🧵🧵How Norm Eisen’s 2025 Democracy Playbook Plans to takeover for the Midterms Without the Presidency
What happens if Democrats + globalist NGOs lose the White House?
Nothing changes.
Because they’ve spent years building a machine that runs WITHOUT needing the presidency.
Here’s how they plan to rule through lawfare, NGOs, media + states + their plans for the 2026 midterms.
(Yes I read the playbook)
Step 1: State-Level Election Control
The White House does NOT certify elections.
→ Secretaries of State do.
In 2026, Democrats + NGOs (e.g. Democracy Alliance, Democratic Association of Secretaries of State) are spending $40M to dominate swing state election offices.
Control the election referees → Control the election.
Step 2: Civil Society Army (NGOs Never Leave)
NGOs don’t leave when presidents change.
Groups like:
•Democracy Docket (Marc Elias)
•Brennan Center
•Common Cause
•Fair Fight Action (Stacey Abrams)
•Southern Coalition for Social Justice
•Movement Voter Project
•SPLC
•Indivisible
→ Stay and FIGHT regardless of who’s in office.
Step 3: Lawfare and the Courts
The legal system is immune to elections.
NGO + Dem lawyers flood the courts 24/7:
•Blocking state laws
•Suing over voter roll rules
•Fighting ID requirements
•Forcing states to adopt expansive voting laws
Litigation locks in rules that presidents can’t easily undo.
Universities, HR departments, Fortune 500 companies → don’t flip red with the presidency.
Through ESG + DEI + NGO partnerships, they push civic norms:
•“Election denial = disinfo”
•“Voting restrictions = racism”
•“Democracy needs protection from nationalists”
Culture capture continues.
Step 6: International + Foreign Leverage
Presidents come and go.
Global institutions do not.
Brookings, NDI, Open Society, UN, EU, and foreign-funded NGOs will:
•Pressure GOP states internationally
•Fund lawsuits
•Attack “authoritarian US actors” abroad
NGOs are sold to the public as altruistic.
→ Saving the planet.
→ Defending human rights.
→ Promoting democracy.
But behind the curtain?
They are powerful political weapons for billionaires and global elites.
Here’s how they really operate:
NGOs are PERFECT vehicles for dark money.
→ They don’t pay taxes.
→ Donors are often anonymous.
→ They can accept unlimited funds.
→ They operate globally with little oversight.
Translation?
Massive untraceable $$$ flowing into politics without public accountability.
↓
Billionaires and special interests use foundations and NGOs to launder their agendas.
Example:
George Soros → Open Society Foundations
Arabella Advisors → $1+ Billion progressive “dark money” empire
Bill Gates → Gates Foundation’s influence on global health and education policy
This isn’t charity. It’s power projection.
NGOs shape policy behind closed doors.
They fund academic studies →
Sponsor media outlets →
Write legislative drafts →
Advise global bodies (UN, EU, WHO) →
Pressure corporations via ESG & DEI mandates →
You vote for politicians.
You don’t vote for these unelected NGO bureaucrats.
↓
They also control narratives.
NGO-funded “fact checkers” and “disinformation watchdogs” dictate what’s true and false online.
→ Censorship via partnerships with Big Tech.
→ Suppression of dissenting voices on elections, COVID, climate, etc.
→ Creating self-reinforcing media ecosystems to drown out opposition.
🧵🧵The 2026 midterms are shaping up to be a critical battleground, with Democrats aiming to capitalize on historical trends favoring the non-presidential party and Republicans leveraging their current congressional majorities and Trump-aligned energy.
What are the parties doing to gear up?
1. Aggressive Targeting of Republican-Held Seats with a Broad Map
Democratic Strategy: Democrats, through the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), have identified 35 Republican-held House seats as targets for 2026, including some in districts Trump won by double digits in 2024. This ambitious list includes traditional swing seats but also stretches into red-leaning districts like Iowa’s 2nd, Ohio’s 15th, and Kentucky’s 6th, where Republicans have stronger historical advantages. The DCCC’s confidence stems from recent special election performances where Democrats narrowed margins in deep-red areas, signaling potential voter discontent with Republican policies under Trump.
Republican Contrast: Republicans, led by the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), are focusing on defending their slim 220-213 House majority and maintaining their Senate edge (53-47). Their strategy emphasizes battle-tested incumbents and Trump’s endorsement power to mobilize their base, particularly in red states. They’re less focused on expanding into Democratic-leaning districts, as only three Republican incumbents represent Harris-won districts compared to 13 Democrats in Trump-won districts. Republicans seem to assume their current map and Trump’s influence will suffice, potentially underestimating the midterm backlash risk.
Insight: Democrats are proactively widening the battlefield, betting on a backlash against Trump’s polarizing agenda (e.g., tariffs, government efficiency cuts) to make even red districts competitive. This contrasts with Republicans’ more defensive posture, which relies heavily on Trump’s personal brand.
The Democratic approach is riskier but could yield higher rewards if voter sentiment shifts, especially given historical midterm losses for the president’s party (average of 25 House seats since WWII). Republicans’ narrower focus might leave them vulnerable if public disapproval of Trump grows, as it did in 2018 when they lost 41 seats.
🧵 THREAD: How the CCP Weaponizes TikTok in the U.S.-China Trade War
A deep dive into NCRI’s latest report reveals the strategic use of TikTok by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to influence U.S. consumers and undermine trade policies.
1/🎯 Strategic Manipulation:
Post-April 2025 tariffs, TikTok saw a surge in content promoting direct purchases from Chinese manufacturers, encouraging Americans to “cut out the middleman.” This content often disguises the origin of goods to bypass tariffs.
2/🤖 Algorithmic Control:
TikTok’s algorithm suppresses content critical of the CCP while amplifying pro-China narratives. Topics like Xinjiang, Tibet, and Tiananmen are notably absent or downplayed.
So I made the mistake of listening to people about this anti-Israel boycott bill instead of reading the whole thing (I should know better).
Now I have read the bill. Here’s what it actually says. The disingenuous way in which people I trust covered it frustrates me. Disregard my previous posts on the subject. I was gaslit.
Give people the truth, then share your opinion. Don’t pass your opinion off as the truth.
Thread: A Full Breakdown of H.R. 867 – The IGO Anti-Boycott Act 🧵
H.R. 867, the IGO Anti-Boycott Act, was voted on in the House on May 5, 2025. It’s a divisive bill, so let’s break it down neutrally: what it does, its intent, benefits, concerns, and the lies being spread. Here’s the complete picture.
What is H.R. 867? It extends the 2018 Anti-Boycott Act (rooted in 1977 laws) to include international organizations like the U.N. It prohibits U.S. entities from joining foreign-led boycotts against allies, mainly Israel, and mandates reporting on such activities (Section 1773). 📜
The intent: Counter foreign-led economic campaigns that isolate U.S. allies. The bill aims to protect national security and alliances by ensuring U.S. entities don’t comply with state-backed boycotts and to expose foreign influence via taxpayer-funded NGOs. 🕵️♂️
Why Israel? Israel, a key U.S. ally with $150B in aid since 1948, faces frequent foreign-led boycotts (200+ U.N. resolutions since 2006). These campaigns threaten U.S. interests like regional stability, intelligence sharing, and $50B in trade (2023).
Why now? Adversarial states use IGOs like the U.N. as proxies to push anti-Israel agendas, often through NGOs. H.R. 867’s reporting exposes this, aligning with 2025 trends like Rubio’s USAID cuts to curb foreign influence. Transparency aims for accountability.