Trump’s gain-of-function ban sounded like a huge win.
Many, including myself, celebrated.
Then we read the fine print—and discovered a massive red flag:
The US banned GOF research abroad—while quietly protecting it at home.
One key Trump ally is linked to Pfizer—and she’s actually helping block a major COVID whistleblower case.
Attorney Tom Renz breaks down all the details—and calls out who he sees as an obvious fraud inside Trump’s cabinet.
🧵 THREAD
The Trump administration’s gain-of-function announcement sounded like a big move, but it wasn’t the whole story.
Instead of shutting down dangerous research, the policy may actually be laying the groundwork to expand it.
Attorney and medical freedom hero Tom Renz (@RenzTom) broke everything down in our exclusive interview.
According to him, the new policy doesn’t end gain-of-function, it essentially “codifies it.”
In plain terms, the US says it won’t fund gain-of-function research in adversarial countries. But domestically? That same restriction doesn’t apply.
“They’re going to allow it under new regulations,” Renz said. “And by doing that, they’re essentially saying, ‘We’re fine with gain-of-function as long as it follows the current rules.’
“So in that way, they’re actually legitimizing gain-of-function work in this country, which is absolutely mind-blowing to me,” he added.
The executive order begins with an encouraging statement: “Dangerous gain-of-function research on biological agents and pathogens has the potential to significantly endanger the lives of American citizens.”
But keep reading. The order lays out a sweeping plan to expand the same mRNA technology disaster we saw with COVID.
1.) Section 4(b) directs officials to “revise or replace the 2024 ‘Framework for Nucleic Acid Synthesis Screening’” to ensure a “commonsense approach” that encourages widespread adoption. It doesn’t ban synthetic DNA or RNA—it ensures it’s more easily and broadly screened and distributed.
2.) The new framework must be “comprehensive, scalable, and verifiable.” That language signals a system designed for growth. It’s not about stopping the technology—it’s about managing it at larger and larger scales.
3.) The executive order also calls for review and revision every 4 years, ensuring the system evolves as the industry grows.
4.) Section 5 expands oversight to non-federally funded research, meaning even private labs working with synthetic genetics are now in scope—another sign the government is preparing for widespread use.
There’s no language anywhere suggesting caution, pause, or ethical review—just infrastructure to make sure this technology keeps going strong.
The conversation revealed that Attorney General Pam Bondi has previously represented Pfizer.
Tom Renz also suspected that some of the most powerful people in the Trump administration are actively working against Bobby Kennedy Jr.
Speaking of Pam Bondi—where are the Epstein files? And why does she keep making big promises while underdelivering?
Attorney Tom Renz had some pointed observations:
• Bondi’s DOJ is actively opposing the Brook Jackson fraud case against Pfizer.
• Her financial disclosures list Pfizer as a recent connection.
• He questioned whether Bondi is incompetent or deliberately misleading the public.
• And he dropped a dose of reality, saying, if no one from the Epstein list has been jailed, why should we expect justice for COVID crimes?
Here’s the main point you need to know, as Tom Renz puts it:
“The Executive Order on gain of function did NOT stop GOF work. Further, it actually enshrines mRNA and DNA tech by requiring regulation related to it. It also requires regulations surrounding GOF, which essentially sanctions it. This was NOT the win people are saying.
“I’m glad the President limited GOF, and this was an improvement in some ways, but whoever wrote this should be fired.”
@RenzTom Thanks for reading. Watch the full conversation below.
This broadcast was made possible through our trusted sponsors.
By clicking the links below, you get a quality product from a company that shares your values and also help financially support the show.
SPONSORED MESSAGE: If you’re tired of being tracked, spied on, and controlled by Big Tech, now’s your chance to break free—with AbovePhone.com/pulse.
With Above’s Freedom Tech and Privacy Suite, you get encrypted messaging, private browsing, a VPN, and a search engine that doesn’t track you.
No surveillance, no forced updates, no one spying over your shoulder.
@RenzTom SPONSORED MESSAGE: If you’re ready to challenge everything you thought you knew about cancer, this powerful course from the Energetic Health Institute offers eye-opening insights.
