Any time I comment on these shoes, someone replies: "What am I supposed to wear? Those are so comfy!"
This is reasonable. But if you want to wear more traditional footwear, here are some suggestions on how to find a comfortable pair. 🧵
First, nothing is going to be as comfy as sneakers. Those are pillows built on marshmallow clouds. But it's also not true that traditional leather shoes have to be painful. For generations, men wore leather soles for sport and long walks.
In fact, John Lobb of St. James in London still calls some of their derbies "navvy cut." The term navvy is short for navigator, which is a working class laborer during the 19th century who worked on civil engineering projects, such as canals and railways.
My favorite dress shoe style is the Norwegian split toe, a navvy style. I like them partly because of their rugged history and because they're worn by men whose style I admire. IMO, they look best when the apron and split toe seam have been handsewn, not machine sewn.
So what changed? How is that men wore leather shoes for generations—including working class laborers and politicians—and yet so many find them uncomfortable today? Some of it is about expectations: men who wear sneakers all the time are used to a certain level of comfort.
At the same time, the market has also changed. It used to be that you could walk into a traditional clothier (sometimes custom tailoring shop) and feel confident you'd get a good suit. But as the demand for suits has dried up, so have these shops.
The same is true for traditional shoes. There simply aren't that many stores nowadays that sell quality leather shoes. Thus, without the help of sales associates, you have to do a lot of the heavy lifting (as is true for clothes).
This starts with knowing how shoes are made.
To find a good pair of shoes, you need to recognize signs of quality. On a basic level, the uppers should be made from full grain leather, which has the natural grain of the hide. Corrected grain means a subpar leather was sanded down and coated. This coating doesn't age well.
The soles should also be sewn on, either through a Goodyear welted, Blake stitched, or hand-welted method. This is better than gluing the soles to the upper (the most common method). When the soles wear down, you can unstitch and replace them. It's like replacing tires on a car.
Goodyear welted shoes also have corking to fill the hollow space created by the welt. This cork takes the impression of your feet over time, making the shoes *more* comfortable with wear. Cheap shoes have foam that feels good on day one, but eventually breaks down.
I strongly believe that the main reason why people find traditional shoes uncomfortable is because they don't know how to find shoes that fit (same with clothes). Many people are going off their sneaker size. Or the shoe size they took when they were 16 years old. Feet change!
To figure out your shoe size, you need to get measured on a Brannock device. This will give you a number (length) and letter (width).
If you're a 10D in US sizing, this means 10 length and medium width (D is medium here). But in the UK, this same size is 9E, as E is their medium
Your Brannock is just your starting point. Different shoe companies will have different sizing systems. To complicate things, you also need to know their lasts. A last is the wood or plastic form over which the uppers are pulled. This defines the shape of the shoe.
Check out these charts for the different lasts at Alden and Vass (two well regarded dress shoe companies). If you try a 10D in Alden's Aberdeen last and find it's pinching your pinky toe, maybe you should move up to the Hampton, Leydon, or Barrie last. They have more space.
On the other hand, if you feel tightness across the top of the shoes, consider going up in width. This will give you more circumference around the uppers. If you're buying cap toes, check if the creases going into the cap. If so, consider sizing down in length. Shoes are too long
Many people see shoes like this and think the toes must be cramped. Not true! Your toes aren't in this area. When judging the fit, pay attention to the fit from the ball of your foot to the heel. This should align with the shoes.
Far and away, your best bet is to go to a store that sells good shoes. Unfortunately, this number is dwindling. There's Leffot (NYC), Gentlemen's Footwear (San Diego), and brand shops like Alden, Carmina, Crockett & Jones, and Meermin (the most affordable).
Going to a store means getting good service. They will help you find a pair that fits and explain how something was made. Sadly, if you're not in a major city, this process is harder. You prob have to shop online, which means looking up info in communities like StyleForum.
