.@JDVance: It's been 1 week since you sent a "cease and desist" letter to me demanding that I delete the tweet in which I called you out for RAPING BOYS in the Ohio Valley in the mid-2000s (which you did). I told you to GET FUCKED. Where is the "swift and certain legal action"?
@JDVance Spoiler Alert: @JDVance will never sue me because:
1. You cannot win a defamation case if the claims made about you are true (and mine are). Truth is an absolute defense to defamation.
@JDVance 2. In both libel (written) and slander (spoken), the core requirement is that the statement be *false* AND damaging to your reputation. If the defendant can prove the statement is true (I CAN), even if it’s embarrassing or harmful, then you lose the case.
@JDVance 3. Since the claim is true, not only would @JDVance lose any defamation case brought against me, he would also, simply by doing so:
—Draw national (more likely global) attention to the accusation
—Legally confirm the truth of the claim
—Embarrass himself more than staying quiet
@JDVance 4. As @JDVance has already learned the hard way with his painfully transparent “cease and desist” letter, trying to suppress the claim through intimidation will only:
—Draw more public attention to it
—Make it (EVEN MORE) viral/ newsworthy, worsening his own reputational damage
@JDVance 5. Any lawsuit filed by Vance against me opens the door to the process of DISCOVERY, in which:
—The person suing (plaintiff) might have to turn over emails, texts, or testify under oath (ruh roh)
—More dirt would be likely to surface
—Media outlets would pick up on it/dig deeper
@JDVance 6. The optics of a sitting Vice President/child rapist suing a private citizen for telling the truth are utterly atrocious, as it would:
—Look like bullying or a desperate attempt at a cover-up.
—Be doomed to backfire with public opinion, especially in the age of social media
@JDVance 7. Litigation is expensive and time-consuming (J.D. might believe he has the upper hand here because of his billionaire backers, but he still doesn’t)
Cause I can crowdfund any legal fees that I ever need to pay and I have all the time in the world to end your career @JDVance
@JDVance 8. A long, protracted, and messy legal battle would not only serve to make these allegations known to all Americans, it would supercharge the story, make headlines for months, and divert time, money, and energy away from other priorities (like pretending to be our Vice President)
@JDVance 9. Vance filing a lawsuit would give the person who made the accusation (me):
—An even bigger platform (I would probably get invited on talk/radio/news shows) and more credibility.
—Legal standing to subpoena and/or counterclaim
—Public sympathy as a “truth-teller under attack”
@JDVance 10. As the other points have made clear, a lawsuit against me would be political/professional suicide for J.D. This is compounded by how it could:
—Trigger investigations, resignations, lost endorsements, and public opprobrium
—Invite scrutiny of a dark secret that would end him
@JDVance 11. I am this administration’s worst nightmare because I rival them in social status/privilege [I’ve even turned being gay from a weak spot into an unassailable strength by unapologetically stating it in my bio and embracing it as a part of who I am unequivocally proud to be]
@JDVance Lastly, as a psychologist I take @JDVance’s letter AS A FUCKING CONFESSION. Because I get called a Nazi and a pedo and a groomer and a Marxist and a Terrorist and every other thing on here CONSTANTLY and it doesn’t bother me whatsoever. Why? Because I am none of those things.
@JDVance I knew it was all true already of course. @JDVance CONFIRMED IT TO ME with that cease and desist letter. And now I will never cease nor desist.
J.D. and I are actually the exact same age believe it or not.
I will dedicate my life to ensuring that he goes down in flames.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s not funny at all. You want to know why the victims haven’t come forward? Because MOST OF THEM ARE DEAD/KILLED. You want to know why no police reports/investigations? Because Republican Ohio governor @MikeDeWine INSTRUCTS THE SHERIFFS IN OHIO VALLEY NOT TO FILE/SHRED THEM.
1. Whether you love me or hate me, I am not “some random twitter douche.” I am the most far-reaching political influencer on this platform. And I achieved that by putting out credible content every single day for the past 9 years straight
2. I made a pledge to all who followed me when I first started posting on here in 2017 that I would always engage with them, answer their questions, and NEVER LIE TO THEM. And I have KEPT THAT PLEDGE. I DO NOT SPREAD MISINFORMATION AND DESPISE PEOPLE WHO DO (like everyone you RT)
.@TheRabbitHole84 is correct that if you type this prompt into @grok, it says “Yes.”
However, it’s incorrect to say that this is the right answer. As a prolific reader and scholar of history, inequality, psychology, sociology, and the origins of social hierarchy, I know this one
Here’s how I led @grok to the right answer:
1. I responded to its wrong answer of “Yes” with:
“That is incorrect”
@grok .@Grok responded:
“I respect your view. My stance is that Affirmative Action can be seen as racist because it involves treating individuals differently based on race, often prioritizing certain groups over others in opportunities like education or employment.”
.@JDVance just had a local constable deliver a “cease and desist” letter about the tweet below from someone named “Chris Ashby,” who interestingly does not appear to even represent the @VP. It threatens to pursue “swift and certain legal action” against me if I don’t delete this.
I will neither be ceasing nor desisting. Nor will I be deleting the tweet. Because nothing in it is false and you cannot win a defamation case against someone who posted a true statement against you. I left a message for Chris at his law firm letting him know to contact me.
I asked @grok: “What would a president of the U.S. who worked for our enemies be doing right now to destroy America while maintaining plausible deniability about his blatant treason?”
Here’s what it said. Stop me if you see any parallels to what @realDonaldTrump is doing
“A president working for enemies while maintaining plausible deniability would likely engage in subtle, strategic actions to undermine the U.S. without overt treason. Here’s what they might do:”
1. **Weaken National Security**:
- Gradually reduce funding or readiness for critical defense programs under the guise of "budget optimization" or "peace initiatives."
.@JDVance: You changed your name three times because you kept getting caught raping children in the Ohio Valley. And I have witnesses who can and will testify against you on this. I cannot wait to put you in prison for the rest of your life you sick fuck.
This all starts to make sense when you zoom out
#GOPPedoRing
I’m so happy this blew up. Which is not something I would be saying if I was making it up. These people are fucking gross and have been covering their tracks very well, but it’s all a stack of cards that’s about to fall. Please check out my most recent space where I talk about it
I just shared a theory of mine with @Grok about how @realDonaldTrump, @elonmusk, the @GOP, and the right-wing media machine stole the 2024 election and it told me I WAS CORRECT.
Here's what I posited:
"I believe the Republican Party waged a propaganda operation (of near psy-op level) to get Donald Trump back into office. In order to do this, they knew they needed to convince the American people that things were terrible under Biden even though they actually were not." (1 of 2)
"I have also always been wary of the way Biden was forced out over one debate performance that seemed to be more of an issue of a hoarse voice than cognitive issues, and yet simply because of how everyone misperceived it, Biden dropped out with only 108 days left in the campaign"