In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce a Russian journalist, Leonid Ragozin (@leonidragozin). He’s best-known for posing as a Russian dissident, while at the same time sneakily promoting the Kremlin’s narratives about the Russo-Ukrainian War.
1/20
On paper, Leonid doesn’t look like your typical Kremlin apologist - he’s written and worked for prestigious Western outlets like the BBC, the Guardian, and he’s even written some Lonely Planet guides for the Baltic countries!
2/20
But Ragozin’s public commentary often seems to walk a fine line: condemning the war while pushing narratives that shift blame, dilute responsibility, or quietly carry the same old imperial baggage Russia - or its opposition - has never truly forgotten.
3/20
He routinely warns the West not to “humiliate Russia,” a talking point that eerily echoes Putin’s own rhetoric. I mean, if your biggest concern during a war of aggression is that the aggressor might feel offended, are you really opposing the right things?
4/20
His framing consistently casts small, vulnerable democracies in Eastern Europe as aggressive, overreacting, or irrational — while subtly positioning Russia as a misunderstood giant, unfairly antagonized by its neighbors.
5/20
Just before the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Ragozin repeatedly ridiculed the idea of a potential full-scale war, called Western support for Ukraine reckless and suggested that Ukrainian sovereignty was being manipulated by NATO interests.
6/20
In Jan 2022, Ragozin tweeted that a “full-scale Russian invasion is an extremely improbable scenario,” & compared the people who were claiming this to the antivax movement.He also called the military buildup at the border “deliberately demonstrative” & a “bluff”.He visited…
7/20
… Mark “All russian girls want to be raped” Ames’ War Nerd Radio, where he denounced the US intelligence leaks about an imminent war, claiming that it was “Russophobia”. Ames has also been a harsh critic of Zelenskyy’s government, and also denied any chance of invasion.
8/20
He also dismissed Ukraine’s post-Maidan politics as “nationalist” and “alienating to Russians,” a take that grossly misrepresents a country fighting for its right to exist. Leonid seems more focused on the feelings of Russians than on the survival of Ukrainians.
9/20
Worth mentioning that right after emigrating to Latvia in 2013, Ragozin published an article ambitiously titled “Ukraine protests: The view from Moscow”. There, he rants about “problems faced by the Russians in Ukraine,” “the danger posed by the Ukrainian nationalists,”…
10/20
…and the “artificial nature of Ukraine’s borders.” Again, all this could’ve come directly from a Kremlin-funded media. Ragozin even blamed Ukraine for the anti-semitic pogroms in Dagestan that took place in 2024 after the 7 Oct Hamas terrorist attack.
11/20
But none of this is new. Already back in 2014, just 2 days after the MH17 tragedy, Leonid published an article in English titled “Who is responsible for the MH-17 tragedy?” where he simply chose to speculate on “versions of the tragedy”, even gesturing towards Ukraine.
12/20
Leonid sees Ukrainian “Nazis” absolutely everywhere. Based on his tweets, one could even come to a conclusion that Ukraine is at the brink of falling into the hands of the evil Banderites — who for some reason have never passed 3% popularity in Ukrainian elections.
13/20
In one of his op-eds for bne IntelliNews, Ragozin emphasized Hungary’s efforts in “promoting peace” for Ukraine, and framed the evil Anglo-Saxon leaders as warmongers who sabotaged all peace efforts with Russia - as if any treaties with Russia could ever be trusted.
14/20
And Leonid still has a hard time believing any imperialistic tendencies of Putin. According to him, Russia’s not fighting for territory, but for new red lines that would stop NATO’s eastward expansion in the future. But this simply isn’t true, as Russia is currently…
15/20
…in full war economy, their education system has been transformed into a fascist brainwashing machine, they’re force-recruiting soldiers from occupied regions, and they’re provenly collaborating with North Korean and Chinese soldiers in their barbaric invasion.
16/20
For someone who claims to be hunted by the regime, Leonid still seems to find a way to visit his beloved home country. He’s made hundreds of trips to Russia since 2014, and he was there even when the full-scale invasion started (flew in on 17 Feb, left on 3 Mar).
17/20
And that’s not all - through 2020, Ragozin worked for Vremya, a newscast described as the “flagship propaganda outlet” of Russia. For being a harsh critic of the Kremlin, Leonid had no trouble working for this state-funded propaganda mill.
Makes you wonder, eh?
18/20
We don’t need more Russian commentators telling us that Estonia is overreacting, that Ukraine is being divisive, or that NATO is to blame. We need voices committed to defending democracy and Ukraine’s sovereignty — not to protecting Russia’s reputation.
