Thread by @UltraViolet_940

Let's break down the fallacy of Linehan's transphobic rhetoric, because that's what it is: Fallacious, bigoted/prejudicial and a set of talk (which sadly can see innocent people getting hurt or worse for no good reason), especially what with throwing around the word "violent" 1/

https://twitter.com/nyx_nyx_nyx_666/status/1913917524925723004

The Encyclopaedia Britannica defines violence as, "an act of physical force that causes or is intended to cause harm."

It further breaks down violence into four types of crimes: murder (killing), assault (phys. attack), robbery (forcible taking) and rape (forced sex). 2/

Violence is further categorised based on the motivation behind the act. Reactive (emotional) violence seeks to express hostility with a view to hurting another.

Proactive (instrumental) violence seeks to extract some form of reward. 3/

When a trans person uses the bathroom which they identify with (in this case, a trans woman using the ladies' restroom), there is neither the use of force nor any harm inflicted on others. 4/

No one dies, no one is physically injured, no property is damaged or lost, nor is anyone sexually assaulted, at the hands of the trans person using their preferred bathroom (again in this case, a trans woman in the ladies bathroom). 5/

It should be interesting to note, however, that violence is further categorised between predatory and affective types. Per Britannica: "Predatory violence involves planned acts of hostile force. Affective violence is more impulsive and unplanned." 6/

With that being said, the captured post by Graham Linehan is, in and of itself, objectively violent, and actually incites violence towards trans women in particular who have actually done nothing violent in using the ladies' bathroom. 7/

"Make a scene, call the cops... punch [her]."

It's ironic that the man who wishes to claim that a trans woman is being "violent and abusive" by using the bathroom of her choice is encouraging acts of hostility which includes physical harm!
8/

Graham seems to want to lean on more flimsy definitions of violence in accusing trans women, such as "irritable violence" (motivated by frustration) and "territorial violence" (motivated by intrusion into one’s perceived territory or space).

9/

What I find most disturbing is the phrase which immediately precedes the incitement to resort to physical/sexual assault on a trans woman: "if all else fails."

This phrase comes immediately after, "Make a scene, call the cops."

10/

Imagine calling the police on someone (instrumental violence) just because they are in the bathroom doing NOTHING which causes harm to you, and the police (who are supposed to be able to determine whether a violent act has indeed taken place) don't do your bidding.

11/

So you decide to ASSAULT that person, whom the police have determined have not done anything to harm you in the first place!

If we follow Linehan's advice in order, you've now committed PREMEDITATED physical AS WELL as emotional violence; TWO PREDATORY ACTS!

12/

Might I also point out that, in situations where one is being PREYED UPON and there is FEAR OF DANGER, one usually has the right to DEFEND oneself from such violence?

Especially if someone comes at you in an isolated, enclosed space?

13/

What will Graham have to say for himself when he entices one woman to attack another woman, only for the former to receive a broken arm and a bloody face or worse when the latter defends herself from BEING UNLAWFULLY ASSAULTED IN THE BATHROOM?

14/

Is this how one protects women's spaces? Is this how one looks after the safety of women and girls? By encouraging VIOLENCE against women and girls simply for BEING IN A ROOM?

Is this how feminism is advocated?

END/15

@threadreaderapp unroll