In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce a Cypriot politician and social media personality, Fidias Panayiotou (@Fidias0). He’s best known for his clickbait YouTube stunts and for voting against aid to Ukraine and the return of abducted Ukrainian children from Russia.
1/20
Fidias hails from Meniko, Cyprus. In 2019, he began posting videos on YouTube. After a slow start, he found his niche with clickbaity, MrBeast-style content featuring silly stunts, catchy titles and scripted dialogue. Today, Fidias has 2,7 million subscribers on YouTube.
2/20
Fidias’s channel started with trend-riding, but he found his niche in traveling without money — aka freeloading. In one video, he fare-dodged on the Bengaluru Metro. The train authority responded by saying they would file a criminal case against him.
3/20
A month later, Fidias released a video of himself traveling across Japan by free—dodging fares, begging for cash, and sneaking hotel breakfasts. He faced heavy criticism and later posted — and then deleted — an apology.
4/20
After breaking up with his girlfriend in 2021 — and making a 2-video publicity stunt about it — Fidias started working seriously on climbing the social media influencer ladder and becoming more famous. At this time, he also started heavily monetizing his channel.
5/20
At this point, his strategy seemed to be clear: do collabs with bigger YouTubers and rising stars like Airrack, and do even more ridiculous, scripted stunts to grow the subscriber base. And to be fair, he wasn’t all that bad at producing clickbait.
6/20
Fidias’s big break came soon with “I Shook The Top 100 YouTubers’ Hands,” in which he shook the hand of world’s biggest YouTuber, MrBeast. After this, both the production values and views of his videos skyrocketed, and he became a well known figure in the YouTuber scene.
7/20
His most popular video with 15 million views is the one where he hugs the “world’s top 100 celebrities”. His final mission was to hug Elon Musk. He even called for his fans to spam Elon’s mother, Maye Musk, with the hug request. She called the campaign “malicious”.
8/20
At the same time, Fidias was cozying up to pro-Kremlin propagandists and likeminded grifters on his podcasts. He had extremely biased discussions with vatniks people like Russell Brand, Jeffrey Sachs, Nigel Farage and Andrew Tate.
9/20
In 2024, Fidias announced his run for the European Parliament on an anti-partisan platform. With no political background, he was seen as a novelty candidate — but quickly gained traction, especially among young voters, probably due to his YouTube fame.
10/20
Fidias campaigned on reforming education — calling to scrap exams and promote self-learning — while also backing AI and Bitcoin. He shocked many by finishing 3rd with 19,4% of the vote, topping the polls and winning a seat in the European Parliament.
11/20
Initially, he claimed to be running a “direct democracy platform” where he ran social media polls for his voting decisions. For example, he voted against Ursula van der Leyen remaining the president of the European Commission based on the results of a Twitter poll.
12/20
But not all votes were left to be decided by his fans. In July 2024, Fidias abstained from a key vote reaffirming the EU’s support for Ukraine — military, political, humanitarian, and diplomatic. His stance raised eyebrows across the Parliament.
13/20
In Feb 2025, Fidias posted a video titled “How the US forced Russia to invade Ukraine,” featuring Jeffrey Sachs. Sachs, who recently spoke at the European Parliament, blamed the war entirely on the West and NATO, while absolving Russia of any responsibility.
14/20
On May 8, 2025, yet again without a poll, Fidias voted against an EU resolution condemning Russia for abducting Ukrainian children. The motion called for their immediate return & accountability under international law. Only 2 other MEPs opposed it.
15/20
The next day, Fidias visited Moscow for Russia’s Victory Day, claiming his trip was about “dialogue and peace.” During the visit, he met with the chairman of the State Duma. He didn’t mention whether Russia’s war crimes and bombing of civilians in Ukraine were discussed.
16/20
Fidias plays the classic “peacenik” role — claiming that if we just stop sending military aid to Ukraine, Russia will magically end its invasion. It’s a delusional take that ignores reality and whitewashes Russia’s long-standing imperial ambitions and aggression.
17/20
And as always, Fidias avoids talking about Russia. He’s made cozy travel vlogs there, but steers clear of politics. Instead, he blames the EU — while pushing his “direct democracy for the people” gimmick, conveniently skipping polls on anything involving Russia & the war.
18/20
Fidias’ anti-EU stance is also echoed by his old friend and hug buddy, Elon Musk. They’ve shared views on tech moderation and online “freedom,” and at one point, Elon even called for making Fidias the “EU President.” You can’t make this shit up.
