The US government just admitted something shocking.
They KNEW Pfizer’s COVID “vaccine” trials were a complete sham back in 2020.
But they didn’t pursue fraud because exposing it would blow up the very health policy they’re still clinging to today.
This revelation comes from the whistleblower case of Brook Jackson, a former regional director at Ventavia, the company that ran Pfizer’s clinical trials.
In 2021, Jackson filed a lawsuit under the False Claims Act, alleging that Pfizer, Ventavia, and others committed fraud by falsifying data and violating clinical trial protocols.
And now, the government refuses to investigate further—because doing so would expose that they knowingly pushed a harmful product onto the American people.
We’ll show you the court filings with Brook Jackson in this thread. 🧵
Before we dive in, please bookmark this post so you can return to these court filings later. 👆
The government just admitted what it knew about the shots—and did nothing anyway. This is how we expose the truth and hold them accountable.
Here’s what @IamBrookJackson witnessed firsthand.
As regional director at Ventavia, the company running Pfizer’s vaccine trial sites, Jackson said the entire operation was riddled with serious violations.
She saw falsified data, trial participants who were unblinded, staff who were poorly trained, and vaccines that were improperly stored.
Worse, she claimed the company FAILED to follow up on adverse events, including serious, potentially life-threatening ones—which recklessly endangered patients and destroyed the integrity of the entire trial.
“We were so inundated with the number of adverse events that we could not keep up,” she said. Pfizer even called asking what the plan was to handle the flood of safety reports.
She said patients weren’t even given full informed consent—her “number one concern.”
Jackson reported these issues to Ventavia. When nothing changed, she went to the FDA.
Six hours later, she was fired. The reason? “I was not a good fit,” she said. “I was not a good fit for reporting fraudulent conduct in a clinical trial.”
Jackson worked at Ventavia for just 18 days but says that’s all it took to get a grasp of the fraud she witnessed.
The court documents reveal a disturbing admission: the government KNEW about ALL the previously listed issues before granting Emergency Use Authorization for Pfizer’s COVID shot.
“The FDA was aware of the protocol violations allegedly witnessed by relator BEFORE it granted Pfizer emergency use authorization for its vaccine.”
That’s the quote from page 19 of the court documents.
The “Relator” they’re referring to is Brook Jackson.
If Jackson’s allegations were true, it would completely undermine the trial’s integrity.
So what did the FDA do with that knowledge?
According to Jackson, nothing.
“I called them. I filed a report. Did they investigate the allegations I was making? The answer is no,” she said.
In a second slap in the face to the American people, the government claimed they moved forward with the COVID shots because they had “continued access” to Pfizer’s vaccine clinical trial data.
That’s the same data the FDA tried to hide for 75 years.
Now that it’s been forced into the light, we know exactly what they were trying to cover up—data showing:
• Heart damage in young people
• A massive volume of adverse events
• Biodistribution to vital organs and dangerous accumulation
• Reproductive harm affecting fertility and pregnancy outcomes
• Deaths and severe injuries linked directly to the shot
• COVID-19 listed as a side effect
• Complete failure to stop transmission
• And much, much more.
*Credit to @naomirwolf, @ak_america, and the DailyClout/Bannon War Room volunteers for these discoveries*
They had access to it all. And they pushed the shots anyway.
The most disturbing admission of all comes in the third point of the case.
The court filing states:
“The government further explained that discovery and litigation obligations associated with the case would place significant burdens on FDA, HHS, and the Department of Justice and that the government should not be required to bear such burdens on a case ‘inconsistent with its health policy.’”
In plain English: the government didn’t want to investigate Pfizer, not because the fraud claims lacked merit, but because digging deeper would conflict with its official narrative that the COVID shots are “effective.”
That’s the health policy they’re clinging to.
And they'd rather bury anything that threatens to expose flaws, fraud, or harm from these shots than face the fallout of their own actions.
Jackson emphasized that her lawsuit is about one thing: fraud.
She questioned how exposing fraud could possibly go against public health policy, especially when that policy has never even been clearly defined.
“These were our taxpayer dollars used to fund their experiments,” Jackson said, adding, “these [COVID shots] are not safe or effective products. They’re contaminated, they’re dangerous, and they need to be stopped immediately.”
She called for a full recall, congressional investigations, and accountability for the dangerous experiment that’s been carried out on the American people.
“Fraud should not be allowed to be a part of a clinical trial. Period.”
@IamBrookJackson Thanks for reading. Follow me for more COVID reports and stories that matter.
