Wanjiru Njoya Profile picture
May 15 2 tweets 1 min read Read on X
The Bantus who are persecuting the Boers are not even indigenous to South Africa. They're from the Congo.

They migrated eastwards and southwards, genociding smaller tribes as they swept their way to the south. Finally they encountered Boers, and attempted to wipe them out too.
The only reason the Boers survived is because they fought to survive. And now the Bantus are trying once more to wipe them out, encouraged by their friends in the liberal media.

If the Bantus want Boers to go "back" to Europe, they should do the same and go "back" to the Congo.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Wanjiru Njoya

Wanjiru Njoya Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WanjiruNjoya

May 14
She blocked me so I can't correct her - she's wrong about this.

White farmers don't own 70% of the land in South Africa, they own 70% of FARMLAND.

That's because they cultivated it into farmland with the sweat of their own brow - it wasn't "farmland" before they cultivated it. Image
Commies are now saying they want their "fair share" of farmland cultivated by the Boers.
South Africa is mostly arid land - the farms don't just magically spring out of the ground. Someone has to work hard for years to turn semi-arid land into productive farms.

Then along come the Bantus and say "we want our fair share of the fruits of your labor"
Read 4 tweets
Mar 17
It was suspected that Dred Scott was a test case, like the Rosa Parks case, where activists prepare a set of facts to challenge a law they deem to be unconscionable. Image
The family that owned him, the Blow family, appear to have had abolitionist sympathies. They were his friends and supporters. So why didn't they just free him? That would have been the obvious thing to do. But they didn't just want to free him, they wanted to take down slavery.
There is no record of Scott ever having been sold by the Blow family to Dr Emerson. The "defense" did not challenge this, leading people to suspect they were colluding. It was suspected they claimed Scott was owned by the (dead) Dr Emerson so nobody would say "just free him."
Read 8 tweets
Mar 2
Thank you, Sir!

I have the measure of these activists, they want slavery to be the always and forever topic. Whatever you say they respond with "but what about slavery?"

- South Carolinians are the truest Americans
- But what about slavery?

Even DEI lawfare is about slavery
Filed in Alabama in January 2025 Image
They don't do this to Northern states - yet. But their day will come, as the goal is to take down the entire America not just the South.

This is Illinois - An Act to prevent the immigration of free Negroes into this state 👇 Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 24
Yankees are brazenly blaming capitalism on the South. It's not a spoof, this is the actual NYT 1619 project.

America's slave traders were from New England and New York. New Yorkers illegally traded slaves until the 1860s, now they want to blame it all on the South. Image
Yankees brazenly erasing their own role from the historical record.

They're teaching that slaves freed themselves.

As for how slaves got to America in the first place, they use the passive voice: they "were brought", they "were traded" - they don't say it was done by Yankees!
You actually couldn't make it up, but they did. They're saying American capitalism was invented in Georgia and Alabama.

Poor, socialist New York, forced into a capitalist system against their will by Alabama and Georgia!
Read 7 tweets
Feb 10
Some slaveowners were pretty lenient and left their slaves de facto free. Some like Stonewall Jackson also taught slaves to read and write.

This really aggravated the nasty slaveowners whose view was "we ALL need to follow the rules of slavery, or you'll make us look bad"
"Please don't give your slaves the weekend off, as I won't be letting mine off and you'll make me look bad"

That was their reasoning. Same people as wanted to enforce Jim Crow laws when nobody else was bothered.

Such people are the total worst.
The rules said no blacks in the Confederate army.

Nathan Bedford Forrest rode with his slaves, he wasn't too bothered about the rules. Many Confederate officers did the same. Image
Read 6 tweets
Feb 10
Notice the word "farm". It says FARM ownership.

The reason white farmers own most FARMS is because they created those farms. Boer = Farmer

These ignorant Bantus think farms created themselves by magic, so they're wondering why all the magic farms were "distributed" to whites.
There's not much you can say when you're dealing with people who are this stupid and ignorant.

If you build anything they'll soon come along and ask why it was "distributed" to you and demand their fair share.
When the Boers arrived in 1652 the population of Africa was not what it is today - most of that land was uninhabited and the rest they bought over the centuries. Nobody "distributed" it to them. They worked for every last inch of that land.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(