The media has a secret playbook to take down Trump—and David Sacks just blew it wide open.
Not only did he expose their dirty tricks, he revealed Trump’s 4-D chess move to flip the entire national conversation.
But wait until you hear what he said about Zelenskyy. The globalist warmongers are going to lose it.
🧵THREAD
📍Don’t forget to bookmark the post above — Sacks just said what the media won't dare to tell you.
On to the clips. Enjoy!
It started with a quiet bombshell—one that David Sacks says most people missed.
According to Sacks, the media isn’t just ignoring Trump’s wins. They’ve built an entire playbook to erase them.
On the All-In podcast, @DavidSacks pulled back the curtain on a dirty trick the media has been using for years. He pointed to a viral post on X that exposed the hypocrisy in plain sight:
“If you think a market selloff delegitimizes Trump’s presidency, you’re going to give him unconditional credit when it rallies right? Cause those are the rules now.”
Simple logic. But as Sacks explained, the media refuses to play fair.
“The market has rallied, like you said it’s up 7% this week but the media doesn’t want to give Trump any credit for it, so it’s kinda created this narrative of a ‘Bessent put.’”
Rather than credit Trump, they scramble to credit anyone else.
“So what they do on any particular week is valorize a particular member of the administration——because I don’t want to give Trump that credit,” he said.
It’s not a glitch—it’s the strategy. Sacks said they’ll keep rotating through different faces just to keep the anti-Trump narrative alive.
“And next week they’ll be tearing Scott down and there’ll be some other member of the administration they’ll be trying to valorize.”
Anyone watching closely can see what’s happening.
“If the media’s going to tear Trump down every time the market goes down,” Sacks said, “you have to give him credit when the market goes back up.”
He added, “I think there’s just a general reluctance to do that.”
The pattern is obvious. But the story doesn’t stop there.
Sacks then turned the conversation to something even bigger—how Trump is flipping the entire national conversation in real time, and most people don’t even realize.
It’s not just about the market anymore. It’s about how Trump uses controversy itself as a weapon.
Andrew Ross Sorkin wondered if Trump could’ve achieved his goals with a softer approach on tariffs.
@chamath Palihapitiya pushed back:
“But what is to say this isn’t the velvet glove?—The stock market is down 6%! Like it's not down 60%.”
Sacks picked up the thread and took it even further.
“This is what I think is so interesting, Andrew, is the way that Trump has already shifted the conversation.”
Just a few weeks ago, none of this was on anyone’s radar.
“Because the truth of the matter is that before Liberation Day on April 2nd, just three weeks ago, no one was talking about the unfair trade practices.”
“No one was talking about the dependencies on rare earths, no one was talking about the race to the bottom. And Trump has shifted the conversation.”
Sacks said it’s no accident. Trump follows a playbook most people don't even realize exists.
“When Jared Kushner was on the show, he talked about how the Trumpian approach is: controversy elevates message.”
Trump isn’t just creating noise—he’s planting flags, forcing a realignment.
“By having this Liberation Day, by planting this flag in the ground, Trump was creating leverage to then have these negotiations, and he completely shifted the conversation.”
And it’s working.
“The fact that you’re saying that you don’t disagree with where Trump is trying to get to, but it’s mostly just tactical, is a huge shift in the conversation.”
The game has changed—and not by accident.
Before we roll the next clip, if you’re reading this but not following me, you’re missing out on explosive new threads every day.
Fix that by following me and hitting the bell so you never miss an update.
→@VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
From there, the conversation took an even sharper turn—straight into the heart of the war in Ukraine.
Sacks sounded off with no filter. He called out something few are willing to say out loud.
“Zelenskyy has made his bed, let him sleep in it.”
According to Sacks, Zelenskyy isn’t just stubborn. He’s become the single biggest obstacle to ending the war.
“The basic problem is that Zelenskyy doesn’t want to make a deal. I mean, he has rebuffed the Americans on Crimea, which should be the easiest point to give on.”
And it’s not just about military strategy—it’s about basic respect.
“He’s been completely unrealistic about their prospects on the battlefield. He was insulting to the White House when he visited the White House in his T-shirt or whatever. He was dressed inappropriately.”
“He was insulting to the president and especially the vice president. He murmured under his breath a curse word to the vice president. Remember that?”