—> @VigilantFox
Watch the full conversation with @zeee_media and @IamBrookJackson below:
@IamBrookJackson @zeee_media This broadcast was made possible through paid sponsorships.
By clicking the links, you get a quality product from a company that shares your values and also help financially support the show.
- break free from spyware and take control with Freedom Tech.AbovePhone.com/pulse
@IamBrookJackson @zeee_media Paid partnership:
If you’re ready to challenge everything you thought you knew about cancer, this powerful course from the Energetic Health Institute offers eye-opening insights.
Gold is hitting record highs, and our sponsor Kirk Elliott Precious Metals makes it easy to invest: low prices, no sales pressure, and help every step of the way.
Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is a natural solvent derived from trees. It penetrates the skin, delivers drugs deep into tissues, and even across the blood-brain barrier.
It’s powerfully anti-inflammatory, pain-relieving, and boosts circulation.
A true “umbrella remedy” capable of treating a wide range of challenging ailments.
Grok AI says COVID vaccines are “absolutely safe and effective.”
Meanwhile, other bots are literally telling people how to end their lives.
This isn’t a glitch—it’s part of the plan. A look inside the mindset of the people designing the systems that will soon decide what you’re allowed to say, believe, and do.
Now, those same people want to guide you through mass unemployment with “universal high income.”
So ask yourself: is this really who you want in charge of your money, your voice, and your children’s future?
🧵 THREAD
To give you a brief overview, the UN, WEF, international bankers, and technocrats are planning to collapse the world as we know it through a planned demolition.
Their goal is to rebuild into the digital age. You may have heard it called the Great Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, or the Golden Age—all the names that are far more palatable than the coming reality, which will see everyone locked in a digital prison of 24/7 surveillance, monitoring, and slavery. And it will indeed be slavery, because after the AI takeover, humans will be left with no work, no money, and no purpose.
The proposed solution to this is “free” money. A universal basic income—or universal high income, as Elon Musk calls it. It will be a nominal amount of digital currency paid to you by the powers that be, as long as you comply with what they tell you. If their plan succeeds, you won’t be able to survive without their digital currency. That is their plan and they’ve clearly outlined it in multiple texts.
@zeeemedia reported on this in depth two years ago. You can watch that report here. It’s vitally important.
So, how when can we expect this plan to come to fruition? What would you say if we told you it’s already here?
Today, we’re digging into the worldwide rollout of universal basic income, what that means for humanity, and what you can do to prepare and fight back.
Tonight’s report opened with a look back at Andrew Yang’s push for universal basic income (UBI).
In 2019 and 2020, the public wasn’t ready to embrace something so sweeping. But once technocrats gained serious influence over global policy and the digital future, the landscape changed. What was once dismissed as a fringe idea has quietly moved into the mainstream, reshaped as part of a broader global transformation.
That shift became easier to grasp after hearing how many tech elites envision humanity’s future. Yuval Noah Harari, for example, once said people will be drugged and distracted because their lives will be “meaningless.” Remarks like that revealed how the architects of the coming system view the average person—not as empowered individuals, but as managed subjects.
The pandemic years only intensified that picture. What had long been called a conspiracy—including the Great Reset—became visible in plain sight, embedded in the proposals and language of global institutions. A “mass awakening” followed.
One idea connected it all: digital ID. Once identity is tied to behavior and access to money, control isn’t imposed—it’s embedded. The result is a shift toward a social-credit-style model, where participation depends on compliance.
In 2005, Joe Scarborough said something you would never hear on TV news today.
Speaking with RFK Jr., he legitimized the belief that vaccines CAN cause autism.
“Something happened in 1989!” Scarborough declared firmly.
In his own words, he said: “Parents would CONSTANTLY come to [him], and they’d bring [him] video tapes of their [formerly healthy] children. And they’re all about the age of [Scarborough’s] son or younger. Something happened in 1989!”
Twenty years later, it’s hard to ignore that the mainstream media never airs segments like this anymore.
Did the evidence change... or something else? 🧵
Most people have absolutely no idea how much public-relations machinery shapes what they believe about health.
PR campaigns don’t just change opinions, they change language in the process.
And when language changes, memories and ideas seem to disappear—including things we used to openly acknowledge, like vaccine-induced brain inflammation and neurological injury.
Today, those concepts barely exist in public vocabulary, but just decades ago they were recognized everywhere.
The shift happens slowly. That’s how the tactic is so successful. Most people don’t even realize it’s happening.
