1/ Starmer is calling cuts to disability support 'behavioural change'- Nudge. Illness is not a 'behaviour'. It's spectacularly & absurdly cruel to claim further cuts to support to meet basic survival needs will cure people & 'help' them into work. Dangerous, cruel pseudoscience
2/ Nudge is pseudoscientific bullshit that can't cure illness & disability. 'Libertarian paternalism' isn't a policy. It's an ideological tool used by governments to nudge people deeper into poverty, handing out the money 'saved' to billionaires.
3/ Ill & disabled people did not consent to being experimented on by the government's punitive, discriminatory and stigmatising, pseudoscientific quackery or the cuts that will endanger lives.
4/ Illness & disability is NOT a 'role' or 'collection of sickness behaviours, that we can be 'punished out of by a technocratic government's experiments on its population without our consent. Dangerous & harmful mindset that violates fundamental human rights & inflicts harms
5/ 'Hands, Face, Space' was the nudge strategy of the previous government to 'tackle' the pandemic while handing out billions of public funds to chums for fake contracts. It didn't prevent deaths, it didn't stop the virus because it's snakeoil psychobabble bullshit
6/ It's not ill & disabled people who need to 'change behaviours'. It is government. No-one seems to be nudging the corrupt and sadistic nudgers. The only group of people being nudged are the poorest citizens. Nudge is just a cover for discrimination, cruel & punitive, cuts
7/ A measure of how discriminatory 'nudge' is may be seen in who it is almost exclusively imposed upon. The poor. The 2 child limit on social security was a 'nudge' to 'change behaviours according to Iain Duncan Smith. Disabled people were also nudged previously. Didn't work then
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ I'm wondering how the Labour Party can tally their current treatment and narratives about ill & disabled people with the their own Human Rights Act and the Equality Act.
2/ For example, forcing someone who is too ill or disabled to work when they are unable to perform the necessary tasks or duties is considered discriminatory and violates the Equality Act 2010.
3/ Targeting the disabled community for cuts is considered discriminatory, as it violates the principle of equality and can lead to disproportionate harm to a vulnerable and protected group.
1/ When the Tories cut disability support, introduced PIP, made it much more difficult to get an award, reassessed people with chronic, incurable degenerative illness every couple of years, they used exactly the same phrases & language as Labour.
2/ Disabled people carried a disproportionately large burden of austerity cuts. Phrases like 'parked on benefits, 'helping people into work' (by cutting their support..), 'many want to work' (doesn't mean they are well enough to work). We were also referred to as 'stock'.
3/ We were discussed by government and the media, but never invited to participate in a dialogue. WE were scapegoated, talked about and acted upon as if we are merely objects - dehumanised. Now we're facing more of the same.
@1kilroywashere @premnsikka @paulapeters2 @WheelieFUMS @DPACSheffield @RandolphTrent @SusanChubb1 @PeterStefanovi2 @BadPutty @vamroses Given that this will most likely target those most likely to have medical issues, I think the legalities of the trial will need to be addressed before it goes ahead. Because there is a very real risk of potential serious harms being inflicted on those people.
@1kilroywashere @premnsikka @paulapeters2 @WheelieFUMS @DPACSheffield @RandolphTrent @SusanChubb1 @PeterStefanovi2 @BadPutty @vamroses 1) The Nuremberg Code is a set of 10 principles that outline what is considered acceptable medical experimentation on human subjects:
Informed, voluntary consent. The subject or their legal representative must give their consent before the experiment.
@1kilroywashere @premnsikka @paulapeters2 @WheelieFUMS @DPACSheffield @RandolphTrent @SusanChubb1 @PeterStefanovi2 @BadPutty @vamroses 2) The experiment must have the potential to produce results that benefit society.
It must avoid unnecessary suffering. The experiment should be designed to avoid physical or mental suffering or injury.
1) Nakba - Palestinian "disaster", "catastrophe", or "cataclysm"'). It describes the destruction of the Palestinian society & homeland in 1948 and onwards, and the permanent displacement of a majority of the Palestinian Arabs.
2) Nakba is used to describe both the events of 1948 & the ongoing occupation of the Palestinians in the Palestinian territories (occupied West Bank and the Gaza Strip), as well as their persecution & displacement in the Palestinian territories & in Palestinian refugee camps
3) Events of the Nakba took place during & shortly after the 1948 war, including 78% of Mandatory Palestine being declared as Israel, the expulsion & flight of 700,000 Palestinians, the related depopulation & destruction of over 500 Palestinian villages by Zionist militias
#Thread 1/ Techniques of neutralisation are language strategies used to switch off the conscience & remorse when someone plans or has done something to cause harm to others. They can also be used to switch off the conscience of others by perpetrators.
2/The idea of techniques of neutralisation was first proposed by David Matza and Gresham Sykes during their work on Edwin Sutherland’s Differential Association in the 1950s.
3/ Matza and Sykes were working on juvenile delinquency, they theorised that the same techniques could be found throughout society and published their ideas in Delinquency and Drift, 1964.