This was a quote from an extraordinary speech given by a sitting United States President. It took place on September 1, 2022, over an year after the events of January 6, and less than three years ago.
In other words, he declared the nation cannot survive the threat of 74 million Americans sharing their opinion.
Make no mistake. The people who were behind this speech haven't gone anywhere. The moment they have a friendly White House again, this kind of divisive, authoritarian rhetoric will be back in full force.
I will be naming them and the NGOs behind them below (putting together the Tweets in live time, patience please). ๐
NPR named five "experts" behind this speech: Sean Wilentz, Allida Black, Anne Applebaum, Michael Beschloss, and Jon Meacham. We will go through each of their biographies.
Sean Wilentz is a professor at Princeton, but he has published numerous op-eds in mainstream publications and sits on the editorial boards of Dissent and Democracy.
He co-signed an open letter titled "An Open Letter in Defense of Democracy" with Bill Kristol among others which declared that democracy was in danger, and the cause is Donald Trump and his supporters.
Overall, he is a major academic influence in the field of democracy research and writer. You can download his CV from his Princeton website.
The next person, Allida Black, describes herself as an advisor to Hillary Clinton.
Her CV shows that she has worked for the National Democratic Institute (NDI), a taxpayer-funded NGO that is one of the four subsidiary NGOs of NED.
In short, she worked for the CIA arm of the Democratic party. @NDI includes big names on its board of directors, including the infamous teacher's union boss Randi Weingarten, Donna Brazile, former Senator Tom Daschel, and Stacey Abrams.
@NDI Not only is the NDI's 171 million dollar budget almost entirely taxpayer funded, it also has one of the highest travel expense ratios and has housing allowances among NGOs.
@NDI Anne Applebaum is where the government connections are the most direct. She is an editorial member of the NED Journal of Democracy.
@NDI She presents herself as a "staff writer" for the Atlantic, but in reality she is a former member of the board of directors for NED. She is deeply entrenched in the intelligence community and NGOs, currently serving as an adviser to the Renew Democracy Initiative NGO.
@NDI You might remember this "Uniparty" diagram. We have representation from two NGOs here: National Democratic Institute and National Endowment for Democracy.
@NDI Why is this important? Our own taxpayer dollars are actively financing people who are spreading the word that anyone who supports President Trump is an enemy of democracy.
To make the conflict of interest even more disgusting, NDI also sits on ACVFA, the "independent" committee which advises where USAID foreign aid money should be spent. So, the entities who allocate the budget, who receive the money, and decide where the billions go are all the same.
@NDI Michael Beschloss is a historian who appears to be more on the journalistic side. What I find most noteworthy is that his wife is president and CEO of the Rock Creek Group, a Washington DC investment firm.
@NDI Rock Creek Group manages more than 16 billion dollars in assets!
@NDI Jon Meacham is a journalist as well with extensive NGO affiliations. He is a member of Council on Foreign Relations, a think tank which is yet another pro-democracy NGO.
@NDI All five of those advisers still view Trump as a threat. In a 2024 Tweet, Applebaum accused Trump of undermining his own country's democracy.
@NDI She fully blames populist ideology. Translation: she still hasn't changed her mind that MAGA Republicans are the enemy of America.
@NDI Sean Wilentz still believes Donald Trump is creating a "Christian Nationalist" rule and has a "Plot against America."
@NDI The @allidablack X account has only 7 followers, but has retweeted @anneapplebaum and frequently retweets Hillary Clinton. It seems likely she is the same Allida Black that advised the Biden speech.
@NDI @allidablack @anneapplebaum Beschloss pushed Biden to make a bigger deal of how democracy was at stake in the 2024 election.
In short - these people have not backed off on the idea that Trump supporters are an enemy of democracy. If anything, they've doubled down.
When a friendly administration is back in power - deplatforming, sweeping arrests, mandates, and speeches about how 74 million people are the greatest threat to the nation will come back too.
Thread end.
@NDI @allidablack @anneapplebaum Pinging @EagleEdMartin to this thread for his weaponization research.
