🧵🧵Many people talk about foreign influence and how other countries own our politicians but not one talks about what it is that they are buying.
The question is not how much money foreign countries invest; the question is how much influence they have purchased and how has that influence affected America. So I did the of research. First thread is on Qatar, other countries to follow.
I looked to see how much money Qatar has spent to buy soft power in America and how that affected American sentiment towards:
- Qatar
- Changes in Americans beliefs on US Foreign Policy, the Middle East, Israel, Immigration, Domestic Stability and mass migration.
- Anti-American sentiment
- Anti-Jewish sentiment
- Support for Open Borders
- Destabilization in America (undermining US Social cohesion, security or integrity and promoting radical activism and disinformation campaigns)
Economic Investments
Total Value: Since 2016 they have invested $40–$45 billion dollars in America and it breaks down as follows:
Real Estate:
- QIA acquired a 9.9% stake in Empire State Realty Trust (2016, $622 million), including the Empire State Building.
- Katara Hospitality purchased the Plaza Hotel (New York) for $600 million in 2018.
- QIA’s 44% stake in a Brookfield Property Partners mixed-use development (2016–2018)
- $100 million townhouse in Manhattan’s Upper East Side (2017) for Qatar’s consulate.
Energy:
- QatarEnergy’s 70% stake in Golden Pass LNG (Texas), a $10 billion joint venture with ExxonMobil, initiated in 2019 and nearing completion in 2025.
- $2.38 billion investment in RWE’s acquisition of Con Edison Clean Energy (2022), entering U.S. renewables.
- Technology/Other: Expanded tech investments via QIA’s Silicon Valley office (opened 2016), including stakes in U.S. startups ($500 million by 2025).
- Key Deals: Golden Pass LNG and Empire State Building stake reflect Qatar’s shift to high-impact, strategic sectors.
- Post-2016 investments surged, driven by Qatar’s need to counter the 2017–2021 Gulf blockade and diversify its economy. High-profile deals amplified economic leverage and visibility.
Academic Investments:
Total Donations: $5.6 billion since 2017
Key Recipients:
- Continued funding to Cornell ($600 million), Georgetown ($350 million), and Northwestern ($300 million).
- New grants to smaller institutions (e.g., University of Idaho, Chapman University) for specific programs.
- QFI: Expanded to ~$20 million in K-12 funding, criticized for promoting biased Middle East curricula.
- Transparency: Post-2020, the Deterrent Act increased scrutiny, but some institutions still underreport gifts.
- Impact: Funding correlated with increased anti-Israel activism on campuses (per ISGAP 2020 report), though causation is debated. Qatar’s influence grew in shaping academic narratives. Academic narratives softened toward Qatari policies and regional alliances.
Qatar-linked institutions hosted policy panels influencing public and student opinion. Increased normalization of groups like the Muslim Brotherhood in academic circles.
- Endowed research centers, Middle East studies programs, and entire campuses (e.g., Northwestern-Qatar).
- Avoided transparency by often failing to report gifts—until forced by Department of Education investigations.
Lobbying and Public Relations
Total Spending: Approximately $243 million since 2015, with over $16 million spent in 2023 alone with projections for 60 million in 2025.
Key Firms: BlueFront Strategies, Audience Partners Worldwide, and others, with $10 million annually post-2017 Gulf crisis.
Activities: ~200–300 lobbying contacts annually, targeting Congress, and local governments with over 24 lobbying firms (e.g., Atlanta, Montgomery).
Municipal Engagement: Expanded to ~10 U.S. cities, offering $50 million in investment proposals.
Impact: Lobbying countered Saudi/UAE narratives during the Gulf crisis. PR campaigns enhanced Qatar’s image as a mediator.
Media and Cultural Influence
-- BeIN media acquired Miramax Studios (2016, ~$300 million).
- CNN Collaboration: In 2025, CNN announced plans to launch a media operation in Qatar, aiming to enhance its Middle East coverage.
- iHeartMedia Partnership: Qatar's Government Communications Office partnered with iHeartMedia to establish a regional podcasting hub, promoting Arabic content globally.
-Media City Qatar: Formed strategic alliances with entities like Euronews and Huawei to bolster its media presence and technological capabilities.
- Al Jazeera America shut down (2016), replaced by AJ+ digital platform (~10 million U.S. monthly users by 2025).
- Reach: AJ+ gained traction among younger audiences, with ~5% of U.S. 18–34-year-olds engaging monthly.
- Cultural Initiatives: Qatar-USA Year of Culture (2021) and sports investments (e.g., attempted NBA/NFL stakes) increased visibility.
- Impact: AJ+ amplified Qatar’s narratives on U.S. social issues and Middle East policy. Cultural initiatives bolstered soft power. Qatar-aligned editorial lines subtly shape U.S. coverage of Hamas, Iran, and Gulf politics. Promotes pro-Palestinian messaging while minimizing scrutiny of Qatari links to Hamas.
Diplomatic and Military Engagement
Military Cooperation: Al Udeid expanded, with Qatar investing ~$1.8 billion (2016–2025) and hosting ~11,000 U.S. troops.
