π¨π³οΈ NED WANTS TO TAKE YOUR ABILITY TO VOTE, AND CALLS IT βDEMOCRACYβ πΊπΈπ§
You thought Romania overturning an election or Germany banning AfD was extreme? Well, the USA Uniparty NED is considering taking away MAGA Americans' ability to vote. This is not an exaggeration.
NED published the idea to end universal suffrage for populists, so politicians like President Trump can never be re-elected.
This idea is from Ghia Nodia, a National Endowment for Democracy (NED) fellow, published in their flagship journal. Again, NED is 100% financed with our taxpayer dollars and their board has sitting members of Congress from both parties.
I will walk you through this incredible article...
"Democracyβs Inevitable Elites" Journal of Democracy, Volume 31, Number 1, January 2020, pp. 75-87.
Let's see the receipts below.π
The problem with real democracy is that people might vote in ways globalists don't like, and that's exactly what this article tries to "fix."
The article leads with the premise:
"[Brexit criticism] rests on the assumption... that popular majorities are not competent to deal with some important issues... If the public lacks the wisdom to weigh the pros and cons of staying in the European Union, can it really be trusted to choose leaders? Many Americans... came close to saying that the people were not qualified to choose their own government."
That is a polite way of asking:
"Should the public still be allowed to vote at all?"
The solution? Taking away the ability to vote. Although Nodia says the idea is "taboo" - he also says in the same breath that the taboo is weakening. And NED did publish this.
Quote:
"So, if voters are truly incompetent (as they sometimes might be), no electoral mechanism will prevent them from making fatefully wrong decisions. Rejecting referendums is not enough: the natural next step would be questioning the very idea of universal suffrage. It is still taboo to voice overt support for such a move β though that taboo may be weakening."
In other words, if you vote the "wrong" way--like for Brexit, Trump, or against EU integration--they may decide you don't deserve a vote at all.
I have said this many times, but I need to say this again. This is not some obscure left-wing journal.
This is the the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a U.S. government-funded organization that operates entirely on taxpayer money. Members of Congress sit on its board, yet it openly publishes material that questions whether universal voting rights should continue to exist.
This is a 100% taxpayer-funded institution with bipartisan political backing, using its platform to circulate arguments suggesting the MAGA public may be too incompetent to vote.
The article makes clear that democratic participation is only acceptable as long as it doesn't threaten the institutions... which, in practice, means the authority of leftist elites.
Quote:
"These passions are crucial for dismantling autocratic regimes... yet in established democracies, the same passions may threaten liberal values and erode institutions."
Translation: Democracy is great... unless it disagrees with us. Then taking away others' ability to vote is fine.
When people vote in ways elites dislike, it's labeled a "democratic deficit." This article argues, without irony, that the EU's design, which deliberately distances voters from decision-makers, is what keeps "democracy safe." No, this isn't satire. They mean it.
Here's the quote:
"The EUβs notorious βdemocratic deficitβ... is not merely another technical problem... it is part of the original intent of the European framers. Although they did not state this explicitly... [they] deemed a certain distance between the rulers and the ruled to be necessary in order to keep democracy safe..."
Again, NED is funded entirely by U.S. taxpayers and overseen by members of Congress. NED is publishing material that questions universal suffrage, defends anti-democratic structures, and openly promotes the idea that voters are too dangerous to be trusted with power.
Why hasn't NED and all its organizations been defunded, dismantled, and scattered to the wind already?
How long are we going to bankroll an institution that sees the American people as the threat?
β’ β’ β’
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
π₯ AI PREDICTS THE NEXT NED/CIA REGIME CHANGE : SYRIA π€π
I ran through the most recent NED Journal of Democracy issues through AI, asking AI to predict the next "Iraq War."
Turns out, their latest issues have three full articles pushing the idea that Syria is on the brink of becoming a democracy.
First article, "Divining Syria's Future" by Tarek Masoud. Take this quote.
βTheir 147-article charterβ¦ βinspired by American federalism and checks and balancesββ¦ ultimately, however, the French and Britishβ¦ put paid to this early attempt.β
Translation: Western powers crushed local democratic efforts, but now weβre told theyβll help Syria "try again."
