🚨Criminal complaint unsealed in case of Wisconsin judge helping illegal. It is just jaw-dropping that a judge would do this to help this character!
2/ Not merely 3 counts of domestic batter with physical pain or injury but he had already been deported once and illegal returned!
3/ So ICE goes to arrest him:
4/ Some agents notified security and explained the arrest would be court proceedings in the public area. Others went to court and notified court security agent.
5/ A public defender (lawyer who represents defendants with no money), took pictures of agents and then went and told Judge's clerk who told the Judge:
6/ What the heck is this judge doing! She tells the agents they need to leave the courthouse!!!
7/ Judge enters through side door, while another agent not "spotted" continues to watch. Meanwhile other agents speak with Chief Judge and confirm arrest in public areas was okay.
8/ Courtroom deputy is a good guy. Judge tries to rush the domestic abuser through the process while everyone is supposedly tied up talking to Chief Judge.
9/ Judge Dugan: "Wait, come with me."
10/ Takes them out through the jury room:
11/ Holy Crap! It's worse than that!!! The judge "adjourned" the criminal case against the illegal who was charged with 3 counts of domestic abuse AND where the victims were present in court for hearing! State's attorney only discovered later when case not called!
12/ Agents then observed illegal & his attorney trying to leave courthouse back way and it took some 22 minutes for them to catch him following foot chase!
13/ Judge charged with 2 different crimes: obstructing or impeding a proceeding of a department and concealing an individual to prevent discovery and arrest.
14/14 This judge went way over the line...and for a domestic abuser!!! She put agents at risk, the public at risk, and acted with utter disregard to the victims AND the State who was there to prosecute the case!! Here's entire criminal complaint. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREADETTE: There were several telling exchanges during yesterday's SCOTUS argument in Trump v. Slaughter, but the one that struck me most was the final exchange between Justice Jackson & Slaughter's attorney. Read the full exchange below. 1/
2/ The problem is fundamental! Article I of the Constitution vests in CONGRESS the power to legislate--not unelected bureaucrats! And this ties into a second point: Jackson, Kagan, & Sotomayor all stressed Congress's "reliance interests" in creating "independent" agencies
3/ with the threesome arguing Congress relied limits on President's removal authority in granting agency regulatory authority. Well, there is a much bigger reliance interest at stake!
😡😡😡ABSOLUTELY. DISGUSTING! So-called "Republican" Dan Schaetzle is smearing my brother Jamie O'Brien, who is huge MAGA (might that be why?). While a local story, Schaetzle's behavior should be make him anathema in not just politics but polite society! 1/
/2 Also shame on @16NewsNow for pushing Schaetzle's preferred narrative that it is about my brother when more accurately Schaetzle is claiming the County never should have sought pension for ANY County Council attorneys most (all?) of whom were Dems before my brother.
@16NewsNow 3/ Here's the backdrop on Slimy Schaetzle's plot with details from Amy Drake.
Holy CRAP! A district court judge entered an injunction that allowed the states that had processed 100% of SNAP without authorization to keep the money! Trump is still seeking stay of lower court's order to fund SNAP with school lunch money. 1/
2/ Trump Administration calls out 1st Cir.'s ridiculous reasoning. This in essence is the problem:
2/ Here's argument: Trump Administration can't "fix" state's incompetence or its system of distributing money. And it is ridiculous to say it is arbitrary and capricious to keep money for kids food for kids food.
3/ How in the hell does this judge think he has the authority to force the administration to take money from another program to pay SNAP benefits?