Eithan Haim MD Profile picture
Apr 11, 2025 12 tweets 4 min read Read on X
During the Congressional hearing, it was obvious the Dems were relying on @RepRaskin to take me down.

Nothing less than a bare-knuckle brawl.

He tried every trick in his dirty little book but this reptilian shell-of-a-boy stood no chance.

Worth a thread to break it down. 🧵
We all know one of the defining features of Raskin is congenital hypocrisy.

Combine that with a couple of decades of "petulant hall monitor" and you can understand his first line of attack.

Worth appreciating the monumental smugness towards the end of the video.
The Republicans could tell I was chomping at the bit to go on the offensive. I'm thankful they gave me every opportunity to do so.

This clip was my response.

(Important to know whenever I'm looking up and to the right, I'm looking directly at Raskin's slimy face).
@RepThomasMassie helped out with a major assist.

Gave me the opportunity to dismantle Raskin's absurd arguments even further.

One thing I forgot to mention is that I worked with Paxton's office in an official capacity as a whistleblower, assisting their TCH investigation.
Raskin's second line of attack is something we've seen a million times - appeal to institutional authority.

At this point, I don't even know why they try - like citing Bernie Madoff for financial advice.

Notice how he says "violated" at 24 sec...the smugness on this guy.
Side point:

Within 24 hours of @realchrisrufo story being released (May 16th), SB-14 was passed (May 17th).

The bill that banned what we exposed received bipartisan support, partially because of our story a day earlier.
Best way to respond is the simple truth - the whole thing is a fraud.

Always has been. Always will be. Every doctor knows this. Every sentient human knows this.

Raskin knows this as well. I could see the fear in his eyes.

He knows his game is up. Just a matter of time.
I thought I would add some more detail from my daily life as a practicing surgeon.

Anything to drive the point home through Raskin's thick, greasy skull.
Last line of attack reflects the pinnacle of Biden-era weaponization.

1) Dems rely on a corrupt DOJ to falsely accuse innocent people of crimes.

2) Dems repeat false accusations to destroy the innocent's person's life.

3) Dems continue to repeat even after proven false.
Couldn't let him get away with something so treacherous and evil.

They tried to take away my freedom for ten years.

They wanted to take me away from my patients, my family, my wife.

They wanted to take me away from my newborn daughter.
After this monster spends his opening 15 minutes repeating the most vicious lies about me, he has to confront me and my attorney, Mark Lytle.

Then all of the sudden, his tone radically changes. He starts to stutter, hesitate, and equivocate - "it seems to me" and "some credence," etc.

No longer do we see Raskin's famous "smug tic" like we do in the last videos.

His own witness won't even weigh in because he knows Raskin is in over his head.
Final thought is this...

This boy Raskin is an embarrassment to himself.

His family should be ashamed of what he has become.

He has no place in the halls of Congress. I would say more suited for used car salesman but that would be an insult to used car salesman.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eithan Haim MD

Eithan Haim MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EithanHaim

Oct 19, 2025
If you want to understand the DOJ's investigation into gender clinics' fraudulent billing practices, best place to start is this Kaiser Health News article.

It tells the story of Tim Chevalier - a lady who believes she's a man who needs laser hair removal for a "phalloplasty." Image
Article starts by explaining Chevalier's insurance, Anthem, denied coverage for laser hair removal because it was "cosmetic."

It goes on to explain that "insurance companies, sometimes question mental health claims more rigorously than those for physical illnesses." Image
The article includes Johanna Olson-Kennedy, one of the trans industry's apex predators.

She endorses the move from ICD-10 (currently in use) to ICD-11.

Her reason is that gender diagnoses would "no longer be a mental health condition, but sexual health one."

Since "sexual health" diagnosis codes are considered physical condition as opposed to a mental health condition, the idea is that insurance would more easily cover the hormones and surgery that are part of "gender affirming care."Image
Read 9 tweets
Oct 16, 2025
In a 2023 podcast, AMA and Harvard "experts" lay out the medical billing scam used for abortion.

This is same exact scam used in gender clinics.

They were warning activists of the massive criminal consequences of False Claims Act.

This reveals their greatest vulnerability 🧵
Notice the intro how they make very specific claims - so specific you could say they are suspiciously specific.

Like they know exactly what is going on and running cover.

Especially once you realize both are leaders in elite left wing activist networks.
Things get even more suspicious when they describe the exact diagnosis codes used to submit fraudulent abortion claims.

And now we know this likely reflects systematic criminality since gender clinics relied on false codes like "endocrine abnormality" and "precocious puberty."
Read 5 tweets
Aug 29, 2025
In May 2022, surgeons who perform "gender reassignment" surgery were instructed to bill insurance for breast reductions, not mastectomies.

This makes no sense though - these are two very different surgeries.

What was the reason for this drastic shift?

AMA guidance 🧵 Image
Some background first.

Whenever a doctor treats a patient they have to submit a code for WHAT they did (treatment) and WHY they did it (diagnosis).

This is how doctors get reimbursed.

The CPT system is used to code treatments; ICD codes used for diagnosis.
CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) codes can be seen as the language doctors use to communicate with insurance.

AMA has a copyright on this "language" which earns them hundreds of millions a year in royalties/licensing fees.

Nearly $500 million a year to be exact. Image
Read 14 tweets
Aug 19, 2025
An important story from last week has largely gone uncovered.

The world's leading authority on clinical research, Dr. Gordon Guyatt, committed a heinous transgression and caved to trans activists.

What was the nature of his crime?

Publishing the truth. Image
The link for the statement is below.

But to really appreciate the gravity of this story, it's worth taking a dive into @GuyattGH's background.

hei.healthsci.mcmaster.ca/systematic-rev…
Dr. Guyatt is a Canadian physician who was inducted into the Canadian Medical Hall of Fame in 2016 and is the founder of evidenced based medicine (EBM).

He actually coined the term "evidenced based medicine" in 1991 (original article - image #2). Image
Image
Read 16 tweets
Jun 25, 2025
A top Fed lawyer who oversaw my prosecution snaked his way to become the top pick for US Attorney in SDTX.

John Pearson presents as a "Republican" but under Biden, he transitioned to Leticia James.

His nomination to Cruz and Cornyn is imminent unless we do something about it. Image
I've spoken with people on the nomination committee as well as SDTX prosecutors who personally witnessed Pearsons's transition to radical left-wing sock puppet under Biden.

Now that he wants an appointment from President Trump, he pretends to be a staunch, conservative.
Pearson gloated to nomination committee that he signed my dismissal.

They were told Pearson had “nothing to do with” my case.

Impossible. He was involved, likely every step of the way. And he did nothing to stop it.

I outlined this in a letter I sent to Cruz/Cornyn’s staff. Image
Image
Read 13 tweets
Jun 18, 2025
I did a deep dive into Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson's dissenting opinion.

It's even worse than I expected.

Follow this thread to see for yourself. 🧵
Their main argument is that the law discriminates on the basis of sex since there are certain medications that make boys look like boys, vice versa for girls.

But that's insane.

These treatments are meant for diagnosable pathologies in order to restore normal physiology. Image
It would be like saying a patient without cancer but "identifies as having cancer" is being discriminated against because a doctor is refusing to give them chemotherapy.

They have the audacity to claim the majority opinion "contorts logic" while they rely on anti-logic. Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(