If you want to understand the DOJ's investigation into gender clinics' fraudulent billing practices, best place to start is this Kaiser Health News article.

It tells the story of Tim Chevalier - a lady who believes she's a man who needs laser hair removal for a "phalloplasty." Article starts by explaining Chevalier's insurance, Anthem, denied coverage for laser hair removal because it was "cosmetic."

It goes on to explain that "insurance companies, sometimes question mental health claims more rigorously than those for physical illnesses."

In a 2023 podcast, AMA and Harvard "experts" lay out the medical billing scam used for abortion.

This is same exact scam used in gender clinics.

They were warning activists of the massive criminal consequences of False Claims Act.

This reveals their greatest vulnerability 🧵 Notice the intro how they make very specific claims - so specific you could say they are suspiciously specific.

Like they know exactly what is going on and running cover.

Especially once you realize both are leaders in elite left wing activist networks.

In May 2022, surgeons who perform "gender reassignment" surgery were instructed to bill insurance for breast reductions, not mastectomies.

This makes no sense though - these are two very different surgeries.

What was the reason for this drastic shift?

AMA guidance 🧵 Some background first.

Whenever a doctor treats a patient they have to submit a code for WHAT they did (treatment) and WHY they did it (diagnosis).

This is how doctors get reimbursed.

The CPT system is used to code treatments; ICD codes used for diagnosis.

An important story from last week has largely gone uncovered.

The world's leading authority on clinical research, Dr. Gordon Guyatt, committed a heinous transgression and caved to trans activists.

What was the nature of his crime?

Publishing the truth. The link for the statement is below.

But to really appreciate the gravity of this story, it's worth taking a dive into @GuyattGH's background.

hei.healthsci.mcmaster.ca/systematic-rev…

A top Fed lawyer who oversaw my prosecution snaked his way to become the top pick for US Attorney in SDTX.

John Pearson presents as a "Republican" but under Biden, he transitioned to Leticia James.

His nomination to Cruz and Cornyn is imminent unless we do something about it. I've spoken with people on the nomination committee as well as SDTX prosecutors who personally witnessed Pearsons's transition to radical left-wing sock puppet under Biden.

Now that he wants an appointment from President Trump, he pretends to be a staunch, conservative.

I did a deep dive into Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson's dissenting opinion.

It's even worse than I expected.

Follow this thread to see for yourself. 🧵 Their main argument is that the law discriminates on the basis of sex since there are certain medications that make boys look like boys, vice versa for girls.

But that's insane.

These treatments are meant for diagnosable pathologies in order to restore normal physiology.

Dr. Moore is about to go to trial in one of the last, most corrupt, Biden-era cases.

He's one of the few surgeons who stood against the worst COVID-era mandates.

Which is why they're trying to send him to prison.

We make enough noise this corrupt case can be ended!🧵 Usually reading through criminal indictment make defendants look awful. Not for @Moore22K.

Indictment reads like an expose on someone about to receive the Medal of Freedom.

Given all we now know about COVID jab, DOJ's case aged like a chain-smoking beach bum.

Ever wonder who oversaw TCH's deception in March 2022 about shutting down their transgender program?

Well, it turns out, it's the person who got an award for it! Yes, an award - a very big award!

Afsheen Davis, TCH General Counsel.

Goes deeper than this. 🧵
First, worth appreciating the language about the award ceremony.

Davis helped TCH's "navigation of the complex legal landscape" about "transgender services."

Kind of like giving an award to Bernie Madoff for his leadership in navigating difficult financial times.

During the Congressional hearing, it was obvious the Dems were relying on @RepRaskin to take me down.

Nothing less than a bare-knuckle brawl.

He tried every trick in his dirty little book but this reptilian shell-of-a-boy stood no chance.

Worth a thread to break it down. 🧵 We all know one of the defining features of Raskin is congenital hypocrisy.

Combine that with a couple of decades of "petulant hall monitor" and you can understand his first line of attack.

Worth appreciating the monumental smugness towards the end of the video.

We had a hearing yesterday with the House Judiciary.

Never thought I would so thoroughly enjoy going toe-to-toe with these radical Dems.

Probably because it was like playing basketball against a bunch of first-graders.

This thread is a play-by-play breakdown. 🧵 Jamie Raskin, arch deep-state goblin, was one the first Dems to speak, then me.

I knew he was crafty but also predictable.

He would simply repeat false allegations from the first indictment, mention a grand jury, all to make me look guilty.

I saw it coming a mile away.

@JudiciaryGOP sent a letter to lead prosecutor, Tina Ansari, requesting her at a hearing April 9th.

They cite an "enormous conflict of interest" between Ansari and Texas Children’s Hospital (TCH).

Part of this story has remained untold. They're so close that now is the time. The backbone of the entire case was testimony of a TCH doctor.

Best witness for the govt, worst for the truth.

Thus, I believe Ansari’s conflicts are more than a passive ethical issue; instead, operationally weaponized to find the right people to create the case against me.

@BracewellLaw just hired Alamdar Hamdani, the former Biden-appt US attorney who weaponized his authority to try send me to prison for a decade for blowing the whistle with @realchrisrufo about TCH's secret pediatric sex change program.

It's only too ironic they hired him to handle "government investigations."

Let's take a trip down memory lane so Bracewell can better get to know the new partner their bringing to their firm. During his time as US Attorney, he broke away from traditional DOJ practices and went fully rogue.

In his case against me, Hamdani bypassed the entire DOJ chain of command to run my case with a single prosecutor.

