π§΅THREAD: How Samantha Power gave USGLC power over USAID
(Thanks to @J_P1776 for the breadcrumb)
In 2022, USAID Administrator Samantha Power resurrected an old, mostly-forgotten advisory board, ACVFA (Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid) and gave it a new mission:
Bring America's top NGOs, business leaders, and global development experts directly into USAID's decision making.
In order to do so, she tapped her peers from the US Global Leadership Coalition (USGLC).
ACVFA pre-dates USAID, but did not have the influence it has now.
Until Power came on stage, ACVFA had met infrequently, their last meeting having been in 2019, and before that, 2017.
But Power's re-imagined ACVFA was to evolve it "to be not just an advisor to USAID, but a bridge linking the institution of USAID to nongovernmental organizations, to the private sector, to religious leaders, to civil society."
The board established in 2022 was praised as the "most diverse in the history of ACVFA" and its vision was to establish tighter partnerships - AKA bringing NGOs into the decision-making process.
Power directed that ACVFA decision-making on how to spend USAID dollars be done through the "lens of localization, diversity, inclusion, accessibility" - and climate change was a top priority as well.
Who was on ACVFA? Among its members serving since 2022, and is still on the board, is none other than the President and CEO of USGLC, Liz Schrayer.
Think about it. Liz Schrayer and USGLC took credit for getting the 95 billion dollar foreign aid passed through Congress last year.
Then Schrayer herself sits on the board which has advisory authority over where USAID dollars go.
How can that possibly be legal? I don't know.
But she's not the only one. Remember how I said that USGLC was plurality (perhaps majority over the years) backed by the Gates Foundation?
Enock Chikava, Interim Director of agricultural development of the Gates Foundation, sits on the ACVFA board as well.
The board also includes the presidents of both the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and the International Republican Institute (IRI). In other words, the Congressional NGOs, where sitting Republican and Democratic lawmakers are directly involved, have a hand in steering where USAID money goes.
No wonder they're so eager to protect USAID money!
C.D. Glin, Global Head of Philanthropy for PepsiCo, sits on ACVFA.
PepsiCo also sits on USGLC via Brigitte Schmidt Gwyn β Senior Vice President Government Affairs.
The full list of members is here:
βͺ Adriana BeltrΓ‘n β Executive Director, Seattle International Foundation
βͺ Asma Lateef β Policy and Advocacy Lead, SDG2 Advocacy Hub
βͺ C.D. Glin β Global Head of Philanthropy, PepsiCo Inc. & Vice President, PepsiCo Foundation
βͺ Daniel Twining β President, International Republican Institute
βͺ Eka Tkeshelashvili β Senior Expert in Rule of Law, Anti-Corruption, Governance, and Justice Sector Reforms, Dexis Consulting Group
βͺ Enock Chikava β Interim Director, Agricultural Development, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
βͺ Hibak Kalfan β Executive Director, NEAR Network
βͺ Hindou Oumarou Ibrahim β President, Association for Indigenous Women and Peoples of Chad (AFPAT)
βͺ Jeremy Weinstein β Professor of Political Science, Director of Stanford Impact Labs, Stanford University
βͺ Johan Swinnen β Director General, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
βͺ Julie Dorf β Co-Chair, Council for Global Equality
βͺ Kate Behncken β Corporate Vice President, Microsoft Philanthropies, Microsoft
βͺ Katherine Marshall β Professor of the Practice of Development, Conflict, and Religion, Walsh School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University
βͺ Kennedy Odede β CEO, Shining Hope for Communities
βͺ Kristin Lord β President and CEO, IREX
βͺ Levon Esters β Vice Provost for Graduate Education and Dean of the Graduate School, Pennsylvania State University
βͺ Liz Schrayer β President and CEO, US Global Leadership Coalition
βͺ Manuel Pulgar-Vidal β Global Leader of Climate & Energy, World Wildlife Fund
βͺ Michael Kobori β Chief Sustainability Officer, Starbucks
βͺ Nadia Murad β Founder and Chairwoman, Nadiaβs Initiative
βͺ Nicole Clifton β President, Social Impact and The UPS Foundation
βͺ Olga Wall β CEO, Avallon Consulting LLC
βͺ Paul Weisenfeld β Executive Vice President for International Development, RTI International
βͺ Peter Laugharn β President and CEO, Conrad N. Hilton Foundation
βͺ Saad Mohseni β Chairman and CEO, MOBY Group
βͺ Sanjay Pradhan β CEO, Open Government Partnerships
βͺ Tamara Wittes β President, National Democratic Institute
βͺ Teresa Barger β Co-Founder and CEO, Cartica
The connections go deep. For instance, Jeremy Weinstein is listed as a Stanford professor in the defunct USAID / ACVFA website, but he was Obama's Director for Development and Democracy for the National Security Council from 2009 to 2011 and afterwards Deputy to the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.
Julie Dorf is listed on ACVFA as "Co-Chair, Council for Global Equality" but she has a long LGBTQ+ advocacy history and was one of the WPATH consultants.
