Trent Telenko Profile picture
Apr 26 • 19 tweets • 7 min read • Read on X
I see this F-35 procurement problems post is getting traction thanks to @elonmusk .

Let's add the F-35 problem list with bolts AKA fasteners.

1/
F-35 Fastener Corruption🧵 Image
I cannot begin to tell you all how fishy this passage from that article is:

"In addition to theĀ F-35Ā production line at Ft. Worth, Texas, the commingling of the two types of bolts was also discovered at the ItalianĀ F-35

2/ Image
... Final Assembly and Check-Out (FACO) facility, but not the one in Japan, the DCMA reported."

Spot checking of aircraft production and depot level maintenance facilities fastener bins is a standard operating procedure for DCMA everywhere it has quality personnel.

3/ Image
Finding incorrect bolts in a fastenerĀ bin at the then E-Systems Greenville Texas aircraft depot level repair facility was one of my first written corrective action requests in 1991.

4/ Image
Image
Image
Which makes this passage is such utter horses---t. I don't know where to begin:

"Both fasteners are called ā€œeddie boltsā€ and are similar in appearance except for a number stamped on them. The titanium bolts cost about $5 apiece, while the Inconel parts cost about $20 each. A Lockheed spokeswoman said the two parts are ā€œvery difficult to distinguish, visually.ā€"

5/
A simple perusal through these links will demonstrate how really different Inconel & Titanium bolts are.Ā 

It isn't just a number on the end of the bolt.

6/
stindia.com/difference-bet…
This is a simplified visual of a bolt being installed in a metal structure.

7/
extreme-bolt.com/products-incon…Image
Inconel & Titanium bolts have different settings on the bolt huck guns that install them.Ā  Inconel has higher tensile strength than Titanium.Ā 

A huck gun set for a Titanium bolt WILL NOT install a high heat shear-resistant Inconel bolt.

8/ Image
Again from the referenced 2020 article

"Inconel is an alloy of nickel and chromium, and is supposed to be used in places where greater strength and corrosion resistance are required, while the...

9/
...titanium bolts are used in areas where its strength and lightness helps reduce weight. Titanium, however, has a lower shear strength than Inconel."

Short form:

Inconel bolts are used in the F-35 engine compartment because of their high heat shear strength vs titanium.
10/ Image
What that article carefully left out was titanium bolts were used inside the F-35 engine compartment in lieu of inconel.

The F-35 JPO did not do a fleet inspection to ferret out which F-35's were affected.

Inconel is magnetic. Titanium isn't. Using magnetic LED flashlights on bolt heads is easy
11/Image
Every production operation on an aircraft in foreign object-controlledĀ (FOD) areas has an electronic worksheet listingĀ tools, their settings, parts, where parts are installed, the order of installation, and sign off boxes for operations completed.Ā 
12/ Image
Materials and tools going into a FOD controlled area are accounted for whenever you enter and leave the area and at the end of the shift.

13/ Image
Image
Image
These operations sheets are built around and feed the electronic "Build of Materials" that automatically purchases fasteners and all the otherĀ parts required for that operation on a plane.

14/ Image
The chances of $5 Titanium bolts being 'accidentally' commingledĀ and used in lieu of $20 Inconel bolts from start of F-35 production to Nov 2019, without detection by anyone, is so low as to be laughable.

15/ Image
There wereĀ a wholeĀ lot ofĀ reasons that DCMA was ordered to put very large teams of inspectors inside the FT. Worth production line for the F-35 in 2020.

It certainly wasn't about trust.

16/
The 2022 DCMA stop of F-35 production acceptance happened because the discovery of Chinese rare earth metals in the F-35 engine structure.

This shows how utterly screwed F-35 pilots really are.


17/17
P.S.

