First of all, to understand the rationale of Thom Tillis in opposing @EagleEdMartin over J6 issues, read the quoted thread. Tha is by and far the most important thing to understand.
Without further ado... let's begin the breakdown. I'll be constructing this thread live from the data I've aggregated, so patience...
Here is his basic biography. Of interest, note he has no military experience and his only postsecondary education is a BS in Technology Management. He became the North Carolina US Senator on January 3, 2015. That was his first elected federal office.
🟤 1996: Graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Technology Management from the University of Maryland University College.
🟤 1997: Promoted to partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers.
🟤 1998: Moved to Cornelius, North Carolina, with his family.
🟤 2002: Joined IBM after it acquired PricewaterhouseCoopers' consulting arm.
🟤 2003: Elected to the Cornelius Town Board of Commissioners.
🟤 2006: Elected to the North Carolina House of Representatives, representing the 98th district.
🟤 2011: Became Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives.
Wikipedia
🟤 2015: Assumed office as U.S. Senator for North Carolina.
🟤 2020: Reelected to the U.S. Senate.
Right after being elected to office, Tillis got several committee assignments. He got into the Senate Armed Services committee as a freshman for the Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee and would become Subcommittee on Personnel and chairman just two years later. He would also get on the Judiciary Committee as a freshman.
Also as a freshman, he served on Immigration and National Interest subcommittees, Constitution subcommittees of the Judiciary committee. In short, immediately after being elected, he was in a good position for foreign policy.
Again, this despite no military experience, no relevant education, and no federal office.
Tillis would quickly rise to the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the US Helsinki Commission starting in 2017.
Per Wikipedia, this commission is "directed to monitor and encourage the development of programs and activities of the United States Government and private organizations with a view toward taking advantage of the provisions of the Final Act to expand east–west economic cooperation and a greater interchange of people and ideas between East and West."
If that's not a perfect description of the Open Society mindset, I don't know what is.
Just two months after getting in office, Tillis would catch the attention of Liz Schrayer of USGLC and meet with USGLC. This is reflected in Hunter's email dated 23 March 2015:
Tillis would quickly form deep friendships with USGLC - as this June 2015 Tweet shows:
Thread continued here - I accidentally riffed off the wrong Tweet:
🇺🇸✈️💰 Ever wonder who pays for Congressional trips abroad?
This week, a House GOP delegation is heading to Israel. But here's what many don't realize: they aren't paying for their own trips.
There's a charity tied to AIPAC called the American Israel Education Foundation Inc, and according to its own IRS 990 forms, its top priority is funding Congressional trips to Israel.
It brings in $70 million a year.
(EIN: 52-1623781)
I'm not anti-Israel, but I am being skeptical of any foreign-sponsored travel for U.S. officials. Should outside groups be paying for our lawmakers’ overseas trips? Especially if these groups are operating in another country's interests?
Here's an example of an ethics form for a sponsored trip.
Evidently, House ethics rules do permit you to meet with foreign government officials over the course of a sponsored trip.
Again.
I am not against Israel. I hate Hamas. I just don't think politicians should be involved in ANY sponsored trips that involve state business.
🇺🇸💰 Ever wonder why European cities accepted so many refugees?
Today, I'm over my jet lag and processing the documents I scanned this week. Already it's pretty shocking.
The refugee influx into Europe began as a U.S. taxpayer-funded subsidy. The U.S. government literally paid European cities to take them in, using Soros-backed operations like ARC (American Refugee Committee) as the middlemen.
Yes, ARC, co-founded with money from the Soros Humanitarian Fund, was running programs directly for the U.S. government.
It goes even deeper and darker than that. Stay tuned.
ARC handled all the logistical needs for IOM including deciding refugee placements and schedules, at least at one point.
Even today, there are plenty of financial incentives for European cities to take refugees. The following is a UN-backed initiative (translation: US-backed):
🚨 BREAKING: JEFFREY EPSTEIN ONCE CLAIMED TO WORK FOR THE CIA
Been doing research with @lamps_apple all evening ... and, yeah, Epstein did claim to work for the CIA in a 2001 Evening Standard article.
@lamps_apple Further update: Epstein was renting property from the State Department - property that was formerly an Iranian government building seized by the U.S. after the Iran hostage crisis.
(Give @lamps_apple a follow - this is a joint research effort)
@lamps_apple . @MikeBenzCyber has more info here, we're just collecting it from various sources:
⚖️ WHY ARE WE NOT CHARGING THE PEOPLE WHO RUN THE CARAVANS?
One of the untalked about side effects of mass migration is its death toll.
The map represents migrant related deaths found around the El Paso area for the years 2022-2024 alone. Most due to environmental exposure.
Serious question: Pueblo Sin Fronteras regularly schedules caravans to Tijuana (where these deaths occurred). Why are we not prosecuting these people? Most of the people in charge of Pueblo Sin Fronteras are Americans.
Founder: Roberto Corona, a "Mexican-American immigrant."
🧵 THREAD: Honduras as a case study for mass migraton
I poked around into the Honduras story a bit more thanks to prodding from a subscriber. The subscriber insisted that there had to be beneficiaries or the "closed loop" where destabilization -> displacement -> resettlement would not have gone on so long unnoticed.
And, yes, the history of Honduras is very much interesting and educational... and I'm going to try my best to share what I've collected below👇
This Congressional report is worth reading in its full for a history (albeit buried under some euphemisms and omissions), but I'll excerpt the important parts here.
As we will see, the seeds of the mass migration crisis was planted very early on. But the actual migration did not begin in earnest until 2014. President Trump tried aggressively to cut down foreign assistance in his tenure, but was only partially successful, stymied by Congress.