The article pushes the idea that if there's a "sliver of faith" then it is our obligation to help them. There's no rigor or science behind any of this. Just hopes and dreams.
π¨ New Substack Drop: How Soros and the NED Engineered Global Regime Change... with Your Tax Dollars πΊπΈπΈ
I ran every issue of the Journal of Democracy (NEDβs house organ) through AI to search for Soros references. And what I found is jaw-dropping.
π³οΈ Soros-backed groups ran exit polls to discredit elections (Moldova 2009)
π βCivil societyβ NGOs blacklisted candidates before votes (Romania 2004)
π§ Activists were flown across borders to learn how to topple regimes (Georgiaβs Rose Revolution)
ποΈ Soros-funded institutes literally wrote legislation and drafted constitutions abroad
π Polling was used not just to measure opinionβbut to shape political climates ahead of transitions
πΌ Western-backed coalitions targeted resource control (oil & gas) under the banner of βtransparencyβ
One of the most surprising things I found was the consistent usage of polls to shape opinion ( @honestpollster , @BIGDATAPOLL , @QuantusInsights , @atlas_intel may be interested).
Ugh. Mining the NED Journal of Democracy articles is sickening. Bunch of power-hungry petty tyrants.
Here's one example quote:
"Government by consent, respect for human rights, and support for the rule of law are the only things that can finally and securely protect our countries, our region, and the world against the threats of terrorism and of crises that compel outsiders to come and use military force on our shores."
Sounds noble; who could argue with "government by consent" or "rule of law"? Except this statement was used to justify the Iraq War which killed hundreds of thousands, destabilized an entire region, and left a power vacuum that fueled groups like ISIS.
From the same article:
NED was also utterly convinced that China would become a democracy after the Tiananmen Square incident and funded a bunch of NGOs to infiltrate.
Today's systems of NGOs isn't accidental - it was laid out in a vision 30 years ago by none other than George Soros.
I joined @MikeBenzCyber on a livestream last night, where he was kind enough to walk us through the basics.
As my bio says, I am just a tool builder. I am not a historian or academic. The information in this thread is common knowledge for many. It wasn't for me.
I want to walk you through an essay which Mike pointed me to- a chilling essay written in 1993 by George Soros, "Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO"
The essay lays out a new mission for NATO after the cold war. NATO would no longer be a defensive alliance against Russia - that is obsolete. Instead, it would proactively go out and shape other countries into "open societies." "[π΅π¨π»πΆ'π πππ] πππππππ ππ ππππ π ππππππ ππ πππππ ππ ππππ πππ ππππππ πππππππππ."
Soros re-defined peace and security not as absence of war, but in terms of how many countries are "open societies."
In other words, NATO's new mission: if a country doesn't adopt Western-style capitalism and liberalism, NATO should step in... politically, economically, and eventually, militarily.
π§΅ THREAD: Congressman Shri Thanedar's conflict of interest
It's been floating around that Shri Thanedar left beagles to starve in a building when his company went bankrupt in 2010. But what's not mentioned is that his successor company, Avomeen Analytical Services, appears to be receiving federal money and got a massive influx of federal spending ever since he became Congressman in 2024 and continues to accelerate in 2025. @DOGE_GSA
Avomeen officially rebranded under Element Material Technology, Ann Arbor. A Google Search for the addresses show that they match up.
The Ann Arbor UEI (JKHYM6LMBFP7) received a boost in 2024/2025.
This week, DOGE shut down a foreign aid agency called Millenium Challenge Corporation.
Thanks to @awsalebadi for finding contracts. See hisπ for strange expenses from MCC, starting with a $746,293.66 for a Gender and Social Inclusion Director.
Millennium Challenge Corporation is heavily USGLC-linked, with a dedicated section on USGLC. They had a section dedicated to it, but it's been removed.
If you don't know what USGLC is - see my pinned thread.
The archive appears to list the people related to MCC. Let's look at the people in detail.
The CEO of MCC, Alice Albright, has hosted roundtables with USGLC. She hails from Citigroup and GAVI, both of which are represented on the USGLC board. The Gates Foundation has supported a conversation featuring her as well.