🧵🧵This thread shows how $4 Trillion in Federal Funds Were Funneled Through Leftist NGOs to Enrich Activists, Mobilize Voters, and Power Anti-Trump Protests—With Receipts
This is maybe the most important thread I have ever done. It explains how the two biggest pieces of legislation from the Biden administration filled the coffers of all of these activist groups that have been engaging in the Trump 2.0 resistance. From GOTV efforts, to Anti-Tesla protests to the legal battles against Trump.
The Center for American Progress (CAP), founded by Clinton ally John Podesta, is more than a think tank—it’s the strategic command center for the modern Left. Under Biden, CAP helped orchestrate the biggest activist cash grab in U.S. history: $4 TRILLION.
When Biden tapped Podesta to oversee implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act—a $369B climate fund—it wasn’t just about energy. It was about control. Podesta’s real mission? Redistribute billions to Democrat-aligned NGOs.
But that $369B was just one piece. The combined total from COVID relief, infrastructure, and climate bills under Biden exceeds $4 TRILLION. CAP helped shape who got that money—and it wasn’t the states. It was activist orgs.
Enter the Justice40 Initiative—designed to steer 40% of benefits to “disadvantaged communities.” In practice, this meant bypassing elected officials and funneling funds directly to NGOs, most of them progressive-aligned.
These grants weren’t just for “climate justice.” They funded GOTV, “community empowerment,” “trusted messengers,” and “technical assistance.” Translation: campaign infrastructure disguised as public service.
Organizations like Indivisible and the Sunrise Movement became major beneficiaries. Both have organized anti-Trump protests, Tesla shutdowns, and youth voter drives—and both have received massive indirect support through these federal programs.
Indivisible used its gains to grow chapters in every swing state, launch digital voter targeting, and coordinate pressure campaigns against GOP legislation. Their footprint expanded after receiving funds through “equity” and “democracy advancement” grants.
Sunrise Movement, tied to “climate resilience” grants, led protests at Tesla showrooms and occupied congressional offices. In 2024, they claimed to have made over 4 million youth voter contacts, playing a massive role in Democrat turnout.
Podesta and CAP created the policy architecture that made this possible. They advised federal agencies to embed “equity” mandates and prioritize “community-based organizations” (aka: progressive NGOs) in grantmaking.
In total, the Justice40 Accelerator—just one program—helped NGOs win $138 million in grants. That’s just the tip of the iceberg.
Let’s be clear: these aren’t apolitical charities.
•Indivisible was built to oppose Trump.
•Sunrise led sit-ins to demand Biden go further left.
•Faith in Action and EDF advocate openly for progressive legislation.
And they’re all funded by your tax dollars—thanks to Podesta’s CAP and their policy-to-grant pipeline. This is government-funded activism, hidden behind a green mask.
CAP didn’t just lobby from the sidelines. Its alumni staff the Biden admin. Its reports became agency regulations. Its “equity” mandates were inserted into budget guidance.
This wasn’t legislation. This was executive-branch capture. Voters never approved it. Congress never debated it. And now, the Left has permanent infrastructure—built and maintained by public funding.
Meanwhile, conservative groups get nothing. No parallel infrastructure. No grants. No embedded agencies. Just censorship, audits, and public smears.
This is what they mean by “saving democracy”:
•Billions to leftist orgs
•Massive GOTV ops under federal cover
•Protest movements
subsidized by taxpayers
•Power concentrated in NGOs that answer to no one
Final receipts:
•$600B+ allocated across 500+ programs (Justice40)
•$138M+ in direct awards via Justice40 Accelerator
•4M+ voter contacts by Sunrise Movement
•Indivisible protest partnerships with House Democrats
•CAP’s direct personnel pipeline into federal agencies
CAP built it. Podesta directed it. NGOs profited. And the Left now has a publicly funded political machine disguised as a climate plan.
The Trump administration MUST investigate this fully.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵🧵THREAD: The Koch–Soros–CCP Alliance — How Defense Priorities Pushes Obama’s Anti-War Foreign Policy to Help China Rise
Defense Priorities looks like a “restrained” conservative think tank.
But peel back the layers and it’s pure Obama-era foreign policy:
•Abandon allies
•Appease adversaries
•Shrink American power
And every move benefits the Chinese Communist Party.
This “restraint” narrative is a direct continuation of Obama’s foreign policy retreat:
•Out of the Middle East
•No arms for Taiwan
•No action on China’s
island building
Now it’s being repackaged as ‘realism’ by Koch- and Soros-funded networks.
Koch Industries has extensive investments in China, including:
•Petrochemicals (via INVISTA)
•Fertilizer and agriculture ventures
•Automation and manufacturing systems
A strong U.S. foreign policy hurts Koch’s business in authoritarian markets.
🧵🧵THREAD: The Radical Blueprint Behind the Chaos — Progressive International Exposed
Do you ever wonder how BLM narratives and anti-Tesla protests became a global phenomenon?
