🧵🧵THREAD: The Untouchable Firm—Inside the Shadowy Power of WestExec Advisors
What if I told you the most powerful foreign policy decisions in America didn’t come from elected officials—but from a quiet D.C. firm called WestExec Advisors?
Let’s talk about the Obama-Biden shadow cabinet that never left.
Founded in 2017 by Antony Blinken, Michèle Flournoy, and other Obama alums, WestExec marketed itself as “bringing the Situation Room to the boardroom.”
Translation? Intelligence, Pentagon, and State Department access—for sale.
WestExec operated in the “revolving door” sweet spot: its consultants weren’t officially registered lobbyists, allowing them to avoid disclosure rules while advising defense contractors, Big Tech, and foreign-linked entities.
Who are some of WestExec’s alumni?
•Antony Blinken – now Secretary of State
•Avril Haines – Director of National Intelligence
•Jen Psaki – former WH Press Sec
•Lisa Monaco – Deputy AG
These are not just former staffers. They run the Biden administration.
The firm’s client list remains highly secretive, but FOIA efforts revealed links to:
•Google and Microsoft (AI & surveillance)
•Palantir (data mining with DOD contracts)
•Shield AI (military drone warfare)
•Israeli security startups
Despite its influence, WestExec never registered under FARA (Foreign Agents Registration Act), despite clients that allegedly include foreign entities.
This allowed the firm to operate in gray zones of legality while shaping U.S. national security.
They positioned themselves as “just consultants”—yet provided strategic pathways to billion-dollar Pentagon contracts, advised on China policy while working with firms invested in Chinese tech, and bypassed ethical safeguards with stunning ease.
And here’s the kicker—many WestExec members went straight from corporate consulting to the White House, without recusal or disclosure of which companies they advised.
Conflict of interest? Institutionalized.
WestExec isn’t just a firm. It’s a blueprint for modern soft power: intelligence, media access, elite networks, and private consulting—operating under the radar, accountable to no one.
It’s K Street for the national security state.
Why should you care?
Because unelected consultants with shadowy client lists are now shaping America’s foreign wars, surveillance policy, and corporate defense contracts—all while avoiding transparency.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵THREAD: How the Muslim Brotherhood infiltrated America’s leftist movement and why it matters now more than ever.
This has been a slow march through academia, civil rights, and immigration activism since the 1960s.
The Muslim Brotherhood was founded in 1928 by Hassan al-Banna. It’s long game?
A global Islamic state ruled by sharia. But not by force alone by infiltration.
Civil society. Culture. Law.
They called it Dawah—ideological warfare.
And that is exactly what they have been doing with their until alliance with the leftist Marxists.
1. Build U.S. front groups. 2. Use “civil rights” as a shield. 3. Exploit open societies to weaken them.
1991 Muslim Brotherhood strategy memo uncovered by the FBI found as follows:
“A kind of civilization-jihad in America… a process of settlement… to eliminate and destroy Western civilization from within.”
It all started in the 1960s with the Muslim Students Association (MSA) on college campuses.
Followed by the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Council…cultivating American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).
Each one grew roots inside American institutions.
These orgs embedded themselves in:
âś… Universities
âś… Think tanks
âś… The media
âś… The legal system
âś… The Democratic Party
They partnered with leftist causes because they share values, but because they share enemies.
And if there is anything that people should have learned it is what happens when the Islamists and communists team up the Islamists shut up the communists real fast.
🧵 THREAD: How Biden’s Justice40 Agenda Is Bankrolling the Anti-ICE/Anti-America protests in LA.
Biden’s Justice40 was sold as a “climate equity” plan. In reality, it’s a multi-billion-dollar redistribution scheme sending federal money straight into the pockets of leftist NGOs, many of which have deep ties to activist networks and “community organizers” who end up fueling street unrest.
On paper: 40% of all federal climate/infrastructure money must benefit “disadvantaged communities.”
In practice: money is laundered through “environmental justice” groups that double as activist nonprofits, many with political agendas far removed from infrastructure.
Funds don’t go directly to roads or clean water. They go to “intermediary” organizations—nonprofits with progressive missions that then subcontract to “partners,” “youth coalitions,” or “local leaders” who push woke ideology and organize “community resistance.”
Justice40-linked funds also:
•Organize protests
•Promote radical agendas like prison abolition and open borders
•Provide “legal aid” and bail funds to violent agitators
Some are even part of coalitions pushing to defund police and dismantle ICE.
