You know Payton McNabb. She is the young lady who was bashed so hard with a volleyball hit by a male player that she got seriously hurt.
Here is John Oliver going after her. Sheβs a young girl and John Oliver is attacking her! 1/
Seriously, can we all stop and appreciate the situation here. John Oliver is minimizing what happened to her. He canβt address the issue that having men in womenβs sports is dangerous, so he belittles a young girl, a teenager at the time, who was seriously injured by a boy. 2/
She did nothing but GET HURT and has to shame her on his show.
This is so low, folks. So down and dirty. He is putting her in danger to push an ideology that is indefensible on its own terms. 3/
Youβre going to ask how he is putting her danger. Heβs doing it by implying that she is making too big a deal out of being badly hurt and implying that bc of her, poor little boys wonβt be able to play sports. Which isnβt true anyway. 4/
This is just like the Nick Sandmann situation where the media went after a kid who did nothing wrong.
Paytonβs mom @PamelaMcNabb22 is on X and could really use your support. John Oliver just set a whole bunch of dangerous folks on her daughter. 5/
When there are extremely violent people out there, itβs reprehensible to do such an irresponsible piece. About a young lady!!!
This is so bad. He has crossed a line he canβt come back from.
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Iβm speechless here. Not only did John Oliver belittle Payton McNabb for getting hurt by a male volleyball player but here he calls her vile names for calling out a man in the ladies room!
What???????
1/
He has the audacity to say the man crossing womenβs boundaries isnβt doing anything?!!!!
When did it become to perfectly ok to violate womenβs privacy?
Itβs like we are in anti Me Too world. 2/
He focuses the whole world on this young lady and calls her nasty. Thatβs low.
What is going on??????
Of all people to go after!! He goes after the girl who was seriously injured bc they let a boy play against her!!!
She is still dealing with the effects of that hit.
For some reason the leftβs hill seems to be getting men into womenβs sports. And denying itβs happening.
I have no idea why they want to do the former, but they want to do the latter bc itβs so unpopular. Or shall I say enraging?
Enter John Oliver. 1/
The UN has put out a statement saying there are hundreds of men in womenβs sports. If youβve been paying the slightest bit of attention, you know. You see it every week. Another guy somewhere has taken a place from women in sports. Just this week we saw three. 2/
So what is a political group to do that is pushing something that NO ONE wants? They have to deny it. And hard!
They try to say itβs not happening by forcing sports groups into NOT keeping records. If no one keeps track, it isnβt happening, right? 3/
A very activist Montana judge has temporarily blocked a bill (HB 121) that was signed into law protecting womenβs privacy in bathrooms.
The reasoning is spectacular. Just wait for this:
1/
The judge found there is no evidence that it protects womenβs privacy to keep men out of womenβs bathrooms!
Umβ¦.excuse me. What does this judge think women want privacy from? 2/
This is a bit technical legally but the court finds that TG status is a suspect class which gets special protection. Why? Bc equal treatment on the basis of s*x is a fundamental right.
But genderism isnβt ON the basis of s*x at all!!!!! Talk about mixing up concepts. 3/
Her name is Stephanie Turner and she faced expulsion from the tournament for refusing to fence a man who pretends he is a woman.
He knows he has the power behind him. She knows it. She took a stance anyway. This is what was said here.
Sheβs amazing. 1/
Stephanie was taken to the bout committee where she was lectured and given a black card and thrown out of the competition bc she refused to participate in her own destruction. 2/
She said later βIt will probably, at least for a moment, destroy my life. I don't think that it's going to be easy for me from now on going to fencing tournaments. I don't think it's going to be easy for me at practice," Turner said. "It's very hard for me to do this." Β 3/
I listened to a hearing today where a bill was brought in California to protect womenβs sports. (Even though that is the law now, they donβt seem to care. I think they are hoping for a severe penalty for political reasons.)
Let me tell you their arguments:
First off there were LOTs of comments about βt*ans kidsβ. Except this was code for boys. There are girls who have these identities but they lose too if the sports are made co-ed. Not one person mentioned that. This whole ideology always hurts the girls. Even their own girls.
Then there was the pretense that this isnβt happening. While simultaneously they argued that not letting boys in girls sports would be the biggest calamity on the planet. 3/
THREAD. Let me explain whatβs happening to womenβs sports with an analogy. We are lost in the weeds over inanities when itβs a simple question of eligibility. No one fits in every category but there IS a category for everyone.
1/
We have 235 pound men declaring how unfair it is that they are banned from the lightweight boxing category. We have people who know nothing about boxing declaring this is unfair!
They will discuss how the 235 pounder identifies as 112 pounds. 2/
We have people who really want to win medals who canβt do it in their weight class, so they are demanding access to other categories they might be able to win.
We talk at length about how some 235 pounders canβt beat a 112 pound man. As if that matters.
3/