David Sacks just set the record straight on Trump’s first 100 days in office.
He laid out in detail three MAJOR accomplishments designed to set America up for the next 100 years.
We are entering a New Golden Age.
But it was what Trump told Chamath about nuclear weapons that reminded him why he voted for him.
🧵 THREAD
Before we dive into the clips, make sure to bookmark this post. 👆
Sacks just dropped truth bombs about Trump’s first 100 days that the media won’t touch.
Let’s get into it.
Before getting into Trump’s policy wins, David Sacks opened up about a side project he’s been working on—a private, Trump-aligned social club in Washington, D.C.
Not a typical D.C. clubhouse filled with lobbyists and press. This one is for the new Republican movement.
A space for people who align with Trump’s vision—far from the old guard and the media echo chamber.
“We just——we want a place to hang out in DC,” Sacks said.
He explained that he’s been inspired by exclusive clubs like The Battery in San Francisco or Malibu’s Beach House and Bird Streets Club. They’re modern, curated, and designed for people who actually want to connect—not posture.
“All of us have been to clubs like the battery or I don't know if you go to L.A.——there's Malibu Beach House or Bird Streets Club,” he said.
Washington, by comparison, feels stuck in time.
“In any event, we wanted a place to hang out and the the clubs that exist in Washington today have been around for decades,” he said.
“They're kind of old and stuffy. To the extent there are Republican clubs, they tend to be like more Bush era Republicans as opposed to Trump era Republicans. So we wanted to create something new, hipper, and Trump-aligned.”
But the real purpose goes beyond aesthetics. It’s about creating a trusted space—where members don’t have to worry about being spied on, recorded, or undermined by people who don’t share their values.
“We want a place to go where you don't have to worry that the next person over at the bar is a fake news reporter or even a lobbyist or something like that, who we don't know and we don't trust.”
That theme of trust carried right into what Sacks sees as Trump’s biggest win in his first 100 days: the border.
For years, border security felt like a political football—debated endlessly but rarely addressed. Sacks said Trump has already done what critics claimed was impossible.
“I think you have to give the administration an A-plus on this,” he said.
In his view, the crisis that dominated headlines for years is over.
“They’ve completely stopped the border crisis.”
Most people expected some progress. But Sacks admitted that even he didn’t think it would happen this fast.
“I don’t think we would have predicted the border would be completely sealed.”
Under Biden, he said, the problem was either ignored or dismissed. Americans were told the footage of caravans was cherry-picked or exaggerated. When the issue couldn’t be denied anymore, Democrats blamed it on legal limitations.
“All of that was just gaslighting,” Sacks said.
Trump proved that no new laws were needed—just a change in leadership. He brought back Remain in Mexico, enforced policies already on the books, and dramatically cut illegal crossings.
As Sacks put it, Trump summed it up in his State of the Union address: “We didn’t need a new law. We just needed a new president.”
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
Next, Sacks pointed to a cultural shift that’s happened just as quickly—maybe even faster.
He described a dramatic reversal around woke ideology and DEI initiatives, which had dominated institutions just months ago.
“Area number two, I would say would be the vibe shift in the culture around wokeism and DEI.”
Corporate boardrooms, college campuses, and government agencies were all deep in it. But suddenly, the tide has turned.
“You know, how quickly we forget about this, but wokeism has completely collapsed. I don't know that anyone is endorsing in a full throated way.”
Sacks credited Trump with ending DEI programs at the federal level and rolling back policies like “disparate impact” in affirmative action.
“I think all of that now is fallen by the wayside. And I think that meritocracy and colorblindness are back.”
Even he didn’t expect the shift to be so fast or so total.
“I think if any of us had tried to predict that 100 days ago, we would have thought, yes, Trump will do something about it, but I don't think we would have predicted the total collapse of wokeism and DEI so quickly.”
Then came the third major accomplishment: the economy.
Sacks described what he sees as the beginning of a major economic reset—what he called the “reprivatization of the economy.”
