A thread
Was the #SupremeCourt's decision in directing the Govt to uphold the elections in #J&K right after upholding the abrogation of #Art370?
Why did the #SC prioritize democratic processes& #constitutional rights in #Kashmir over the threat to Nation's sovergnity?
Was democratic process more important than the Security Concerns & Terrorists threats, with the Enemy Nation baying for our blood?
Why did #SupremeCourt encroach on the #legislative domain, esp in a volatile Border-State, exercising its authority ?
Was #Constitutional Governance in #Jammu and #Kashmir possible in such a dangerous Border State, always prone for enemy's proxy war?
Why was the #Governor's rule not favoured? What was the International pulls & pressures on the #judiciary?
Governor's rule would have allowed the #Centre to maintain direct control, potentially ensuring stability and security in the region.
It might have addressed concerns about loyalty & potential anti-national activities among some political parties, police officers & bureaucrats.
The #SupremeCourt could have exercised judicial restraint, allowing the Centre to manage the situation without judicial intervention.
The Centre might have had reasons to believe that Governor's rule would be more effective in stabilizing the situation and addressing security
concerns inspite of challenges in ensuring good governance and addressing the region's unique needs.
There are various perspectives on the SupremeCourt's decision to conduct elections in Jammu & Kashmir. Some possible influences:
Did SC buckle under International Pressure of
Human Rights organizations or Foreign Govts or Internal Political Dynamics of major Parties or some powerful lobbies or interests?
The situation remains a topic of debate on the overreach of #Courts #Collegium system & #judges interpreting the #Constitution, with different
stakeholders holding varying perspectives on the court's decision.
However, the blood of 26 innocent victims of #PahalgamTerroristAttack will be on the hands of #SupremeCourt!!
A thread
How does the #Congress #dynasty leverage the loyalty of dangerous #BehrulIslam and yet have the audacity to preach on Rule of Law to BJP, sanctity of #Constitution? It did make the entire system of #judiciary, #SupremeCourt a mockery during its 6 decades of rule.
Who is this Behrul Islam?
Behrul Islam is a Member of Parliament (MP), and Inc India rewarded him with key positions.
Islam was elected to the Rajya Sabha twice, from 1962 to 1972, as a member of the Indian National Congress and resigned from the #RajyaSabha in 1972 to become
a #judge in the Gauhati #HighCourt, eventually rising to the position of #ChiefJustice, simply showing his unstinted loyalty to Congress.
After retirement, Islam was appointed as a judge of #SupremeCourt in 1980, an unprecedented move as retd judges were not reappointed!!.
A thread.
The #SupremeCourt's decision to set a timeline for the #President to pass bills could lead to a complex situation, potentially sparking debates/ war of words or logjams about the separation of powers and #judicial overreach. The Centre might even challenge
the Supreme Court's decision, arguing that it oversteps the judiciary's authority and infringes on the executive's discretion. Alternatively, it could engage in consultations with the #SC & other stakeholders to understand the court's concerns to find an acceptable solution.
The legislature might assert its authority, arguing that the judiciary's intervention is unwarranted and undermines the legislative process and could review the court's decision or pass a resolution or legislation to clarify the roles and responsibilities of each branch of Govt
Dr. B.R. #Ambedkar had several concerns regarding Indian Muslims, particularly in the context of national unity and social reform.
Ambedkar noted that Indian #Muslim society was stagnant and didn't have an organized movement for social reform, unlike the Hindu society. He
highlighted issues like the subjugation of women, caste systems, and the practice of purdah.
Ambedkar was concerned about the apparent extra-territorial loyalties of Indian Muslims, who often identified themselves as part of a universal Islamic brotherhood. This, he felt,
could lead to divided loyalties in the event of a conflict.
Ambedkar believed that the communal tensions between #Hindus and Muslims were deep-seated and unlikely to be resolved. He cited frequent riots and the inability of the two communities to coexist peacefully.
What is the #DMK #DravidianModel of blaming always the Central Government for not supporting its #WelfareSchemes in Tamil Nadu?
While there are no specific details on central schemes passed on as state schemes, here are some notable welfare schemes of #TamilNadu,with possible
connections to central funding.
Only Annamalai BJP can unravel this conundrum of M. K. Stalin -tricks- "Head DMK wins, tails Centre loses"
Mission Nature Scheme focuses on environmental awareness and activities in government schools, potentially aligning with Central Govt
initiatives like the National Environmental Awareness Campaign.
Kalaignar Women's Rights Grant Scheme provides financial support to women in Tamil Nadu, similar to central schemes like the Pradhan Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana (#PMJDY) or the Mahila Shakti Kendra scheme.
A thread.
Thru the #Constitution, @INCIndia tried its best to turn Bharat into a #Muslim nation.
This is how it amended various acts of the #Constitution
Article 25, 28, 30(1950)
HRCE Act(1951)
HCB MPL(1956)
Secularism(1975)
Minority Act(1992)
POW Act(1991)
WaqfAct(1995
Ram Setu Affidavit (2007)
Saffron Flower (2009)
Thru Article 25, they legalized religious conversion.
Through Article 28, they removed religious education from #Hindus but allowed it for #Muslims and #Christians through Article 30.
Using the HRCE Act of 1951, they looted the funds of #Hindu #temples and sanctums.
Through the Hindu Code Bill, Divorce Act, and Dowry Law, they destroyed Hindu families, but did not touch the #MuslimPersonalLaw. Polygamy was allowed, enabling them to increase their population.
A thread.
Look at the beauty of our #justice system. The Governor and the #PresidentOfIndia should have a time frame of 3 months to study the bills passed by the states in all #Constitutional angles, not the #CJI or #SupremeCourt !
In the year 2000, the terrorists of #Pakistani terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba attacked the unit of 7-Rajputana rifles of the Indian Army deployed in Delhi Red Fort! 3 soldiers of Indian Army were martyred in that attack suddenly...!
Delhi police arrested #Pakistani #terrorist #MohammadArif alias #Ashfaq, mastermind of terrorist attack within 4 days!
See the beauty of our judiciary -Indian justice system- after that.
Delhi's trial court took 5 years to give him hanging sentence (2005).