So over the last two days, the Red Cross released a video that was over 6 minutes long which they state was recorded on a phone of one of the paramedics killed by the IDF in late March.
The video was sent to the NYT who published an article claiming the IDF lied and executed the paramedics from close range in cold blood.
I’m going to show you that the Red Cross, the NYT, and the media and multitude of propagandists who have pushed this story are lying.
The vast majority of the account given by the IDF is true and accurate.
2/
To start with I’m going to add the video being used by the media and propagandists. It’s just 48 seconds long and is deliberately edited and shortened to give a very different perspective and image than what really happened.
3/
Now before I go into the full video, I’m going to provide additional videos so that you as the readers can understand what I’m analysing and showing you.
In the full video, you’ll hear the 5 minutes of gunfire as mentioned in the shorter version.
My analysis found that there were three different types of rifles used during the shootings. You will be able to hear three different distinct sounds, but it’s important to know what it is you’re hearing and why it matters.
4/
Now the first video I’ll show is of two rifles that are most commonly used by Hamas and PIJ terrorists - the AK47, and the M4. Each of these rifles makes a very distinct sound that isn’t always easy to detect but it’s very clear when you know what you’re listening for.
The AK47 uses 7.62 x 39mm rounds. When this rifle is fired, it makes a higher pitch sound with a short ruffled echo.
The M4 uses 5.56 NATO rounds, and makes a lower pitch sound. It’s both a semiautomatic and a full automatic rifle. This is important for when you listen to the full video by the Red Cross.
Put your volume up and if you like, close your eyes and listen to the sounds each rifle makes when fired so that you keep it in memory.
5/
Now one other rifle used by Hamas, but not as common as the first two, is the AR15. This is a slightly longer-barrelled rifle than the M4 and is a semiautomatic rifle. However the M4 is based on the same design and takes the same ammo.
Here is a video with the AK47 and AR15 so you can again hear the difference in sounds, with the AK47 again being higher pitched and the AR15 slightly lower pitched.
6/
Now the next two videos will focus on the IDF rifles. Being a nighttime gunfight, the IDF soldiers would have used suppressors (silencers) as well as NV goggles to allow them to see clearly even in total darkness.
When you hear the sound of rifles using silencers, you can hear what sounds like clicking sounds rather than typical gunfire. And you hear that clicking so clearly throughout this video.
To understand what I mean by clicking, the following two videos will show this. This first video shows a shooter at a range firing an IMI Galil rifle with suppressor. The IDF use the 5.56 NATO rounds as standard with their rifles.
7/
To be thorough, I’ve added a second IDF rifle, the IWI Tavor X95 with 5.56 NATO rounds and a suppressor.
Again you will hear the clear clicking sounds of the rifle when fired with a silencer.
8/
Now with the above videos and sounds in mind (and please feel free to go back to any of the videos again to hear the sounds), below is the full part of the video by the Red Cross that has been omitted by the media and propagandists.
You will hear roughly 5 minutes of gunfire on and off, as well as the voice of the paramedic recording it and sporadically the voices of a few soldiers and other “people” involved in the shootout.
What my analysis has found is:
1. You will hear all three distinct sounds of the three different rifles.
2. You will hear the clear difference between rifle fire from rifles with and without suppressors.
3. You will clearly hear gunfire both originating close to the phone going away from the phone, as well as gunfire from a distance coming towards the phone. This is important as it shows that this was a shootout between two sets of armed forces - the IDF and armed terrorists.
4. From 00:01 to 00:23 you hear a barrage of several rifles firing at once and the distinctive clicking sound showing that these are shots using silencers.
5. At 00:26 you then hear a different rifle sound without a silencer.
6. At 01:48 there is a burst of gunfire that can easily be heard being fired from two different directions, with both the sounds of the higher pitched AK47 without a silencer as well as the clicking of the rifles with a silencer. At 02:06 you hear semiautomatic gunfire without a silencer.
7. At 02:48 you hear a 6 second burst of multiple clicking sounds denoting rifle fire with silencers.
8. At 03:56 you hear a further two-way gunfight with the different rifles being used simultaneously from different positions. Again this denotes a shootout between two parties.
9. At 04:04 you clearly hear rifle fire without suppression followed shortly after with the clicking sound of rifle fire with suppression. This continues for 7 seconds then stops for 7 seconds and starts again at 04:18 where again you hear the different weapons being fired from different positions. This continues for the next 52 seconds.