19/20
To conclude, Fidias is a social climber with a broken moral compass. He’s inserted himself into serious geopolitical issues — and for some reason, has chosen to simp for Russia while pushing the absurd narrative that the entire conflict is the West’s fault.
20/20
The 2nd edition of “Vatnik Soup — The Ultimate Guide to Russian Disinformation” is officially out!
In this 5th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss something that sounds great in theory, but was completely turned upside-down by the tankie kind of vatnik: anti-imperialism. More consistent anti-imperialists call this the “anti-imperialism of idiots”. 1/5
“Anti-imperialism” was popularized by Lenin, who saw imperialism as the ultimate stage of capitalism. Ironically, the largest empire is now… Putin’s Russia, proud heir to both Lenin’s Soviet Union and to the Tsarist Empire. 2/5
Indeed, Russia is an empire that is still ruled by a de facto all-powerful Tsar, that still proudly flies its imperial flag, that still dreams of expanding its already huge territory through brutal conquest and colonization. 3/5
In this 4th Debunk of the Day, we’ll refute an absolute classic of vatnik BS, the crown jewel of peak dishonesty: whataboutism.
Now, not everything that looks like whataboutism is wrong. Seeking consistency or comparing actions or responses is normal. 1/5
But when someone pulls some completely unrelated event, that happened to completely different people, a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, you know what you’re dealing with: a crass denial of the problem at hand, a bad-faith attempt to derail the topic. 2/5
Logic or chronology plays no role here, nor your opinion on these other topics. You could be the staunchest critic or supporter of these other actions thrown into the discussion, it doesn’t matter. It is irrelevant whether these other things are true or not, or bad or not. 3/5
In this 3rd Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “ending” the war by surrendering or ceding territory.
Nearing four years of the 2-day “special military operation”, Russia is desperate to obtain through other means what they failed to conquer on the battlefield. 1/5
An endless army of vatniks therefore tries to demoralize both Ukrainians and supporters.
They sound noble: “anti-war” or concerned about the fate of Ukraine’s civilians, soldiers and cities. They claim that if we just stop fighting or helping, this horror would magically end. 2/5
What they never mention is… WHO started the war, WHO murders Ukrainians, WHO destroys Ukrainian cities: the same monsters they suggest Ukrainians be at the mercy of. Surrendering wouldn’t end the atrocities of the occupation, it would enable them. Surrendering wouldn’t even…3/5
In today’s Debunk of the Day (2), we’ll look at… nuclear blackmail. Vatniks love using Russia’s nuclear threats as a reason for surrendering or for not lifting a finger to help Ukraine: “see, they have nukes, we have to give them whatever they want”.
The argument is absurd: 1/5
Nuclear deterrence has been a reality for decades. Both the US and Russia have lost wars without resorting to nukes. We are not submitting to the whims of Pakistan or North Korea either. For vatniks, it’s just an insidious way of siding with Putin. 2/5
We can’t just give in to the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail, to the threats their officials and propagandists make five times a day to scare us into letting them have something they know perfectly well is not theirs, with no limit to their appetite. 3/5 vatniksoup.com/en/nuclear-thr…
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce a Ukrainian “scholar” and social media activist, Marta Havryshko (@HavryshkoMarta). She’s best known for spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives online, along with a habit of spotting neo-Nazis everywhere in Ukraine.
1/20
Marta hails from Ukraine, where she studied history at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. She received her PhD in history in 2010. Her academic work focused on gender-based violence and wartime atrocities, including publications on sexual crimes in occupied Ukraine.
2/20
She is currently working as a visiting Assistant Professor at the Strassler Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies at Clark University in the US. According to the center’s website, Marta teaches courses on antisemitism, racism, and gender-based violence in armed conflicts.
In today’s (first) Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “realistic expectations”.
Russia has the GDP of Italy. NATO — which Russia claims to be fighting — has 20 times their GDP, and a much stronger and more modern military. 1/5
Russia’s full scale invasion was supposed to take 2 days, but we’re nearing 4 years. They’ve lost a million men. Their economy is in shambles.
And yet we're letting them set their red lines instead of massive sanctions, strong support for Ukraine, and an immediate sky shield. 2/5
Russia thought their war was “realistic” because we’d let them get away with it. It wouldn’t be “realistic” to invade a European nation and redraw borders by force if the West had a strong and united response.
What’s “realistic” is what public opinion tolerates and accepts. 3/5