Margot Cleveland Profile picture
May 13 16 tweets 5 min read Read on X
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Trump Administration pounds SCOTUS in new filing asking court to lift administrative injunction entered for non-parties in the Alien Enemies Act case. h/t @gvincentamore 1/
2/ Here's full filing. Comments to follow: supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24/2…
3/ You'll recall this is case where SCOTUS entered a midnight injunction barring Trump from removing any members of a "putative class" of tDa members. "Putative class" means there was NEVER a class action lawsuit "certified"--it was a wanna-be class action.
4/ SCOTUS entered injunction even though lower court NEVER entered decision on class certification one way or the other & NEVER decided whether or not to enter injunction in favor of the putative class, one way or the other and 5th Circuit never decided either.
5/ That was a blatant violation by SCOTUS of Marbury v. Madison which made clear SCOTUS has only APPELLATE jurisdiction (other than limited circumstances that don't apply here). And yet that SCOTUS injunction has been in place for 3 weeks.
6/ Last week the district court denied class certification, meaning there is NO CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT and thus the injunction SCOTUS entered makes no sense!!! SCOTUS injunction said Trump can't remove any tDa members in northern Texas district but only 2 individuals are Plaintiffs
7/ So Trump Administration asks SCOTUS to remove injunction, noting that there is no class. Image
8/ Trump Administration adds that at this point 3 weeks have past so there was more than enough time for tDa members to file a habeas case. Here, it is helpful to understand what is really going on: The tDa members aren't being prevented from suing. Rather.. . . Image
9/ the ACLU wants to automatically represent every illegal, terrorist or not, to make it difficult (or impossible) to deport them. You gotta wonder why!!
10/ The Trump Administration's filing does something else: It highlights why keeping tDa members locked up in U.S. isn't an answer. Image
Image
Image
11/ The ACLU yesterday however asked SCOTUS to keep in place the injunction and to provide an advisory opinion re propriety of class action in habeas--something beyond SCOTUS' Article III authority. Image
Image
12/ Trump also notes why the made-up 30 days supposedly required for "due process" makes no sense when dealing with violate tDa members. Image
13/ Trump picks another 80/20 issue: Image
Image
14/ SCOTUS's midnight rush even prevented removal under other non-AEA authority! OUTRAGEOUS! Image
15/15 And now, with no class action, of course the application should be denied. SCOTUS made a mess of this case and really has no option but to eat crow. But will it?! Image
16/ One final thought: I absolutely LOVE how Trump Administration is wiping SCOTUS' face in fact its injunction was so unthought-through it technically barred deportation of tDa members deportable for other reasons & forcing SCOTUS to acknowledge mistake by altering injunction.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

May 9
🚨🚨🚨HUGE development in Alien Enemies Act case that SCOTUS entered a stay for an entire class that had not been certified. District judge now denies class certification. 1/
3/ This decision is first case where court denied class certification. Additionally, now that the court has denied class certification, it changes status quo of case before SCOTUS.
Read 7 tweets
May 3
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: HUGE win from Trump Administration and D.C. Circuit enters stay of lower court injunction. Lower court barred Trump Administration from managing Voice of America. D.C. Circuit stayed decision allowing Trump to move forward w/ firings/grant terminations. 1/
2/ Full order. Thoughts follow. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ Here is what Trump Administration did and what lower courts order via injunctions: Image
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
May 2
🚨New filing in Boasberg Alien Enemies Act case. Amazing this must be said! 1/ Image
2/ That excerpt was from a Declaration filed by Trump Administration in support of its Response in Opposition to New Motion for a Preliminary Injunction. This Response is interesting as it is first effort by Trump Administration to explain whether it is in constructive control
3/ of prisoners. Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 16 tweets
May 1
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Federal district court enters first merits ruling on Alien Enemies Act habeas case. On question of class certification: Court punts on whether class cert. under Rule 23 is available & considers if All Writs Act provides analog, i.e. another way to do a class. 1/
2/ Court holds "yes," so treating it as a class action which allows ACLU to represent all terrorists Trump seeks to remove under Alien Enemies act whether they ask to challenge removal or not! Image
3/ Note: This remains limited to the jurisdiction of the d.ct. though, so ACLU still seems to need to file "class actions" in all 94 districts...well it would need to if SCOTUS hadn't entered a stay in a non-case with non-plaintiffs already!
Read 22 tweets
Apr 30
🚨Folks, I'm seeing A LOT of what I believe is misreporting regarding an order entered yesterday by Judge Thurston. Her ACTUAL order appears to be consistent with federal law: 1/ Image
Image
2/ So she is NOT saying they can't arrest without a warrant and it should be easy to prove "flight risk" on an individual basis...in fact that's precisely what ICE requires, which prompted Trump Administration to argue case was moot.
3/ So bottom line the ACTUAL order is merely what law requires & policy states, although the "comply with law" injunctions are disfavored. And entering an injunction requiring following of a policy NOT constitutionally required is problematic. That policy concerns documentation Image
Read 5 tweets
Apr 30
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: On Sunday, @NCLAlegal on behalf of its clients, @FDRLST and @realDailyWire sent letter to Attorney General Bondi in response to President Trump's EO on censorship and Secretary Rubio's recent announcement of closing new censorship HUB is State Department. 1/ Image
2/ The letter applauded the President's change in policy and efforts undertaken to protect First Amendment rights but noted ongoing concerns. Image
3/ As we explained, Secretary Rubio's recent announcement of shuttering of the new censorship hub actually validates our concerns that bureaucrats continued stealth efforts to target domestic speech in excess of their foreign remit. Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(