9/
Hopefully this thread and analysis was able to shed some much needed light on what really transpired and may help with any investigations into this incident.
I hope you found this informative and as interesting as it was for me to analyze and write it.
Tagging a few people who may feel free to add any further comments:
If you value truth, then I encourage you to read all of this and share it. And yes, that includes you too @elonmusk @DouglasKMurray @bariweiss @KonstantinKisin @benshapiro @BillAckman and @GadSaad.
The claim that Zionism and Israel caused the conflict is a LIE.
The full history shows the opposite.
Jews were massacred, raped, and driven from their communities in this land for centuries before any Zionist movement existed.
The Palestinian victim narrative depends on erasing that record.
2/
In 1517, during the Ottoman conquest, Jewish communities in Safed and Hebron were attacked.
Jews were killed, raped, burned alive and looted. Survivors fled.
No Zionism. No Jewish state. No occupation.
Just Jews living as a minority under Muslim rule and being targeted.
3/
In the 1660s, Safed and Tiberias were devastated during local power struggles.
Jewish homes and communities were destroyed. Communities massacred.
Jews were driven out again.
This is one of the most important assessments I’ve written which I encourage both @IsraeliPM @netanyahu as well as US Federal Government Agencies @StateDept @SecretService @DHSgov @WhiteHouse to consider.
2/
STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT: HYPOTHETICAL LOCAL ENFORCEMENT ATTEMPT AGAINST ISRAELI PRIME MINISTER NETANYAHU BY NEW YORK CITY AUTHORITIES AND THE RESULTING DOMESTIC SECURITY, OPERATIONAL, AND SOCIETAL FRACTURE RISKS
(MorEdge Insight Analysis – 24 July 2026)
Pattern analysis of recent public statements and positioning by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani regarding the International Criminal Court arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reveals a consistent willingness to elevate symbolic confrontation over legal and operational constraints.
Mamdani has publicly conceded the absence of independent municipal authority to execute the warrant while simultaneously framing Netanyahu as a war criminal, calling for federal enforcement, declaring him unwelcome, and encouraging protest activity around the expected September UN General Assembly visit.
This posture, when combined with the mayor’s documented historical rhetoric toward the New York Police Department and alignment with ideological currents hostile to both Israeli security doctrine and conventional American law-enforcement institutions, generates a set of plausible high-risk scenarios whose second- and third-order effects merit formal assessment.
3/
In the baseline hypothetical in which municipal authorities attempt physical detention of Netanyahu as a publicity or political signaling action despite acknowledged lack of authority, the immediate operational environment would feature a layered Israeli protective detail (Shin Bet primary with Mossad liaison elements) operating in coordination with US Diplomatic Security Service and residual federal protective assets.
Protective doctrine prioritizes principal extraction and denial of custody under all but lawful federal process. Any sudden approach by NYPD officers, or hired civilian activist, would be assessed by the detail as an active threat vector, triggering immediate force application calibrated to create distance and secure the principal.
The resulting kinetic contact, whether limited to physical interdiction, vehicle extraction, or higher levels of force, carries elevated probability of injury to local officers, bystanders, or media in a dense urban setting. Even a brief irregular detention window measured in minutes would place the principal outside continuous overwatch, introducing medical, opportunistic, and communications vulnerabilities that professional protective teams are trained to prevent at all costs.
A STRATEGIC COUNTERTERRORISM ANALYSIS AND ASSESSMENT: THE UNITED STATES-SAUDI CIVILIAN NUCLEAR COOPERATION AGREEMENT AS A HIGH-PROBABILITY VECTOR FOR PROLIFERATION, TERRORIST TARGETING, AND LONG-TERM STRATEGIC CATASTROPHE
(Mor Edge Insights – 23 July 2026)
Open-source pattern analysis combined with historical precedent and current threat trajectories establishes that the recently approved thirty-year United States-Saudi civilian nuclear cooperation agreement constitutes a critical vulnerability in regional counterterrorism architecture.
The agreement, which authorizes American firms to construct and operate nuclear infrastructure in the Kingdom with bilateral safeguards and potential enrichment pathways, creates permanent high-consequence targets in a theater dominated by Iranian regime proxies whose operational doctrine prioritizes maximum civilian and economic damage.