I'll end with this: when I was on StyleForum, a fellow member worked at Crockett & Jones. He was also an avid fisherman who trekked along a small coastal path for days and slept in a cave to get to his fishing spots. While climbing and hiking, he wore C&J leather shoes.
To be sure, these were special shoes: Crockett & Jones Snowden, which are field boots made with waxed uppers, bellow tongues, water-resistant Veldtschoen construction, and lugged rubber soles. But the soles are closer to traditional leather soles than sneakers. And they're comfy.
He also has a pair of split toes that he wear with jeans and tailoring. The key difference is that he can tell when shoes fit and how to spot quality. While traditional shoes are never going to be as comfy as padded sneakers, they don't have to hurt.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's first establish good vs bad ways to think about style. The first pic is correct — style is a kind of social language and you have to figure out what type of person you are. The second pic is stupid bc it takes style as disconnected objects ("this is in" vs "this is out").
I should also note here that I'm only talking about style. I'm not here to argue with you about ergonomics, water bottle holders, or whether something accommodates your Dell laptop. I'm am talking about aesthetics.
Watch these two videos. Then answer these two questions:
— Which of the two men is better dressed?
— How does each come off?
I think Carney is better dressed, partly because his clothes fit better. Notice that his jacket collar always hugs his neck, while Pierre Poilievre's jacket collar never touches him.
The level of craftsmanship that goes into a lot of Japanese menswear simply doesn't exist in the United States. You can do this for many categories — suits, jeans, hats, etc.
In this thread, I will show you just one category: men's shoes 🧵
For this comparison, I will focus on Japanese bespoke shoemaking vs. US ready-to-wear. The level of bespoke craftsmanship shown here simply doesn't exist in the US, so a Japanese bespoke vs. US bespoke comparison would be unfair. US bespoke is mostly about orthopedic work.
So instead, I will focus on the best that the US has to offer: ready-to-wear Alden.
On a basic level, top-end Japanese shoes are better because they are handwelted, whereas Alden shoes are Goodyear welted. The first involves more handwork and can be resoled more often.
In 1999, a group of Haitians were tired of political disorder and dreamed of a better life in the United States. So they built a small, 23-foot boat by hand using pine trees, scrap wood, and used nails. They called the boat "Believe in God." 🧵
In a boat powered by nothing but a sail, they somehow made it from Tortuga Island to the Bahamas (about a 90 mile distance). Then from the Bahamas, they set sail again. But a few days and some hundred miles later, their makeshift boat began to sink.
The men on the boat were so dehydrated this point, one slipped in and out of consciousness, unable to stand. They were all resigned to their death.
Luckily, they were rescued at the last minute by the US Coast Guard.
After this post went viral, I called Caroline Groves, a world-class bespoke shoemaker, to discuss how women's shoes are made. I normally don't talk about womenswear, but I found the information interesting, so I thought I would share what I learned here. 🧵
Footwear is broadly broken into two categories: bespoke and ready-to-wear. In London, bespoke makers, including those for women, are largely focused on traditional styles, such as wingtip derbies and loafers. Emiko Matsuda is great for this.
In Paris, there's Massaro, a historic firm that has been operating since 1894, now owned by Chanel. Their designs are less about creating the women's equivalent of traditional men's footwear and more about things such as heels or creative styles. Aesthetic is still "traditional."
Earlier today, Roger Stone announced his partnership with a menswear company, where together they've released a collection of tailored clothing items.
Here is my review of those pieces. 🧵
The line is mostly comprised of suits and sport coats, supplemented with dress shirts and one pair of odd trousers (tailor-speak for a pair of pants made without a matching jacket). Suits start at $1,540; sport coats are $1,150. One suit is $5,400 bc it's made from Scabal fabric
Let's start with the good points. These are fully canvassed jackets, meaning a free floating canvas has been tacked onto the face fabric to give it some weight and structure. This is better than a half-canvas and fully fused construction, but requires more time and labor.