Post

More from @VigilantFox

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 8

Trump’s gain-of-function ban sounded like a huge win.

Many, including myself, celebrated.

Then we read the fine print—and discovered a massive red flag:

The US banned GOF research abroad—while quietly protecting it at home.

One key Trump ally is linked to Pfizer—and she’s actually helping block a major COVID whistleblower case.

Attorney Tom Renz breaks down all the details—and calls out who he sees as an obvious fraud inside Trump’s cabinet.

🧵 THREAD

The Trump administration’s gain-of-function announcement sounded like a big move, but it wasn’t the whole story.

Instead of shutting down dangerous research, the policy may actually be laying the groundwork to expand it.

Attorney and medical freedom hero Tom Renz (@RenzTom) broke everything down in our exclusive interview.

According to him, the new policy doesn’t end gain-of-function, it essentially “codifies it.”

In plain terms, the US says it won’t fund gain-of-function research in adversarial countries. But domestically? That same restriction doesn’t apply.

“They’re going to allow it under new regulations,” Renz said. “And by doing that, they’re essentially saying, ‘We’re fine with gain-of-function as long as it follows the current rules.’

“So in that way, they’re actually legitimizing gain-of-function work in this country, which is absolutely mind-blowing to me,” he added.

Read 10 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 8

Victor Davis Hanson just shattered the media’s favorite lie about Trump.

For years, they’ve used fake polls to manipulate public opinion and crush his momentum.

But Hanson didn’t just say the polls were wrong. He showed they were rigged—by design.

Polling is now just a weapon, used to suppress Trump’s base and supercharge Democrat fundraising.

And once you hear the evidence, you’ll never trust another mainstream poll again.

🧵 THREAD

Lately, the media’s been pushing a familiar narrative: Trump is tanking in the polls.

But Victor Davis Hanson says that story doesn’t hold up—and once you see what’s behind the numbers, it starts to look a lot more like propaganda than polling.

So where did it all come from?

“We've touched on polls before,” Hanson said, “but I don't think I've seen anything quite as egregious in pollsters' bias as recently when they... purportedly surveyed the first 100 days of Donald Trump and the public reaction.”

Headlines immediately screamed: Worst first 100 days in history.

Trump’s approval supposedly dropped from 52 to 41 percent.

But as Hanson pointed out, none of that lined up with reality.

“The economic news was pretty good,” he explained.

Trump has been racking up the wins:

“Job growth was just spectacular—over 170,000 jobs. Inflation was down. Energy prices were down. Corporate profits were up. There was a movement on the trade question. Ukraine, still—there was no bad news except the controversy and chaos of a counterrevolution.”

So why were the polls painting such a grim picture?

Hanson believes the goal wasn’t to reflect public opinion—it was to steer it.

“What were the pollsters trying to tell us,” he asked, “or were they trying to manipulate us? I think it’s the latter.”

He pointed to analysis from Larry Kudlow, who found that top polls—like those from The New York Times and The Washington Post—deliberately underrepresented Trump voters.

“They were deliberately not counting people who surveyed that they were Trump voters in 2024,” Hanson said.

“That was half the country.”

Even worse:

“They were only polling about a third,” he added.

“Think of that. A third of the people that said they voted for Trump, they polled—not half. So of course the results were going to be disputed or suspect.”

And this isn’t the first time.

Hanson reminded us that pollsters have repeatedly missed the mark—in 2016, 2020, and again in 2024.

“They said they had learned their lessons. And they were way off in 2024.”

Read 8 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 7

🚨 RFK Jr. Just Blew the Lid Off Big Food’s Worst Scam

He pinpointed the exact moment in history that corporations captured the food industry—and started poisoning the public.

For decades, they’ve used one dirty loophole to flood our food with toxic additives, all while staying “FDA approved.”

🧵THREAD

📍Don’t forget to bookmark this post.

Kennedy just dropped truth bombs the mainstream media wouldn’t dare cover—and the fight for America’s health is finally shifting.

Let’s break it down.

It began with a story most people never heard—and a turning point most never noticed.

In the late 1980s and early ’90s, something strange started happening in America.

Chronic illness was on the rise. Obesity rates soared. Autoimmune diseases became more common.

It felt like the health of the nation was unraveling.

According to Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., that wasn’t a coincidence. It was the result of a corporate takeover.

“At that time, Greta, the tobacco industry took over the food industry,” he said.

“By the early 1990s, the two biggest food companies in the world were R.J. Reynolds and Philip Morris.”

The same companies that had perfected the art of chemical addiction through cigarettes were now running the food system. And Kennedy says they brought the same playbook with them.

“They began moving scientists from the endeavor of making tobacco more addictive to developing new lab ingredients that would make food addictive.”

That’s when everything changed.

What had once been real food—grown, cooked, and served—became something else entirely. A highly engineered product designed not to nourish, but to keep people hooked.

The health consequences were immediate. But behind it all, there was something even more insidious: the regulatory system meant to protect Americans had already been compromised.

“Those chemicals were largely untested because of the capture of the FDA by the food and drug industries,” Kennedy warned.

The public trusted the FDA. But the FDA, Kennedy says, had already been captured by the very industries it was supposed to regulate.