2/
Decades of operational patterns demonstrate that Iranian regime-backed actors, including the Houthis, have repeatedly targeted Saudi energy and critical infrastructure with ballistic missiles, drones, and asymmetric strikes. These actors exhibit no restraint calculus, no fear of death, and no regard for collateral consequences.
Jihadist networks operating under this umbrella treat high-value targets as religious and strategic obligations. The introduction of operational nuclear reactors into this environment transforms limited kinetic attacks into potential radiological release events on a scale that exceeds conventional damage models.
A salvo of six to ten ballistic missiles, or the future introduction of Iranian-supplied hypersonic systems, against such facilities is assessed as a high-probability scenario once plants reach operational status.
3/
Air and missile defense systems, while effective against certain aerial vectors, are irrelevant against underwater or covertly emplaced nuclear devices.
A detonation in the Strait of Hormuz, whether airburst or underwater, would produce immediate shipping lane closure, massive tanker losses, radioactive contamination of the Gulf, disruption of desalination systems, and global oil market collapse. An underwater blast generates far-reaching shockwaves, base surge contamination, and persistent seabed radiation that air defense architectures cannot address.
Attribution would trigger immediate escalation. One successful nuclear event is sufficient. Millions of casualties, economic paralysis, and retaliatory spiral follow. Classic mutually assured destruction frameworks do not apply when the initiating actor operates through deniable proxies willing to accept regime-level destruction.
🚨The Inversion of Truth – How a Lost War Spawned 78 Years of Propaganda to Steal Sympathy and Rewrite History
The below thread is important because it will allow you to understand the propaganda used over the past 3 years and how they did it. I would encourage you all to read it, understand it, and share it.
2/
The Arab leadership has weaponized the word “genocide” for decades. After losing the war they launched in 1947-48, they shifted to narrative warfare to defeat Israel by other means. But the roots go deeper.
3/
A decade earlier, Haj Amin al-Husseini (The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem) actively allied with the Nazis. He met and stayed as a guest of Hitler in Berlin in 1941, broadcast propaganda, recruited for SS units, and worked to block Jewish emigration to Palestine, and played a critical role in aiding the machinery that led to the Holocaust.
When that failed and the 1947 civil war ended with Israel’s creation, a new plan emerged.
That’s the nonstop propaganda.
But here are the children the activists, media, and propagandists almost NEVER show you… the ones being turned into soldiers, martyrs, and propaganda tools across Gaza, Iran, Africa, and beyond.
A thread on the hidden crisis they ignore.
2/
Child soldiers are a grim reality in many conflicts involving Islamist armed groups.
Boys and girls, often under 15, sometimes as young as 9, are recruited through poverty, ideology, or force. They carry guns, plant bombs, clear minefields, or are sent on suicide missions.
This violates every international law on children, yet it continues because these groups see kids as cheap, disposable, and easy to radicalize.
3/
Nowhere is this more relevant to today’s narratives than in the Palestinian territories.
Indoctrination starts early.
UNRWA schools have long faced criticism for curricula that glorify martyrdom and erase Israel from maps.
Hamas runs “summer camps” for up to 100,000 children a year, kids in fatigues learning to march, shoot, and simulate attacks on soldiers and civilians. Islamic Jihad does the same in mosques.
The roots of antisemitism in modern education run deep, tracing back to dark alliances that have poisoned minds for generations. From Nazi influences in the Middle East to today’s global push in Western schools, this ideology threatens the very fabric of free societies, and Israel stands as its primary target.
Understanding this history is crucial if we want to protect our children and preserve Western values.
2/
The story begins in the aftermath of World War II, when Nazi ideology found a new home in the Arab world.
Johann von Leers, a former high-ranking Nazi propagandist, fled to Egypt in the 1950s. He was welcomed by President Gamal Abdel Nasser and worked closely with Amin al-Husseini, the former Grand Mufti of Jerusalem who had collaborated with Hitler.
3/
Von Leers took charge of shaping education curricula, infusing them with antisemitic themes that portrayed Jews as eternal enemies. This wasn’t just rhetoric. It was a systematic effort to embed Jew-hatred into young minds across Egypt and beyond.
Schools became breeding grounds for anti-Jewish sentiment, blending Nazi racial theories with local grievances.