“Then I'd say the third area, which is still in flight, is the reprivatization of the economy.”
The phrase came from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, and Sacks said it captures the scale of what Trump is trying to do.
“I think that the Trump administration needs to re-privatize the economy, and I like that framing of it.”
At the center of it all is DOGE—the Department of Government Efficiency. Its mission: cut the waste, trim the fat, and shrink the swollen federal bureaucracy.
“I'd say number one is DOGE, again ending this hog wallow government spending.”
Sacks said the Biden administration had pumped trillions into the economy, propping it up with artificial numbers and unsustainable government hiring.
“And we knew that that spending was unsustainable. We have to do something about it.”
Trump didn’t just talk about it. His administration has already started slashing federal jobs and reining in spending.
“We've actually started to make real cuts in government, real cuts in the federal workforce. And look, we'd like to do more, but that is a huge shift in the conversation.”
And that’s just the beginning. Deregulation is happening across the board—from energy and crypto to artificial intelligence.
“President Trump has signed a significant number of executive orders on deregulation,” Sacks said.
“He ended Biden's EV mandate… and a lot of these like green new scam projects, offshore wind. And he's been encouraging oil and gas exploration.”
He continued: “We did repeal Biden's exact order on AI, which was, you know, 100 pages of unnecessary regulation on AI.”
Crypto’s also back on the table.
“We’ve ended the war on crypto, and I think we’re trying to stop the regulatory capture that benefits large incumbents.”
It’s still early, Sacks admitted, but the momentum is building.
“I do think that this sets us up for a Trump boom in the future. It's just that a lot of these changes take time to play out.”
Just when the conversation around Trump’s wins eemed to be winding down, Chamath jumped in with something unexpected—and deeply personal.
He shared a moment from a private dinner with Trump that, as he put it, reminded him exactly why he voted for him.
Trump had talked about his uncle, who once warned him about the dangers of nuclear weapons.
It stuck with him—and Chamath.
Trump explained his stance on the war in Ukraine with a simple but powerful statement: “This is why I'm so fundamentally against this thing.”
Chamath said it hit him hard.
“It is so easy to forget that there’s only one existential risk——where all these issues become fringe issues,” he said.
In that moment, everything else—trade, immigration, economic policy—felt secondary. Trump was focused on avoiding nuclear war. That clarity mattered.
“And I was like, I am so glad this guy’s in charge, because this one issue, he never wavers.”
He contrasted that steadiness with what he felt under Biden.
“This was where my biggest issue with Biden was, was I did not know who was in control.”
But now, with Trump back in office, Chamath said the contrast couldn’t be clearer.
“In the first hundred days—has reinforced that there are no conditions under which he'll go to war. He has time and time again, showed, find the off ramp. And I think that that's really healthy for Americans to see.”
Watch the full episode of the All-In Podcast with @DavidSacks and @chamath here:
A registered nurse with 30 years of experience treating chronic pain says she saw “TEN TIMES” the positive effects after mixing DMSO with castor oil to treat her peripheral neuropathy.
Castor oil on its own has anti-inflammatory effects, but adding the DMSO is where she says it “got interesting.”
That’s because DMSO “isn’t just a treatment, it’s a carrier,” Danielle Minetti explained.
“It can pull medications and nutrients right through the skin barrier deep into the body.”
That’s why when Danielle mixed DMSO with castor oil, she saw “ten times” the positive results.
Because DMSO acts as the delivery system, carrying the castor oil deeper into the areas where she needs relief most.
DMSO is a naturally occurring compound that is primarily derived as a byproduct of the wood pulp and paper industry, which makes it widely and affordably available.
But that also creates a problem...
Because if a treatment can’t be patented, Big Pharma can’t profit.
And that simple reality is where the DMSO story takes a dark turn.
So what happened to DMSO, and why is a substance that is so medically promising still relatively unknown to this day?
Let’s take a closer look. 🧵
The real story isn’t whether or not DMSO worked.
