foundation was crucial. Here's why:
3/ Lee Kuan Yew's key insight (from his Cambridge days studying Britain's NHS):
Free healthcare sounds civilized, until you understand human behavior and system incentives.
So, the government made a counterintuitive choice in 1960s:
4/ They ranked healthcare 5th in priority, after:
• International recognition
• Defense capabilities
• Economic development
• Housing
Why? Building wealth creates resources for healthcare.
5/ Here's their secret weapon most analysts miss:
The "outpatient dispensary" network.
They built satellite clinics (small healthcare facilities that are extensions of larger hospitals or healthcare centers) offering immunization, health screening, family planning, and psychiatric counseling.
All before investing in expensive hospitals.
6/ The data proves this worked. Success metric?
They moved most primary care away from expensive hospitals to these clinics that former Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan called "low-hanging fruit."
High return on low investment.
7/ 1983 was the inflection point. The first National Health Plan introduced Medisave.
Every employee contributes a portion of their monthly salary to a personal account.
After age 50, rates decrease. This creates individual responsibility without abandoning collective support.
8/ What makes their hospital system unique?
Public hospitals have autonomy like private ones.
Their prices set a benchmark for private hospitals, and the government keeps control through MOH Holdings.
Result: Competition without chaos.
9/ The price transparency experiment is fascinating:
All healthcare providers in Singapore must display their prices and outcomes so that buyers can assess the cost and quality.
Why? MOH published all hospital prices online.
Markets work when consumers have information.
10/ They solved the "free rider" problem with this solution:
• Basic clinic visit: 50 cents
• Doubled on holidays
(It's pricier now)
Small co-pays prevent abuse while maintaining access. When people paid for antibiotics, they finished the course instead of wasting them.
11/ Modern polyclinics are one-stop centers handling:
Most doctors won't tell you this, but this weight loss comes with a terrible price.
Here's the real truth about Ozempic: 🧵
2/ Let's be clear: Ozempic is everywhere.
Half of Hollywood is on it. Your favorite celebrities swear by it. It's the "miracle" weight loss solution du jour.
But America has a long, dark history with weight loss drugs.
And we never seem to learn. Now you will 👇🏽
3/ Since WWI, we've been chasing the weight loss dragon:
1940s: Benzedrine (an amphetamine)
1950s: HCG (hormone from pregnant women)
1960s: Obetrol (now sold as Adderall)
2004: FDA banned ephedra (after heart attacks and strokes)
As a new administration comes in, I expect to hear more about how banning seed oils or disincentivizing ultraprocessed foods is "unscientific".
Here's the story of how "scientific consensus" kept trans fats legal for 60 years:
2/ Modern medicine excels at acute care.
Car accident? You're in good hands.
But with nutrition science, research has been corrupted by corporate interests, leading to decades of harmful dietary guidelines.
3/ Trans fats are the perfect example of this corruption.
Throughout the 40s and 50s, trans fats were added to processed foods to increase shelf stability and flavor, and were marketed as a “healthy alternative” to saturated fats.
There are 40,000+ chemicals in American products, food, and water that have never been safety tested.
And tens of thousands more toxic chemicals (like glyphosate) that are considered safe due to low exposure levels.
Ever wonder how these safe exposure levels are determined?
Spoiler: It's not as scientific as you'd hope.
The process, roughly, goes like this:
-ChemCo invents a chemical that makes your eggs not stick
-ChemCo runs their own tests, tells FDA it's safe
-The novel chemical hits the market
This is almost literally what happened with Dupont and Teflon
Though with Teflon, Dupont had internal testing showing Teflon gave employees cancer, and their children birth defects