🚨 Actor Terrence Howard just stunned Bill Maher with a barrage of jaw-dropping claims.
Howard held nothing back: from ivermectin and cancer to JFK to “breaking the buck” rituals inside the entertainment industry.
What he said during this podcast will leave you speechless.
🧵 THREAD
Howard held nothing back: from ivermectin and cancer to JFK to “breaking the buck” rituals inside the entertainment industry.
What he said during this podcast will leave you speechless.
🧵 THREAD
📍Bookmark this post — it might be the wildest collection of clips we’ve ever packed into one thread.
Are you ready for these?
Are you ready for these?
It began with a simple but chilling question.
On Club Random, Terrence Howard leaned in and asked what many have quietly wondered since RFK Jr. entered office:
“Did they pull something out on him to make him change his stance?”
Howard didn’t hesitate. He wanted to know what happened to the man he once met—the one who had been so strongly against vaccines like MMR.
“What happened to him, man? RFK. No, what happened to him?” he said. “He was so against MMR vaccines, so against that. And then he gets into the office——and I’ve seen him, I’ve met him.”
“Did they pull something out on him to make him change his stance? Or.....”
Bill Maher didn’t offer a defense. Instead, he gave a glimpse into how Washington wears people down.
“Well, you know, as Mario Cuomo used to say, you run for office in poetry, you govern in prose. You know, once you get in, you know, once you are the sheriff things are a little different,” Maher said.
He suggested that even getting confirmed might have required RFK Jr. to say things he didn’t truly believe.
“First of all, just to get confirmed, he probably had to say a few things that he’s not completely on the page with.”
Once you’re in, Maher implied, survival demands compromise.
On Club Random, Terrence Howard leaned in and asked what many have quietly wondered since RFK Jr. entered office:
“Did they pull something out on him to make him change his stance?”
Howard didn’t hesitate. He wanted to know what happened to the man he once met—the one who had been so strongly against vaccines like MMR.
“What happened to him, man? RFK. No, what happened to him?” he said. “He was so against MMR vaccines, so against that. And then he gets into the office——and I’ve seen him, I’ve met him.”
“Did they pull something out on him to make him change his stance? Or.....”
Bill Maher didn’t offer a defense. Instead, he gave a glimpse into how Washington wears people down.
“Well, you know, as Mario Cuomo used to say, you run for office in poetry, you govern in prose. You know, once you get in, you know, once you are the sheriff things are a little different,” Maher said.
He suggested that even getting confirmed might have required RFK Jr. to say things he didn’t truly believe.
“First of all, just to get confirmed, he probably had to say a few things that he’s not completely on the page with.”
Once you’re in, Maher implied, survival demands compromise.
The conversation shifted, but the underlying theme stayed the same—how the systems in place aren't what they seem.
Howard opened up about his view of vaccines, painting a darker picture of their purpose.
“The entire process that they’re working on, it’s not to build humanity up. I don’t see it. It’s more so to tear us down,” he said.
Maher pressed him: “Who are we talking about?”
Howard didn’t miss a beat.
“I’m still talking about the government as a whole, either Democrat or Republican," he said. "Because if you go back to, like, for me, when the vaccines first were coming out, and I was talking about—not the COVID vaccine, just me dealing with my children—about, am I going to do vaccines to give them in school? And I was like, no, I don’t want to give them the MMR and all of that.”
Maher agreed: “They don’t need it now.”
Howard then shared a little-known shift that he believes changed everything about vaccines—and their effects.
“No! And when we were kids back in 1969 when I was born, and they gave me the shot, it was delivered with duck embryo DNA. Then in 1970, when they got the abortion clinics, they started using human DNA.”
He explained the critical difference:
“The duck embryo DNA would not bond. It would deliver the vaccine, it would deliver the little protein that was necessary, but it didn’t have any match to your DNA, so it would be taken out of the body. But because they’re using human DNA cells from the abortion clinics, those now bond into our cells and try to bond with it.”
According to Howard, the consequences of that change are now visible everywhere.
“That’s why we have all the psoriasis now. Did you see that much psoriasis back in the ’80s? Back when you were—when I was a child—I didn’t see it.”
Howard opened up about his view of vaccines, painting a darker picture of their purpose.
“The entire process that they’re working on, it’s not to build humanity up. I don’t see it. It’s more so to tear us down,” he said.
Maher pressed him: “Who are we talking about?”