"According to the DCMA, there are more than 48,000 fasteners of the two types on an F-35 fighter. The Air Force's F-35As have 848 Inconel bolts out of 48,919 total fasteners, or about 1.7 percent of the total. The Marine Corps' F-35B model has 877 Inconel fasteners out of 50,603, also 1.7 percent. The Navy's F-35C carrier-capable model, though, which has to endure the shock of repeated hard landings on an aircraft carrier, and is larger and heavier than the other two variants, has 51,353 fasteners, of which 1,813, or 3.5 percent, are made of Inconel."

airforcemag.com/lockheed-poten…
@threadreaderapp unroll please

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
怀

Keep Current with Trent Telenko

Trent Telenko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrentTelenko

May 13
Finally!

Accounts watching the Russo-Ukrainian War have been utterly confused as to why Ukraine and Russia simply refused to use barbed wire.

1/
This one of my long threads on the lack of barbed wire from 2023.

4/
Read 7 tweets
May 13
This Ukrainian video shared by @bayraktar_1love makes clear it wasn't US Patriots on German mobile launchers that nailed a Backfire bomber and a pair of A-50 AEW radar planes.

It was a Ukrainian 1960's era S-200 (Nato SA-5) SAM.

A Victory Lap🧵
1/
What that video showed was the remote control feature for the S-200's 5P72 launchers.

This Soviet PVO scheme allowed S-200 batteries to put the 5P72 launcher near the front lines and keep the 5N62 Square Pair illuminating target radar 100 km behind it,

2/ Image
Image
...out of range of NATO tactical ballistic missiles.

A lot of "expert" X accounts in Feb 2024 were saying that this video showed a Patriot engagement or Russian friendly fire engagement.

The A-50 countermeasures pattern was inconsistent with both.

3/
Read 15 tweets
May 11
Actually, I disagree with @wretchardthecat below.

The question to be asking is "which military power is it more cost effective to have a cease fire?"

Strangely enough, a 30 day ceasefire favors Ukraine far more than Russia, because drones.

1/
The most important grand strategy scale decision of this conflict has been Ukraine's move to mass produce multi-copter drones, Propeller assault (OWA) drones, jet drone-missiles and increasing numbers of military spare parts via masses of 3D/AM printers.

2/
Ukraine is making 4 million drones a year including over 30,000 long range OWA drones and 3,000 "Drone-missiles" of three models a year.

That's over
33K small drones
2,500 OWA drones, and
250 Drone-missiles per month.

3/
Read 6 tweets
May 11
I have a copy of Solly Zuckerman's book mentioned in the thread below and I can confirm it's applicability to the Russo-Ukrainian War for the Ukrainian cause.

1/
To date, no strategic bombing campaign has been analyzed by serious historians as to how the targeting decisions for the various strategic bombing campaigns against Germany, Japan, North Korea, and North Vietnam/Laos/Cambodia were done.

2/
To quote the late Pierre Sprey:

"...strategic bombing targeting in every one of those campaigns was done by highly centralized, highly bureaucratized committees--and every one of those committees

3/
Read 17 tweets
May 6
This is Grok analysis of one of my X threads is a good example of why farming out your thinking/analysis to AI is a really bad idea.

Grok accurately reflects a highly flawed US National Security consensus about small drones.😱

A Grok vs Drone Reality🧵

x.com/i/grok/share/B…
Grok focused on Ukrainian drone capabilities to the exclusion of actual fielded Chinese drone capability and literally eight decades old aviation technology like conformal fuel tanks which have also been applied to cruise missiles in the Chinese technological base for 20 years
2/ Image
The Chinese Sunflower-200 is it's clone of the Iranian Shahed-136. It appeared at Russia's Armiya-2023 show and in 2025 combat in Sudan.

The China Defense website says it has a 3.2-meter length, 2.5-meter wingspan, a flight speed of 160-220 km per hour with a maximum take-off weight of 175 kilograms, a combat payload of 40 kilograms and can fly up to 2000 kilometers.
x.com/clashreport/st…
3/Image
Image
Read 18 tweets
May 4
I cannot begin to tell you how heartened I am by this development in Ukrainian combat barrier doctrine.

1/
Compare the picture above to my complaints about Ukrainian fighting doctrine in the Summer of 2024.

2/
Or my B*tching about its lack in the Summer of 2023 for the Russian Army

3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(