Sacks pointed out the obvious: Zelenskyy is biting the very hand that feeds him.
“And remember, he’s biting the hand that feeds him. I mean, he has an obligation, I think, to be respectful to his patrons in a way that his patrons may not have to be to him.”
The bigger picture, he said, is even more troubling.
“And he has demonstrated, I think, that he’s unrealistic in every possible way. He’s unrealistic about Ukrainian prospects on the battlefield, about retaking Crimea, and about who the hand is that feeds him.”
Then Sacks dropped the final hammer:
“So my view on this is quite simple, which is if Zelenskyy won’t see reality, let him find new patrons. Let Starmer and Macron support him.”
And he closed it out with a brutal but honest truth:
“My point is Zelenskyy has made his bed. Let him sleep in it.”
But Sacks wasn’t done yet.
He ended with a warning that stretched beyond the headlines—one that hits the heart of the fight for America’s future, DOGE.
He said Elon Musk has already exposed the rot inside the government through DOGE—and he paid a heavy personal price for doing it.
Elon Musk, Sacks said, has been the canary in the coal mine. And now, it’s Congress’s turn to act.
“What we really need is for Congress to now embrace all of the corruption that Elon has found and eliminate it from the budget, because at the end of the day, in order to capture the savings here, we do need those appropriations eliminated from the budget.”
But the real danger isn’t Musk walking away—it’s Congress slipping right back into business as usual.
“These old bulls in Congress who control the appropriations process—are they going to basically backslide and just put the spending back in because it’s easier to engage in this logrolling, or do we take advantage of this?”
Sacks made it clear: Musk didn’t expose all this without paying a heavy price.
“This has cost him enormously. One of the reasons why Tesla is down is because you've had crazy leftists engaging in terrorism, firebombing Tesla dealerships.”
And what Musk uncovered, Sacks said, is even worse than people realize.
“We’ve basically learned that this whole NGO thing is a giant scam where the people in government give enormous amounts of money to their friends, probably with the expectation that when they leave government, they're going to be next in line at the trough.”
The corruption has been exposed. Now the question is whether anyone will do anything about it.
“Elon's done an enormous service exposing this. But it's not entirely up to him. In order for us to realize the benefit, we need Congress now to act on that. I’m afraid that’s not going to happen.”
A new investigation has revealed that Jeffrey Epstein, alongside powerful people like Bill Gates, may have MASTERMINDED the COVID response before it hit.
Internal emails show that in 2017, Epstein was part of an email chain with Bill Gates discussing how “pandemics” could be treated as a PERMANENT funding bucket inside large donor-advised funds — positioned not as a one-time emergency, but as an ongoing area where capital could be organized and directed long term.
And oddly enough, that same year, a close associate in Epstein’s network told him she had been working on “pandemic-related insurance products” designed to automatically pay out when a pandemic is declared.
Coincidence? That’s only scratching the surface of what @sayerjigmi’s report uncovers:
As Kim Iversen put it, “The new investigation and the Epstein files show that this wasn’t about preparedness. This was about control.”
“‘We’ll have these plans in place so that at the opportune moment, we can trigger them and gain all of this power and control.’”
What you’re about to read lays out how this machine actually works, from lab funding and media hype to profit mechanisms that turn every new “threat” into a predictable payday.
Think this ended with COVID? The money didn’t disappear. It just moved to the next “outbreak.” 🧵
The information in this report comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and eye-opening details, read the full 15,000+ word article below.
REPORT: The NIH is now funding research into ivermectin as a cancer treatment.
Yes, the same drug they mocked as “horse paste” is now being seriously studied—for its ability to kill cancer cells.
On February 10, the NIH confirmed it’s funding preclinical trials on ivermectin’s anti-cancer properties. Dr. Anthony Letai, head of the National Cancer Institute, said there’s “enough interest” and “enough reports” to take it seriously. Studies are already underway, with results expected in just a few months.
This follows 2024 and 2025 reviews by U.S. scientists showing signs that ivermectin can inhibit tumors. The NIH is now backing that research, pointing to ivermectin’s Nobel Prize-winning legacy and its decades of safe, FDA-approved use in humans.