Read 9 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 7

The American Populist Reset Has Already Begun

VP Vance spoke to the Munich Security Conference with a softer tone than in February but still the made the case for American populism.

Defend western values.

End the wars.

Rebalance trade.

But the media missed his warning about free speech last time, this time it cannot go ignored.

🧵THREAD

📍Remember to bookmark this post—you’ll want to revisit these examples of an American vice president actually standing up for the people he represents.

Let’s break it down.

When JD Vance stood before the Munich Security Conference in February, he didn’t play diplomat. He played truth-teller.

Facing a room filled with European elites, the Vice President called out a creeping authoritarianism that he said was threatening freedom on both sides of the Atlantic.

“I look to Brussels,” he said, “where EU Commission commissars warn citizens that they intend to shut down social media during times of civil unrest the moment they spot what they've judged to be quote, hateful content.”

He also pointed to examples closer to where he stood.

“Or to this very country where police have carried out raids against citizens suspected of posting anti feminist comments online as part of quote, combating misogyny on the internet, a day of action."

That speech turned heads—and stirred backlash—but Vance didn’t back down.

Today, he returned to a Munich Security Conference event, this time in Washington.

The message was more measured, but the core argument was unchanged: if the West wants to defend its values, it has to start living up to them.

Read 12 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 7

They said heartburn was because of too much acid.

That lie made Big Pharma billions—and wrecked millions of lives.

Too much acid? Try too little.

And the drugs they’re pushing to “treat” heartburn are actually turning your body into a cash cow.

• 1.8x increased risk of stomach cancer
• 33% greater risk of dementia
• 74% higher risk of severe kidney disease
• 28% more heart attacks
• 77% higher death risk from COVID

These are the risks you take when you take acid blockers like PPIs.

They don’t fix the problem. They just create new ones.

This report exposes Big Pharma’s heartburn scam—and the natural fixes that actually work. 🧵

The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the eye-opening details on the Great Acid Blocker Scam, read the full 10,000-word article below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/stomach-acid…

Long before COVID came along, four drugs topped nearly every integrative doctor’s “most harmful” list:

• Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)
• SSRIs (antidepressants)
• Statins (cholesterol drugs)
• NSAIDs (like ibuprofen)

They’re handed out like candy—but these drugs come with huge hidden costs. From nutrient loss to chronic disease, the long-term damage is real.

Where’s the informed consent?

Read 28 tweets

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

@VigilantFox

May 7

REPORT: Trump just steamrolled Mark Carney on his first official visit as Canadian Prime Minister—and did it with a smile.

Carney walked into the Oval Office fresh off a campaign where he vowed to cut ties with the U.S.

But when the cameras rolled, he folded.

He praised Trump’s “transformational leadership,” echoed his policies on the economy, border security, and fentanyl, and even pledged to boost Canada’s military spending.

Then came Trump’s pitch: Why is the U.S. subsidizing Canada to the tune of $200 billion? Why not just annex it and give Canadians better healthcare, stronger defense, and lower taxes?

Carney nervously insisted Canada “isn’t for sale,” but Trump didn’t flinch. “Never say never,” he replied—twice.

And just before wrapping, Trump dropped a bombshell: a historic announcement is coming “as big as it gets”—just before his trip to the Middle East.

This wasn’t a meeting. It was a live masterclass in pressure, positioning, and power.

Watch as @Zeee_Media breaks down every move in this stunning Oval Office showdown.

AD: When the financial system starts to crack, it’s wise to get out—before it brings you down with it…

Kirk Elliott Precious Metals is our trusted partner for low-cost gold and silver you truly own and control.

Move your money into something real at . KEPM.com/Pulse

In another related development, Trump just dropped another subtle but telling clue about who blew up the Nord Stream pipeline.

@ZeroHedge—not CNN, not the Times—was the one bold enough to break the silence during a recent Oval Office press conference.

“Now that you’re president again, would you consider launching a formal investigation into what happened and who actually did it?” the reporter asked.

Trump didn’t flinch.

“Well, probably if I asked certain people, I’d be able to tell you without having to waste a lot of money on an investigation,” he said.

“But I think a lot of people know who blew it up.”

Trump’s clue that “If I asked certain people, I’d be able to tell you without having to waste a lot of money on an investigation” points to something that we are all thinking.

In February 2023, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh published a report titled “How America Took Out the Nord Stream Pipeline” on his Substack.

In this article, Hersh alleges that the United States, with assistance from Norway, orchestrated the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines in September 2022.

The operation was reportedly ordered by President Joe Biden and coordinated by the CIA.

In an April 2023 interview with Tucker Carlson, Trump was asked directly, “Who blew up the Nord Stream pipeline?”

He replied, “I don’t want to get our country in trouble, so I won’t answer it. But I can tell you who it wasn’t — was Russia.”

In February 2024, when Tucker Carlson pressed Putin on this issue, Putin joked that Carlson blew up the Nord Stream pipeline.

Carlson said, “I was busy that day. I did not blow up Nord Stream. Thank you, though.”

“You personally may have an alibi, but the CIA has no such alibi,” Putin replied.

Watch as @zeee_media expertly unpacks all these moments in the video below.