I know for a fact this is very atypical because my wife is an assistant US atty and one of the attorneys defending me, Ryan Patrick, was the former US Attorney for the Southern District right before Hamdani.

I imagined Hamdani was treating this case like an inappropriate office romance because he wanted to conceal this "government investigation" from his colleagues.

This is no surprise since it was the first time in American history the DOJ was using HIPAA not to protect patient privacy but multi-billion-dollar hospital systems - TCH and Baylor.

If you think this is bad, just wait until you see who he chose as the single prosecutor to run this case.

Great reporting about this one from @AndrewCMcCarthy.

The study showing worsening mental health post-gender surgery has been a bombshell.

The most remarkable detail has been missed.

The study was published by left-wing med students who unknowingly decimated the central premise underlying every transgender intervention. First, consider other papers published by these authors.

Every article is a plug-and-chug of woke DEI talking points, mashed together with pseudo-intellectual jargon.

This shows they follow the golden rule for publication in academic journals - never question left-wing dogma.

At President Trump's speech last night, I was sitting right behind the Democrats in the gallery.

I had a perfect bird's eye view of everything.

No doubt very dramatic for all of those watching but there was so much more the cameras missed. 🧵 Not only did the Dems not applaud or stand for the stories honoring average Americans but neither did their guests in the gallery.

Even for the most heartwarming moments most stayed seated, very few ever applauded.

It was heart-breaking to see.

One year before Judge Hittner, a Regan appointee, took on my case, a well-known trans-activist/drag performer, Brigitte Bandit (they/them), was twerking in his courtroom.

Bandit and other trans activists, represented by the ACLU, were challenging SB-12, law passed by the Texas Senate which banned sexualized drag performances in front of children.

Hittner seemed to be quite moved by Bandit's performance because he ended up striking down SB-12, ensuring the twerking going on in his courtroom would also continue in front of children.

The story surrounding SB-12 is so important because it helps explain one of the main contradictions in my case - how was it possible that a seemingly conservative Judge allowed the DOJ to break every rule in the book to target a whistleblower who exposed a major hospital for lying about harmful transgender interventions?

A deep dive into the SB-12 hearings shows this was no contradiction. 🧵

1/

To start this off, consider Judge Hittner's response to the New Yorker after he overturned the bill. He was asked about his reaction to Bandit twerking in his courtroom.

They write, "The moment seemed to have impressed the judge. 'Darn it, it was interesting...you learn about different things and different folks and different science every day.'”

From this response you can see that Hittner seemed positively enamored. But what was it about this case that he was so interested in? What "science" was Hittner referring to?

Last week, a DOJ memo went out to all employees indicating that steps would be taken to restore faith in the DOJ after its weaponization under the corrupt Biden regime. 🧵

According to this memo, reports will be provided quarterly to President Trump. One of those reports includes "the retaliatory targeting and in some instances criminal prosecution of legitimate whistleblowers."

I realize quarterly is a pretty frequent basis. I figure why not give whoever is writing these reports a little bit of a head start so in this thread I included some questions that are in critical need of answers. Is Tina Ansari, the former lead prosecutor, still employed as an AUSA after my attorneys wrote a letter to Congress detailing how she threatened my wife - who was just hired as an AUSA in the Northern District of Texas and undergoing a background check - during their first phone call?

Per their letter, Ansari claimed my wife was interfering with an investigation when she encouraged me to not speak with federal agents the first time they showed up.

She went on to say she wouldn't bring up my wife's behavior to background investigators "unless [Mrs. Haim] becomes difficult."

Last month the DOJ's case was blown apart, the truth revealing the remarkable absurdity of their arguments. 🧵

This happened after the DOJ disclosed bombshell evidence to my legal team on September 13th. This came to us at 5:30 PM on a Friday which also happened to be the last business day before a critical deadline - we had to file our responses to their motions by that Monday.

We couldn't help but notice the irony that it was also Friday the 13th.

This disclosure showed that key factual evidence the DOJ was using in their indictment and all subsequent motions was egregiously false.

The story of how this played out is pretty unbelievable. Ryan Patrick, one of my attorneys, put it well - "How we've gotten to this place is beyond bizarre and in my nearly 20 years practicing criminal law, I have never seen a case play out like this."

I believe it's worth taking a deeper dive.

This is a thread of the basic summary from publicly available motions and statements from my attorneys (link to docket below).
courtlistener.com/docket/6886091…

The cost of all of this has been astronomical given the complexity of this case. We can't do this alone so any donation can go to the legal fund (link below).
givesendgo.com/texas_whistleb… The Friday the 13th disclosure refuted one of the central claims in the DOJ's case - that I requested access to the TCH medical record system under false pretenses.

They spell out this claim very explicitly since it is the basis for the first of four felony charges.

In a motion from September 6th, they state "after January 2021, the defendant had no patients under his care at TCH."

In the same motion they go on to say, "On April 19, 2023, the defendant emailed an administrator at TCH urgently requesting that his login credentials be restored so he could access “operative cases” he was “covering.”

They emphatically state their conclusion in four words, "This was a lie."

I blew the whistle on @TexasChildrens secret sex change program and the @TheJusticeDept came after me for exposing the truth. After experiencing DOJ corruption we've decided to fight back. If you want to join the fight, donate below.
givesendgo.com/texas_whistleb… We realized our case is meaningless unless we go on the offensive to hold those accountable who have abused their authority. So that is exactly what we've done. Read the letter below.