In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce a Russian journalist, Leonid Ragozin (@leonidragozin). He’s best-known for posing as a Russian dissident, while at the same time sneakily promoting the Kremlin’s narratives about the Russo-Ukrainian War.
1/20
On paper, Leonid doesn’t look like your typical Kremlin apologist - he’s written and worked for prestigious Western outlets like the BBC, the Guardian, and he’s even written some Lonely Planet guides for the Baltic countries!
2/20
But Ragozin’s public commentary often seems to walk a fine line: condemning the war while pushing narratives that shift blame, dilute responsibility, or quietly carry the same old imperial baggage Russia - or its opposition - has never truly forgotten.
3/20
He routinely warns the West not to “humiliate Russia,” a talking point that eerily echoes Putin’s own rhetoric. I mean, if your biggest concern during a war of aggression is that the aggressor might feel offended, are you really opposing the right things?
4/20
His framing consistently casts small, vulnerable democracies in Eastern Europe as aggressive, overreacting, or irrational — while subtly positioning Russia as a misunderstood giant, unfairly antagonized by its neighbors.
5/20
Just before the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Ragozin repeatedly ridiculed the idea of a potential full-scale war, called Western support for Ukraine reckless and suggested that Ukrainian sovereignty was being manipulated by NATO interests.
6/20
In Jan 2022, Ragozin tweeted that a “full-scale Russian invasion is an extremely improbable scenario,” & compared the people who were claiming this to the antivax movement.He also called the military buildup at the border “deliberately demonstrative” & a “bluff”.He visited…
7/20
… Mark “All russian girls want to be raped” Ames’ War Nerd Radio, where he denounced the US intelligence leaks about an imminent war, claiming that it was “Russophobia”. Ames has also been a harsh critic of Zelenskyy’s government, and also denied any chance of invasion.
8/20
He also dismissed Ukraine’s post-Maidan politics as “nationalist” and “alienating to Russians,” a take that grossly misrepresents a country fighting for its right to exist. Leonid seems more focused on the feelings of Russians than on the survival of Ukrainians.
9/20
Worth mentioning that right after emigrating to Latvia in 2013, Ragozin published an article ambitiously titled “Ukraine protests: The view from Moscow”. There, he rants about “problems faced by the Russians in Ukraine,” “the danger posed by the Ukrainian nationalists,”…
10/20
…and the “artificial nature of Ukraine’s borders.” Again, all this could’ve come directly from a Kremlin-funded media. Ragozin even blamed Ukraine for the anti-semitic pogroms in Dagestan that took place in 2024 after the 7 Oct Hamas terrorist attack.
11/20
But none of this is new. Already back in 2014, just 2 days after the MH17 tragedy, Leonid published an article in English titled “Who is responsible for the MH-17 tragedy?” where he simply chose to speculate on “versions of the tragedy”, even gesturing towards Ukraine.
12/20
Leonid sees Ukrainian “Nazis” absolutely everywhere. Based on his tweets, one could even come to a conclusion that Ukraine is at the brink of falling into the hands of the evil Banderites — who for some reason have never passed 3% popularity in Ukrainian elections.
13/20
In one of his op-eds for bne IntelliNews, Ragozin emphasized Hungary’s efforts in “promoting peace” for Ukraine, and framed the evil Anglo-Saxon leaders as warmongers who sabotaged all peace efforts with Russia - as if any treaties with Russia could ever be trusted.
14/20
And Leonid still has a hard time believing any imperialistic tendencies of Putin. According to him, Russia’s not fighting for territory, but for new red lines that would stop NATO’s eastward expansion in the future. But this simply isn’t true, as Russia is currently…
15/20
…in full war economy, their education system has been transformed into a fascist brainwashing machine, they’re force-recruiting soldiers from occupied regions, and they’re provenly collaborating with North Korean and Chinese soldiers in their barbaric invasion.
16/20
For someone who claims to be hunted by the regime, Leonid still seems to find a way to visit his beloved home country. He’s made hundreds of trips to Russia since 2014, and he was there even when the full-scale invasion started (flew in on 17 Feb, left on 3 Mar).
17/20
And that’s not all - through 2020, Ragozin worked for Vremya, a newscast described as the “flagship propaganda outlet” of Russia. For being a harsh critic of the Kremlin, Leonid had no trouble working for this state-funded propaganda mill.
Makes you wonder, eh?