But instead of welcoming a promising, low-cost treatment, the media doubled down. Outlets like MedPage Today rushed to dismiss the story as “right-wing hype,” ignoring the science and smearing anyone who dared to ask questions.
Why attack a drug that could save lives—unless the real threat is to their bottom line?
If ivermectin works, it won’t just save lives. It’ll shatter the system built to suppress it.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
#ad: The digital ID financial nightmare isn’t coming someday. It’s already here.
Once a single identity becomes the gateway to your money, your work, and your ability to participate in everyday life, compliance is no longer a choice.
That’s why Genesis Gold Group created the free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide.
It breaks down the real risks of digital ID and explains how physical gold and silver allow you to operate outside the system.
Digital dollars leave you exposed. Gold and silver can’t be frozen, tracked, or turned off.
Get your free Digital ID Resistance Wealth Guide right now at GoldandFreedom.com, before digital ID becomes the default and your options disappear.
DISCLOSURE: This ad was paid for by Genesis Gold Group. We may earn a small commission when you shop through our sponsors. Thank you for your support.
In other news, Republicans and Democrats are backing a bill that opens the door to mandatory Digital ID for every American.
It’s called the “Kids Off Social Media Act.” But it doesn’t just target kids. It targets you.
The bill bans anyone under 13 from having a social media account. Sounds reasonable—until you realize enforcement means scanning your face, checking your ID, or tracking your device… just to prove you’re old enough to speak online.
The bill doesn’t have to say “Digital ID.” The logic demands it. And once those systems are in place, they won’t stop at children. They’ll be used to control what you can say, see, and share.
Multiple states have already declared these laws unconstitutional. So why are Republicans still pushing them?
This is exactly how it started in the UK. Today, people are getting arrested for memes.
Watch @zeeemedia's report before they normalize this—and your freedom to speak anonymously disappears forever.
👇 rumble.com/v75mnac-republ…
Google why we no longer see crippled kids from polio. You’ll get one answer: vaccines.
But Dr. Suzanne Humphries says that’s not what the facts show—and when you dig into the history, the real story is jaw-dropping.
First off, polio never actually disappeared. “Polio is still here. Polio is still alive and well,” Humphries says.
What changed? The definition. Once the vaccine was introduced, the medical establishment redefined what counted as “polio.”
Humphries explains: “Polio is called different things today. Whereas back in the 1940s, 1950s, the criteria for diagnosing polio were completely different to the year that the vaccine was introduced. The playing field, the goalposts—everything was changed… they were able to show a complete cascading drop of paralytic polio simply because of the way they changed the definitions of what polio is and what could cause it.”
Suddenly, cases that would’ve been labeled polio were now called Guillain-Barré syndrome, coxsackievirus, echovirus—or simply chalked up to heavy metal poisoning. “They didn’t have virus, or they had coxsackievirus or echovirus, or they were lead poisoned or mercury poisoned, which was—the mercury and lead were the leading treatments of the day,” she said.
But it gets worse.
The rise of polio, she says, directly mirrored the use of toxic pesticides like DDT. “The tonnage of production of DDT absolutely mirrored the diagnosis for polio.” And even today, “the countries that still make DDT today is where we’re still seeing this paralytic polio situation happen.”
So what about the virus?
Polio virus, according to Humphries, is what’s known as a commensal—a normal virus that lives in most people without causing problems. In fact, “95 to 99% of all polio is asymptomatic.” She described a study of the Javante Indians where “98 to 99% of every person they tested… had evidence of immunity to all three strains of polio.”
When asked where all the paralyzed children were, she recalled: “They were like, ‘We don’t have any of that problem.’”
Humphries also points to a 1916 Rockefeller lab in Manhattan that, in her words, had “the specific stated goal… to try to create the most pathological, neuropathological strain of polio possible.” By injecting monkey brains and human spinal serum into monkeys, “there was a big problem with that, which was released into the public by accident. And the world experienced the worst polio epidemic on record. 25% mortality.”
Bottom line? According to Dr. Humphries, polio didn’t disappear because of vaccines. It disappeared behind a curtain of redefinitions, misdiagnoses, manmade disasters—and a whole lot of propaganda.
And if they went that far to deceive you about the polio vaccine, what else are they lying about? 🧵
Did you know the original smallpox vaccine caused serious injuries—and was often contaminated with pus, bacteria, and fungus?