The LA riots didn’t come out of nowhere. They were the predictable outcome of taxpayer-funded activist ecosystems:
•NGO-funded “organizers” stir up outrage over ICE raids
•Mobilization happens in hours
•Street chaos erupts
•Legacy media plays cleanup crew.
🧵🧵THREAD: Let’s talk about the love affair the Democratic Party has with communist Cuba.
And let’s talk about the link no one is talking about… the Democratic Socialists of America.
Oh and let’s discuss how Cuba actually uses our NGO structure to subvert American politics.
1. Karen Bass – Mayor of Los Angeles
In the 1970s, Bass traveled to Cuba as part of the Venceremos Brigade, a Marxist group that sent young Americans to Cuba to receive ideological and practical training under the Castro regime.
The FBI and CIA monitored the Brigade due to suspected ties to Cuban intelligence.
2. Jamaal Bowman – Congressman (NY-16)
A DSA-endorsed representative, Bowman faced backlash for his 2021 vote to fund Israel’s Iron Dome—but his alignment with Cuba’s defenders runs deeper.
He initially refused to condemn Cuba’s crackdown on protestors and instead focused blame on the U.S. embargo.
Only reversed course after internal pressure—highlighting DSA’s hardline stance.
🧵🧵 How did a communist become Mayor of the second largest city in America.
Let’s do a deep dive into Karen Bass. She had destroyed Los Angeles because that’s what she was trained to do.
In the 1970s, Bass was deeply involved with a pro-Cuban group called the Venceremos Brigade, which sent young Americans to Cuba to train under Fidel Castro’s communist regime.
This wasn’t tourism. This was political indoctrination.
Founded in 1969, the Venceremos Brigade was created by U.S. leftists aligned with revolutionary Marxist ideals. The group’s mission was to show solidarity with Cuba’s communist revolution by organizing trips where American youth would work alongside Cubans, often in sugar cane fields, and participate in political indoctrination programs.
Bass made at least one trip to Cuba as part of the Venceremos Brigade, an experience she later described as having a “profound impact” on her. She was reportedly involved in local organizing for the Brigade’s Los Angeles chapter, which recruited others to participate.
This was during the Cold War, at a time when Cuba was openly hostile to the United States, allied with the Soviet Union, and exporting violent revolution throughout Latin America and Africa.
The Cuban regime that Bass praised:
•Executed political prisoners
•Censored the press
•Outlawed dissent
•Imprisoned gays, dissidents, and religious leaders
And yet, when Fidel Castro died in 2016, Bass issued a public statement calling him “comandante en jefe” and did not mention his human rights abuses at all.
THREAD: How USAID Became a Pipeline to Fund Leftist NGOs and CIA Black Ops — With Your Tax Dollars 🧵
Let's shatter the fake narrative and the sob stories about USAID money being used to fight for poverty and that cutting off USAID money will result in the death of 300,000 children.
Anyone peddling that ridiculous claim is just lying to you.
USAID is a massive funnel of taxpayer money flowing straight into the pockets of left-wing NGOs, activist networks, and globalist institutions.
Let’s follow the money. Again. Receipts and examples below.
USAID’s largest grantees include:
– National Democratic Institute (NDI)
– International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL)
– Freedom House
– Open Society Foundations' partners
– George Soros-backed groups in Latin America, Africa, and Eastern Europe
– Tides Foundation affiliates
These groups push progressive reforms, gender ideology, abortion access, and electoral interference—all abroad, with U.S. money.
USAID gave over $2 billion in 2022 to NGOs alone. USAID’s public grants database reveals that billions in taxpayer funds are awarded to nonprofit organizations with explicitly left-leaning missions, often under the language of “humanitarian aid,” “democracy support,” or “sustainable development.”
Of the top 50 recipients, nearly all promote:
– “Democracy reform” (read: election meddling)
– DEI initiatives
– LGBT advocacy abroad
– Climate change mandates
– Opposition to “right-wing extremism” (often defined as traditionalist/nationalist movements)
Examples of not sick children getting aid:
1. Democracy Reform” = Election Interference
USAID funds “democracy promotion” in countries with conservative or nationalist governments under the guise of helping “civil society.”