18/20
We don’t need more Russian commentators telling us that Estonia is overreacting, that Ukraine is being divisive, or that NATO is to blame. We need voices committed to defending democracy and Ukraine’s sovereignty — not to protecting Russia’s reputation.
19/20
To conclude: Ragozin is a classic case of a Russian “dissident” - someone who seemingly criticizes Putin’s barbaric invasion, yet at the same time telegraphs his willingness to help the country in its “patriotic struggle”.
20/20
The 2nd edition of “Vatnik Soup — The Ultimate Guide to Russian Disinformation” is officially out!
What you see happening here is coordinated strategic communication by the Trump cult. Elon’s baby mama and former MAGA influencer Ashley St. Clair explained this ecosystem in a long video. They have built platforms where people can find narratives to spread and get paid for doing so.
Even though the system technically breaks the platform's ToS, this is perfectly fine for @nikitabier and the rest of the X crew, because Elon pays their salaries and this is part of his election interference machinery.
If you wanna know how the system works, read this:
Here’s Ashley’s video, where she explains how the system works. She was immediately attacked by various MAGA actors, which suggests that what she said hit a nerve.
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce Yanis Varoufakis, a Greek economist and politician. He’s best known for rising to power at the height of the Greek debt crisis, not solving anything but endearing himself to the left, and using his fame to promote Russian imperialism.
1/20
Born in 1961 in Athens, Varoufakis studied economics in the UK and built an academic career in Australia, the US, and Europe. His early work focused on game theory, political economy, and critiques of capitalism.
2/20
Presenting himself as the fearless, unorthodox economist willing to confront the EU’s “neoliberal” elites, he rose to prominence during Greece’s debt crisis. At its height in 2015, he was appointed finance minister under the left-wing Syriza government of Alexis Tsipras.
In this 8th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss complaints about US financing of NATO, in particular how the US allegedly pays for European defense, leading to calls for a US withdrawal from the Alliance — which would only make it easier for Putin to invade more countries.
1/7
NATO by itself costs peanuts. In fact, the core of NATO is a principle, an agreement, that ideally costs nothing. The main cost is defense spending, which the US is eagerly doing anyway: Trump has just announced a 50% increase in military spending for his “Department of War”. 2/7
To sow division and thereby weaken the Alliance, vatniks deliberately mix up different figures, such as contributions to the NATO common budget, with defense spending. And US military spending has been huge by the sheer fact that the US is the world’s largest economy.
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we’ll talk about why we’re doing this: why we think Ukraine is so important and why we believe that souping vatniks and debunking their propaganda narratives is so crucial to counter Russia’s & their allies’ wars of aggression and achieve real peace.
1/20
War is expensive, and Russia is not a rich country that could afford this: Hospitals? Roads? Plumbing? No: everything into terror and destruction.
But not only that. There is a 2nd item in the Russian state budget that remains strong no matter what:
Manufacturing support for that terror and destruction. Propaganda. Vatniks. “Innocent” travel bloggers. “Independent” journalists. “Patriotic” politicians. Russia spends hundreds of billions of rubles a year ($5 billion) on this, and that kind of money buys you A LOT of BS.
In this second (and possibly last) Basiji Soup, we’ll explore how the Islamic Republic of Iran has prepared for a conflict with the US and Israel. We won’t cover the military aspects, but another kind of war — information warfare.
1/20
In the 1st Basiji Soup, we souped the Islamic Republic, its disinformation operations, its hypocrisy, its support of terrorism including Russia’s, its (one-sided?) relationship with Putin, and the mass protests against it that started two months ago:
The Internet blackout has been crucial in allowing the regime to cover up its massacre of the protesters and especially the scope of it, making it difficult to assess the number of victims. They went to great lengths to jam Starlink, after having made its use illegal.
In this 7th Debunk of the Day, we’ll expose the “Chickenhawk” fallacy. The chickenhawk accusation or the “go to the front!” imperative is a dishonest attempt to silence anyone supporting Ukraine by pushing them to go fight. A barely hidden death wish, as it’s always uttered… 1/5
…with zero regard for who you are or what your personal circumstances might be — you could already be there, on your way there, a veteran, or unable to fight. More broadly, not everyone can or should be a soldier, just as not everyone can or should be a policeman or a nurse. 2/5
Yet a society still needs those things to be done, and the fact that not everyone can go to medical school or fight crime does not mean that we have to surrender to invaders and criminals, nor that we cannot all have an opinion on healthcare. 3/5