Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture
Apr 17, 2025 38 tweets 16 min read Read on X
The 50-Year-Old Cancer Miracle Hiding in Plain Sight

Back in 1968, the FDA discovered something incredible: a common dye combined with DMSO (Dimethyl Sulfoxide) could destroy cancer cells without harming healthy ones.

Instead of fast-tracking this breakthrough, they chose to bury the evidence.

But now, as @MidwesternDoc shows, doctors have proven this combination works—safely treating otherwise “incurable” cancers.

🧵 THREADImage
📍 Before we get started, do yourself a favor and bookmark this powerful information.

You never know when you’ll need to revisit it—or use it to help someone in desperate need.
DMSO—or Dimethyl sulfoxide—was discovered in the 1960s and quickly gained medical recognition.

It turns out DMSO has a shocking ability to treat everything from inflammation and stroke to autoimmune diseases and even cancer.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/hundreds-of-…
The dye used in combination with DMSO was Haematoxylon, a natural extract traditionally used for staining tissue under a microscope.

When doctors combined it with DMSO, they witnessed something extraordinary: aggressive, recurring cancers began to vanish.

It worked even in cases where standard treatments had failed. The results were so promising, they should’ve launched a new era of cancer care.Image
But the good news didn’t last long.

DMSO’s momentum was cut short.

Regulatory suppression and pharmaceutical interests had their say.

And once again, it was all about profit over people.

Now, decades later, DMSO’s astonishing potential in cancer treatment remains largely forgotten.Image
Thanks to @MidwesternDoc, the good news about DMSO is finally making waves again and reaching a wider audience.

This article compiles hundreds of studies showing just how DMSO could transform everything we thought we knew about cancer.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/hundreds-of-…
Before we dive deeper into the promise of DMSO, let’s review some important things about cancer and its treatment.

Simply put, cancer is hard to treat. And that’s the truth—isn’t just part of the medical industry script.

Cancer isn’t one-size-fits-all.

Two people can have the same type of cancer with completely different causes. And those two people can respond quite differently to treatment.

That’s why standardized treatments—even holistic ones—will fail for some patients.Image
Add to this the fear surrounding a cancer diagnosis.

The overwhelming influence of profit-driven treatment models.

The sheer number of available treatments.

And social pressure to follow the conventional protocols.

You can begin to see why many patients feel helpless.

And why many often just do what their doctor says.Image
But did you know that oncologists often earn 65% of their income from chemotherapy drugs?

Sixty-five percent!

More than half of their income comes from prescribing drugs to their patients—not from curing them.

Cancer drugs are the most profitable pharmaceutical products on the planet.

The system isn’t designed to cure cancer. It’s designed to manage it—for profit.Image
DMSO is actually a naturally occurring compound with a remarkable profile.

DMSO is:

Anti-inflammatory

Antioxidant

Non-toxic at therapeutic doses

Able to penetrate cell membranes and the blood-brain barrier

After its discovery in the 1960s, DMSO quickly became America’s most desired drug!

Just look at this 60 Minutes segment on DMSO from 1980.
This isn’t quack science. DMSO has been studied extensively.

And those studies have shown that it helps treat a wide range of issues ranging from mild to life threatening:

• Strokes and neurological disorders

• Autoimmune inflammation

• Chronic pain

• Skin conditions

• Infectious diseases

• Internal organ dysfunction

• CancerImage
@MidwesternDoc There’s also a wealth of anecdotal evidence from DMSO users who sing its praises. Just look at the comments on this article by @MidwesternDoc.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-remarkab…
One of the most incredible effects of DMSO is its ability to differentiate cancer cells.

Cancer involves dedifferentiated cells—cells that have lost their structure, purpose, and connection to the body. They divide and overtake the body.

DMSO can stop this process and turn cancer cells back into normal, healthy cells.

What?!

Why isn’t this treatment option number one for everyone suffering from cancer?! How did this information get successfully suppressed and memory-holed?Image
The truth about DMSO is even more jaw-dropping than you think.

Back in 1971, a virologist accidentally discovered that DMSO could stop leukemic cells from growing.