@RenzTom SPONSORED MESSAGE: Gold is hitting record highs, and our sponsor Kirk Elliott Precious Metals makes it easy to invest: low prices, no sales pressure, and help every step of the way.
Watch the video below for more information—or visit to get started. kepm.com/pulse
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The media came to the White House press briefing today armed with networks talking points.
They came to spin, smear, and sabotage Trump’s latest moves.
But Karoline Leavitt was ready—locked, loaded, and armed with the truth.
She didn’t just clap back…
She torched their entire narrative on live TV.
🧵THREAD
👆And don’t forget to bookmark this thread—because what you’re about to see is a masterclass in media narratives crumbling in real time.
These moments won’t make it to the mainstream.
Let’s break it down.
The media onslaught began the moment Karoline Leavitt opened the floor at the White House press briefing.
One reporter wasted no time, suggesting Trump’s upcoming trip to the Middle East was less about diplomacy and more about personal business.
He hasn’t even landed in Saudi Arabia, the U.A.E., or Qatar—but they were already implying he was using the presidency for private gain.
“Is the president planning to meet with folks involved with any of the family businesses over there?” the reporter asked.
Leavitt cut the question off before it could gain steam.
“Not to my knowledge,” she said.
Then she fired back at the entire narrative.
“I think it’s frankly ridiculous that anyone in this room would even suggest that President Trump is doing anything for his own benefit.”
She reminded the room what Trump gave up to serve the country—twice.
“He left a life of luxury and a life of running a very successful real estate empire for public service. Not just once, but twice.”
And she made it clear why the American people sent him back to the White House.
“The American public reelected him back to this White House because they trust he acts in the best interests of our country and putting the American public first.”
Leavitt then highlighted what the media never admits:
“This is a president who has actually lost money for being president of the United States.”
She ended with a pointed comparison.
“I don’t remember these types of questions being asked of my predecessor about a career politician who was clearly profiting off of this office.”
Germany is on the brink of national suicide—and it’s no accident.
What was once Europe’s economic powerhouse is now unraveling under green delusions, open borders, and paralyzing deindustrialization.
Victor Davis Hanson reveals the one party trying to save the nation from this nightmare.
But the elites just labeled them “extremists” for telling the truth.
🧵THREAD
Victor Davis Hanson opened with a warning—and it wasn’t subtle.
This week, Germany’s only major right-wing opposition party, Alternative for Germany (AfD), was officially labeled an “extremist” group by the country’s domestic intelligence agency, the BfV.
The designation sent shockwaves through the political landscape.
AfD immediately challenged it in court, prompting the agency to suspend enforcement while litigation proceeds.
But the damage, Hanson said, has already been done.
This move, he argued, wasn’t about public safety—it was about political control.
“Recently, the German government announced that it is going to label or maybe relabel the Alternative for Deutschland,” Hanson explained.
“The conservative party that has an antithetical agenda both to the German government of both liberal and conservative factions, but also to the EU in general.”
He said the classification ensures AfD will remain on the outside of political power, regardless of how many people support them.
“It will cement this aura that no government under their parliamentary democracy system will ask them to join to form a majority government,” Hanson said.
“So the process of ostracism and demonization of this party continues.”
And for what? The real issue, he said, is that AfD simply offers a different vision.
“The party is advocating an alternative for the way that Germany is going.”
So where is Germany going?
Hanson painted a bleak picture—of economic decline, energy failure, and political denial.
“If you look at what has become of Germany,” he said, “it has had two years of essentially no growth or negative growth.”
He noted the country finally reached its long-delayed NATO defense spending goal, pledging 2% of GDP—something it was supposed to do back in 2014.
But the milestone felt more like a bare-minimum box-check than a serious turning point.
“It just barely did it,” Hanson said.
Meanwhile, Germany has doubled down on green energy while dismantling its nuclear infrastructure, despite the country’s climate not being suited for solar reliance.
The results have been catastrophic.
German electricity costs are now roughly four times higher than those in the United States.
And that’s not just hitting households—it’s pushing away manufacturers and investors who can no longer justify doing business in the country.
