Germany is on the brink of national suicide—and it’s no accident.
What was once Europe’s economic powerhouse is now unraveling under green delusions, open borders, and paralyzing deindustrialization.
Victor Davis Hanson reveals the one party trying to save the nation from this nightmare.
But the elites just labeled them “extremists” for telling the truth.
🧵THREAD
Victor Davis Hanson opened with a warning—and it wasn’t subtle.
This week, Germany’s only major right-wing opposition party, Alternative for Germany (AfD), was officially labeled an “extremist” group by the country’s domestic intelligence agency, the BfV.
The designation sent shockwaves through the political landscape.
AfD immediately challenged it in court, prompting the agency to suspend enforcement while litigation proceeds.
But the damage, Hanson said, has already been done.
This move, he argued, wasn’t about public safety—it was about political control.
“Recently, the German government announced that it is going to label or maybe relabel the Alternative for Deutschland,” Hanson explained.
“The conservative party that has an antithetical agenda both to the German government of both liberal and conservative factions, but also to the EU in general.”
He said the classification ensures AfD will remain on the outside of political power, regardless of how many people support them.
“It will cement this aura that no government under their parliamentary democracy system will ask them to join to form a majority government,” Hanson said.
“So the process of ostracism and demonization of this party continues.”
And for what? The real issue, he said, is that AfD simply offers a different vision.
“The party is advocating an alternative for the way that Germany is going.”
So where is Germany going?
Hanson painted a bleak picture—of economic decline, energy failure, and political denial.
“If you look at what has become of Germany,” he said, “it has had two years of essentially no growth or negative growth.”
He noted the country finally reached its long-delayed NATO defense spending goal, pledging 2% of GDP—something it was supposed to do back in 2014.
But the milestone felt more like a bare-minimum box-check than a serious turning point.
“It just barely did it,” Hanson said.
Meanwhile, Germany has doubled down on green energy while dismantling its nuclear infrastructure, despite the country’s climate not being suited for solar reliance.
The results have been catastrophic.
German electricity costs are now roughly four times higher than those in the United States.
And that’s not just hitting households—it’s pushing away manufacturers and investors who can no longer justify doing business in the country.
“You can see what that’s going to do to German investment,” Hanson warned.
Before we roll the next clip: if you’re not following me, you’re missing out on critical updates.
Hit the bell 🔔 to stay sharp and informed.
→ @VigilantFox
Now, back to the story you came for.
The problems aren’t limited to energy and economics.
Hanson pointed to a deeper crisis—one that strikes at the heart of Germany’s identity.
Open borders and mass migration, largely from the Middle East, has dramatically reshaped the population.
And according to Hanson, the consequences are both cultural and existential.
He estimated that 16 to 18 percent of Germany’s population wasn’t born in the country and has not assimilated.
“These are refugees—or I don’t think they’re refugees,” he said.
“They’re illegal immigrants from the volatile Middle East. Most of them are Muslim. Most of them do not have an intention of assimilating, intermarrying, and integrating fully in German society.”
The government’s refusal to address this, he said, has allowed a demographic transformation to unfold without public debate or accountability.
And that’s a far cry from the Germany that once held Europe together.
“For years, Germany was the powerhouse, the cohesive economic power that kept the EU together,” Hanson recalled. “It’s very tragic.”
Even the German military—a former pillar of NATO—is now little more than a shell.
“During the Cold War, it fielded one of the best NATO armies… well over 400,000 troops,” he said.
“It’s almost literally disarmed.”
In a functioning democracy, Hanson argued, this kind of failure would trigger a national reckoning.
There would be debate. Conflict. Reform. Politicians and citizens would argue over energy, borders, military policy, and economic growth. They’d hash it out—then find consensus.
Germany would close its borders. Demand full assimilation. Return to reliable energy. And reassert itself on the global stage.
That’s what you’d expect in a healthy system.
But instead of debating those solutions, the one party calling for them is silenced.
“They would do all of that,” Hanson said. “But instead, when one party is advocating much of what I just talked about, they demonize it because it’s out of the norm.”
Then came the most chilling line of all:
“And the norm, unfortunately in Germany today, is national suicide.”
For Hanson, this isn’t just a German issue.
The collapse of a once-great Western democracy—economically, militarily, and culturally—will have ripple effects far beyond Europe.
“Unfortunately, this is not going to end well for Germany,” he concluded.