Howard didn’t miss a beat.
“I’m still talking about the government as a whole, either Democrat or Republican," he said. "Because if you go back to, like, for me, when the vaccines first were coming out, and I was talking about—not the COVID vaccine, just me dealing with my children—about, am I going to do vaccines to give them in school? And I was like, no, I don’t want to give them the MMR and all of that.”
Maher agreed: “They don’t need it now.”
Howard then shared a little-known shift that he believes changed everything about vaccines—and their effects.
“No! And when we were kids back in 1969 when I was born, and they gave me the shot, it was delivered with duck embryo DNA. Then in 1970, when they got the abortion clinics, they started using human DNA.”
He explained the critical difference:
“The duck embryo DNA would not bond. It would deliver the vaccine, it would deliver the little protein that was necessary, but it didn’t have any match to your DNA, so it would be taken out of the body. But because they’re using human DNA cells from the abortion clinics, those now bond into our cells and try to bond with it.”
According to Howard, the consequences of that change are now visible everywhere.
“That’s why we have all the psoriasis now. Did you see that much psoriasis back in the ’80s? Back when you were—when I was a child—I didn’t see it.”
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing critical information.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
The deeper they went, the more the conversation exposed how little trust remains in major industries—starting with Big Pharma.
Maher explained how pharmaceutical companies don’t necessarily discard failed or dangerous drugs.
“It’s also a known fact that when they come up with a drug, and it doesn’t work on one thing—or sometimes because it works too well, in other words, it kills you—they don’t throw it away exactly. Because that’s bad money after good. Okay,” Maher said.
He continued, “What they do is they repurpose it. They do that many times. You know, it didn’t work on cancer, but we got a whole stockroom of it. No, I’m sure it’s not quite like that. But it is suspicious to me.”
Howard didn’t miss the opening. He stepped in with a bold claim that turned the conversation toward cancer treatment itself.
“What made the cancer go away was the ivermectin, the antiparasitics, all of those things that they were saying, ‘Oh, that you give to dogs,’ things of that nature,” Howard said.
He explained why he believes cancer isn’t simply a random mutation, but something cells naturally fight against.
“Because cancer, I don’t believe—and from looking at it—a cancer isn’t just some deformity that happens to a given cell. Correct. Cells have a fight against it.”
To Howard, the answers were never as far away as we were told—they were just hidden.
Maher explained how pharmaceutical companies don’t necessarily discard failed or dangerous drugs.
“It’s also a known fact that when they come up with a drug, and it doesn’t work on one thing—or sometimes because it works too well, in other words, it kills you—they don’t throw it away exactly. Because that’s bad money after good. Okay,” Maher said.
He continued, “What they do is they repurpose it. They do that many times. You know, it didn’t work on cancer, but we got a whole stockroom of it. No, I’m sure it’s not quite like that. But it is suspicious to me.”
Howard didn’t miss the opening. He stepped in with a bold claim that turned the conversation toward cancer treatment itself.
“What made the cancer go away was the ivermectin, the antiparasitics, all of those things that they were saying, ‘Oh, that you give to dogs,’ things of that nature,” Howard said.
He explained why he believes cancer isn’t simply a random mutation, but something cells naturally fight against.
“Because cancer, I don’t believe—and from looking at it—a cancer isn’t just some deformity that happens to a given cell. Correct. Cells have a fight against it.”
To Howard, the answers were never as far away as we were told—they were just hidden.
But Maher wasn’t done swinging.
In a moment that stunned even the most skeptical listeners, he turned his fire directly at the left—and their demonization of ivermectin during COVID.
Maher laid it out as simply as anyone could.
“The fact that it was demonized by the left is one of the things that I would say, I could come up with a larger list of things that, you know when people are like, oh you know why aren't you just all on our team?”
“Because your team does some shitty stuff too.”
He called out the nonsense behind pretending ivermectin was somehow evil.
“And pretending that ivermectin was somehow evil, it wasn’t evil. It won the Nobel Prize in 2015.”
“They say it cured probably more people [than] except penicillin.”
Maher kept pressing the obvious question that so many refused to ask.
“Okay, was it crazy to think it could work on Covid?”
“Because, again, we’re all individuals. This one-size-fits-all medical treatment bugs me.”
In an era when questioning the narrative could get you canceled, Maher made it painfully clear why trust in "the science" was never blind—or deserved.
