I still want to know how the VOOP managed to survive Stalin. Practically every other CSO was shut down. Not VOOP. And that, in spite, of its often provocative, outspoken nature - the sort which frequently led to a one-way ticket to the gulag.
... if I can just find one bit of evidence, I can synthesise my two disparate timelines; pre-1960, and that of globe environmental governance
I saw some comments elsewhere that the Russian archives never released information on VOOP. But don't quote me on it. But Golitsyn's Perestroika Deception essentially aligns - not just with Gorbachev himself, but also with Brzezinski's 'Between Two Ages'
because, logically, it fits. and Kovda is right there, in the middle of all the happenings.
and he, essentially, fused the ICSU with UNESCO in early 1946. logically, IUCN came next - and VOOP joined the IUCN in 1960, which again fits Khrushchev timeline
so, so, so frustrating, because if that VOOP connection can be established, that paves the road to Science and World Order in 1941 - an ode to scientific socialism - and Huxley, Needham... and the International Resource Office aka IUCN
that further aligns back to the Cambridge Apostles, Max Nicholson's PEP, and even the Deborinites, whose philosophy rested on Bogdanov.
Not forgetting Kovda carries forward the torch of Vernadsky, who then aligns with Teilhard.
hnnghh, where are you, missing piece of puzzle
... and then, politically, through the Cambridge Apostles we arrive with Keynes and Leo Woolf, whose 'General Theory' and 'International Government' led to central bank facilitation of NGO-driven governance.
RAND, OECD, IIASA, Macy/Pugwash conferences, Cambridge Apostles, WOMP, technocracy inc/LID, vatican 2, integral humanism (maritain)... I could cover these topics, but I don't see the point because they all just strengthen my case. there are no internal contradictions.
i have covered health, environment, finance, governance, systems theory, role of ethics, cultural engineering, aesopian language, global governance, digital twins, digital id, CBDCs, carbon accounting, bogdanov, dug up documents which essentially no-one else has covered...
i think, in short, im done because i dont fundamentally see any major developments which even could change the overall arc of my theory. absolutely everything is logically coherent, and there can't really be any reason but one - because it's all true.
the call for global data, harmonious standards and so forth came at the 1968 unesco biosphere conference - data, which would lead into the global information database called for shortly before JFKs death
HAHAHAHAHA and after accusing it of carrying water for the establishment it suddenly CAN find evidence of my original claim
holy fucking shit this is corrupt
calling it out in that regard and it owns up.
this is just so breathtakingly dishonest. the AI called me a 'conspiracy theorist' for stating what's obviously true, and has now done a full reversal and apologised
most people will not challenge it but just accept its word