“And it’s not going to end well for us. We need a powerful, friendly Germany and we wish it well.”
“But the reaction to needed reform—economic, political, social, cultural, military, diplomatic—is not to essentially ban a political party’s freedom of expression. That shows weakness and fear rather than confidence in the future.”
Watch the full episode of @DailySignal with Victor Davis Hanson here:
But a sleeping pill study found you are “almost FIVE TIMES more likely to die [prematurely] if you pop the pills.”
“And at a certain dosage, 35% likelier to get cancer.”
“I don’t think there’s any dose which is safe,” said Dr. Daniel Kripke, one of the study’s leading researchers.
The local news reporter noted: “This is not the first study to associate sleeping pills with a higher rate for mortality. Eighteen other studies have also established the link.”
Sleeping pills “stop our brain cells from firing” to get us to sleep.
And if they can increase our risk of death, what are the other risks that no one is talking about? 🧵
Jordan Peterson disappeared from public view last year.
When his daughter finally broke her silence, her video got 10 million views in a matter of days. What she revealed: he was experiencing a devastating relapse from a previous benzodiazepine injury—triggered by stress and mold exposure.
Most people watching had never heard of anything like this. And some refused to believe it was possible.
But it is.
What she described is far more common than medicine will ever admit.
Anxiety is now the defining condition of modern life.
Take a moment to let that really sink in.
In the early 2000s, roughly 1 in 5 American adults had a diagnosable anxiety disorder. By 2023, more than half of young adults aged 18 to 26 reported suffering from anxiety. Forty-three percent had experienced panic attacks. A third were already on anxiety medications.
Despite spending $36.8 billion on anxiety and mood disorder care in 2007 alone, the problem has gotten measurably worse with every passing year.
That’s not a treatment failure. That’s a business model.
We took Erin Brockovich's map of every data center in America. Then we laid the nation's aquifers on top of it.
We noticed they're not building data centers where the land is cheap. They're building them where the water is.
Farmers near these facilities say their livestock have stopped falling pregnant. Residents say the humming never stops.
And the projects arrive under NDAs, so most towns don't know until the ground is already broken.
The question isn’t where they’re building anymore. It’s why they’re building where they’re building. Tonight, we think we can answer that question.
We’ve been covering the data center issue in great detail on this broadcast, and for good reason. It’s a serious problem in America and worldwide, and it’s one that is uniting people from all sides of the political aisle because, guess what, whether you are a conservative or a liberal, you have human rights that enable you to have access to basic survival needs like water, which was given to us by God, not by the state or Big Tech, by the way.
Erin Brockovich joined the data center fight recently. She launched a site including a map that shows data centers either completed, under construction, planned, or community reported, likely due to all those pesky NDAs in place stopping us from knowing they’re coming to our area. But the public isn’t stupid.
So Maria thought she’d do something a little bit different. She created a series of maps using Erin Brockovich’s data center data, then superimposed aquifer maps onto those maps, then superimposed smart city locations onto those maps. What Maria found was pretty mind-blowing and, she says, lends credence to her theory that those in charge are purposely making rural areas unlivable for the purpose of pushing people into smart cities, where they will be under constant surveillance and on a short leash.
The main reason for this continued investigation is because data centers are destroying rural communities by siphoning natural resources, contaminating and consuming water for surrounding communities, driving up power costs, creating noise and light pollution, destroying habitats, wildlife, animal health, human health, and impacting fertility, as discussed in one of the show’s recent reports.
The list goes on. For many, it’s making it impossible to continue living in the rural communities they fled to during COVID because they could see the playbook coming down the pipeline. But if you live in the city, these developments are going to impact you too, possibly in ways you can’t even begin to imagine yet.
Maria’s theory, what she calls a common-sense one, is that there is a direct correlation between data centers and the AI control grid. Furthermore, she believes there is a direct correlation between data centers and smart cities.
Before presenting the evidence, we want to walk you through key information on Erin Brockovich’s website, BrockovichDataCenter.com.
The key concerns include energy consumption, water usage, e-waste, location risks, scalability and efficiency, and noise. Anecdotal evidence suggests the noise itself may be impacting fertility, with farmers near data centers reporting that their livestock are no longer falling pregnant or giving birth.
The website also highlights:
• 15+ moratoria and pauses passed at the local, county, or state level.
• 66% voter approval for Port Washington’s nation-first referendum.
• 4 council members ousted in Festus, Missouri, after a data center vote.