In a moment that stunned even the most skeptical listeners, he turned his fire directly at the left—and their demonization of ivermectin during COVID.
Maher laid it out as simply as anyone could.
“The fact that it was demonized by the left is one of the things that I would say, I could come up with a larger list of things that, you know when people are like, oh you know why aren't you just all on our team?”
“Because your team does some shitty stuff too.”
He called out the nonsense behind pretending ivermectin was somehow evil.
“And pretending that ivermectin was somehow evil, it wasn’t evil. It won the Nobel Prize in 2015.”
“They say it cured probably more people [than] except penicillin.”
Maher kept pressing the obvious question that so many refused to ask.
“Okay, was it crazy to think it could work on Covid?”
“Because, again, we’re all individuals. This one-size-fits-all medical treatment bugs me.”
In an era when questioning the narrative could get you canceled, Maher made it painfully clear why trust in "the science" was never blind—or deserved.
From the decay of medicine, the conversation took aim at another broken system: America's poisoned food supply.
Maher didn’t mince words.
“I just think that when money gets involved, they will find a way to manipulate seeds or—you know—they do it with our food supply is shit,” he said.
He explained how natural diversity in food was sacrificed for corporate profits.
“There used to be like so many different kinds of wheat, but because of—the economics. And it was more economical.”
Howard took it one step further.
“And that’s where Monosat [Monsanto] came in. They’re just keeping the same...”
Once money became the mission, Howard and Maher agreed, food stopped being nourishment—and started becoming another industrial product.
Maher didn’t mince words.
“I just think that when money gets involved, they will find a way to manipulate seeds or—you know—they do it with our food supply is shit,” he said.
He explained how natural diversity in food was sacrificed for corporate profits.
“There used to be like so many different kinds of wheat, but because of—the economics. And it was more economical.”
Howard took it one step further.
“And that’s where Monosat [Monsanto] came in. They’re just keeping the same...”
Once money became the mission, Howard and Maher agreed, food stopped being nourishment—and started becoming another industrial product.
But the darkest revelations were still ahead.
This one will stay with you, especially after connecting the dots on Harvey Weinstein and P. Diddy.
That’s when Howard opened up about a disturbing reality that he said still lingers behind the glitz of Hollywood—the old practice of “breaking the buck.”
He described a brutal method from the days of slavery:
“They would tie him to a log or barrel, and a bunch of the overseers would rape him. When he walked around with the slaves, now he didn’t have the confidence. His whole—he was broken. And it was called breaking the buck.”
According to Howard, that system never truly ended—it just adapted to the modern entertainment industry.
“That’s still taking place.”
Today, he said, young artists are still pressured into submission.
“They go and see someone, and they tell them, ‘Okay, yeah, you can have a deal. Perform fellatio on me and you get your deal.’”
Howard pointed to artist Petey Pablo, who he says tried to expose what was happening—and paid a steep price.
“He was kicked out of the music business. No radio station would play his stuff. You look for Petey Pablo—he’s not around anymore.”
This one will stay with you, especially after connecting the dots on Harvey Weinstein and P. Diddy.
That’s when Howard opened up about a disturbing reality that he said still lingers behind the glitz of Hollywood—the old practice of “breaking the buck.”
He described a brutal method from the days of slavery:
“They would tie him to a log or barrel, and a bunch of the overseers would rape him. When he walked around with the slaves, now he didn’t have the confidence. His whole—he was broken. And it was called breaking the buck.”
According to Howard, that system never truly ended—it just adapted to the modern entertainment industry.
“That’s still taking place.”
Today, he said, young artists are still pressured into submission.
“They go and see someone, and they tell them, ‘Okay, yeah, you can have a deal. Perform fellatio on me and you get your deal.’”
Howard pointed to artist Petey Pablo, who he says tried to expose what was happening—and paid a steep price.
“He was kicked out of the music business. No radio station would play his stuff. You look for Petey Pablo—he’s not around anymore.”
The shadows got even darker when the conversation turned to the infamous Diddy parties.
Maher cracked a nervous joke when Howard rummaged through his bag.
“Uh oh. Well, this is how it started at the Diddy parties. Yeah. The guy reaches into a bag, and the next thing you know, you’ve got somebody’s d*ck up your butt,” Maher joked.
He kept pressing the point, asking if Howard could believe who showed up at those parties—mentioning Justin Bieber by name.