We’ve been told it saved humanity from a deadly disease, but what if that’s a lie?
Dr. Suzanne Humphries explained to Joe Rogan what happened to children who received the vaccine. They developed large ulcers, high fevers, and widespread infections. With no antibiotics available, treatments were limited to mercury, arsenic, bloodletting, or isolation in dark rooms.
These severe reactions weren’t considered rare. In fact, they were referred to as “a good take.”
What made matters worse was how the vaccine was produced. According to Dr. Humphries, it was made by infecting animals and harvesting the resulting pus.
“They would take pus from other animals, scratch it into the belly of a cow, then take the pus off of the big pimples that would form,” she said. The material—called “pure lymph”—often came from cadavers, horses, or ulcerating cow udders, mixed with glycerin, and scratched into the surface of the skin.
Even decades later, contamination was an issue. “There was more bacteria and fungus in the smallpox vaccines than there was smallpox virus.” One widely used version, Dryvax, was eventually considered so problematic that health authorities ordered all remaining specimens destroyed around 2009.
Living conditions at the time were “a disaster.” Streets were filled with human and animal waste, there was no running water, and sanitation was nearly nonexistent. Poor hygiene and co-infections absolutely made smallpox far more deadly than it might have been otherwise.
Despite all this, the smallpox vaccine is still presented as a flawless triumph.
But for those who experienced the injuries firsthand, and for those who study its full history, the story isn’t so simple.
“This is the one vaccine that eliminated, eradicated a disease,” Dr. Humphries said sarcastically. “Can you believe that fairytale?”
We’ve all been taught that the smallpox vaccine was one of medicine’s greatest triumphs.
But when you read the actual clinical observations recorded by doctors who lived through its rollout, a far more unsettling picture emerges.
It’s not propaganda, and it’s not hindsight. It’s primary-source medicine.
There’s a reason doctors love pushing vaccines. The more they inject, the more money they make.
The foot traffic alone brings in big money, but there’s another perverse incentive, and once you hear it, it will make you angry.
RFK Jr. explains: “Pediatricians who vaccinate 80-85% of the kids in their office, get these giant bonuses... And that's why they throw you out of the office if you fight back…You'll lose them their bonuses.”
Sadly, these perverse financial incentives aren’t limited to vaccines but across many areas of medicine.
Dig a little deeper, and another disturbing pattern appears. Once you see it, you’re left gobsmacked by just how far the corruption runs beyond money. 🧵
The video below is haunting—not because the doctor in it is malicious, but because she genuinely believes she’s helping.
She’s an MD with a Master’s in Public Health, a Fellow of the American Academy of Pediatrics, and a former leader at Georgetown. Her language is warm. Her intentions seem pure.
Yet this interview perfectly captures how public health has lost its way.
After conquering most deadly contagious diseases, it turned toward chronic illness—and failed.
Instead of questioning why children are getting sicker, it doubled down on vaccinating more, earlier, and without dissent, often dismissing safety concerns as heresy.
Watch this video. Then ask yourself what matters more in modern medicine: children’s outcomes—or institutional certainty.
A lawsuit filed several years ago exposed something far more disturbing than a single act of medical misconduct.
It revealed how, during COVID, core medical ethics quietly collapsed—how consent became optional, coercion was reframed as care, and vulnerable people were treated as obstacles rather than patients.
This isn’t about ideology. It’s about what happens when fear, authority, and institutional pressure override conscience.
The real cause of heart disease has been buried for decades in favor of the lie about cholesterol.
40 million Americans take statins to lower their cholesterol, thinking it’s the best way to protect their hearts.
But what doctors never tell them is that statins interfere with the body’s natural repair system, weakening the very cells that rely on cholesterol to function.
In trying to prevent disease, they’re paradoxically fueling it.
This report exposes what really happens to the body when you take a statin every day.
For years, doctors have been taught that high cholesterol causes heart attacks. They’ve passed the warning along to their patients, and most of us have believed them.
But that idea came from one man: Ancel Keys.
Keys cherry-picked data to make fat and cholesterol look deadly while ignoring the real culprit: sugar.
John Yudkin tried to warn the world that sugar—not fat—was driving heart disease. But no one listened. He was ridiculed, silenced, and erased from history.