At 2% concentration, it caused most of the cancer cells to differentiate back to normal cells.

At 3%, it stopped their growth.

At 5%... It killed them.

In 2025, why is DMSO not a household name?Image
But it wasn’t just one study in 1971 that showed this encouraging effect.

Over time, hundreds of studies confirmed DMSO’s differentiating power across many cancer types: leukemia, melanoma, breast, liver, colon, prostate, brain cancers, and more.

Studies have consistently found that DMSO:

• Increased tumor-suppressing genes like p21 and PTEN

• Suppressed oncogenes like c-myc and ras

• Altered cell membranes and cytoskeletons

• Triggered apoptosis (programmed cell death)

• Made changes that were often permanent and irreversible

And this didn’t just happen in test tubes.Image
@MidwesternDoc For a peek into just how many studies have shown DMSO’s ability to differentiate multiple types of cancers, check out @MidwesternDoc’s article:

midwesterndoctor.com/p/hundreds-of-…
Because cancer and cancer treatment aren’t one-size-fits-all, I’m not surprised to learn that sometimes DMSO isn’t able to fully eradicate cancer.

But guess what? It consistently weakened it—which is huge!

DMSO makes tumors less aggressive and more vulnerable to other forms of treatment.

Sometimes it’s necessary to throw everything AND the kitchen sink at cancer. And in that case, DMSO makes it all a lot more effective.Image
DMSO does what most immunotherapies aim to do: it makes tumors visible to the immune system.

Cancers usually survive by hiding from your immune cells. But DMSO exposes them.

Unlike immune-suppressing drugs commonly prescribed to cancer patients, DMSO enhances the immune response to cancer.

It boosts the expression of cell surface antigens, activates natural killer cells, and enhances the immune response to tumors.

Sign me up!Image
In one 2016 study, researchers treated cancer cells with DMSO and injected them into mice.

The mice developed immunity—not just to that cancer, but to other types as well!

That sounds a lot like a cancer vaccine… that’s actually a vaccine.

And there’s no toxic additives or mRNA. Great!Image
If you or anyone you love has ever fought cancer, you know just how painful it can be. Cancer hurts.

And so does chemotherapy and radiation.

Addictive opioids like fentanyl are commonly prescribed for late-stage cancer pain, but even they don’t always work. And they have their own unwelcome side effects.

DMSO, on the other hand, has provided relief in cases where nothing else worked. And without the nasty side effects.Image
Hundreds of patients have reported life-changing relief, and studies have confirmed DMSO’s effectiveness, too.

DMSO works when opioids don’t because it works through an entirely different mechanism.

It addresses nerve sensitization and inflammation at the root. It’s not a bandaid.

DMSO has even helped patients with “incurable” metastatic cancer—which causes some of the most unbearable pain known—to reduce or eliminate opioid use.Image
It almost sounds too good to be true…

Not only does DMSO help with debilitating cancer pain, it has a rare ability to protect your healthy tissue while making cancer cells more sensitive to treatment.

In animal studies, DMSO prevented radiation-induced skin damage, cataracts, kidney injury, and intestinal destruction.

It protected against fibrosis, adhesions, and long-term inflammation caused by radiation.

It reduced chemotherapy toxicity—especially to the heart, kidneys, and nervous system—without protecting cancer cells.

In one study, DMSO protected stem cells from radiation but did not protect leukemia cells.

And in others, DMSO increased the potency of chemotherapy drugs—reducing the dose needed and making side effects far more manageable!Image
You read that right. DMSO makes chemotherapy more effective and safer.

Why? Because it:

• Increases drug absorption into tumors (including in the brain)

• Enhances drug concentration in key organs and lymph nodes

• Bypasses cellular resistance by altering the cancer cell membrane

• Triggers programmed cell death in cancer while protecting normal tissue

In many studies, the addition of DMSO enabled the use of lower doses of chemotherapy.

It’s also been used in combination therapies with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and other potent drugs.

One study even showed that 57 out of 65 patients with incurable cancers achieved partial or full remission when DMSO was combined with chemotherapy and amino acids.