“You can see what that’s going to do to German investment,” Hanson warned.
REPORT: We looked into Pope Leo XIV’s background—and what we found raises serious questions.
He’s the first American pope in history. But as he takes the role of 267th pontiff, a disturbing allegation has come to light.
• While serving as Bishop of Chiclayo, Peru, three women say they told him they were sexually abused as children by two priests under his leadership.
• They claim he told them the Church couldn’t investigate unless a civil complaint was filed.
• One of the accused priests was later transferred out of the area, officially for “health reasons.”
• The Church allegedly ignored the allegations for years—until one of the victims spoke out publicly on social media.
• Only then did the diocese reopen an investigation—but to this day, there’s been no official response.
• A report by an Italian journalist alleges Prevost (Pope Leo) actively avoided the case and failed to follow through.
We believe in innocent until proven guilty. But it is odd that he was chosen when he has these allegations hanging over him.
SPONSORED MESSAGE: Gold is hitting record highs, and our sponsor Kirk Elliott Precious Metals makes it easy to invest: low prices, no sales pressure, and help every step of the way.
Watch the video below for more information—or visit to get started. kepm.com/pulse
Our next story involves Kash Patel and the baffling comments he just made.
He says that Jeffrey Epstein DID kill himself.
In a mind-boggling exchange with Sen. John Kennedy, Patel claimed Epstein “hung himself in his cell”—despite the suspiciously convenient coincidence of broken cameras and sleeping guards.
Patel also confirmed that the government has possession of the Epstein files and is actively redacting details to “protect the victims.”
But multiple victims have publicly demanded the full, unredacted release.
So what’s going on here?
Pam Bondi promised the files months ago—yet all we’ve seen are delays, redactions, and silence. Now, we’re expected to believe Epstein killed himself.
Not going to lie. Very disappointed in our FBI and DOJ picks. It seems accountability won’t happen on its own; it’ll only come when the people demand it.
Victor Davis Hanson just shattered the media’s favorite lie about Trump.
For years, they’ve used fake polls to manipulate public opinion and crush his momentum.
But Hanson didn’t just say the polls were wrong. He showed they were rigged—by design.
Polling is now just a weapon, used to suppress Trump’s base and supercharge Democrat fundraising.
And once you hear the evidence, you’ll never trust another mainstream poll again.
🧵 THREAD
Lately, the media’s been pushing a familiar narrative: Trump is tanking in the polls.
But Victor Davis Hanson says that story doesn’t hold up—and once you see what’s behind the numbers, it starts to look a lot more like propaganda than polling.
So where did it all come from?
“We've touched on polls before,” Hanson said, “but I don't think I've seen anything quite as egregious in pollsters' bias as recently when they... purportedly surveyed the first 100 days of Donald Trump and the public reaction.”
Headlines immediately screamed: Worst first 100 days in history.
Trump’s approval supposedly dropped from 52 to 41 percent.
But as Hanson pointed out, none of that lined up with reality.
“The economic news was pretty good,” he explained.
Trump has been racking up the wins:
“Job growth was just spectacular—over 170,000 jobs. Inflation was down. Energy prices were down. Corporate profits were up. There was a movement on the trade question. Ukraine, still—there was no bad news except the controversy and chaos of a counterrevolution.”
So why were the polls painting such a grim picture?
Hanson believes the goal wasn’t to reflect public opinion—it was to steer it.
“What were the pollsters trying to tell us,” he asked, “or were they trying to manipulate us? I think it’s the latter.”
He pointed to analysis from Larry Kudlow, who found that top polls—like those from The New York Times and The Washington Post—deliberately underrepresented Trump voters.
“They were deliberately not counting people who surveyed that they were Trump voters in 2024,” Hanson said.
“That was half the country.”
Even worse:
“They were only polling about a third,” he added.
“Think of that. A third of the people that said they voted for Trump, they polled—not half. So of course the results were going to be disputed or suspect.”
And this isn’t the first time.
Hanson reminded us that pollsters have repeatedly missed the mark—in 2016, 2020, and again in 2024.
“They said they had learned their lessons. And they were way off in 2024.”