In practice, this often means:
-Training left-aligned media and NGOs to counter “disinformation” (i.e., conservative ideas)
- Funding opposition groups with organizing tools
Promoting electoral law changes to weaken traditionalist parties
- Running poll observation missions staffed by ideologically aligned watchdogs
📍Examples:
Hungary, Poland, Guatemala, El Salvador, Tunisia – All saw targeted interventions labeled “pro-democracy” that supported U.S.-aligned or leftist factions.
2. DEI Initiatives (Diversity, Equity, Inclusion)
USAID grants often require “equity frameworks” even in countries where such concepts are alien or culturally inappropriate.
Funded programs push:
-“Unconscious bias” training in government institutions
-Racial equity assessments in African and Latin American judicial systems
-Gender quotas in business and politics
-Forced cultural shifts in hiring, education, and religious institutions
These initiatives mirror U.S. progressive ideology and are often resisted by local populations yet carried out anyway using American tax dollars.
3. LGBT Advocacy Abroad
USAID’s LGBTQI+ Inclusive Development Policy (2022) formalized U.S. support for advancing sexual and gender identity rights worldwide.
Includes:
-Legal reform grants to decriminalize homosexuality and redefine marriage
-Trans rights education for children through school partnerships
-Funding drag shows, pride parades, and gender workshops in conservative countries
📍Targeted regions include: Africa, the Middle East, Latin America, and Eastern Europe, many of which hold traditional or religious views.
4. USAID now requires nearly every grant—whether for farming, education, or security—to include “climate resilience” language.
This means:
-Funding goes only to groups who push green energy, net-zero policies, or environmental justice
-Fossil fuel-based development is denied aid
-Smallholder farmers are forced into “climate-smart agriculture” contracts controlled by green NGOs
In practice, this destroys energy independence, slows growth, and allows Western climate NGOs to dictate policy in poor countries.
5. “Right-Wing Extremism” = Anyone Not Aligned with Progressive Norms
USAID grants fund:
“Disinformation monitoring hubs” in media and universities
“Resilience programs” to protect against “radicalization”—usually defined as traditional family advocacy, nationalism, or religious conservatism
“Narrative training” for influencers and journalists to combat “hate speech” (often meaning any right-of-center opinion)
📍In India, Brazil, Philippines, and Kenya, conservative religious or nationalist parties were flagged as extremist and targeted by these programs.
🧵🧵THREAD: How “Responsible Statecraft” Is Functionally Aligned With the Muslim Brotherhood Agenda
Responsible Statecraft is the media arm of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, a think tank co-founded in 2019 by George Soros and Charles Koch.
This is the anti-war think tank that appeals to progressives and is now all the sudden cited by conservatives. Knowledge is power. In order to understand if the information you are getting is tainted, it is good to examine who is presenting it and what their motivations might be. So let's the rip the band aide off of the foreign policy that has taken hold not just in Obama circles but also in conservative circles.
For some reason Responsible Statecraft is Anti-Israel. Anti-Gulf. Anti-American exceptionalism.
Why would Koch and Soros fund a foreign policy think tank. You would think their agenda is not aligned.
Well you would be wrong. If your goal is dismantling American influence abroad then these two people have a lot in common.
The Quincy Institute pushes a doctrine of "restraint." But in practice, it repeatedly:
– Defends Iranian proxies
– Undermines Abraham Accords
– Attacks U.S. alliances with Egypt, UAE, and Saudi Arabia
– Normalizes Islamists under the guise of “diplomacy”
Why should you care about this? Because Responsible Statecraft presents itself as “mainstream” foreign policy analysis but subtly launders Islamist-aligned narratives through an “anti-war” filter.
It’s not peace journalism. It's not about restraint. And it is not about anti-war. It’s proxy influence.
Responsible Statecraft’s rhetoric often mirrors Qatari state media, especially Al Jazeera English and Middle East Eye which both known for Brotherhood-friendly slants.
It’s not accidental. Many of their experts are the same people.
Let’s talk about who writes for Responsible Statecraft.
You'll find contributors tied to:
– CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations)
– American Muslims for Palestine
– National Iranian American Council (NIAC)
– Qatar-backed academics
All known vectors of Muslim Brotherhood narratives in the U.S.
RS writers have aggressively pushed anti-Egypt content often defending the Muslim Brotherhood post-Morsi regime, even as Egypt, Saudi, and the UAE consider the Brotherhood a terrorist organization.