Great news for cancer patients—less great for oncologists.Image
And it’s great for non-conventional treatments, too. DMSO’s value isn’t limited to pharmaceuticals.

It has the potential to revolutionize cancer care as we know it by boosting the effects of natural treatments, like:

• Vitamin A and retinoic acid

• Vitamin D

• Alpha-lipoic acid

• Plant-based compounds

• Butyrate

• Oxygen therapy

Because it penetrates tissues so effectively, it makes topical and oral therapies dramatically more effective.

For skin cancer and precancerous lesions, photodynamic therapy using DMSO and 5-ALA has yielded clearance rates as high as 90%!Image
But despite the growing mountain of evidence, the FDA has blocked nearly all uses of DMSO.

Except for one.

The FDA approved DMSO to treat extravasation injuries, which occur when chemo drugs leak into surrounding tissue. These accidents can cause severe tissue damage and necrosis.

In dozens of studies, DMSO was the only substance that could reliably prevent this.

While this is a clear acknowledgment of DMSO’s healing power, maybe patients with extravasation injuries wouldn’t have them in the first place if DMSO were used from the get go—not just to clean up the mess caused by their cancer treatment.Image
@MidwesternDoc Shockingly, DMSO is widely used today in research labs, particularly in cancer research.

It’s used to cryopreserve cells, carry drugs, and trigger differentiation. Scientists know how powerful it is; that’s why it’s used every day in research. midwesterndoctor.com/p/hundreds-of-…
But outside the lab? Its use is blocked.

Why? Because it threatens a $500 billion business model.

Chemotherapy is the lifeblood of the cancer treatment industry, and oncologists earn around 65% of their income from these drugs.

Do you think they want to offer a treatment that allows lower doses and causes fewer side effects (side effects that typically require additional treatment)?

Of course not. That’s a threat to their livelihood and the billion-dollar cancer industry.

When researchers tried to launch human trials of DMSO-chemo combinations, they were shut down.

It’s that bad.Image
But despite the barriers and decades-long battle to suppress it, DMSO’s revival is happening.

Right now.

More cancer patients are asking about it. More integrative doctors are using it. More researchers are revisiting the data and finally asking questions.

What we need now is…

More public awareness and education.

More patient demand for informed choice.

More independent clinical research.

And more open-minded collaboration between integrative and conventional medicine.

Cancer patients and their families deserve better than a system that hides viable treatments and milks them for every dollar they have. They deserve better than treatments that ravage the body leaving it weakened and vulnerable.Image
DMSO is not a silver bullet. But it’s the best Swiss army knife of cancer care we’ve got. By far.

And it certainly shouldn’t be withheld.

DMSO has been proven to weaken tumors, restore normal cell function, activate the immune response to cancer, boost treatment effectiveness, protect healthy tissue, and relieve pain.

It’s an answer to a prayer that’s been prayed by millions of people.

The real tragedy is that most people—doctors included—don’t even know it exists.

But we can change that.Image
@MidwesternDoc If someone you love is facing cancer, they deserve to know about DMSO.

This is the kind of breakthrough the cancer industry hopes you’ll never find. But now that you have, you can share it—and change the trajectory of a terrifying diagnosis.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/hundreds-of-…
@MidwesternDoc Part 2 of this thread will cover the details of DMSO’s incredible ability to transform cancer—practical application, sourcing, dosages, protocols, and more.

Here’s a sneak peek of the next thread, straight from @MidwesternDoc’s Substack.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-forgotte…
Because in our increasingly toxic environment, cancers are on the rise. But with this knowledge we can finally do something about it.

Cancer doesn’t have to be a years-long battle that drains your resources. It doesn’t have to be a death sentence. With DMSO, we can transform the diagnosis and bring real hope.Image
@MidwesternDoc Thanks for reading! This information was based on a report originally published by @MidwesternDoc.

