The President has absolute authority to remove enemy aliens — and has for over 200 years.
Arguments about due process, removal orders, and vetting are IRRELEVANT.
Here’s the truth the left doesn’t want you to know. 🧵👇
/2 Nearly 75 years ago, the Supreme Court clearly explained that the President acts at the height of his authority when acting under the express authorization of Congress or pursuant to his constitutional authority.
/3 The Supreme Court affirmed that when the President exercises a core Article II power, it “disables the Congress from acting upon the subject,” and the “Courts have no power to control the President's discretion.”
/4 The invocation of the Alien Enemies Act is such a case.
Congress delegated to the President plenary authority to remove any alien from an invading or hostile nation.
/5 There is a difference between:
➡️ The Alien Enemies Act
➡️ The Immigration and Nationality Act
These are two different sources of authority for the President to remove people from the United States. Further, the limitations of the INA do not apply to the AEA.
/6 Recall the use of “Title 42” during the COVID-19 pandemic.
This allowed the government to rapidly expel illegal border crossers because of the public health concern.
Those people were not put into “immigration proceedings” under Title 8 because Title 42 provided an independent basis to remove them from the United States.
The same goes for the AEA.
/7 Similar to Title 42’s grant of discretion to declare a public health emergency, with the AEA, Congress delegated complete discretion to the Executive Branch to determine when enemy aliens pose a public safety risk, and empowered the President to remove them immediately.
/8 Both Title 42 and the AEA are separate and independent authorities from the Immigration and Nationality Act, codified in Title 8 of our laws.
/9 What does this mean?
It means:
➡️ “Due process” arguments are irrelevant
➡️ Deportation orders are irrelevant
➡️ Being “vetted” is irrelevant
➡️ Temporary Protective Status is irrelevant
Why?
Because none of the “normal immigration laws” apply to AEA removals.
/10 Under the AEA, the only question is if the alien is from the invading country.
If they are, the statute says they can be removed.
/11 The AEA vests the exclusive authority in the President to make this determination.
/12 In this case, President Trump limited his invocation of the statute to members of TdA even though he could have declared, and still has the power to declare, that any Venezuelan could be removed under the AEA.
/13 But the President’s determination of who is a member of TdA is not reviewable.
Law enforcement and national security are “core executive functions,” and Congress has given explicit authorization.
“Courts have no power to control the President’s discretion.”
/14 Some have argued that those removed are entitled to “due process” or were “lawfully admitted” or “already vetted.”
These arguments are false.
The Courts have spoken with unmistakable clarity: those removed under the AEA are not entitled to any due process of law
/15 @VP Vance has already displayed the fallacy of the “already vetted” argument.
@VP /16 Most of these aliens were not “lawfully admitted.”
They were allowed to enter illegally by the Biden Administration, which let 11 million illegal aliens enter through catch and release and historic abuses of the “parole authority.”
/17 But even if those arguments were true, it still wouldn’t matter because those “due process” arguments apply to Immigration and Nationality Act removals, not to the Alien Enemies Act.
/18 In the end, the courts cannot review the executive’s classification of members of TdA.
The President has the authority, through congressional authorization and his commander-in-chief powers, to expel any Venezuelans he determines have invaded the United States.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“Kristen Clarke, who headed up the Justice Department office that prosecuted pro-lifers for protesting abortion clinics, met with leaders at the Southern Poverty Law Center, which compares mainstream conservative and Christian groups to the Ku Klux Klan, documents suggest.”
“The meeting may shed light on the animus that Clarke—then the DOJ’s assistant attorney general for civil rights—harbored against conservatives.”
“According to emails obtained through the Freedom of Information Act by America First Legal and provided to The Daily Signal, Clarke planned to meet with SPLC leadership on Monday, March 6, 2023.”
/1🚨BREAKING — A federal court just DENIED IBM’s attempt to dismiss AFL’s lawsuit over the company’s illegal race and sex-based discrimination.
This is a huge victory in the fight to END unlawful DEI policies across corporate America.
/2 The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan rejected IBM’s motion to dismiss AFL’s lawsuit, which alleges IBM engaged in illegal race and sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
/3 AFL filed the lawsuit in August 2024, alleging IBM violated federal law by systematically discriminating against white male employees and firing AFL’s client — a model employee with stellar performance reviews — to further illegal DEI quotas based on race and sex.
/1🚨Did Attorney General Merrick Garland lie to Congress about DOJ’s involvement in the politically-motivated prosecution of President Trump?
Newly released records reveal troubling contradictions — and raise serious questions.
/2 On March 27, 2023, AFL launched an investigation to determine if the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) coordinated with New York County District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s Office in the politically-motivated prosecution of President Trump.
/3 AFL requested all communications between specific custodians at the New York County District Attorney’s Office and DOJ mentioning President Trump.
/1🚨BREAKING — AFL and @RepBrandonGill just filed an amicus brief supporting President Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act to expel dangerous Tren de Aragua terrorists and defend Americans from the gang’s deadly invasion.
/2 The Alien Enemies Act (AEA) gives the President unilateral authority to determine when the United States is facing an invasion, to identify the foreign terrorists involved, and expel them.
/3 Courts have repeatedly upheld this presidential power, ruling that the President’s decision to invoke the AEA is not subject to judicial review.
New documents expose how the Venezuelan TERRORIST gang Tren de Aragua INVADED the U.S. under the Biden-Harris Admin’s open border.
/2 AFL uncovered an “Officer Safety Situational Awareness Bulletin” prepared by the Colorado State Patrol’s (CSP) Smuggling, Trafficking, and Interdiction Section (STIS) on Tren de Aragua (TdA).
/3 These records were uncovered as part of AFL’s nationwide investigation into Tren de Aragua — now designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.
/1🚨BREAKING — Explosive new documents expose a massive government-backed censorship operation orchestrated by USAID, the Global Engagement Center, the UK government, and media firms to manipulate public discourse and silence Americans.
/2 The documents reveal the Global Engagement Center (GEC), the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the UK government, and media groups working together to conduct mass censorship under the guise of “misinformation,” “disinformation,” and “malinformation.”
/3 AFL obtained the documents through ongoing litigation against the U.S. Department of State’s GEC.