First of all, to understand the rationale of Thom Tillis in opposing @EagleEdMartin over J6 issues, read the quoted thread. Tha is by and far the most important thing to understand.
Without further ado... let's begin the breakdown. I'll be constructing this thread live from the data I've aggregated, so patience...
Here is his basic biography. Of interest, note he has no military experience and his only postsecondary education is a BS in Technology Management. He became the North Carolina US Senator on January 3, 2015. That was his first elected federal office.
๐ค 1996: Graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Technology Management from the University of Maryland University College.
๐ค 1997: Promoted to partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers.
๐ค 1998: Moved to Cornelius, North Carolina, with his family.
๐ค 2002: Joined IBM after it acquired PricewaterhouseCoopers' consulting arm.
๐ค 2003: Elected to the Cornelius Town Board of Commissioners.
๐ค 2006: Elected to the North Carolina House of Representatives, representing the 98th district.
๐ค 2011: Became Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives.
Wikipedia
๐ค 2015: Assumed office as U.S. Senator for North Carolina.
๐ค 2020: Reelected to the U.S. Senate.
Right after being elected to office, Tillis got several committee assignments. He got into the Senate Armed Services committee as a freshman for the Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee and would become Subcommittee on Personnel and chairman just two years later. He would also get on the Judiciary Committee as a freshman.
Also as a freshman, he served on Immigration and National Interest subcommittees, Constitution subcommittees of the Judiciary committee. In short, immediately after being elected, he was in a good position for foreign policy.
Again, this despite no military experience, no relevant education, and no federal office.
Tillis would quickly rise to the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the US Helsinki Commission starting in 2017.
Per Wikipedia, this commission is "directed to monitor and encourage the development of programs and activities of the United States Government and private organizations with a view toward taking advantage of the provisions of the Final Act to expand eastโwest economic cooperation and a greater interchange of people and ideas between East and West."
If that's not a perfect description of the Open Society mindset, I don't know what is.
Just two months after getting in office, Tillis would catch the attention of Liz Schrayer of USGLC and meet with USGLC. This is reflected in Hunter's email dated 23 March 2015:
Tillis would quickly form deep friendships with USGLC - as this June 2015 Tweet shows:
Thread continued here - I accidentally riffed off the wrong Tweet:
Let's test how AI responds when you bring up George Soros in the context of documented history. Spoiler: it gets cagey.
Here are three verifiable facts, with receipts:
1๏ธโฃ It was the Clinton Administration's stated SOP to align their foreign policy with Soros, comparing him to a country unto himself.
2๏ธโฃ Soros co-chaired the Central Europe and Eastern Europe committee for NED, and the founder of NED considered Soros a key partner for US intelligence operations in the post-CIA age.
3๏ธโฃ Open Society Foundations was one of the NGOs involved in drafting the failed Afghanistan constitution.
Next up: let's ask AI some questions and see how it tries to tiptoe around these facts.
Gemini, pt. 1: "There's no definitive evidence of a formal, official cooperation between the U.S. government and George Soros on foreign policy."
Gemini, pt. 2: "there's no definitive evidence to suggest that George Soros directly worked with US intelligence agencies or their NGOs."
This happened in the year 1984. How many "sponsorships" with American media outlets have happened since?
GPT confirms that FCC disclosure rules only kick in when money changes hands for actual broadcast time.
Sponsorships labeled as "training" or "exchanges" let mainstream media quietly take funding or perks without ever having to tell the public. cc:@EagleEdMartin
@EagleEdMartin I think I'm onto something here. That the NGO money laundering happens through "training" and isn't reported because of this FCC loophole.
๐จ ANNOUNCING NEW TOOL: NED NETWORK NAVIGATOR (BETA) ๐จ
๐ง AI-POWERED. CONGRESSIONALLY FUNDED. HIDING IN PLAIN SIGHT.
I just shipped a crawler-indexer that rips apart the National Endowment for Democracyโs flagship Journal of Democracy archive โ then stitches every author, NGO, and article summary into one laser-focused query interface. This is more than search; this is x-raying a decades-old influence machine at machine scale.
Hereโs what it does:
โ Link the Whole Web โ One click surfaces every author โ NGO โ article connection, exposing the revolving door between grant-hungry nonprofits, State-adjacent think tanks, and โindependentโ scholars.
โ Instant Context Summaries โ AI distills thousands of pages so you see the thesis, not the fluff. No more slogging through academic euphemisms.
โ Prefix Hunter Mode โ Type โcolor revโ and catch every variant (โcolor revolution,โ โcolor-coded revolutions,โ etc.) that editors bury in footnotes.
โ Role Detector โ Flags when an author quietly moonlights on an NGO board funded by NED dollars.
โ NGO Cross-Check โ Pull EIN links straight to ProPublica filings; follow the money in two clicks.
โ Source-First Design โ Every claim traces back to the PDF or muse.jhu.org page, so NED canโt cry โmisinformation.โ
Why this matters:
For 40 years NED has branded regime-change lobbying as โdemocracy promotion,โ funneling your tax money into overseas activists while scolding domestic populists as threats. Their own journal is the narrative factory โ academics launder talking points that later justify sanctions, censorship, or NATO expansions. By making the entire archive searchable, we finally turn the microscope back on the operatives who insist theyโre safeguarding freedom.
This is what happens when you weaponize code instead of platitudes.
๐ Dig in, map the network, and decide for yourself: [link in next post]
Open Society Foundation (OSF) gave grants to Al-Haq, a group designated as terrorist by Israel. Israel passed this intelligence onto the CIA, but the CIA claimed insufficient evidence for designating these groups as terrorists.
Today, we also learned that OSF also gave the International Republican Institute (IRI) and National Democratic Institute (NDI) grants. The IRI and NDI are subsidiaries of the National Endowment for Democracy, which is a quasi-governmental NGO which works closely with the CIA.
Did Soros money influence the CIA's refusal to designate Al-Haq as a terrorist organization?
I cannot emphasize how serious it is that IRI and NDI accepted Soros money. These aren't normal NGOs. These are supposed to be "soft power" vehicles operating on the behalf of the United States government.
Of all the discoveries, this makes me the most angry. Soros may very well have compromised our national security in a direct way. cc: @elonmusk
Turns out, George Soros gave $1.7 million to the IRI and $1.5 million to the NDI... two D.C.-based "democracy promotion" fronts tied to the State Department and both subsidiaries of NED.
๐ Lindsey Graham, Tom Cotton, Joni Ernst, and Dan Sullivan all actively sit on the IRI board.
These groups were created to run on U.S. taxpayer dollars, not Soros money.
Why are either IRI or NDI taking his money? He's buying influence over both parties, and the GOP is letting him in the front door.
Hey @SenateGOP : why are you letting Soros fund your foreign ops machine?
Thanks to @bullfrog35 for spotting this.
In 22 CFR ยง 67.4, it says NED has a special responsibility to operate openly. @EagleEdMartin shouldn't it be disclosed that NED/IRI/NDI has taken money from a far left, regime change foundation?
@EagleEdMartin On their website, it says "NED raises limited private contributions from foundations, corporations and individuals to support some of its non-grant related activities." But the descriptions of the grants themselves seem to be very much grant related activity.
Ever wonder where George Soros is sending his money? ๐ I've extracted and published the public Open Society Foundations grant database in spreadsheet format. This is your chance to dig through the receipts. ๐๐งพ
๐บ๐ธ Want to follow the money? See who's getting funded, where it's going, and what it's paying for.