- Arms Purchases: ~$12 billion in U.S. weapons (e.g., F-15 jets, 2017–2022).
- Think tanks received an additional 10 million dollars mainly Brookings.
- Impact: Qatar’s mediation role and military hosting enhanced its leverage,
Qatar has purchased significant influence over American public discourse, particularly through elite institutions.
The scope of this campaign rivals or exceeds those of larger regional actors like Saudi Arabia and China—but with less media scrutiny.
By aligning itself with progressive values, academia, and media outlets, Qatar has softened its image while continuing to maintain ties with groups like Hamas and the Taliban.
Terrorism ties:
1. Hosting of Hamas Leadership
Since 2012, Qatar has hosted the political leadership of Hamas in Doha. This arrangement was reportedly established with the encouragement of the U.S. and Israel, aiming to monitor and potentially moderate the group's activities. However, critics argue that this has provided Hamas with a safe haven. (NY Times)
2. Financial Support to Al-Qaeda Affiliates
Several Qatari nationals have been designated by the U.S. Treasury for financing Al-Qaeda and its affiliates:
Sa'd bin Sa'd al-Ka'bi: Designated in 2015 for facilitating funds to Al-Nusra Front, Al-Qaeda's branch in Syria. (Breitbart)
Abd al-Latif al-Kawari: Accused of coordinating financial support to Al-Qaeda and facilitating the travel of couriers carrying funds. (Breitbart)
3. Sanctions on Hamas Financial Network
In October 2023, the U.S. imposed sanctions on 10 Hamas members and financial facilitators, including individuals based in Qatar. These sanctions aimed to disrupt Hamas's financial networks following attacks on Israel. Senate Banking Committee+2Axios
4. Allegations of Interference in Terror Financing Investigations
A UK court case in 2024 revealed allegations that Qatari agents used bribes and threats to undermine a terror financing case involving Doha Bank, which was accused of facilitating funds to Al-Nusra Front. Witnesses reported intimidation and coercion, leading to the withdrawal of several claimants. (Guardian)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵🧵It has been 4 months since President Trump took office. In that timeframe he has put forth 150 executive orders to reverse the policies of the previous administration. Policies that every Republican campaign are reversing and complained at nauseam about online.
Let’s examine what if anything they have done to codify these executive orders. Let’s see who has actually done anything other then posting on X.
Election Integrity
To secure elections, Trump’s EO (number TBD) mandates voter ID verification.
Rep. Chip Roy (R-TX) championed the SAVE Act (H.R. 22), which passed the House on April 10, 2025.
It’s now stalled in the Senate, needing legislation to endure. No Senate sponsor has emerged—will GOP step up?
Trump’s EO 14200 (Feb 5, 2025) protects women’s sports by barring transgender women.
Rep. Greg Steube (R-FL) led H.R. 28, passed by the House on Jan 14, 2025.
Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) introduced S.9, but it’s stuck in the Senate.
🧵🧵Day 1 Recap: Sean “Diddy” Combs’ Federal Sex Trafficking Trial
The federal trial of music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs started today in Manhattan.
Key Developments
•Charges: Combs faces five federal charges, including racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking by force, and transportation for purposes of prostitution. If convicted, he could face life imprisonment.
•Jury Selection: A jury comprising 12 members and six alternates was finalized. The selection process included inquiries about potential biases, especially concerning familiarity with celebrities and views on sexual behavior.
Prosecution’s Opening Statements
Assistant U.S. Attorney Emily Johnson presented a narrative portraying Combs as orchestrating a decades-long criminal enterprise:
•“Freak Offs”: Prosecutors described events termed “freak offs,” alleging that Combs manipulated women into drug-fueled sexual encounters, sometimes involving male escorts, and used recordings of these acts for blackmail.
•Cassie Ventura Allegations: Johnson detailed alleged abuse of Combs’ former girlfriend, singer Cassie Ventura, including a 2016 incident captured on hotel surveillance where Combs purportedly assaulted her.
Johnson played a significant role in the prosecution of Bevelyn Beatty Williams, who was sentenced to 41 months in prison for violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act by interfering with individuals seeking reproductive health services in Manhattan
đź§µHow much money does China invest into the US and what does it buy them?
I looked to see how much money China has spent to buy soft power in America and how that affected American sentiment towards:
- China
- Changes in Americans beliefs on US Foreign Policy, the Middle East, Israel, Immigration, Domestic Stability and mass migration.
- Anti-American sentiment
- Support for Open Borders - Destabilization in America (undermining US Social cohesion, security or integrity and promoting radical activism and disinformation campaigns)
A. Economic Investments
Total Value: ~$100 billion additional investments (2016–2025), totaling ~$210 billion since 2005, constrained by U.S. restrictions (e.g., CFIUS reforms).
- Technology: $30 billion in U.S. tech, though deals like ByteDance’s TikTok faced scrutiny (2020–2024). Investments shifted to venture capital ($10 billion in U.S. startups).
- Real Estate: ~$20 billion, with reduced high-profile acquisitions due to U.S. oversight (e.g., Anbang’s forced divestment, 2018).