19/20
To conclude: Ragozin is a classic case of a Russian “dissident” - someone who seemingly criticizes Putin’s barbaric invasion, yet at the same time telegraphs his willingness to help the country in its “patriotic struggle”.
20/20
The 2nd edition of “Vatnik Soup — The Ultimate Guide to Russian Disinformation” is officially out!
In this 4th Debunk of the Day, we’ll refute an absolute classic of vatnik BS, the crown jewel of peak dishonesty: whataboutism.
Now, not everything that looks like whataboutism is wrong. Seeking consistency or comparing actions or responses is normal. 1/5
But when someone pulls some completely unrelated event, that happened to completely different people, a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, you know what you’re dealing with: a crass denial of the problem at hand, a bad-faith attempt to derail the topic. 2/5
Logic or chronology plays no role here, nor your opinion on these other topics. You could be the staunchest critic or supporter of these other actions thrown into the discussion, it doesn’t matter. It is irrelevant whether these other things are true or not, or bad or not. 3/5
In this 3rd Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “ending” the war by surrendering or ceding territory.
Nearing four years of the 2-day “special military operation”, Russia is desperate to obtain through other means what they failed to conquer on the battlefield. 1/5
An endless army of vatniks therefore tries to demoralize both Ukrainians and supporters.
They sound noble: “anti-war” or concerned about the fate of Ukraine’s civilians, soldiers and cities. They claim that if we just stop fighting or helping, this horror would magically end. 2/5
What they never mention is… WHO started the war, WHO murders Ukrainians, WHO destroys Ukrainian cities: the same monsters they suggest Ukrainians be at the mercy of. Surrendering wouldn’t end the atrocities of the occupation, it would enable them. Surrendering wouldn’t even…3/5
In today’s Debunk of the Day (2), we’ll look at… nuclear blackmail. Vatniks love using Russia’s nuclear threats as a reason for surrendering or for not lifting a finger to help Ukraine: “see, they have nukes, we have to give them whatever they want”.
The argument is absurd: 1/5
Nuclear deterrence has been a reality for decades. Both the US and Russia have lost wars without resorting to nukes. We are not submitting to the whims of Pakistan or North Korea either. For vatniks, it’s just an insidious way of siding with Putin. 2/5
We can’t just give in to the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail, to the threats their officials and propagandists make five times a day to scare us into letting them have something they know perfectly well is not theirs, with no limit to their appetite. 3/5 vatniksoup.com/en/nuclear-thr…
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce a Ukrainian “scholar” and social media activist, Marta Havryshko (@HavryshkoMarta). She’s best known for spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives online, along with a habit of spotting neo-Nazis everywhere in Ukraine.
1/20
Marta hails from Ukraine, where she studied history at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. She received her PhD in history in 2010. Her academic work focused on gender-based violence and wartime atrocities, including publications on sexual crimes in occupied Ukraine.
2/20
She is currently working as a visiting Assistant Professor at the Strassler Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies at Clark University in the US. According to the center’s website, Marta teaches courses on antisemitism, racism, and gender-based violence in armed conflicts.
In today’s (first) Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “realistic expectations”.
Russia has the GDP of Italy. NATO — which Russia claims to be fighting — has 20 times their GDP, and a much stronger and more modern military. 1/5
Russia’s full scale invasion was supposed to take 2 days, but we’re nearing 4 years. They’ve lost a million men. Their economy is in shambles.
And yet we're letting them set their red lines instead of massive sanctions, strong support for Ukraine, and an immediate sky shield. 2/5
Russia thought their war was “realistic” because we’d let them get away with it. It wouldn’t be “realistic” to invade a European nation and redraw borders by force if the West had a strong and united response.
What’s “realistic” is what public opinion tolerates and accepts. 3/5
In this first (and maybe last?) Basiji Soup, we’ll look at… the Islamic Republic of Iran, its disinformation operations, its hypocrisy, how it sells its atrocities as virtue and its repression as morality, how it serves the Kremlin, and the current protests against it.
1/20
Basijis are members of the most fanatical part of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). In a broader sense: Iranian regime loyalists & propagandists. They may be fewer than vatniks or wumaos, but the goal is the same: destabilize the West to protect a brutal regime.
2/20
The regime oppressing Iran is a “theocratic” authoritarian state around a “Supreme Leader” hiding behind religion to justify its crimes: censorship, repression, executions, torture and terror — similar to Russia and its “holy war” against Ukraine.