Key details were streamlined and editorialized for clarity and impact. Read the original report here.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/hundreds-of-…
@MidwesternDoc For a deeper dive into what modern medicine has overlooked—or intentionally buried—check out these other eye-opening reports by @MidwesternDoc:

The Horrific and Deadly Effects of Antidepressants

midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-anti…
@MidwesternDoc The Great Cholesterol Scam and The Dangers of Statins midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-ch…
@MidwesternDoc What's The Healthiest Water To Drink? midwesterndoctor.com/p/whats-the-he…
@MidwesternDoc While you’re at it, give @MidwesternDoc a follow.

No one brings more research, clinical insight, or historical context when it comes to exposing the health myths we’ve all been fed.

This is easily one of the most valuable accounts you’ll ever follow. Image
@MidwesternDoc If you found this information valuable, share it with a friend and bookmark it somewhere for later.

You never know who it might help.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vigilant Fox 🦊

Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VigilantFox

Feb 12
REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment.

Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells.

On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months.

This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans.

But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions.

Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line?

If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.
👇
rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.

GoldandFreedom.com 👈

Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.

That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.

It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.

Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.

Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.

DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.Image
In other news, Republicans and Democrats are backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American.

It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you.

The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online.

The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share.

Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them?

This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes.

Watch @zeeemedia's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.
👇
rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
Read 7 tweets
Feb 11
Polio didn’t disappear the way you think it did.

Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.

But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.

First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.

What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”

Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”

Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.

But it gets worse.

The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”

So what about the virus?

Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”

When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”

Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”

Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.

And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about? 🧵
Did you know the original smallpox vaccine caused serious injuries—and was often contaminated with pus, bacteria, and fungus?

We’ve been told it saved humanity from a deadly disease, but what if that’s a lie?

Dr. Suzanne Humphries explained to Joe Rogan what happened to children who received the vaccine. They developed large ulcers, high fevers, and widespread infections. With no antibiotics available, treatments were limited to mercury, arsenic, bloodletting, or isolation in dark rooms.

These severe reactions weren’t considered rare. In fact, they were referred to as “a good take.”

What made matters worse was how the vaccine was produced. According to Dr. Humphries, it was made by infecting animals and harvesting the resulting pus.

“They would take pus from other animals, scratch it into the belly of a cow, then take the pus off of the big pimples that would form,” she said. The material—called “pure lymph”—often came from cadavers, horses, or ulcerating cow udders, mixed with glycerin, and scratched into the surface of the skin.

Even decades later, contamination was an issue. “There was more bacteria and fungus in the smallpox vaccines than there was smallpox virus.” One widely used version, Dryvax, was eventually considered so problematic that health authorities ordered all remaining specimens destroyed around 2009.

Living conditions at the time were “a disaster.” Streets were filled with human and animal waste, there was no running water, and sanitation was nearly nonexistent. Poor hygiene and co-infections absolutely made smallpox far more deadly than it might have been otherwise.

Despite all this, the smallpox vaccine is still presented as a flawless triumph.

But for those who experienced the injuries firsthand, and for those who study its full history, the story isn’t so simple.

“This is the one vaccine that eliminated, eradicated a disease,” Dr. Humphries said sarcastically. “Can you believe that fairytale?”
We’ve all been taught that the smallpox vaccine was one of medicine’s greatest triumphs.

But when you read the actual clinical observations recorded by doctors who lived through its rollout, a far more unsettling picture emerges.

It’s not propaganda, and it’s not hindsight. It’s primary-source medicine.

And much of it was quietly buried.Image
Read 29 tweets
Feb 9
There’s a reason doctors love pushing vaccines. The more they inject, the more money they make.

The foot traffic alone brings in big money, but there’s another perverse incentive, and once you hear it, it will make you angry.

RFK Jr. explains: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses... And that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back…You'll lose them their bonuses.”

Sadly, these perverse financial incentives aren’t limited to vaccines but across many areas of medicine.

Dig a little deeper, and another disturbing pattern appears. Once you see it, you’re left gobsmacked by just how far the corruption runs beyond money. 🧵
The video below is haunting—not because the doctor in it is malicious, but because she genuinely believes she’s helping.

She’s an MD with a Master’s in Public Health, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a former leader at Georgetown. Her language is warm. Her intentions seem pure.

Yet this interview perfectly captures how public health has lost its way.