- Financial Markets: Treasury holdings peaked at $1.3 trillion (2016) but fell to ~$870 billion by 2024 amid decoupling efforts.
- Trade: Trade reached $690 billion in 2022, with U.S. exports at $150 billion and imports at $540 billion, maintaining a ~$390 billion deficit.
- Key Deals: Tencent’s $8.6 billion stake in Epic Games (ongoing) and Didi Chuxing’s U.S. IPO (2021, later delisted) highlighted China’s tech ambitions.
Total Donations: ~$1 billion additional funding (2016–2025), totaling $1.68 billion since 2001.
- Key Recipients: NYU ($140 million, 2020–2023), MIT, and smaller institutions ($300 million).
- Confucius Institutes: Declined to ~5 by 2025, with ~$100 million redirected to research grants and student scholarships.
- Programs: ~370,000 Chinese students in the U.S. (2023), contributing ~$15 billion in tuition.
- Transparency: Post-Deterrent Act (2023), disclosures improved, but ~$400 million in gifts remained unreported.
- Impact: Funding faced scrutiny after FBI warnings about espionage, leading to Confucius Institute closures. China’s academic influence persisted via student tuition and research partnerships.
🧵🧵The ways and means committee released the 389 page centerpiece of the big beautiful bill. And this, this is what I voted for. Growth, stabilization, promotes business and helps the middle class. Don’t let the media lie about this like did with the TCJA.
It makes permanent key elements of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) while introducing new incentives to reward work, investment, entrepreneurship, and productivity. Its guiding philosophy is simple: lower taxes + fewer restrictions = more innovation, jobs, and prosperity.
This is arguably the most important piece of legislation for Present Trump’s second term.
Pro-growth provisions:
A. Permanent Tax Relief for Families & Workers
•Permanently extends individual tax rate cuts, ensuring lower marginal rates that incentivize work, saving, and entrepreneurship.
•Expanded standard deduction helps simplify filing and rewards income earners.
•Eliminates personal exemptions in favor of a more streamlined system that increases transparency and efficiency.
B. Boost to Business Formation and Investment
•Increases the pass-through business deduction (Section 199A) from 20% to 23% and makes it permanent.
•Encourages small business formation, especially LLCs, S-corps, and sole proprietorships.
•Includes Business Development Companies (BDCs), boosting access to capital in underserved markets.
•Removes limitations based on business type for many taxpayers, reducing the bias against service-based firms.
•Higher estate and gift tax exemption ($15M) keeps family-owned businesses and farms intact across generations.
C. New Deductions That Reward Productivity
•“No Tax on Tips” Deduction: Workers in traditionally tipped occupations can deduct tip income—encourages accurate reporting and rewards labor directly.
•“No Tax on Overtime” Deduction: Hard work is honored, not penalized. This deduction directly rewards employees who work beyond standard hours, especially in hospitality, logistics, and healthcare.
•Enhanced deduction for seniors reduces their taxable income during fixed-income years, supporting continued consumption and intergenerational transfers.
🧵🧵A detailed thread about all the specific actions taken by the DOJ and Civil Rights Division, as well as all of the investigations that have been opened.
You be the judge if anything is happening or not, but at least make that call with all of the available information.
Establishment of the Weaponization Working Group
On February 5, 2025, AG Bondi formed the “Weaponization Working Group” to review prior prosecutions of Trump, including cases led by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, New York Attorney General Letitia James, and Special Counsel Jack Smith, focusing on allegations of politicized justice.
The DOJ launched an investigation into Letitia James following a criminal referral from federal housing officials accusing her of mortgage fraud. James led a civil fraud case against Trump in 2023.
Review of Tina Peters’ Case
- Date: May 6, 2025
- Description: After Trump’s Truth Social post labeling former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters a “political prisoner,” the DOJ began reviewing her prosecution for compromising voting equipment to support Trump’s election fraud claims.
- Key Individuals/Entities: Tina Peters, Colorado prosecutors.
- the investigation is centered around her prosecution and the lack of prosecution for Jenna Griswold who published passwords online that unlocked voting machines before the 2024 election.
🧵🧵THREAD: The Untouchable Firm—Inside the Shadowy Power of WestExec Advisors
What if I told you the most powerful foreign policy decisions in America didn’t come from elected officials—but from a quiet D.C. firm called WestExec Advisors?
Let’s talk about the Obama-Biden shadow cabinet that never left.
Founded in 2017 by Antony Blinken, Michèle Flournoy, and other Obama alums, WestExec marketed itself as “bringing the Situation Room to the boardroom.”
Translation? Intelligence, Pentagon, and State Department access—for sale.
WestExec operated in the “revolving door” sweet spot: its consultants weren’t officially registered lobbyists, allowing them to avoid disclosure rules while advising defense contractors, Big Tech, and foreign-linked entities.
Who are some of WestExec’s alumni?
•Antony Blinken – now Secretary of State
•Avril Haines – Director of National Intelligence
•Jen Psaki – former WH Press Sec
•Lisa Monaco – Deputy AG
These are not just former staffers. They run the Biden administration.