Why is Heinz Ketchup Called "Tomato Seasoning" in Israel—and How Trump's Tariffs could end up being great for Israelis.
The victims might be the monopolies, Netanyahu and the public might be the victors. This presents huge opportunities for the savvy. Here’s how: (1/8)
When Israel announced a few days ago that it was cancelling all tariffs on American goods, it was essentially bluffing.
There have been virtually no tariffs on American goods for over 30 years. The total amount collected annually was around $40 million — about 0.02% of the Israeli government’s budget. (2/8)
One of the major issues with Israel’s otherwise thriving economy is the high cost of goods, especially groceries, which are on average 50% more expensive than in other OECD countries.
So why hasn't anyone taken advantage of the obvious arbitrage opportunity? If there are no tariffs on American goods, wouldn’t enterprising individuals flood the Israeli market with American products, bringing prices down to U.S. levels (plus shipping and local distribution)? (3/8)
Because the problem was never tariffs it’s the myriad other trade barriers, implemented by a government heavily lobbied by local conglomerates (who also happen to be the biggest advertisers in Israeli media).
Two examples: (4/8)
Imagine you're a local ketchup producer — say, Osem. Your ketchup doesn’t taste great, and you can’t compete with Heinz, which benefits from global economies of scale. Then Heinz lands in the market. What do you do? Compete on price? Improve your formula?
Of course not. Instead, you use lobbyists and friendly bureaucrats (some of whom wouldn’t mind a future seat on your board) to create a new legal definition of "ketchup" — one that only your product fits. Heinz, suddenly, is no longer allowed to market itself as ketchup. If they want to stay in the game, they have to relabel as “Tomato Seasoning.” And so it was. (5/8)
Now imagine you're one of only two small farms in Israel growing pineapples. The climate is poor for growing pineapples, and pineapples are labor-intensive, so your costs are high. But then how come big, juicy pineapples in the UK (with higher labor costs and worse weather) sell for $3, while scrawny, sad pineapples in Israel cost $12?
You guessed it: you’re not in the pineapple business. You’re in the lobbying and bureaucracy business. For 30 years, you’ve fought to make pineapple imports as complicated and expensive as possible — and you've succeeded.
(After much public pressure, the pineapple market was opened up partially, leading to an instant halving in the price of pineapples.)
And these are just two examples out of thousands. In each case, the result is the same: a quiet, steady transfer of wealth from consumers to producers, bureaucrats, and conglomerates. (6/8)
Often, it doesn’t even protect local jobs. In many cases, the beneficiaries are merely exclusive importers.
Tariffs were never the issue. The real barriers are the bogus certification requirements and restrictive import licensing, which vested interests use to block foreign competition. Simply allowing American or European certified goods (whose standards are generally higher anyway) to enter Israel freely and without limit would revolutionize the Israeli market — to the enormous benefit of consumers.
The Israeli Standards Institute replicates the work of EU and US standards bodies, but for the tiny Israeli market. This is great for its well paid employees, but bad for Israel. (7/8)
The government could eliminate most of this nonsense tomorrow, and over 90% of the public would support it. The only reason it doesn’t happen is because a huge share of Israeli lobbying power — and media ad revenue — is tied to keeping things exactly the way they are.
Netanyahu is, at heart, a free-marketeer. Interestingly, the major conglomerates are mostly aligned with his political opponents. Passing a law that would let Walmart, for example, open 100 stores and sell its full range of products at 30% of what Israelis currently pay would make him wildly popular.
The Trump tariffs might just be the excuse needed to finally make this happen. Vested interests that have blocked this for decades could be told: “Sorry, Trump forced our hand.”
As a bonus, here is a hilariously prescient article from @rntamir in 2021... (8/8)
One option to butter up the Ameircan admin might be to cut the duties and luxury tax on American imported cars—perhaps specifically or especially on ELECTRIC CARS 😉—this would please all the right people in all the right places without any major shock to Israeli producers...
Not a bad summary from Grok.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As Francesca Albanese tries to revive BDS—just as Arab states clamour for peace & trade with Israel—few have noticed that next week (July 9) marks 20 years since the BDS movement set out to defeat Israel by isolating & boycotting it. 🧵
So let’s review the results: (1/8)
Over that period, Israel has overtaken all the major European nations in terms of GDP per capita and now boasts the sixth highest GDP per capita in the world, of all nations with 10 million population or more. (2/8)
Far from being isolated, the Israeli passport is now one of the most powerful in the world: Israelis enjoy visa-free or visa-on-arrival access to 170 countries, ranking 19th globally, and that is set to expand along with the Abraham Accords. (3/8)
There are three goals for the war. Forcing Israel to end the war prematurely means you can only pick two:
1. Bring home the last 20 hostages (and the 30 bodies being held as bargaining chips).
2. Ensure Hamas can never again pose a strategic threat to Israel.
3. Free the two million Gazans from Hamas— a prerequisite for any form of meaningful rebuilding.
Israel has already achieved point 2. Hamas is now permanently boxed in behind a large buffer zone, and even a small IDF presence with close surveillance ensures they can never rearm or threaten Israelis again.
So, from a purely cynical Israeli perspective, a deal that ends the hostage situation in return for allowing Hamas to remain in some form of power might be acceptable. True, they won't be able to claim "Total Victory" while Hamas still rules the rubble and terrorizes its own people—but Total Victory would have come with Total Responsibility, and a new set of risks. For most Israelis, “We reduced them to a harmless (to us) rabble” is victory enough.
The people who have been clamoring for a ceasefire since 2023 always supported Hamas. They never cared a jot for the Gazans, whom they saw only as useful tools. If they had even an ounce of humanity—or even common sense—they would recognize that Hamas is now only a threat to the Gazans themselves, and that a Total Israeli Victory is what they should be calling for too.
Note that this would be the same policy Israel took in Lebanon and Iran. Bringing about regime change immediately via military force is neither easy nor desirable. Better, reduce the enemy threat to you to something manageable in the long term, and let the locals fight it out.
On set today with Inbal Rabin-Lieberman, the 26-year-old heroine whose quick thinking and IDF weapons training meant that her village, Nir Am, was the only one along the Gaza border where none of the residents was killed.
She’s watching today as they film a reenactment of her actions on October 7. She and her team, with only light weapons, killed 70 heavily armed, drugged-up terrorists as they came to murder their families—twelve civilians held the line for four hours.
Remember: this is why they chant "Death to the IDF"—they want these pesky heroes out of the way so the savages can have their fun unmolested.
How do the "Death to the IDF" kids at Glastonbury hold up to young women like Inbal? What have they ever done to protect their families, their communities? What would they do when the barbarians come to scale the fence?
Her 700 neighbours owe her their lives. Including her then unborn nephew, now 18 months, who will one day get to watch the movie about his aunt and how she saved his life.
There are 100 stories like Inbal that could be dramatised into full-length movies, with no need for even a drop of embellishment.
Qatar's Machiavellian schemes have reached a dead end. Can it make a U-turn?🧵
Nobody did more to support Hamas than Qatar—money, propaganda—so when this video of Qataris running from Iranian missiles in terror was shared in a Hamas group, what was the universal reaction? Laughter & joy. (1/7)
Qatar’s strategy was so clever. Whoever thought it up and implemented it is some true genius—or perhaps a very sharp team of Western consultants. They picked every point of influence in the West and made them their dependents.
It's almost as if they read "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion", believed it was real, and decided it to try it themselves. Who knows? That might actually be true, since The Protocols is a bestseller across the Arab world. (2/7)
They worked out which colleges fed into critical nodes—like Georgetown and the State Department—and ploughed money in. Many new recruits in sensitive government departments come fresh from the mad rantings of people like Jonathan AC Brown.
They trained a generation of journalists at their Al Jazeera propaganda network. They bought right-wing and left-wing media, and when they didn’t buy them, they made themselves indispensable—becoming, as with the UK’s failing Sky News, their only major advertising partner. (3/7)
A week into one of the most audacious military operations in history, what is the state of play? Iran is petulantly lashing out, flailing, while Israel is tearing its way through the regime, inflicting 2 to 3 orders of magnitude more damage on Iran than vice versa. 🧵(1/7)
Their attacks are simply depleting their remaining stocks, exposing their launch sites, but doing no damage at all to Israel’s military apparatus. They have killed 22 Israeli civilians, as well as 5 Ukrainians, and done perhaps $50 million worth of property damage.
The cost to them of these attacks, when all is said and done—including the sanctions they forced their people to bear over decades, the R&D, the opportunity cost? Certainly hundreds of billions of dollars. Most of what they built up over 40 years has disappeared in a week. (2/7)
Almost comically, they have sent over 1,000 drones against Israel in the past week, and not a single one has made it through. On their drones, they are zero for a thousand. (3/7)
MEHDI: "Wow! All you had to do to make me like Nazi-apologia fan, & fellow Qatari teet-suckler Tucker, was to stop the IRGC, who promised for 50 years to genocide the Jews, from getting the tools to actually do it! It's almost like a horseshoe!" (1/6)
This is not a coincidence: you can learn a lot about what really matters to someone by what they are willing to compromise on. For example, Netanyahu and Lapid are bitter rivals—but faced with the threat of nuclear annihilation, they come together, because that is the most important issue.
And so too with Mehdi and Tucker: they can also come together around the issue of the nuclear annihilation of Israel. Because that is the true core of their belief systems; everything else is peripheral, secondary. (2/6)
They didn’t realize that their patron in Qatar was just playing a game. Qatar is more threatened by an Iranian nuke than anyone. It isn’t a real country in the traditional sense—it has no real army—and a nuclear Iran would mean the disappearance of the American base that protects it, and the arrival of Shia domination over their Sunni statelet with just 0.5% of the citizenry.
Qatar only wanted Iran to play the bad cop in its great game against Israel, the West, and its Saudi and Emirati rivals. Part of that strategy included Tucker and Mehdi—useful idiots they hired—who genuinely dreamed of a nuclear Iran, not realizing they were merely being used as one of Qatar’s many instruments.
But just as Hamas didn’t realize it was meant to be only a proxy for Iran and went rogue—bringing down the entire Axis of Resistance—the influencers didn’t realize they were just pawns on the chessboard. (3/6)