A lot of people have noticed it. In the past few years, a bunch of different infections in England have started moving together.
Spikes, dips, rising and falling in sync.
And not just the trough of the covid mitigation days.
Look at that weird mini-plateau on the right for both Lyme and Legionella.
I mean that's so extremely precise, isn't it.
🫤
I had the data handy for a few infections going back over the last 15 years, so I thought I'd run a pearson correlation on each of the pairs.
That's a
This is how much correlation there was among them *before* Covid arrived.
This is the correlation during the period 1/1/2016 to 1/3/2020.
What's this saying and how does it work...
Scroll your finger down the left side to pick an infection... like Measles... and then scroll along to pick something to see whether it's spread correlates with that condition... like Hep E.
So before Covid arrived, their correlation was +0.07.
Which means there's no significant matching pattern.
It's coloured kind of light brown.
Blue means it's perfectly out of sync... and red means it's perfectly in sync.
The darker blue, the more precisely this is up when that is down and vice versa...
And the darker red, the more precisely this is up when that is up, and this is down when that is down.
So things are a bit all over the place before Covid...
Some things are completely out of sync.
And some are completely in sync.
And some things are not at all in sync.
And remember, these are *annual* rolling totals, so this isn't about time of year, it's about yearly trends.
How do things change when Covid arrives...
How interesting is this, eh.
Hep C and the two Clostridia stand right out.
Hep C has hardly any correlation with the rest of them.
The same goes for Clostridium Perfringens.
And Clostridium Tetani goes negative across the board.
But the rest... 👀
The correlation for the rest before Covid was, on average 0.038.
🫤
The pearson correlation after Covid arrived is 0.79
Hmm.
This was supposed to say "That's a way of putting a number value on how in or out of sync two sets of numbers are".
One of the incorrect theories for all of these coming into synchronisation is the old 'people weren't catching these during 2020 lockdowns'.
Which is, like I said, incorrect, because...
... some of these are things that people only ever have a problem with when their immune system is not working properly...
... and some of them are things that you *hardly ever encounter*...
... and some of them are things that you only have problems with when your gut is misbehaving...
and some of them are things that you only have problems with if your lungs are struggling...
... and suddenly, they've all synchronised.
(apart from Hep C, and those Clostridia)
BUT LOOK AT THE REST.
Let's just work through the mechanisms...
Covid can damage the immune system's command centre, especially T cells, making it harder to recognise and clear new infections.
That gets exploited by respiratory viruses (RSV, flu, rhinovirus), Hepatitis B (reactivation or flare-ups), Polyomaviruses (which are normally controlled by strong T-cell responses). Possibly tuberculosis in some individuals.
Covid damages the thin linings that protect your lungs and intestines. These are frontline defences against pathogens.
That can be exploited by gut infections like E. coli O157, Shigella, Campylobacter, and lung ones like Legionella, Pseudomonas, Streptococcus pneumoniae.
Long-term immune activation after Covid can throw the whole system off balance, sometimes overreacting, sometimes underperforming.
Listeria and other intracellular bacteria can hide better during immune confusion, and auto-inflammatory flares may also obscure or worsen response to real pathogens.
Covid infection can wake up viruses that were hiding in the body, often kept in check by a healthy immune system.
Exploited by:
Polyomaviruses
Possibly hepatitis B
EBV (glandular fever/mono/Epstein Barr, Cytomegalovirus, HHV-6/7, VZV (shingles), maybe even rare cases of measles SSPE.
Covid infection and its aftermath alters your gut and airway microbiota, the good bugs that help crowd out harmful ones.
E. coli O157, Shigella, Listeria and gut infections in general may get a competitive edge.
Covid infection can inflame and damage the blood vessels, compromising organs and spreading infections more easily.
That can help *so many* other infections.
Covid reduces 'secretory IgA', your local antibody defence on mucosal surfaces like the nose, throat, lungs, and gut.
Again, Covid opens the door, and...
And I'm barely even started.
Covid makes you more vulnerable to *many* bacterial infections.
Covid makes you more vulnerable to some fungal infections.
Covid makes you more vulnerable to many viral infections.
Covid infections damage you, and since your defence against infection is *you*, then you're more vulnerable to almost everything that wants to get you.
All those UTIs.
All those gut infections.
All those chest infections.
All those bugs.
Speaking of which, I'm off to make myself a sandwich.
Here are some of them with Scottish Covid Wastewater on the graph, @fitterhappierAJ
For those who think this is all skewed by the lockdowns, here's the same heatmap for the time period after all non-pharmaceutical interventions were ended:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A lot of people have been really hard on the ukhsa, but I don't think it's always fair.
They're still a relatively new agency, so I think it's worth taking a moment to highlight some of the considerable achievements of their brief history.
❤️🙌
1
Encouraged everyone to repeatedly and endlessly catch Covid, a virus that has killed upwards of 30 million people and caused lasting ill health for 400 million so far.
2
Pushed handwashing as the solution for the aforementioned airborne virus, proving that they want you to catch it.
tern:<shares story about local person with rare infection>
Infectionists: "that's just anecdote"
tern:<digs up and publishes ukhsa data showing sharp rise in that infection>
...
Infectionists:"That's just one type of infection!"
tern:<digs up and publishes ukhsa data showing sharp rise in multiple similar infections>
Infectionists: "Those are just infections with small numbers!"
tern:<digs up and publishes nhs data on infections with huge numbers>
Infectionists: "That's just caused by immigration!"
tern: <digs up and publishes *aged based data* that shows that age groups without high immigration are subject to higher rises in rare infection rates>
Whatever you blame it on (and I mostly blame covid infections), can we agree something is going badly wrong?
Hospital episodes of treatment for assorted pathogenic infections, England, all ages, by year.
From the top left:
Assorted mycobacteria
Amoebiasis
Nervous system viruses
Leptospirosis
Brucellosis
Listeriosis
Shigellosis
Diptheria
Bartonellosis
Not only is Veldhoen wrong about the lack of damage to the immune system, he's also ignorant of the actual damage it's causing.
From his ivory laboratory tower, he provides no explanation for what is going on in the real world.
You've probably asked yourself whether there really are more people with things like prostate cancer and prostate problems.
There's lots in the news, including kings and cartoonists and rock stars.
And some that aren't in the news, like maybe your friends and mine.
Well, yeah, here's some actual data rather than just headlines or anecdotes.
This data is the 'hospital episodes' data from English hospitals, for working age men.