For the first time ever, a U.S. president has officially terminated government-funded gain-of-function research—the same reckless science that likely sparked the COVID pandemic.
Then RFK Jr. stunned the room with a chilling exposé of government practices that you have to hear to believe.
🧵 THREAD
📍Don’t forget to bookmark this post.
These aren’t just headlines—they’re the turning points in the battle for America’s health.
Now, let’s roll the clips!
Before he ever stepped into office, RFK Jr. was warning the public about something few dared to touch—gain of function research.
Long before most people had even heard the term, Kennedy was calling out Dr. Anthony Fauci for experimenting on viruses, making them more deadly under the guise of science.
He explained it plainly: scientists were taking wild viruses and making them more contagious, more lethal—then building vaccines to counter the threats they’d just created.
And for what purpose?
“The only real rationale,” Kennedy said, “is to develop bioweapons, and then develop a defense to those bioweapons.”
It wasn’t a fringe theory.
It was happening under Fauci’s watch—and Kennedy revealed that Fauci even got a 68% raise from the military for his role in these new “military responsibilities.”
Now, fast forward to today.
Kennedy is no longer just a whistleblower.
He’s the Secretary of Health and Human Services, standing beside President Trump as history is made.
In a moment that critics have been demanding for years, Trump signed an executive order banning federal funding for gain of function research.
This is the kind of dangerous experimentation that many believe led directly to the COVID-19 pandemic. And now, it’s over.
Trump held up the signed document and said, “It’s a big deal. Could have been that we wouldn’t have had the problem we had [Covid] if we had this done earlier.”
His aide, Will Scharf, explained exactly what the order does:
“What this executive order does: first of all, it provides powerful new tools to enforce the ban on federal funding for gain of function research abroad.”
“It also strengthens other oversight mechanisms, related to that issue and creates an overarching strategy to ensure that biomedical research in general is being conducted safely, and in a way that that ultimately protects human health more.”
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
Kennedy called it a turning point.
Not just because of what the order does—but because of what it ends.
And that’s when RFK Jr. dropped the chilling history behind gain of function in America.
He explained how it all started back in 1947, when U.S. military and intelligence agencies began experimenting with biological weapons.
By 1969, the CIA bragged about achieving “nuclear equivalency”—the ability to wipe out the population for just 29 cents a person.
That same year, President Nixon toured Fort Detrick and shut it down.
He called it “dual use research”—bioweapons disguised as vaccine development—and led over 180 countries to sign a treaty to end it.
But after the 2001 anthrax attacks, everything changed. A quiet clause in the Patriot Act gave government officials legal immunity—even if they violated that bioweapons treaty.
“That relaunched a bio weapons arms race,” Kennedy said, “and that was driven by gain of function research.”
In 2014, Obama tried to stop it after multiple pathogens escaped from U.S. labs.
But the research didn’t stop—it just went offshore, to places like the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
That, Kennedy said, is where the COVID story really begins.
The ceremony ended with a powerful moment from Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, the newly appointed Director of the NIH.
He called it “a historic day,” and warned that gain of function research—the kind that makes viruses more contagious or deadly—has always carried a catastrophic risk.
“This research does not protect us against pandemics,” he said.
“What it does is there's always a danger that in doing this research, it might leak out just by accident, even, and cause a pandemic.”
Bhattacharya stressed that the vast majority of scientific research will continue as normal. But this small slice of high-risk experimentation?
That’s no longer just up to scientists.
“This executive order puts in place a framework to make sure that the public has a say… that in fact, the public can say, no, don’t take this risk.”
For the first time, the door is finally closing on one of the most dangerous scientific practices in modern history.
Thanks for reading. Follow me for more stories that matter.
—> @VigilantFox
Looking for something else to read?
The media just took a beating as Trump dropped three truth bombs from the White House today!
If you thought “Ozempic face” was bad, wait till you hear what it’s doing inside the body.
A massive study involving 16 million people found GLP-1 users had a 9.09 times greater risk of pancreatitis, 4.22 times greater risk of bowel obstruction, and a 3.67 times greater risk of stomach paralysis.
And if you’ve ever had pancreatitis, it is “quite a painful experience.”
What you’re hearing on the news about Ozempic is still too little, too late.
Here’s the story you’re not getting about Ozempic, the business model behind it, and why a growing number of researchers believe another pharmaceutical disaster is already unfolding in real time. 🧵
In early 2023, JP Morgan hosted its annual healthcare conference—a private, invitation-only event it describes as “the industry’s biggest gathering.”
