First of all, to understand the rationale of Thom Tillis in opposing @EagleEdMartin over J6 issues, read the quoted thread. Tha is by and far the most important thing to understand.
Without further ado... let's begin the breakdown. I'll be constructing this thread live from the data I've aggregated, so patience...
Here is his basic biography. Of interest, note he has no military experience and his only postsecondary education is a BS in Technology Management. He became the North Carolina US Senator on January 3, 2015. That was his first elected federal office.
🟤 1996: Graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Technology Management from the University of Maryland University College.
🟤 1997: Promoted to partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers.
🟤 1998: Moved to Cornelius, North Carolina, with his family.
🟤 2002: Joined IBM after it acquired PricewaterhouseCoopers' consulting arm.
🟤 2003: Elected to the Cornelius Town Board of Commissioners.
🟤 2006: Elected to the North Carolina House of Representatives, representing the 98th district.
🟤 2011: Became Speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives.
Wikipedia
🟤 2015: Assumed office as U.S. Senator for North Carolina.
🟤 2020: Reelected to the U.S. Senate.
Right after being elected to office, Tillis got several committee assignments. He got into the Senate Armed Services committee as a freshman for the Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee and would become Subcommittee on Personnel and chairman just two years later. He would also get on the Judiciary Committee as a freshman.
Also as a freshman, he served on Immigration and National Interest subcommittees, Constitution subcommittees of the Judiciary committee. In short, immediately after being elected, he was in a good position for foreign policy.
Again, this despite no military experience, no relevant education, and no federal office.
Tillis would quickly rise to the Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe, also known as the US Helsinki Commission starting in 2017.
Per Wikipedia, this commission is "directed to monitor and encourage the development of programs and activities of the United States Government and private organizations with a view toward taking advantage of the provisions of the Final Act to expand east–west economic cooperation and a greater interchange of people and ideas between East and West."
If that's not a perfect description of the Open Society mindset, I don't know what is.
Just two months after getting in office, Tillis would catch the attention of Liz Schrayer of USGLC and meet with USGLC. This is reflected in Hunter's email dated 23 March 2015:
Tillis would quickly form deep friendships with USGLC - as this June 2015 Tweet shows:
Thread continued here - I accidentally riffed off the wrong Tweet:
I am not the person to break this story or these details. Rather, I am providing an independent fact-check of the below accusations.
The allegation is that Tillis improperly reported real estate transactions with TRT Holdings LLC, which he initially reported for 2013 as having 50% ownership with a value between 100K and 200K.
The allegations involve two addresses. For the first address, Tillis did make a quitclaim deed in 2008 to his LLC.
The LLC itself did sell the house in 2013 for $55,000. It is not clear if Tillis was required to report transactions for a LLC where he had 50% ownership in.
@USGLC @ThomTillis Another email from Liz Schrayer to the USGLC board, this time dated 15 April 2016, named Tillis as an advocate against cutting foreign aid.
@USGLC @ThomTillis Tillis generally is pro-immigration. He co-sponsored a bill to create 2,500 additional Afghan interpreter SIVs.
@USGLC @ThomTillis He joined an effort to end family separation at the border. In addition, Politico called him the "Republican who might cut a Dreamers deal."
🚨 DECIPHERING NED DROP 4️⃣: WHY J6 IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT🏛️
Many have asked me to do a deep dive on @SenThomTillis , but before I do that, I think it is important to contextualize why the events of January 6, 2021 were such an existential threat to NED, Open Society Foundation, and like-minded organizations.
I always thought that J6 was mostly a Trump overreaction on the part of media and the J6 Committee. I was wrong.
The NED journals reveal the ideological underpinnings of why Open Society believers found J6 an alarming, existential threat to themselves.
🧵Thread Start... will be updating this live as I piece together the material.
@SenThomTillis We will be hitting on Larry Diamond's article published on January 2022 edition of the NED Journal of Democracy. If you don't know who Diamond is, he is one of the foremost "democracy" academics - his name appears all over the NED journals.
@SenThomTillis Notably, Diamond and Soros both have co-coached regional committees for NED conferences. His ideology is deeply aligned with Soros' Open Society model, like the rest of NED.
🚨 DECIPHERING NED DROP 3️⃣: MASS MIGRATION AS A CORNERSTONE STRATEGY 🗺️
If you haven't read the first National Endowment for Democracy (NED) NED drop below, take a moment and do that first.
The thread covers that virtually every Western government operates on the Soros-invented foreign policy concept of dividing up the populace into "Open Society" versus "Closed Society."
To them, assimilation of other nations and people into Open Society (which they term "democracy" or "Western") by any means necessary is the topmost foreign policy priority.
In this drop, we will see the Open Society principle necessitates mass unchecked immigration in the name of national security.
We'll look at the Freedom House Survey for 2022, published in the NED Journal of Democracy Volume 34, Number 2, April 2023. But, first, let's back up and see what Freedom House is...
Freedom House is a NGO which receives mostly federal grants and the rest of funding from National Endowment for Democracy, National Democratic Institute, Internews, and Open Society Foundations. In short, it is a perfect hybrid of our taxpayer money and George Soros funding, and one of the many examples of why George Soros is part of our government rather than being an outsider.
🚨 DECIPHERING NED DROP 2️⃣: POLLS AS A PROPAGANDA TOOL 🗳️
Put yourself in the shoes of an Open Society ideologue. How do you make the case to the general public and leaders that they should financially and militarily support regime changes of other countries?
The most important toolkit: Polling. Hundreds of NED articles justify the necessity of financial and military intervention with polling. It's how they create "data."
"Polling proves that the Iraq War is going well."
This is not an exaggeration.
Polling is part of the "Ouroboros of Interest" - they hire cut-out NGOs to create the illusion of demand, the illusion of proof in order to justify sending more taxpayer money into those NGOs.
As I published in my Substack yesterday, NED has used Open Society (Soros) polling as data points in their journals. And in rare circumstances, polling can create a narrative that an election's outcome was fraudulent.
🚨 DECIPHERING NED DROP 1️⃣: WHAT IS? "DEMOCRATIC BACKSLIDING" 🗳️
The National Endowment for Democracy (NED) is a U.S. taxpayer-funded NGO with active members of Congress on its board. While it presents itself as a promoter of democracy, in practice it has long served as a front for the CIA, carrying out foreign influence operations that would be politically or legally unacceptable if done directly by U.S. intelligence.
As I've documented extensively in threads and on Substack, NED also works closely with George Soros's network of NGOs and has largely adopted his ideological agenda, especially overseas.
They publish an academic journal, NED Journal of Democracy, which is extremely revealing.
The New World Order- that is, the world order that dominated since the Cold War- is based on the concept of "Open Society" versus "Closed Society."
Peace and national security is not measured in terms of absence of war or violence, but in terms of how many countries are an "Open Society."
It doesn't matter if a country elected their own leader in a democratic or peaceful way. If they are not an "Open Society," they are a "Closed Society" and thus an enemy.
It is a binary worldview, binary mindset.
Under the same binary worldview, assimilation of other nations as Open Societies is the top priority of foreign policy. Which means- pouring massive amounts of foreign aid into them (and NGOs). And military intervention if that fails, as with Afghanistan or Iraq.