WPATH is accused of influencing research to establish its guidelines as the standard for gender-affirming care in children.
That's right, USAID dollars is being directed by one of the key players in modern children gender transition practice. @libsoftiktok
Kristin Lord is listed as the President and CEO of IREX (International Research & Exchanges Board).
Her longer biography - she is a board member of USGLC and also hails from Brookings Institution and other NGOs.
Once again.
Remember USGLC is funded by Gates Foundation and Open Society Foundation.
The first large Gates Foundation grant, which kickstarted it to the national stage, was in 2007 - the goal: "to educate and build awareness about the centrality of soft powers and increase commitment to greater investments in development, diplomatic and economic programs in such areas as global health."
In other words, outsource government functions to NGO which Soros and Gates exert control over.
Fast forward to 2022, and these "soft powers" aka NGOs got given massive advisory authority over where these dollars go.
Power was not shy about her intent to outsource these functions to NGOs. In a 23 May 2024 meeting transcript, she states an important issue is "how we shift more of our resources to local partners, to smaller organizations, to community-based organizations, faith leaders, and the like..."
(Sorry, 24 May 2023 meeting)
Power even stated a target of having 50% of all foreign assistance be ran by NGOs by 2030:
ACVFA had their last meeting in 2024, but the YouTube video is private. If someone from fedgov sees this, please make it public again:
More USGLC connection: C.D. Glin's LinkedIn lists him as a former board member of USGLC. He sits on ACVFA representing PepsiCo.
(Not finished yet, running a deep search...)
These companies receiving federal money were incentivized to follow woke agendas.
On his first day in office, Biden signed EO 13985, Executive Order On Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government.
In it, he directs each agency's head to prioritize funding for agendas that go towards advancing equity-related goals.
In other words, he ordered an audit of federal awardees.
I'll finish this thread for now. Here's the timeline:
πΉ 2007: The Gates Foundation seeded the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (USGLC) with a major donation. Over time, Gates contributed $71M+, with millions more flowing in from the Open Society Foundation (Soros).
πΉ Official Mission: USGLC claimed to promote U.S. soft power globally.
Actual Practice: It worked to outsource government functions to private NGOs.
πΉ Lobbying Power: USGLC successfully pushed for billions in federal funding to be directed to businesses, nonprofits, and faith-based entities.
πΉ Dependency Created: These organizations became financially dependent on continuous government contracts.
πΉ Bidenβs First Day: An Executive Order mandated a review and prioritization of federal awardees that aligned with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) goals.
πΉ Ideological Capture: Companies, now reliant on federal dollars, were forced to conform to DEI principles to survive.
πΉ The Endgame: Through the combined influence of Soros and Gates, the U.S. government was systematically hacked; federal funds outsourced to ideologically compliant businesses and NGOs, locking in permanent institutional capture.
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Everyone has their opinion on the Iran war or Israel. Maybe that opinion is enough to deter them from supporting Trump. I may not agree with it, but I understand where it comes from and it's a free country.
But when that turns into allying with Communists - that's when I have to speak up.
Institutional left-wing populism IS Communism. I'm not using it as a slur as in everyone to the left is a Communist. I mean it literally.
I'm talking about PSL, CODEPINK, Singham groups. The movements on the left that are anti-globalist are overwhelmingly Marxist.
π¨π§΅ BREAKING: Former DHS Chief Miles Taylor's prank site collected death threats against the President and 4,000+ people's personal data. Then exposed them through all an open API. π¨
Two days ago, I showed you how Miles Taylor's GTFO ICE site exposed 17,000+ people's data on an open API. That site halted sign-ups and is still "under construction."
But Taylor's organization DEFIANCE[.]org didn't just build one leaky site. They built two. On the same server.
UndoTrump[.]org β launched April 1, 2026 as an "April Fools' joke" β collects names, emails, and political messages from people signing up for fictional "Removal Parties" at government buildings. The White House Ballroom. The Kennedy Center. The DOJ. Battleships.
4,000+ signup records. 3,300+ unique people. Same vulnerability. Same API. Same zero authentication.
And this one has death threats against a sitting President in the database.
The man who was deputy chief of staff for the department that houses the Secret Service couldn't secure a sign-up form. Again.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. π
Here's a video of Miles himself soliciting PII in sign-ups. He implies he's not saving the user data... but he did.
Same server. Same IP address. 34.111.179.208. Google Cloud Platform. Same React 19 frontend. Same Express.js backend. Same registrar. Domains registered 13 days apart.
This wasn't two mistakes. This was one codebase deployed twice. Name.com
π§΅π¨ BREAKING: Miles Taylor: "Anonymous," former DHS Chief of Staff, Google security executive launched a website called GTFO ICE that collects your full name, email, phone number, and zip code to join an anti-ICE "rapid response network." And publishes the user infromation via a public API. π¨
17,662 people have signed up.
The sign-up data is exposed on a public REST API. No true authentication. No rate limiting. Full records: names, emails, phone numbers, zip codes, timestamps.