The real story is how a low-cost, widely available substance became an early case study in medical distrust.
Regulators suddenly restricted it. Doctors dismissed it.
But patients kept using it.
And once that happened, official medicine no longer controlled the story.
DMSO was discovered in 1866 by a Russian chemist, then largely forgotten.
In the 1950s, the paper industry needed new solvents. Dimethyl sulfide from wood pulping could be oxidized into DMSO.
That industrial turn set up one of the most unusual medical controversies of the 20th century!
The FDA knew the COVID shots would kill and maim countless Americans.
They kept injecting anyway.
One government employee tried to sound the alarm about “49 examples” of deadly side effects that conventional safety analyses weren’t detecting.
She was shut down.
Her name was Dr. Ana Szarfman.
On March 1, 2021, less than three months after the rollout of the COVID-19 injections, Dr. Ana Szarfman, an employee at CDER and safety data mining developer, warned that the FDA’s existing system could hide vaccine safety signals due to a flaw called “masking.”
She proposed a newer method developed by statistician Dr. William DuMouchel that corrected for this issue and, when applied, detected “49 examples of extreme masking” that the standard system did not.
These “49 examples of extreme masking” include not “minor” but serious adverse events:
• Bell’s palsy
• Cardiac failure
• Acute left ventricular failure
• Agonal rhythm (severe end-of-life arrhythmia)
• Pulmonary infarction
• Cerebral artery occlusion
• Aortic stenosis
• Sudden cardiac death
• Hypertensive emergency
• Basal ganglia stroke
When Dr. Szarfman proposed a new method, she was told to “hold off on creating and sending data mining reports and analyses.”
Later, they “made it clear” that she “needs to focus on her assigned work” and “should not be discussing or providing internal analyses externally.”
As Dr. Szarfman puts it, her work became a “pest” for raising concerns about safety signal masking.
In September 2021, Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA's top vaccine official, decided that Dr. Szarfman’s COVID vaccine data-mining days were over.
He informed Dr. Patrizia Cavazzoni, the then director of CDER, that Dr. Szarfman “has been asked to cease and desist conducting her data analysis.”
Dr. Marks complained that Dr. Szarfman’s work had become “a major distraction” and that her efforts could “create erroneous conflicts that feed into anti-vaccination rhetoric.”
Dr. Szarfman went on to retire from the FDA in 2025 after more than 35 years of service.
She raised concerns about safety signal masking. The FDA essentially told her to shut up.
Because in their eyes, “49 examples of extreme masking” could create “erroneous conflicts” and fuel “vaccine hesitancy.”
Unfortunately, this is not a one-off instance. It’s part of a much deeper problem: the gap between what’s known internally and what’s allowed to reach the public. 🧵
For years, Americans were told the COVID vaccines were “safe and effective.”
Not mostly safe.
Not partially effective.
Not still being studied.
Safe. Effective. Full stop.
The message was absolute, repeated by government officials, doctors, media outlets, hospitals, employers, schools, and nearly every major institution in the country.
But internal records now suggest something very different was being discussed behind the scenes.
The story is no longer just about whether the COVID vaccines caused harm.
That debate has been raging for years.
The bigger question is what federal health agencies knew, when they knew it, and why the public was told a much different story than the one officials were discussing behind closed doors.
Senator Ron Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations obtained thousands of pages of subpoenaed HHS records.
The investigation and subpoenaed records suggest that the CDC and FDA were aware of serious safety signals involving myocarditis and strokes, yet continued pushing the vaccines while downplaying the risks.
That’s the part we can’t ignore.
Vaccine trust was built on a very simple promise.
The government said the products had been carefully tested, monitored, and transparently evaluated.
If a serious safety issue appeared, the public would be told.
But according to the records Johnson released, that isn’t how the COVID vaccine rollout worked. Not even close.
Republicans are once again teaming up with Democrats to ram Digital ID through at the federal level.
The bill they’ve just introduced is, if you can believe it, worse than all the others before it.
