With the help of @d_stock07734's due diligence, it seems like we are able to uncover what must have been quite a challenge at that time for Masaryk University.
The manufactoring of the dendritic cell vaccine for the trial.
Please follow @d_stock07734 for additional due diligence regarding the Czech Trial results and other possible links.
In 2014, Masaryk University launched a pediatric trial using a dendritic cell vaccine called MyDendrix to treat children with metastatic/refractory tumors.
The methods looked strikingly familiar to NWBO’s DCVax-L platform.
CREATIC includes 6 Fraunhofer scientists, including:
🧬 Ulrike Köhl
🧪 Stephan Fricke
🔬 Ulrich Blache
These individuals were part of IZI Frauenhofers NWBO’s DCVax-L manufacturing team.
A direct human and institutional connection.
14/
Then came the name change:
The Czech product, MyDendrix, was renamed Murcidencel in 2024 - the WHO-assigned INN for NWBO’s DCVax-L.
The alignment is now official, clinical, and regulatory.
15/
Why this matters:
NWBO’s UK approval process requires a Pediatric Investigation Plan (PIP) under MHRA rules.
The Czech trial may now fulfill those PIP (Pediatric Investigation Plan) requirements - without needing a new trial.
16/
The Czech trial reported promising outcomes in a high-risk pediatric population:
📊 Median OS: 7.03 years
🛡️ Disease control: 53–68%
🧬 PD-1 synergy: 60% mortality risk reduction (HR = 0.40)
✅ No severe adverse events
[PubMed, 2024; Frontiers in Oncology, 2019]
17/
The Czech trial was never a side project.
It looks more like a strategic pediatric extension of DCVax-L - quietly aligned with NWBO’s platform, using existing tech, and surfacing only when regulatory timing made it useful.
18/
Now, with:
✅ The renaming to Murcidencel
✅ CREATIC’s formal partnership
✅ Historical Fraunhofer capacity
✅ Regulatory alignment in the UK
…the Czech trial completes the picture.
19/
The Czech trial MAY very well reflect Linda Powers’ long-view strategy, quietly extending NWBO’s platform via trusted partners like Fraunhofer.
In parallel, she set up dormant UK/US entities in 2014, laying global groundwork years before DCVax-L neared approval.
Foresight.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Allow me to entertain a hypothesis, that is probable "far out", but which I somehow still find believable, knowing Linda Powers setup several dormant companies in 2014, obviously trying to predict a few chess board moves over the last decade.
Let's say she did that.
1/
Something extraordinary may have just come together for NWBO - and many missed it.
A Czech trial, once unrelated, now bears the name Murcidencel - the official WHO name for NWBO’s DCVax-L.
Coincidence?
ChatGPT and Perplexity says otherwise.
2/
In 2022, the WHO approved Murcidencel as the INN for NWBO’s DCVax-L.
This isn’t a marketing term - it’s an internationally protected name that defines the therapy's composition:
autologous dendritic cells, tumor lysate, matured with GM-CSF and IL-4.
Laura Posner (Cohen Milstein) & Columbia law prof Joshua Mitts filed a powerful amicus brief in Slack v. Pirani, arguing that modern tech makes it possible to trace stock origins—a key issue in securities fraud.
In the case, the Supreme Court ruled that if you sue under Section 11 of the Securities Act, you must prove your shares came from the registration statement you’re challenging.
That’s called traceability
3/
Critics said this would block investors from suing, especially in direct listings where shares are mixed.
But Posner & Mitts argued: with today’s digital trading records, we can trace shares.
If $NWBO’s DCVax-L is approved for both Grade 3 & 4 gliomas, covering newly diagnosed and recurrent GBM, it’s a major leap forward — not just a drug approval, but platform validation.
Here’s what it would mean:
2/7
Such a broad label would:
• Expand the patient population
• Boost valuation
• Open doors to pan-solid tumor use
• Strengthen NWBO’s case for NICE + EU filings