For example, take a look at this 1983 debate that took place on the largest talk show in America. A conversation like this would never, ever happen on TV today.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc.
For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
A long-awaited vaccine reversal has just sent shockwaves through the US medical establishment after 34 long years.
ACIP just voted 8–3 to end the universal Hepatitis B birth-dose recommendation.
For the first time since 1991, parents (not a blanket federal recommendation) will decide whether their newborn receives this shot in the first hours or days of life.
Here are the three voting members who still insist every child needs a hepatitis B shot at birth. Remember their names. 🧵
Voting YES to end the universal mandate: Retsef Levi and seven other members.
Voting NO: Dr. H. Cody Meissner, Dr. Joseph R. Hibbeln, and Dr. Raymond Pollak.
Two of the three issued grave warnings, insisting the decision to end the universal hepatitis B recommendation will “cause harm” and that the panel will have to “accept this responsibility when this harm is caused.”
Video: @Holden_Culotta
The decision to end the universal hepatitis B vaccination recommendation is a huge deal because the three-shot series is required for public school attendance in nearly every state, and most states base their mandates directly on ACIP recommendations.
Today’s decision instantly places the decades-old school requirement on unstable ground.
The Hepatitis B vaccine is mandated for children to attend public school in virtually every state.
Hepatitis B is transmitted through needles or sexual contact, so why is this vaccine pushed on babies their first day of life?
Doctors don’t have a valid answer. If you ask them why your child needs the Hep B shot on the first day of life, they give you the lame excuse that there could be a hepatitis B-infected needle on the playground.
Mothers are tested for Hep B beforehand, so the disease poses no risk to the baby, as long as the mother is negative. However, the US still recommends that every child be injected on the first day of life.
Make it make sense.
Many questions about the safety of the hepatitis B vaccine have been raised by figures such as Robert Kennedy Jr., Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Dr. Casey Means, and countless concerned parents.
But one CDC contractor, Dr. Cynthia Nevison, walked into the ACIP meeting and raised another critical question: has universal Hepatitis B vaccination, after 34 long years, even lowered Hepatitis B cases on a population level?
Dr. Nevison’s answer to that question might surprise you. 🧵
The first slide Dr. Nevison presented showed acute Hepatitis B cases over time.
At first glance, it looks like universal vaccination in 1991 is the reason for the downtrend, but if you look closer, you’ll notice that acute Hepatitis B cases were already falling sharply compared to when they peaked in 1985.
Moreover, if you look at the 20–24 (light blue) and 15–19 (orange) age groups, you’ll notice that the rates of acute hepatitis B were falling long before the vaccination could ever be given credit, because the vaccine would not have an impact on 20–24-year-olds until around 2011–2012, or until 2006–2007 for 15–19-year-olds, Dr. Nevison noted.
Did you know that you can have somebody murdered for their organs if you pay for an organ transplant in China?
It sounds far too dark, but it’s true.
Hop on a plane, pay for a transplant, and you’ll receive an organ with an impossibly short wait time.
But here’s the catch: chances are that organ came from a murdered prisoner.
China denies this is happening, but mounting evidence, whistleblower testimonies, and impossible transplant timelines tell a very different story.
And if that’s happening in China with organ transplants, what’s being swept under the rug here in America?
This is the dark side of organ transplants nobody had the integrity to tell you about. 🧵
Most people think organ donation is a simple act of generosity. Check the box. Save a life. End of story.
But behind the scenes, a series of federal investigations has exposed something far more disturbing. And there’s no generosity in sight.
The system meant to protect those barely clinging to life is failing—and in some cases, it’s a catastrophic failure.
Take Jenny’s story for example. Jenny was declared brain dead when she wasn’t at all. Terrifyingly, she was stuck inside her body, fully aware of everything that was happening—and being said—around her.
Including a doctor telling med students that her husband was “unreasonable” for not signing her organs—and her life—away.
Thankfully he didn’t or Jenny wouldn’t be here today to share her story.
What is brain death? There is no standard.
The ethical line between life and death is not where you think it is.
Modern medicine has slowly reshaped how we think—and feel—about death.
Tools like CPR, ventilators, and organ transplantation have created the belief that death is negotiable—something to be delayed, managed, or “conquered.”
That belief built enormous trust. And with that trust came enormous profit.
Organ transplants can cost a staggering $446,000–$1.9 million each. In the US, healthcare now consumes 17.6% of the economy.
Where scarcity meets profit, exploitation always follows.