The man who ran the third-largest federal department (250,000 employees, $60 billion budget) who oversaw election security architecture and led counterterrorism operations, then served as Google's Head of National Security Policy...
...can't secure a sign-up form. But he does milk hundreds of thousands of NGO dollars on these credentials. While freeloading off his fame as the person who wrote the infamous NYT article "I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration."
And despite me pinging @MilesTaylorUSA about this 12 hours ago, the REST API is still wide open and exposed as of now. Everything has been turned over to FBI, HSI, ICE, and more agencies.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. π
Taylor's security clearance was suspended by presidential memorandum in April 2025. Trump called his conduct "treasonous." Five months later, Taylor launched DEFIANCE dot org. Five months after that... GTFO ICE.
GTFO ICE is a coalition of three orgs:
1. DEFIANCE dot org : Miles Taylor + Xander Schultz 2. Save America Movement : Steve Schmidt (yes, of the Lincoln Project) 3. Project Salt Box
π§΅ THREAD: You've heard the phrase "OUR DEMOCRACY" a million times. But what exactly is "OUR DEMOCRACY"? π€
When they say "democracy," they don't mean a republic. They don't mean consent of the governed. They don't mean your right to choose your own leaders.
They mean a system where "institutions" - NGOs, multilaterals, the permanent bureaucracy - advance a set of values they consider settled: equality, social justice, cosmopolitanism, global governance. These values aren't proposals to be voted on. They're treated as moral prerequisites that must be true *before* your vote counts.
Despite what they say, they aren't for checks and balances. Checks and balances limit what government can do to you. This limits what you can do to *them*. The brakes are on accountability, not power. The institutions that set the boundaries of acceptable policy have put themselves beyond the reach of the electorate, and they call that arrangement "democracy."
Trump has been an existential threat to this system since the moment he said "drain the swamp" ... because the swamp IS the system. When he threatened those institutions, he didn't threaten the republic. He threatened their immunity from it.
And they said so. On camera. At their own events. In their own words.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread.π
Robert Kagan:
"I would say there is an argument for saying give me some smoke filled rooms... they weeded out the Donald Trumps of this world."
Backroom deals instead of primaries. Because primaries are how you got Trump... and the old gatekeepers would have stopped him.
Think Kagan's an outlier? Here's Brookings senior fellow William Galston at the National Endowment for Democracy's (NED) most prestigious annual lecture.
He explains that "liberal democracy" requires "some abridgement of majoritarianism."
Translation: democracy means limiting what the majority can do.
π§΅π¨ THREAD: How the Charlottesville rally and SPLC birthed an entire billion-dollar-plus "democracy" ecosystem π¨
11 federal counts. Wire fraud. Money laundering conspiracy. But here's what the SPLC headlines are missing:
β’ The indictment describes a paid informant in the leadership chat that PLANNED Unite the Right
β’ That informant "helped coordinate transportation" to the rally... at SPLC's direction
β’ There is ONE publicly identified organizer whose documented role was transportation coordinator
β’ His Discord posts about running over protesters were made 26 DAYS before Heather Heyer was killed by a car
β’ The indictment says postings were made "under the supervision of the SPLC"
β’ Charlottesville then became the founding event for a billion-dollar political machine
β’ SPLC installed itself as that machine's definitional gatekeeper
I report. You draw your own conclusions.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. π
It is NOT confirmed fact that Chesny, who appeared to be encouraging running over protesters, was SPLC's informant.
But the indictment (paragraph 11a) describes informant F-37, and it matches Chesny:
β’ Member of the online leadership chat that planned Unite the Right
β’ Attended Charlottesville (at SPLC's direction)
β’ Made racist postings (under SPLC's supervision)
β’ Helped coordinate transportation for attendees
Now here's why this matters beyond the fraud charges.
Charlottesville became the single most consequential founding event in modern American political infrastructure. Every one of these organizations says... in their own words.... that they exist or were transformed because of August 12, 2017.
π§΅ THREAD: The true reason Pete Hegseth is being targeted is because he's standing between President Trump and a coup
@PeteHegseth named the institutions... CFR, Brookings, the general class... in 37 seconds in a video by @Liz_Wheeler . Within 72 hours of his nomination, a color revolution planning document cited him as an insider threat.
They didn't go after him because of drinking. They didn't go after him because of women. They went after him because every color revolution manual ever written says the same thing: you cannot topple a government unless the security forces defect. And a loyal Secretary of Defense is the one person who makes sure they don't.
I have the receipts. Their own documents. Their own training sessions. Their own words on camera.
As always, patience as I pull together the thread. π
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler This is not my theory. This is theirs.
Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan β the two most cited scholars in the color revolution field β studied 323 regime change campaigns. Their finding:
Security force defections make campaigns FORTY-SIX TIMES more likely to succeed.
@PeteHegseth @Liz_Wheeler So what did co-author Maria Stephan do next?
She became Chief Organizer of the Horizons Project. And on July 16, 2025, she trained New Kings participants on video.
"Security forces refused to obey orders to repress protesters."