The keynote speakers included the chairman of JPMorgan Chase, the CEO of Eli Lilly, and several managing directors of major healthcare venture capital firms.
The fourth keynote was Dr. Robert Califf.
His day job at the time: Commissioner of Food and Drugs for the United States Food and Drug Administration.
Hmm…
This wasn’t a public health symposium. It wasn’t an academic conference.
It was specifically designed for large investors, and its explicit purpose was to set the pharmaceutical industry’s financial priorities for the year ahead.
A pharmaceutical safety advocate named Kim Witczak obtained what she could from the conference’s public-facing website.
The world’s second most published critical care doctor says they’ve been lying to you about the sun for decades.
Dr. Paul Marik says there’s no reason to fear the sun; you should embrace it.
Because when you get adequate levels of vitamin D, your risk of cancer goes down, depression symptoms alleviate, and your immune system functions far better.
What about sunscreens? Dr. Marik advises against it because “it defeats the purpose.”
“There’s some data that sunscreens increase your risk of melanoma — paradoxically.”
Similar to how Big Pharma doesn’t like the “I drug” (Ivermectin) for treating COVID-19, Dr. Marik explained they also don’t like Vitamin D for general health and well-being.
Why? Because if you are in good health and devoid of chronic disease, there’s less money to be made.
Big Pharma played us. They propagandized the masses into fearing an essential component of human life.
Here’s what they don’t want you to know about the sun vs. artificial light—and what happens when your body is cut off from natural light. 🧵
The further north humans migrated away from the equator—and away from the sun—the lighter their skin became.
That’s not cosmetic. It’s a survival adaptation.
The human body, recognizing it wasn’t capturing enough light, made itself more transparent to capture whatever remained.
We evolved to need light the way we need food.
But in our modern lives, we commute in sealed cars, work 8 hour shifts under fluorescent lights, and go home to screens in the comfort of our artificially lit homes.
And we wonder why we’re sick.
In a 20-year study following 29,518 women, researchers found that those who avoided the sun were 60% more likely to die—with heart disease showing the greatest mortality difference.
A separate large study found that high solar UVB exposure halved one’s risk of both breast and prostate cancer.
The data is there. And it’s been available for decades. But almost no one talks about it.
This teacher-turned-cognitive scientist shared a disturbing reality that left the room stunned.
“Our kids are LESS cognitively capable than we were at their age.”
Every previous generation outperformed its parents since we began recording in the late 1800s.
So, what happened?
Screens.
Dr. Jared Horvath explained:
“Gen Z is the first generation in modern history to underperform us on basically every cognitive measure we have, from basic attention to memory, to literacy, to numeracy, to executive functioning, to EVEN GENERAL IQ, even though they go to more school than we did.”
“So why? … The answer appears to be the tools we are using within schools to drive that learning (screens).”
“If you look at the data, once countries adopt digital technology widely in schools, performance goes down significantly, to the point where kids who use computers about five hours per day in school for learning purposes will score over two-thirds of a standard deviation LESS than kids who rarely or never touch tech at school. And that’s across 80 countries.”
But screens aren’t just decimating learning and making new generations less intelligent than the ones before them.
They’re doing something far worse. And when you take a closer look, it isn’t pretty.
This isn’t a glitch.
Engagement-driven algorithms don’t understand meaning, context, or childhood development. They only understand clicks and watch time driven by dopamine spikes.
So when AI is tasked with churning out videos at scale, it doesn’t filter for innocence—it optimizes for stimulation.
Cartoon imagery masking adult themes, fear cues, violence, and psychological distress is being served to toddlers. Bright colors on the surface. Something very, very wrong underneath.
This content has zero educational or developmental value. No story. No moral arc. No learning. Just rapid-fire novelty engineered to hold attention at all costs—even if that cost is literally the viewer’s brain and nervous system development.
Dopamine-optimized media and AI-generated slop are conditioning our children for addiction, emotional dysregulation, and long-term neurological harm.
We have to stop this before it starts—and before Big Pharma steps in with the “solution.”
Something unprecedented and highly concerning is happening to children’s brains.
Toddlers aren’t just watching screens—they’re being neurologically conditioned by them.
Rapid cuts, flashing colors, constant novelty.
And none of it is by accident. It is all by design.
What looks like “kid’s content” is often dopamine engineering aimed at maximizing engagement, not healthy development, no matter the damage it does.