HR 8250, deceptively named the Parents Decide Act, doesn’t just force everyone to link their identity to use apps on their phones, it mandates that they must do it to use ANY operating system. That means Apple, iOS, Windows, Google, Android, even Samsung—basically everything.
And once that’s in place, there’s nowhere to step outside of it.
But one brave group is refusing to go along.
GrapheneOS has made a statement saying: GrapheneOS will remain usable by anyone around the world without requiring personal information, identification, or an account.
@glennmeder from PrivacyAcademy.com/Pulse has been working to educate people on how to escape the digital control grid, including how to put GrapheneOS on your phone—for free. And they have a solution to Digital ID right now.
He joins us to discuss. 🧵
You’ve seen this pattern before.
When the same thing starts appearing everywhere at once, it’s usually not random.
A new push for Digital ID laws isn’t happening in just one place. With bills like the Parents Decide Act (HR 8250), it’s now moving directly into the systems we use every day. It’s happening in a very coordinated way across countries, across platforms, and now, at the operating system level.
This isn’t about regulating a few apps anymore. The focus has moved underneath them—to the operating system itself—the software that runs your phone and computer. @GlennMeder described it plainly, they’re trying to “lock it down on an operating system level,” because that’s the one layer you can’t avoid.
Apps can be swapped. Accounts can be deleted.
But if access to the operating system requires Digital ID, there’s nowhere left to step outside of it.
That’s the inflection point.
Glenn called it “the hill to die on,” not because of how it looks today, but because of what it enables once it’s in place. In his words, this isn’t just verification, it’s the foundation for removing privacy and building a system that monitors “everything we say.”
He warned it would “change instantly,” the kind of shift you only recognize after it’s already locked in.
Access to your phone. Your apps. Your accounts. All tied to one digital identity.
And once that becomes the standard, stepping outside of it stops being an option.
Your phone is a surveillance Trojan Horse.
Big Tech and Big Brother have colluded together to create a spyware monopoly.
Your phone tracks your location at all times, who you text, what you read, whether you’re skeptical person or not, how you spend your money and where your finances are stored... This list could go on forever.
Privacy Academy is hosting a FREE webinar on Thursday, May 7th at 7pm CT (8pm ET / 6pm MT / 5pm PT) where you can learn how to escape the cell phone surveillance state.
For four years, Ron Johnson has wondered how US health officials could ignore “overwhelming evidence of harm” from the COVID vaccine.
“Now I know,” he says.
The truth is, health officials didn’t “ignore” safety signals. They buried them instead.
And now we have the receipts:
The US Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigated what federal health officials knew and when they knew it—and dug out a timeline that would make any American furious.
This is not a fringe “conspiracy theory.” It was revealed by the government’s own investigation—and it’s a story they don’t want you to read.
(Post 1 of 7)
According to VAERS, the US’s vaccine adverse event reporting system, more adverse events and deaths have been reported following COVID vaccines than from all other vaccines combined over the system’s 30+ year history.
More dangerous than ivermectin. More dangerous than hydroxychloroquine (which turned out not to be so dangerous after all).
It was 55 times more deadly than the flu vaccine (0.46 deaths vs 25.5 deaths per million doses).
And even more dangerous than Remdesivir, which earned the nickname “Run Death Is Near” after it wreaked havoc on the kidneys and livers of tens of thousands of COVID patients in the hospital.
But still the question remains. How did US health officials miss a safety signal this big?
(Post 2 of 7)
The U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations investigated what federal health officials knew and when they knew it.
It turns out they knew the safety signal was there. But they didn’t see it as a warning sign. They saw it as “pest.”
So much of a “pest” that they decided it was better to ignore the devastating safety signals and let people die than to deal with the data head-on because it could stoke “vaccine hesitancy.”
Mikhaila Peterson says she went through “two years of pure hell” when she decided to stop taking SSRIs.
She didn’t need the drugs anymore. Her paleo/keto diet had put her depression into remission.