โข โข โข
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Open Society Foundation (OSF) gave grants to Al-Haq, a group designated as terrorist by Israel. Israel passed this intelligence onto the CIA, but the CIA claimed insufficient evidence for designating these groups as terrorists.
Today, we also learned that OSF also gave the International Republican Institute (IRI) and National Democratic Institute (NDI) grants. The IRI and NDI are subsidiaries of the National Endowment for Democracy, which is a quasi-governmental NGO which works closely with the CIA.
Did Soros money influence the CIA's refusal to designate Al-Haq as a terrorist organization?
I cannot emphasize how serious it is that IRI and NDI accepted Soros money. These aren't normal NGOs. These are supposed to be "soft power" vehicles operating on the behalf of the United States government.
Of all the discoveries, this makes me the most angry. Soros may very well have compromised our national security in a direct way. cc: @elonmusk
Turns out, George Soros gave $1.7 million to the IRI and $1.5 million to the NDI... two D.C.-based "democracy promotion" fronts tied to the State Department and both subsidiaries of NED.
๐ Lindsey Graham, Tom Cotton, Joni Ernst, and Dan Sullivan all actively sit on the IRI board.
These groups were created to run on U.S. taxpayer dollars, not Soros money.
Why are either IRI or NDI taking his money? He's buying influence over both parties, and the GOP is letting him in the front door.
Hey @SenateGOP : why are you letting Soros fund your foreign ops machine?
Thanks to @bullfrog35 for spotting this.
In 22 CFR ยง 67.4, it says NED has a special responsibility to operate openly. @EagleEdMartin shouldn't it be disclosed that NED/IRI/NDI has taken money from a far left, regime change foundation?
@EagleEdMartin On their website, it says "NED raises limited private contributions from foundations, corporations and individuals to support some of its non-grant related activities." But the descriptions of the grants themselves seem to be very much grant related activity.
Ever wonder where George Soros is sending his money? ๐ I've extracted and published the public Open Society Foundations grant database in spreadsheet format. This is your chance to dig through the receipts. ๐๐งพ
๐บ๐ธ Want to follow the money? See who's getting funded, where it's going, and what it's paying for.
๐งตTHREAD: Rachel Kleinfield and Nicole Bibbins Sedaca
I will be doing a bigger thread later on the J6 weaponization which @EagleEdMartin is investigating when I have access to Internet (doing this over a phone now) , but @labtechleigh found who appears to be an key figure who is deeply involved in our government.
In an article she published in NED Journal of Democracy, she expresses support for Germany's soft ban on AfD.
Rachel Kleinfeld is not a nobody. As @labtechleigh found, she serves on the NED Board of Directors. She also serves on boards of Freedom House, Protect Democracy, and States United. NED and Freedom House are largely taxpayer funded, with Freedom House having a large Open Society Foundation financing component.
In October 2024, she co-published an article in the NED Journal of Democracy on "How to Prevent Political Violence."
"Political violence" is a loose term here. Only populist violence ever counts as violence by these democracy groups. Actual leftist violence, such as Tesla firebombings or Black Lives Matter does not count here, and if they do, it's because they were incited by populists.
Today in Manhattan, an "emergency protest" popped up with a professionally printed banner reading: "๐พ๐๐๐๐ โ๐๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ต๐๐๐๐? ๐ต๐๐โ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๐๐!"
This is treading close to an incitement for violence. Let's break down who organized these protests, and who finances these organizers.
I'm putting together the thread as I go, so thanks for the patience.๐
The Manhattan protest had several co-organizers, and we'll go through them one by one. The foremost was Working Families Party:
Working Families Party is a far-left political party associated with the 501(c)(4) Working Families Organization, which is founded by Dan Cantor, an ACORN veteran. It is also the political party under which Letitia James was elected to the New York City council and closely associated with Bill de Blasio.
And of course they consider foreign policy a "moral imperative." How many of those NGOs have infiltrated intersectional demographics like LDS women? I'm not LDS, but this feels super insulting.
This should be another AI project - mapping out the financing from "top down" NGOs like Defending Democracy Together to smaller NGOs such as this one obviously intended to manufacture consent among super-specific demographics