Howard didn’t laugh it off.
“Yeah, but he shouldn’t have been there at 14,” he said, shifting the mood back to something dead serious.
Howard made it clear that even if a child is assaulted, it doesn’t take away their manhood.
“If some child is r*ped, it doesn’t take it [man card] away,” he said.
Maher asked him to explain: “What is man card meaning?”
Howard replied, “The man card is your integrity, your dignity,” before quipping, “It’s your butt.”
Maher laughed, teasing, “Oh wait, is it your integrity, or is it your butt?”
Howard shot back, “That [your butt] is your integrity. That’s because that goes to your intestines.”
Maher closed the moment with a final jab: “My man card is never expired, okay? … I don’t think my butt has anything to do with my man card.”
Maher cracked a nervous joke when Howard rummaged through his bag.
“Uh oh. Well, this is how it started at the Diddy parties. Yeah. The guy reaches into a bag, and the next thing you know, you’ve got somebody’s d*ck up your butt,” Maher joked.
He kept pressing the point, asking if Howard could believe who showed up at those parties—mentioning Justin Bieber by name.
Howard didn’t laugh it off.
“Yeah, but he shouldn’t have been there at 14,” he said, shifting the mood back to something dead serious.
Howard made it clear that even if a child is assaulted, it doesn’t take away their manhood.
“If some child is r*ped, it doesn’t take it [man card] away,” he said.
Maher asked him to explain: “What is man card meaning?”
Howard replied, “The man card is your integrity, your dignity,” before quipping, “It’s your butt.”
Maher laughed, teasing, “Oh wait, is it your integrity, or is it your butt?”
Howard shot back, “That [your butt] is your integrity. That’s because that goes to your intestines.”
Maher closed the moment with a final jab: “My man card is never expired, okay? … I don’t think my butt has anything to do with my man card.”
As the conversation wound down, Howard introduced one final WILD theory—one that tied the deep state, the Fed, and the JFK assassination together.
Howard asked Maher about JFK:
“Did you hear what I heard about what got him killed?”
Maher answered carefully.
“Oh, I think we all know generally what got him killed, but what’s your theory?”
Howard answered without hesitation.
“The night before he had signed an executive order, ordering that the Federal Reserve would no longer be printing the dollars, that the U.S. government will now print the dollars.”
Maher pushed back slightly.
“The Federal Reserve is the U.S. government.”
Howard corrected him.
“The Federal Reserve is a separate entity.”
He connected JFK’s fate to another president who challenged the same system.
“What I’ve researched and found, it was comparable to what happened to Abraham Lincoln. He wanted to do the same thing. Start printing money himself, instead of having the Federal Reserve.”
Howard explained why this battle over money mattered.
“Say Congress needs $20 billion—they print the $20 billion, but they never print up the interest. So they were always going to be in debt.”
In Howard’s view, JFK and Lincoln both tried to free America from that endless debt trap—and both paid the ultimate price.
Howard asked Maher about JFK:
“Did you hear what I heard about what got him killed?”
Maher answered carefully.
“Oh, I think we all know generally what got him killed, but what’s your theory?”
Howard answered without hesitation.
“The night before he had signed an executive order, ordering that the Federal Reserve would no longer be printing the dollars, that the U.S. government will now print the dollars.”
Maher pushed back slightly.
“The Federal Reserve is the U.S. government.”
Howard corrected him.
“The Federal Reserve is a separate entity.”
He connected JFK’s fate to another president who challenged the same system.
“What I’ve researched and found, it was comparable to what happened to Abraham Lincoln. He wanted to do the same thing. Start printing money himself, instead of having the Federal Reserve.”
Howard explained why this battle over money mattered.
“Say Congress needs $20 billion—they print the $20 billion, but they never print up the interest. So they were always going to be in debt.”
In Howard’s view, JFK and Lincoln both tried to free America from that endless debt trap—and both paid the ultimate price.
Watch the full Club Random episode with Bill Maher and Terrence Howard here:
Thanks for reading. If you appreciate this kind of reporting, follow me for more daily threads.
—> @VigilantFox
Did you know that the media has a secret playbook to take down Trump?
🔥 Check out David Sacks tearing it wide open!
—> @VigilantFox
Did you know that the media has a secret playbook to take down Trump?
🔥 Check out David Sacks tearing it wide open!
https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1916252386026525111
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
