America is hurtling towards a demographic disaster.
Our birth rates have been declining for decades. In 2023, they hit an all-time record low.
President Trump ran on a "new baby boom." This week, the New York Times covered the plan to help deliver it.
A few takeaways. 🧵
In 2023, our fertility rate fell to just 1.62 births per woman—well below the 2.1 replacement rate needed to maintain our population.
If nothing changes, America faces a future of shrinking families and communities, economic and cultural stagnation, and national decline.
This isn't just an abstract demographic problem. It's a civilizational crisis. It touches every aspect of American life.
President Trump ran on launching a new baby boom as part of his pro-family agenda. This administration is a historic opportunity to reverse the birth decline.
The solution isn't just more babies. It's more FAMILIES.
Birthrates for married couples have actually been mostly stable since the 1990s. (Save for a modest decrease from 2016-2020).
The birthrate collapse is driven not just by fewer kids per marriage, but by fewer marriages.
As I wrote for @firstthingsmag last year: The U.S. marriage rate has dropped an astounding 60% since 1970.
Roughly one-third of Generation Z is on track to never marry.
We need policies that reward marriage and family formation—not just giving birth in isolation.
Thankfully, we have an administration that wants to do just that.
This week, NYT published a long report highlighting how the Trump administration is building an ambitious plan to boost marriage and birthrates. That includes many of the ideas we've been working on at @Heritage.
There are many parts of this plan: Financial incentives for childbearing and marriage, pro-marriage preferences in government programs, etc.
But one of the major issues to confront—something I've worked on at length—is tackling the crisis of infertility.
Financial incentives aren't enough, on their own, if American couples physically can't have babies.
As many as 1 in 7 American couples struggle with infertility—and it's been steadily climbing for years. We treat it like a niche issue. In reality, it's a public health crisis.
The problem is, in many cases, we don't even know why. 15%-30% of individuals with infertility receive a diagnosis of "unexplained infertility," with few meaningful treatment options available.
One obvious, easy fix: Fund research and education.
Endometriosis affects as many as 1 in 10 U.S. women—but it takes an average of 10 years to be diagnosed. 30-50% of women with endometriosis are diagnosed with infertility. NIH spent just $2 per patient for endometriosis research in 2022.
We spend more on researching hair loss 🤯
This gets to the deeper challenge: We need a total overhaul of the way we treat infertility. Most infertility "cures" just bypass the problem. We should be treating the root causes—like endometriosis and hormone imbalances—rather than papering over them with treatments like IVF.
That requires a comprehensive approach—one that's in line with the Make America Healthy Again mandate: Restorative Reproductive Medicine (RRM). It means treating the root causes—rather than just the symptoms—of infertility.
RRM solves the infertility crisis at the source.
RRM ensures that people are not only able to have the children they desire—but also live longer, healthier lives. (Because the reproductive health conditions that lead to infertility often have other negative health effects, too). It's a pro-human flourishing solution.
This isn't an abstract, fringe set of ideas. It's gaining momentum every day. Just last week, Arkansas passed a state-level RESTORE Act on RRM.
With @RobertKennedyJr calling for research on the root causes of illness, we should rethink infertility care, too.
A new women’s health movement is emerging—rooted in science, powered by innovation, and guided by respect for the female body. It seeks not just to manage symptoms, but to heal. And it's going to be one of the keys to solving our birthrate crisis—and reversing American decline.
Vanessa Brown Calder, a director at the Cato Institute, recently published a blog calling into question the validity of my research claims on IVF.
Let's set the record straight 👇
Calder placed ideology over good methodology and relied on a) old data from the United Kingdom; b) misrepresented what my claims were and “debunked” a red herring; and c) equated recommended guidelines with legally enforceable laws.
Relying on 2011 data from the United Kingdom, she disputes my claim that on average, as many as 4 million embryos are created each year in the United States.
Using the CDC's most recent 2021 data, I show how approx 10 embryos per cycle quickly adds up over 413K+ cycles.
🧵 China’s birth rates are declining to the point of no return.
American’s should pay careful attention: their decline is the direct result of targeted policies meant to reduce the number of children born.
China’s one-child policy and career focused model worked all too well.
China’s National Bureau of Statistics documented 9 million births in 2023, a stark contrast to the 17 million births in 2017. Further, China recorded 11 million deaths in 2023, resulting in an overall population decline of 2 million people (about the population of New Mexico).
When China softened the one-child policy in 2016, Beijing expected a baby boom to occur as couples were finally permitted to have the number of children they wanted. But after an initial increase, birthrates continued to decline.
🧵 A Review of Protestant Denominations and their Stance on Reproductive Technology.
Most Protestant denominations still lack a biblically informed stance on childbearing, infertility, and the most basic reproductive technology, such as IVF, surrogacy, and stem cell research.
Protestants hold a central place in America’s political and institutional life, their denominations’ positions on contemporary bioethical questions play a key role in determining the way that new scientific innovations are integrated into the moral framework of the American mind.
This matters practically, too, as individual pastors and congregants cannot be expected to handle the moral and medical complexity of emerging technologies on their own. It's time for Prots to provide guidance informed by scripture, theology, medical practice, and natural law.
🧵A quick look at what we know and don't know when it comes to studies on surrogacy. 👇
Despite what many experts want you to believe, we actually know very little about the impact of surrogacy on the long term wellbeing of children and families.
Studies do exist analyzing birth weight, multiples, preterm births, and the variety of birth defects that accompany children born of IVF. See @JenniferLahl for more on this.
While the outcomes for kids born of ART are typically worse than naturally conceived children, they aren’t, in and of themselves, the reason to want to limit such treatments. (i.e. if none of these side affects existed, should we promote it? I would say no).
American policymakers need to get serious about countering the threat from communist China. The House China Select Committee has announced it will be investigating Chinese investment in various U.S. industries. It's time to examine the Chinese “rent-a-womb” industry in America.
Increasingly, Chinese nationals are using American surrogates to bear their children. Thanks to in vitro fertilization, they don’t even need to leave China.
The worst part is that Washington has no idea who these children or their parents are.
Surrogacy is illegal in China, with the CCP outright condemning the practice. Still, decades of the "one child" policy, an aging population, and difficulty finding a partner mean that many Chinese nationals are turning to U.S. surrogates as the solution.