@BracewellLaw just hired Alamdar Hamdani, the former Biden-appt US attorney who weaponized his authority to try send me to prison for a decade for blowing the whistle with @realchrisrufo about TCH's secret pediatric sex change program.

It's only too ironic they hired him to handle "government investigations."

Let's take a trip down memory lane so Bracewell can better get to know the new partner their bringing to their firm. During his time as US Attorney, he broke away from traditional DOJ practices and went fully rogue.

In his case against me, Hamdani bypassed the entire DOJ chain of command to run my case with a single prosecutor.

I know for a fact this is very atypical because my wife is an assistant US atty and one of the attorneys defending me, Ryan Patrick, was the former US Attorney for the Southern District right before Hamdani.

I imagined Hamdani was treating this case like an inappropriate office romance because he wanted to conceal this "government investigation" from his colleagues.

This is no surprise since it was the first time in American history the DOJ was using HIPAA not to protect patient privacy but multi-billion-dollar hospital systems - TCH and Baylor.

If you think this is bad, just wait until you see who he chose as the single prosecutor to run this case.

Great reporting about this one from @AndrewCMcCarthy.

The study showing worsening mental health post-gender surgery has been a bombshell.

The most remarkable detail has been missed.

The study was published by left-wing med students who unknowingly decimated the central premise underlying every transgender intervention. First, consider other papers published by these authors.

Every article is a plug-and-chug of woke DEI talking points, mashed together with pseudo-intellectual jargon.

This shows they follow the golden rule for publication in academic journals - never question left-wing dogma.

At President Trump's speech last night, I was sitting right behind the Democrats in the gallery.

I had a perfect bird's eye view of everything.

No doubt very dramatic for all of those watching but there was so much more the cameras missed. 🧵 Not only did the Dems not applaud or stand for the stories honoring average Americans but neither did their guests in the gallery.

Even for the most heartwarming moments most stayed seated, very few ever applauded.

It was heart-breaking to see.

One year before Judge Hittner, a Regan appointee, took on my case, a well-known trans-activist/drag performer, Brigitte Bandit (they/them), was twerking in his courtroom.

Bandit and other trans activists, represented by the ACLU, were challenging SB-12, law passed by the Texas Senate which banned sexualized drag performances in front of children.

Hittner seemed to be quite moved by Bandit's performance because he ended up striking down SB-12, ensuring the twerking going on in his courtroom would also continue in front of children.

The story surrounding SB-12 is so important because it helps explain one of the main contradictions in my case - how was it possible that a seemingly conservative Judge allowed the DOJ to break every rule in the book to target a whistleblower who exposed a major hospital for lying about harmful transgender interventions?

A deep dive into the SB-12 hearings shows this was no contradiction. 🧵

1/

To start this off, consider Judge Hittner's response to the New Yorker after he overturned the bill. He was asked about his reaction to Bandit twerking in his courtroom.

They write, "The moment seemed to have impressed the judge. 'Darn it, it was interesting...you learn about different things and different folks and different science every day.'”

From this response you can see that Hittner seemed positively enamored. But what was it about this case that he was so interested in? What "science" was Hittner referring to?

Last week, a DOJ memo went out to all employees indicating that steps would be taken to restore faith in the DOJ after its weaponization under the corrupt Biden regime. 🧵

According to this memo, reports will be provided quarterly to President Trump. One of those reports includes "the retaliatory targeting and in some instances criminal prosecution of legitimate whistleblowers."

I realize quarterly is a pretty frequent basis. I figure why not give whoever is writing these reports a little bit of a head start so in this thread I included some questions that are in critical need of answers. Is Tina Ansari, the former lead prosecutor, still employed as an AUSA after my attorneys wrote a letter to Congress detailing how she threatened my wife - who was just hired as an AUSA in the Northern District of Texas and undergoing a background check - during their first phone call?

Per their letter, Ansari claimed my wife was interfering with an investigation when she encouraged me to not speak with federal agents the first time they showed up.

She went on to say she wouldn't bring up my wife's behavior to background investigators "unless [Mrs. Haim] becomes difficult."

Last month the DOJ's case was blown apart, the truth revealing the remarkable absurdity of their arguments. 🧵

This happened after the DOJ disclosed bombshell evidence to my legal team on September 13th. This came to us at 5:30 PM on a Friday which also happened to be the last business day before a critical deadline - we had to file our responses to their motions by that Monday.

We couldn't help but notice the irony that it was also Friday the 13th.

This disclosure showed that key factual evidence the DOJ was using in their indictment and all subsequent motions was egregiously false.

The story of how this played out is pretty unbelievable. Ryan Patrick, one of my attorneys, put it well - "How we've gotten to this place is beyond bizarre and in my nearly 20 years practicing criminal law, I have never seen a case play out like this."

I believe it's worth taking a deeper dive.

This is a thread of the basic summary from publicly available motions and statements from my attorneys (link to docket below).
courtlistener.com/docket/6886091…

The cost of all of this has been astronomical given the complexity of this case. We can't do this alone so any donation can go to the legal fund (link below).
givesendgo.com/texas_whistleb… The Friday the 13th disclosure refuted one of the central claims in the DOJ's case - that I requested access to the TCH medical record system under false pretenses.

They spell out this claim very explicitly since it is the basis for the first of four felony charges.

In a motion from September 6th, they state "after January 2021, the defendant had no patients under his care at TCH."

In the same motion they go on to say, "On April 19, 2023, the defendant emailed an administrator at TCH urgently requesting that his login credentials be restored so he could access “operative cases” he was “covering.”

They emphatically state their conclusion in four words, "This was a lie."

I blew the whistle on @TexasChildrens secret sex change program and the @TheJusticeDept came after me for exposing the truth. After experiencing DOJ corruption we've decided to fight back. If you want to join the fight, donate below.
givesendgo.com/texas_whistleb… We realized our case is meaningless unless we go on the offensive to hold those accountable who have abused their authority. So that is exactly what we've done. Read the letter below.