RFK Jr. told Tucker Carlson the CDC buried its own internal study showing a 1135% INCREASE in autism risk from hepatitis B vaccination.
The researchers were shocked.
So they covered it up.
How?
“They got rid of all the older children essentially and just had younger children who are TOO YOUNG TO BE DIAGNOSED [with autism],” Kennedy explained.
Imagine discovering evidence of catastrophic harm and making sure no one ever found out.
Then, telling everyone it’s “safe.”
If health authorities are willing to keep a signal this alarming hidden from you, what else are they not telling you about vaccines?
Is it possible that your child’s allergies or chronic immune issues didn’t appear organically, but were triggered by vaccination instead? 🧵
The vaccine-autism fight is usually framed as one bad paper versus settled science.
Hands down. No questions.
That framing is emotionally powerful and far too small.
The question is not whether a single case series proved causation. It’s whether modern medicine has built a system that can even detect rare, subgroup-specific neurological injury.
And if it can detect it, is the system even capable of admitting it?
Before digging into the evidence, one thing has to be understood:
The official public-health position is that vaccines have not been shown to cause autism.
But that doesn’t end the discussion. Not even close.
It actually narrows the real question: are there vulnerable subgroups, injury patterns, or mechanisms that broad population studies are just not designed to see?
If your studies are designed to not see something, can you ever expect to see it?
RED ALERT: Former COVID Task Force coordinator Deborah Birx is now calling for “widely available” PCR testing for Hantavirus, including in schools, and many people are noticing the exact same pandemic playbook that preceded the chaos of 2020.
The real red flag is not the virus itself. It’s watching the same fear infrastructure suddenly reactivate in real time—PCR testing, asymptomatic spread warnings, quarantine language, hazmat imagery, and nonstop media coverage telling the public not to panic.
Birx openly argued that viruses should be tracked through PCR testing instead of symptoms, the same testing system that used to inflate COVID case counts and justify lockdowns across the world.
At the exact same time, Fox News is now airing “deadly outbreak” coverage featuring quarantine centers, hazmat suits, and warnings about possible spread, while officials simultaneously insist there is “nothing to worry about.”
Watch @zeeemedia's report before this escalates any further.
Health insurance in America is broken. But it doesn't have to be that way.
Over 200,000 Americans go bankrupt because of medical bills every year—and many of them already had insurance. On average, 20% of claims are denied, leaving families stuck paying massive out-of-pocket costs after spending thousands on premiums.
Nearly 20% of the world’s population is being urged to return to COVID-style lockdowns, this time because of the global oil crisis tied to the Iran war.
Critics say this is how the next phase begins, not with force at first, but with emotional appeals about “patriotism,” sacrifice, and doing your part for the collective good before harsher measures eventually follow.
In a passionate national address, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi called on citizens to work from home, return to virtual meetings, avoid driving whenever possible, and use electric rail systems instead.
For many people, the messaging feels disturbingly familiar. During COVID, governments first framed compliance as a moral responsibility “for the common good.” Not long after came fines, surveillance, movement restrictions, and aggressive enforcement across much of the world.
Now, a growing number of critics are asking what happens when every major crisis, from pandemics to oil shortages to climate emergencies, becomes justification for the same systems of control.
The full report reveals why many people believe COVID was never the end of this agenda, only the beginning.
In 1982, an NBC affiliate station in Washington, D.C., produced a documentary called “DPT: Vaccine Roulette.”
It got such a huge reaction, the station re-aired it twice. The big NBC promoted it. It even won an Emmy.
All because it asked one vital question: Is the DPT vaccine more dangerous than the disease itself?
44 years later, a film like this would never win an Emmy, never be funded by mainstream television, nor receive positive media coverage. You can’t even watch the film on YouTube anymore.
The question we have to ask is: why?
Did the evidence change… or something else? 🧵
There was a time when vaccine injury wasn’t treated as a forbidden topic.
It was treated as news.
NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, Fox, CNBC, local stations, talk shows, and even European broadcasters aired lengthy segments about paralyzed children, neurological injury, conflicts of interest, hot lots, mandates, regulatory failure, and more.
Most people forgot about it or don’t even know that used to be the norm.
Today, a single skeptical segment about vaccine safety can be framed as reckless and even deadly misinformation.
But for decades, mainstream TV interviewed injured families, challenged officials, and aired data the agencies did not want discussed.
This information comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc
For all the sources and details, read the full report below: