Gilles Demaneuf Profile picture
Apr 6 12 tweets 5 min read Read on X
You can't make that up..

"Blame" – when the only critical words about Shi Zhengli and Peter Daszak come from a Chinese journalist.💥

Jane Qiu visibly feels uncomfortable. It seems to her as if she is participating in propaganda, she says' Image
In contrast, Variety has a surrealist article:

"Oscar-nominated Swiss director Christian Frei began to experience a feeling that “those who warned us would eventually be the ones who are blamed.

This sentiment, which he calls an “epiphany,” is at the heart of “Blame”. Image
For the inside story, Frei contacted Daszak at end of 2020, to discuss a film project (initially called 'Host').

Shi Zhengli and Linfa Wang, as well as Quammen, were looped in Sep 2020. Image
Then the cast of Daszak, the great Markolin (!!), Jane Qiu, Linfa Wang, Supaporn, was put in place by 2 Dec 2022.
@emilyakopp @R_H_Ebright @janeqiuchina @NZZWissen Image
2022 was when travel was easier, and the filming was able to proceed.

👉🏻 The operation was part of the 'Positive engagement strategy' of Daszak.
@JaEsf @Tantalite @NolwennLF @zeynep Image
👉🏻 That strategy included trips for journalists in fall 2022, at a time when Daszak had a problem with poached Lao samples that ended up in Latinne et al.

A proposed Addendum did not work out, resulting in a retraction/republication which wiped out the intermediate peer-reviews. Image
Image
More details of the filming in 2022. and post-production in 2023.

Also:
👉🏻 25 Feb 2023: 'whatsapp christian [Frei] and philip [Markolin?] re. filming the man who loved China, the hare with the golden eye' [some heavy references here]
👉🏻 Frei visited EHA offices in April 2023. @NZZWissenImage
When Daszak became a 'martyr', the name was changed from 'Host' to 'Blame'.

Quite a bit of a love-fest. Complete lack of distance to the subject.

Using one's brain instead of one's political emotions would have resulted in a better documentary, not a soapy propaganda piece.
Some more details here on the filming:
@NZZWissen
Separate thread for the heavy references in one of the tweets above:
You can read the unrolled version of this thread here: typefully.com/gdemaneuf/qCrI…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gilles Demaneuf

Gilles Demaneuf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gdemaneuf

Apr 5
You can't make that up..

"Blame" – when the only critical words about Shi Zhengli and Peter Daszak come from a Chinese journalist.💥

Jane Qiu visibly feels uncomfortable. It seems to her as if she is participating in propaganda, she says' Image
In contrast, Variety has a surrealist article:

"Oscar-nominated Swiss director Christian Frei began to experience a feeling that “those who warned us would eventually be the ones who are blamed.

This sentiment, which he calls an “epiphany,” is at the heart of “Blame”. Image
For the inside story, Frei contacted Daszak at end of 2020, to discuss a film project (initially called 'Host').

Shi Zhengli and Linfa Wang, as well as Quammen, were looped in Sep 2020. Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 19
Let it be clear:

Farrar did not just sign Daszak's statement of support. He also organized its publication in Lancet.

This happened after he shared a taxi with Daszak back from a WHO conference in Switzerland on 12 Feb 2020.

Here is the never-published proof:
@JeremyFarrar #DRASTICImage
Here Farrar replies it's fine with him, and please send the letter to Richard Horton (editor-in-chief) at Lancet: Image
Horton obviously declined to sign the letter given his position at Lancet.

Was Peter so blinded by his own COI?
Well, Peter even tried to get @DrTedros and Mike Ryan at the WHO to sign his letter:

@R_H_Ebright @Tantalite @KatherineEban @zeynep Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 9
1/12 Nice article by @stephaniebenz and @yohanblavignat summarizing the situation as to the origins debate.

It captures very well the absurd cheap certitudes of the 100% zoonosis fans, and the questions that such a rush to close an existential debate raises.
lexpress.fr/sciences-sante…Image
2/12 If asked, I would say that after the wise 50/50 position that any scientist should have initially considered, most of the developments have been towards a research-related accident, with many predictions there coming true,
3/12 On the contrary, the ground has been weakening under the zoonotic side, with demolished market papers, no animal reservoir identified, and a lot of time wasted on candidate pangolins and racoon dogs.

Flo Debarre is mentioned here as someone jumping to conclusions that are in fact essentially speculations (the whole raccoon dog saga),Image
Read 12 tweets
Dec 28, 2024
1/8 I am relieved to see that @RogerMarshallMD has asked Thomas Monheim, Inspector General of the IC, to look into the integrity of the Intelligence Community's COVID-19 origins assessment process.
marshall.senate.gov/wp-content/upl…Image
Image
2/8 I also asked 2 years ago if DEFUSE was part of the Biden intel evaluation, and, if not, why.
3/8 Sen Marshall asked that very pertinent question to the Intelligence Community (IC) Inspector General: Image
Read 8 tweets
Dec 19, 2024
1/15 As you know, Peter Daszak is Greedy.

In 2023 Daszak was boasting internally that his funding was better than before the pandemic (and, indeed, at $17 min over the year, it was).

Read🧵 below for the details:
@R_H_Ebright @DrJBhattacharya Image
2/15 Research from Billy and me for DRASTIC, with the help of some anonymous friends, all based on legally obtained original documents (h/t @BillyBostickson), provides the internal EHA story.
3/15 Despite a lot of whining by Peter, EHA was not 'in dire straits' in 2022-2023.
projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/org…Image
Read 15 tweets
Dec 4, 2024
1/29 In September 2021, we released DEFUSE with the original rejection letter, plus our 2-pager that detailed the reasons why DEFUSE was turned down:

Potential GoF/DURC work, no risk mitigation plan, no ESLI plan, all with vague deployment in the wild.

assets.ctfassets.net/syq3snmxclc9/5…Image
Image
2/29 @PeterDaszak spent the following 3 years pretending that this was all lies, that the grant was denied just because he asked for too much money, calling DRASTIC conspiracy theorists.

Today's💥bipartisan💥 @COVIDSelect report 💯% confirms what we explained back in Sep 2021. Image
3/29 That bipartisan report also includes many examples of Daszak's lies and obfuscations.


But I'd like to retweet below a thread I published exactly a year ago, based on a source who provided many more details about the rejection.
@emilyakopp oversight.house.gov/wp-content/upl…Image
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(