After conquering most deadly contagious diseases, it turned toward chronic illness—and failed.

Instead of questioning why children are getting sicker, it doubled down on vaccinating more, earlier, and without dissent, often dismissing safety concerns as heresy.

Watch this video. Then ask yourself what matters more in modern medicine: children’s outcomes—or institutional certainty.

youtu.be/hiQVU4px5dU
A lawsuit filed several years ago exposed something far more disturbing than a single act of medical misconduct.

It revealed how, during COVID, core medical ethics quietly collapsed—how consent became optional, coercion was reframed as care, and vulnerable people were treated as obstacles rather than patients.

This isn’t about ideology. It’s about what happens when fear, authority, and institutional pressure override conscience.Image
Read 22 tweets
Feb 7
The real cause of heart disease has been buried for decades in favor of the lie about cholesterol.

40 million Americans take statins to lower their cholesterol, thinking it’s the best way to protect their hearts.

But what doctors never tell them is that statins interfere with the body’s natural repair system, weakening the very cells that rely on cholesterol to function.

In trying to prevent disease, they’re paradoxically fueling it.

This report exposes what really happens to the body when you take a statin every day.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the sources and details, read the full report:

midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-are-stat…
For years, doctors have been taught that high cholesterol causes heart attacks. They’ve passed the warning along to their patients, and most of us have believed them.

But that idea came from one man: Ancel Keys.

Keys cherry-picked data to make fat and cholesterol look deadly while ignoring the real culprit: sugar.

John Yudkin tried to warn the world that sugar—not fat—was driving heart disease. But no one listened. He was ridiculed, silenced, and erased from history.Image
Read 27 tweets
Feb 6
This drug reversed a condition that usually ends with a ventilator and a body bag.

Three patients were on the brink of death from total lung failure.

Then they were given intravenous DMSO—and something incredible happened.

Days later, they were breathing freely. One even had completely normal lungs within just a week.

You’ve probably never heard of DMSO—and that’s by design.

Once you see what it can do, you’ll understand why it had to be buried.

🧵 THREADImage
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.

For all the sources and details, read the full 9,000+ word report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-dmso-pro…
DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) use exploded in the 1960s as a medical breakthrough.

There were thousands of studies.
There was massive public demand.
And there were miracle recoveries.

But the FDA dropped the hammer—and the pharmaceutical industry buried DMSO.

Why?

Because it worked.Image
Read 27 tweets
Feb 5
In 2015, Scott Adams made a “crazy” prediction that most people thought was impossible.

He said Trump had a 98% chance of becoming president, and he made that call on a single observation.

The winning attribute that made Scott confident in Trump’s victory was his one-of-a-kind persuasion skills.

While political betting markets dismissed Trump’s chances, Adams argued—using his background in persuasion and hypnosis—that Trump was the most psychologically effective candidate in the race and therefore favored to win.

He built a massive following by showing how persuasion, not policy, drives political outcomes.

That insight proved correct. But it also revealed something darker. 🧵
After Trump’s victory, Adams pivoted to punditry—and during COVID, even he struggled to see the truth.

Scott strongly endorsed the vaccines, vaccinated himself, and publicly belittled followers who refused. Many later derisively called him “Clot Adams.”

In January 2023, Adams admitted—on video—that he’d been wrong and that the anti-vaxxers were correct. But he framed it as luck: the right people just happened to distrust the government, while “all the data” supposedly pointed intelligent analysts toward vaccination.

That framing matters. It reveals how even skilled observers of persuasion can mistake marketing consensus for truth—and how the same system that manufactures medical certainty also hides the limits of medicine, until reality forces a reckoning.
Last May, Scott told the world something most people never say out loud until it’s unavoidable: he had terminal, metastatic prostate cancer.

He openly stated he planned to use California’s medically assisted dying to reduce suffering.

He also shut down speculation—saying he had already tried fenbendazole and ivermectin and had no interest in continuing them.

The reaction was explosive.

People weren’t just debating treatment choices—they were watching, in real time, what a protracted, modern death actually looks like.

For many, it shattered comforting abstractions about both cancer and mortality.
Read 33 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(