Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Apr 25 14 tweets 6 min read Read on X
🚨Criminal complaint unsealed in case of Wisconsin judge helping illegal. It is just jaw-dropping that a judge would do this to help this character! Image
2/ Not merely 3 counts of domestic batter with physical pain or injury but he had already been deported once and illegal returned! Image
3/ So ICE goes to arrest him: Image
Image
4/ Some agents notified security and explained the arrest would be court proceedings in the public area. Others went to court and notified court security agent. Image
5/ A public defender (lawyer who represents defendants with no money), took pictures of agents and then went and told Judge's clerk who told the Judge: Image
Image
Image
6/ What the heck is this judge doing! She tells the agents they need to leave the courthouse!!! Image
Image
7/ Judge enters through side door, while another agent not "spotted" continues to watch. Meanwhile other agents speak with Chief Judge and confirm arrest in public areas was okay. Image
Image
8/ Courtroom deputy is a good guy. Judge tries to rush the domestic abuser through the process while everyone is supposedly tied up talking to Chief Judge. Image
9/ Judge Dugan: "Wait, come with me." Image
10/ Takes them out through the jury room: Image
11/ Holy Crap! It's worse than that!!! The judge "adjourned" the criminal case against the illegal who was charged with 3 counts of domestic abuse AND where the victims were present in court for hearing! State's attorney only discovered later when case not called! Image
Image
Image
12/ Agents then observed illegal & his attorney trying to leave courthouse back way and it took some 22 minutes for them to catch him following foot chase! Image
13/ Judge charged with 2 different crimes: obstructing or impeding a proceeding of a department and concealing an individual to prevent discovery and arrest. Image
14/14 This judge went way over the line...and for a domestic abuser!!! She put agents at risk, the public at risk, and acted with utter disregard to the victims AND the State who was there to prosecute the case!! Here's entire criminal complaint. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

May 15
THREAD on broad thoughts from hearing: My "gut" is that SCOTUS will follow what I call the Kavanaugh approach to nationwide injunctions and hold that there are rules & those must be followed and those rules require class certification to provide relief beyond Plaintiffs. 1/
2/ Justice Kavanaugh (echoed by several other justices) stressed that exigent circumstances purportedly justifying nationwide injunctions don't exist because courts can grant TRO/Preliminary Injunctions for putative classes (meaning class action lawsuits not yet certified).
3/ Given that reality, Justice Kavanaugh suggested the argument that we need nationwide injunctions collapses. And as he stressed couple times, there is a rule & those rules must be followed. If you listened to the argument, Justice Kavanaugh's approach came off balanced & sane.
Read 12 tweets
May 15
🧵on SCOTUS Nationwide Injunction re birthright citizenship case. Couple preliminary points: The argument is NOT about the merits of the birthright citizenship case. You may hear reference to the APA or the Administrative Procedure Act. This case does NOT concern APA. 1/
2/ Justices may reference APA b/c whether nationwide injunctions are appropriate under APA is a different issue (again not before the court). You'll also hear discussion of "organizational standing". Standing means ability to "stand" before court & ask for remedy b/c YOU are hurt
3/ Organizations have "standing" to sue if at least one member has standing to sue. But to have a remedy, Trump Administration maintains CASA, the organizational plaintiff, must establish which members are actually injured (by affidavit) & injunction is limited to them.
Read 21 tweets
May 13
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Trump Administration pounds SCOTUS in new filing asking court to lift administrative injunction entered for non-parties in the Alien Enemies Act case. h/t @gvincentamore 1/
2/ Here's full filing. Comments to follow: supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/2…
3/ You'll recall this is case where SCOTUS entered a midnight injunction barring Trump from removing any members of a "putative class" of tDa members. "Putative class" means there was NEVER a class action lawsuit "certified"--it was a wanna-be class action.
Read 16 tweets
May 9
🚨🚨🚨HUGE development in Alien Enemies Act case that SCOTUS entered a stay for an entire class that had not been certified. District judge now denies class certification. 1/
3/ This decision is first case where court denied class certification. Additionally, now that the court has denied class certification, it changes status quo of case before SCOTUS.
Read 7 tweets
May 3
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: HUGE win from Trump Administration and D.C. Circuit enters stay of lower court injunction. Lower court barred Trump Administration from managing Voice of America. D.C. Circuit stayed decision allowing Trump to move forward w/ firings/grant terminations. 1/
2/ Full order. Thoughts follow. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ Here is what Trump Administration did and what lower courts order via injunctions: Image
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
May 2
🚨New filing in Boasberg Alien Enemies Act case. Amazing this must be said! 1/ Image
2/ That excerpt was from a Declaration filed by Trump Administration in support of its Response in Opposition to New Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. This Response is interesting as it is first effort by Trump Administration to explain whether it is in constructive control
3/ of prisoners. Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(