Well look no further then the nonprofit Bernie Sanders and his wife started in 2018.
Meet Progressive International (PI) — a global leftist network founded in 2018 by Bernie Sanders, Yanis Varoufakis, and the European DiEM25 movement.
But there’s more: Jane O’Meara Sanders, Bernie’s wife, is also listed as a key founding board member.
This isn’t grassroots. It’s elite-engineered revolution.
PI’s stated mission: unite progressives worldwide.
Its real operation: incite coordinated civil unrest, destabilize Western institutions, promote anti-capitalism, and export radical protest models under the guise of justice.
The CCP and Iran may seem ideologically different — but they share one goal: weakening U.S. power globally.
They’re now strategic partners in cyber, energy, military tech, and political disruption campaigns.
And not enough people are talking about it.
ECONOMIC WARFARE
China is Iran’s largest oil customer — often via sanction-evading deals.
In 2022 alone, Iran exported over 1 million barrels/day, mostly to China — bringing Tehran billions in illicit revenue.
China props up Iran’s economy, which fuels terror networks.
25-YEAR STRATEGIC AGREEMENT
In 2021, China and Iran signed a sweeping deal:
•$400 billion Chinese investment in Iran
•Joint infrastructure, ports, telecom, and defense projects
•Energy-for-tech swaps
It formalized long-term cooperation against the West.
Let’s expose the think tanks trying to derail President Trump’s agenda. Not only in the press through OpEds and media hits but also white papers and policy influences. Up first is the International Crisis Group.
🧵🧵The International Crisis Group (ICG) is funded by a diverse array of sources, including governments, foundations, corporations, and individual donors. George Soros, through his Open Society Foundations (OSF), provided the organization’s initial seed funding and continues to support it. Both George Soros and his son, Alexander Soros, are members of ICG’s Board of Trustees, reflecting their ongoing involvement with the organization .
In addition to the Soros family’s contributions, ICG receives substantial funding from various foundations such as the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Henry Luce Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, and the Friedrich Ebert Stiftung . Governmental support comes from countries including Australia, Canada, France, and Finland, among others .
It is one of the most powerful think tanks influencing foreign policy all over the world.
ICG’s Trump 2.0 Criticism: ICG’s Nov 2024 report, What Trump’s Return Means for Iran, trashes Trump 2.0, warning it’ll “double down” on maximum pressure—sanctions, maybe even regime change. They claim Trump’s hawkish advisors (e.g., Marco Rubio) risk “escalation” or Iran going nuclear.
Rewind to Trump 1.0 Attacks: ICG’s been anti-Trump since 2018, calling his JCPOA withdrawal “reckless” and sanctions a “failure” that “hardened Iran’s hardliners.” Reports like The Iran Nuclear Deal at Five (2020) say Trump’s Soleimani strike nearly sparked war. They push diplomacy—code for appeasing Iran.
1. 🧵🧵Trump’s War on the Cartels & Human Trafficking
What the media won’t say: Mexican cartels aren’t just drug lords — they run the largest human trafficking operation in the Western Hemisphere. Trump is taking the fight directly to them. Here’s how.
2. Cartel human smuggling is a multi-billion dollar black market.
•Migrants pay $5,000–$20,000 per person
•Cartels earned over $13 billion in 2022 alone (per Homeland Security est.)
•Children, women, and families are trafficked, raped, extorted — then dumped across the U.S. border.
3. Trump’s First Term: What Was Already Done
•Built 450+ miles of border wall
•Ended “Catch and Release”
•Enacted Remain in Mexico (MPP)
•Signed Executive Order 13988, prioritizing trafficking prosecutions
•Arrested 12,000+ smugglers & traffickers via ICE/CBP/DOJ ops
I find it very concerning that federal money was used by Northwestern University to develop a program that allows AI to search a database of all the legal opinions from 2016 and 2017 in an effort to make forum shopping and judge shopping very easy.
And wait until you find out who was in charge of building this database of “transparency.” 🧵🧵
1/ Who is Rachel Davis Mersey?
Rachel Davis Mersey is a journalism and media expert, currently Executive Vice President and Provost at Southern Methodist University (SMU, since June 2025).
She was Interim Provost at UT Austin (2024–2025) and Associate Professor at Northwestern’s Medill School.
Her leadership of the SCALES project and past role at Meta raise concerns about censorship and lawfare against conservatives due to her ties to Meta and the Biden administration.
Sources:
UT News, May 9, 2024
SMU News, April 23, 2025
Northwestern University, March 17, 2021
2/ Mersey’s Role at Meta
Mersey served as Director of Global Research Partnerships at Meta (then Facebook), managing data-sharing with academics to study social media’s impact (e.g., 2020 U.S. Election Study).
She liaised with U.S. policymakers including Biden officials post-2021, on data policies.
Sources:
LinkedIn Profile, Rachel Davis Mersey, accessed April 20, 2025