/3 Judge McConnell is presiding over New York v. Trump, a lawsuit brought by 21 states and D.C. challenging President Trump’s temporary freeze on federal funding.
In February, he ordered taxpayer money to continue flowing to the states, including to Crossroads Rhode Island, where he served as a board member and board chairman over a span of nearly 20 years.
/4 Crossroads Rhode Island received at least $128 million in federal funds during Judge McConnell’s time on its board.
His recent ruling ensures the nonprofit will now receive millions more.
/5 This week, AFL presented its investigative findings to Chief Judge David Barron of the First Circuit Court and formally requested an official investigation into Judge McConnell’s conduct.
/6 AFL’s complaint alleges Judge McConnell has violated multiple Canons of Judicial Conduct, and may have breached his fiduciary duty as a longtime board member of Crossroads Rhode Island.
Here are the details…
/7 Judge McConnell holds a significant conflict of interest between his duty to Crossroads Rhode Island, where he served as a board member for decades, and his obligation as a federal judge to avoid even the appearance of impropriety or bias in adjudicating cases.
/8 While he was Chairman of the Board of Directors, Judge McConnell oversaw Crossroads Rhode Island’s purchase of two properties — both purchased from a sitting board member at prices far above fair market value.
One of those transactions was never reported to the IRS.
/9 The properties purchased and the board member who sold them are tied to two infamous Rhode Island public corruption scandals:
➡️ The Governor Edward DiPrete bribery scandal
➡️ The Rhode Island Banking Crisis
This raises significant concerns about Judge McConnell’s judgment.
/10 AFL has discovered that Crossroads Rhode Island operates housing developments through for-profit subsidiaries that funnel 99% of profits to unnamed “partners.”
/11 According to homeless individuals in Providence, Crossroads Rhode Island’s homeless facilities have been a haven for drugs and violence — failing this vulnerable community it was meant to serve, all while Judge McConnell sat on the board with a duty to uphold its mission.
/12 AFL urges the First Circuit to immediately investigate Judge McConnell’s conduct and these serious conflicts of interest and ethics violations.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
/1🚨ROGUE REDISTRICTING — AFL is urging a federal court in Utah to reject a state judge’s congressional map.
The map was drawn by activists and partisan lawyers at the Elias Law Group and would redistrict about half a million voters from a single county into new districts.
/2 Late last year, a state judge ordered Utah’s lieutenant governor to use this new map that would redistrict approximately half a million voters and result in dramatic political point swings.
/3 AFL’s brief argues that this court-imposed congressional map violates federal law, including the U.S. Constitution’s Elections Clause, which requires courts to enforce the last map enacted by the legislature if the current one is unconstitutional.
The Trump Administration Wants White Men to Claim Discrimination. This Is What Happens When They Do
“Jeff Vaughn says it was a 2022 billboard that convinced him being White and male was becoming a liability.
The then-evening anchor at CBS’s flagship Los Angeles television station remembers seeing an ad for his news program — and realizing it didn’t feature him.”
“It did include all of his co-anchors, none of whom, he says, was a straight White man like him.
‘That was a real gut punch,’ Vaughn, 60, said in an interview.
‘If you take a look at every person that’s on the billboard, it’s somebody that CBS sees as checking the box, whether it’s a woman or a minority or LGBTQ.’”
/1🚨BREAKING — AFL just filed a new lawsuit against HHS and CMS to expose the architects behind a Biden-era organ transplant policy that financially rewards higher transplant volume and prioritizes race in transplant decisions.
/2 Last week, AFL filed a lawsuit to determine who within the Biden Administration was behind its race-based organ transplant policy.
This new lawsuit seeks to uncover the outside influencers who shaped the program, and why.
/3 The lawsuit targets the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for failing to produce records tied to a federal transplant program that rewards hospitals for increasing kidney transplant volume and embeds race into the process.
/1🚨VICTORY — AFL DEFEATED Maricopa County’s attempt to hijack County Recorder Justin Heap’s election integrity lawsuit and block us from representing him.
An Arizona court fully rejected the blatant power grab.
Our lawsuit against Maricopa County will now proceed.
/2 After Recorder Heap chose AFL to represent him in a lawsuit against the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell filed another lawsuit against him, claiming that she had the right to select his attorney, and she did not want AFL to represent him.
/3 In its ruling, the Maricopa County Superior Court held that Arizona law does not give the county attorney authority to control a county officer’s legal representation.
/1🚨VICTORY — AFL has BROKEN Nashville’s years-long stonewalling over the Covenant School shooter’s “manifesto.”
A Tennessee appeals court REJECTED Nashville’s attempt to withhold records related to the shooting and keep the public in the dark.
/2 The ruling from the Court of Appeals of Tennessee at Nashville reverses most of a lower court decision that allowed the Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County (Metro) to withhold the shooter’s “manifesto” in full.
/3 The court’s ruling made clear that government agencies cannot rely on sweeping legal theories to justify total secrecy, and must instead conduct a record-by-record review, redacting only what is lawfully protected and releasing the rest under Tennessee’s Public Records Act.
AFL has uncovered that MULTIPLE states lack evidence to support their claims of harm in their lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration’s federal wind regulation review.
/2 Last year, 17 states and D.C. sued the Trump Administration and several federal agencies, challenging the implementation of the Wind Memo, claiming it would cause irreparable harm to each state’s environment, climate, and economic, transportation, and security interests.
/3 The plaintiff states include New York, Massachusetts, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, and the District of Columbia.