The first few days off the medication, she felt “on top of the world.”
But once week two hit, her life “turned upside down.”
For years, she blamed her “intolerable symptoms” on what she ate.
Little did she know… she was actually experiencing severe antidepressant withdrawal.
One of the symptoms Mikhaila experienced during her own SSRI withdrawal is the same condition her dad is suffering from right now: akathisia.
Akathisia is an extremely distressing neurological condition that makes you feel an unbearable inner restlessness and agitation.
This condition, she describes as “the worst thing I’ve ever seen anyone go through…”
When Mikhaila experienced it, she described it as being “overwhelmed with a sense of impending doom that was stronger than anything you can naturally feel.”
“It felt like I was falling into a volcano while being chased by a bear,” she said.
But as bad as her experience was, her dad is currently going through a form of akathisia that’s even worse. 🧵
Last week, Mikhaila shared an emotional update on her father, Jordan Peterson’s health.
He is dealing with a recurrence of akathisia stemming from an old psych med–induced neurological injury.
Mikhaila explained that this is a flare-up of a neurological injury caused by benzodiazepines, primarily clonazepam, that he took around 2019–2020. He has been completely off all psychiatric medications since January 2020.
The recent symptoms intensified last summer after he was diagnosed with Chronic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (CIRS) from mold exposure. About a month later, he developed pneumonia and sepsis, which further worsened the condition and triggered the akathisia.
“Dad’s been suffering from an old neurological injury that’s more recently been causing akathisia,” Mikhaila said.
“Akathisia is the worst thing I’ve ever seen anyone go through… it’s catastrophic.”
She stresses that this is a neurological injury from past psychiatric medication use, not from any current medications. Her dad has been psych med-free for six years.
But for the past 8–9 months, akathisia has taken over his life without warning or relief, making this an extremely difficult time for the entire family.
The serotonin theory worked because it was simple.
It gave patients a clear explanation, doctors a straightforward framework, and the pharmaceutical system a powerful way to communicate value. Depression became something measurable, correctable, and treatable with a targeted intervention.
But simplicity can also obscure complexity.
Because the brain isn’t a system governed by a single chemical variable—it’s a dynamic network of interacting pathways, feedback loops, and adaptive responses that change over time.
And when you try to reduce that system to one variable, you risk misunderstanding what your intervention is actually doing.
70% of U.S. farmers can’t afford fertilizer for 2026, and the damage is set.
That means shortages haven’t hit yet… but they’re about to.
At the same time, food, fertilizer, and energy facilities are “spontaneously combusting” across the globe.
@ChrisMartenson has been tracking it closely, and the pattern is clear: this isn’t random.
So why isn’t anyone talking about it? 🧵
Food hasn’t been treated like the center of the story… but suddenly everything keeps pointing back to it.
Chris Martenson cuts through the noise in a way that’s hard to ignore. What looks like separate problems isn’t separate at all. It’s a “poly crisis”—multiple systems breaking at once. And it’s not just oil—it’s “liquefied natural gas,” fertilizer inputs, and supply chains all getting hit together.
You’ve heard about the energy disruptions. What hasn’t been made clear is how directly that flows into what ends up on your plate.
Martenson warns of a “gigantic blow to fertilizer production” and says we’re already past the point in the season where it can be fixed. That means yields drop. Not later, not hypothetically, but in the next cycle.
And that’s where the disconnect hits hardest.
You’re living through rising prices now, but what he’s describing explains why the system underneath those prices is starting to weaken. The part that grows the food isn’t being supported, it’s being strained.
That’s why it feels like something bigger is coming… even if no one says it outright.
Markets can freeze fast, and when they do, access to your own money can slow or disappear.
That’s why more investors are moving a portion of their savings into physical gold and silver.
Genesis Gold Group helps you roll over an IRA or 401k into a gold IRA with real, securely stored assets. They walk you through the process step by step and currently offer a free Financial Survival Report to help you decide if it fits your strategy.