• 19% of community submissions mentioning NDAs, secret deals, meetings, or no public voice.
• 25+ projects canceled due to local opposition in 2025 alone.
• 69 active moratoriums across U.S. jurisdictions as of April 2026.
•$156 billion in investment stalled by community opposition since 2025.
This is where things start to look overwhelming.
According to the data center map, there are currently 33 operational data centers, 67 under construction, and 39 proposed.
A Fox News guest just said out loud what the “conspiracy theorists” have been screaming into the shadowbanned void for years:
The AI Big Tech and Big Government have is distinctly separate from the AI the public gets access to, because the AI they have is a weapons system that will be used against us.
Take a listen. (See clip below)
The only question that remains now is, if it’s being admitted on Fox News at this point, is it already too late to protect ourselves against it? For many people, it is. But not for those listening to this broadcast.
You see, we consider that we have a fairly sound understanding of where this is all heading, we’ve been reporting on it for years. You are talking about not just a social credit system, but something far more sinister, far more pervasive, the type of system that will deny you access to basic needs like food, power, even water, based on your behavior.
And you need not take our word for it; there are countless speeches at the World Economic Forum telling you they will do just that.
So what can we do about it? One of the key things is to cut off the machines food source at its knees. Your data is what the beast needs to grow.
Every single person can take action to end the incessant spying on every inch of their lives today, and they can learn how for free.
Glenn and Eric Meder join us today to discuss. 🧵
You've driven past one this week and probably never noticed it. 100,000 Flock cameras now line America's roads — and thousands more go up every month.
They don’t just film traffic. They read faces. They carry microphones. Once the system knows who you are, everything it captures gets attached to your profile — where you went, when, how often.
“It’s like the Truman show, but if it was 1984,” Eric said.
Want proof? Go to deflock.me and pull up your own city. The map is stunning.
What makes this even more concerning is that people have hacked these cameras on video. So it’s not just the government watching you. It’s potentially anyone.
You’re being spied on constantly. And the home tech is the biggest spy of them all.
Your Alexa, your smart TV, your phone — every one is a microphone you paid for. The WEF was publishing articles back in 2017 about how a single camera lets a computer understand you “on a very deep level.”
Smart city plans in Australia include “street furniture” that monitors public sentiment — AI reading your mood, 24/7. Feel the wrong way in the wrong place, and you get flagged.
Flagged by whom, for what? That’s where it gets dark.
Modern medicine is addicted to the biochemical model of disease because it creates a pipeline for expensive, patentable drugs, and it often leaves patients and their families in the dark, rather than empowered and in control.
It’s not about finding root causes. It’s about finding something you can bill for.
That’s why the industry has spent decades treating Alzheimer’s like a “chemical imbalance” in the brain caused by amyloid plaques—even though hundreds of trials targeting amyloid have failed.
The more the theory collapsed, the harder the system doubled down. Just like cholesterol and heart disease, the medical machine kept pushing the failed model long after it broke.
Tucker Carlson admitted he used to make fun of people who believe vaccines cause autism.
He now describes his behavior as “unthinking, stupid, and reactionary.”
Tucker says people are noticing what Robert De Niro noticed about vaccines before he suddenly abandoned the issue: “There’s something there that people aren’t addressing” with vaccines and autism.
De Niro declared this on “The Today Show” back in 2016. Let the clip roll, and you’ll see it.
Fast forward to today, and it’s hard to believe De Niro actually said what he did on mainstream television.
What’s even harder to believe is just how most of the vaccines used today got approved in the first place.
“Placebo” doesn’t mean what most people think it means when it comes to vaccines.
Once you understand what a vaccine “placebo” is, the way evidence gets buried starts making a lot more sense. 🧵
Something strange happens when people first start looking seriously at vaccine safety data.
They do the research. They find the studies. They bring the evidence carefully into a conversation that feels safe and possible.
But nothing moves.
The other person doesn’t adjust. Doesn’t even get curious. They just double down harder.
Nothing about it feels like a normal disagreement. It feels like something else entirely.
Because it is.
And there’s actually a specific reason for that. A reason that goes much deeper than tribalism.
The reason vaccine orthodoxy functions differently from almost every other medical debate isn’t random.
It’s structural. It was designed and built this way.
To understand why the evidence lands differently here—why the same standards of proof that apply literally everywhere else somehow don’t apply to vaccines—you have to understand what vaccines actually represent in Western medicine.