Anthony Constantino, CEO of Sticker Mule, says that he would use a US manufacturer for his company's t-shirts. However, he feels the US company doesn't meet his quality standards and they "must maintain quality."
So what constitutes a quality t-shirt? Let's find out. 🧵
For reference, I'm comparing Sticker Mule's t-shirts (made in Nicaragua) to Bayside Apparel (fully made in the US from fiber to finish). Sticker Mule charges $19 for their t-shirts. Organizations that print on Bayside blanks sell their merch for $27.
I should state at the outset that to properly determine quality, I would need to send these t-shirts to a lab, which I'm unable to do because I don't own a Sticker Mule t-shirt. Additionally, quality can be subjective, as it depends on your preferences.
But I can talk about some basic dimensions.
What does it mean for a t-shirt to be "high quality?" Well, first we need to identify what we don't like about t-shirts. T-shirts often get thrown away because the fabric ages poorly or the seams either stretch out or simply break.
The neckline is the most prone to stretching out, as famously referenced in this Seinfeld episode where George Costanza's friend denied him a cashmere sweater because he was worried that George's big head would stretch out the sweater's "neck hole."
To reinforce this area, manufacturers can use a strip of fabric tape. Sometimes this is done with the same jersey material used for the shirt. Other times they use a strip of woven twill. The twill is better because it's less prone to stretching than the jersey.
IG toofbush
Both Sticker Mule and Bayside use tape to reinforce their collar. But Sticker Mule uses the same material as the t-shirt, while Bayside uses a twill. Jersey is more prone to stretching because it's a knit, rather than a woven. Think of how sweaters are stretchy, but jeans aren't.
You can see the effect on this old Sticker Mule t-shirt. The neckline has become wavy after some use.
I should note that tape is not the only dimension that determines quality. 3sixteen's made-in-USA t-shirts don't feature any tape. However, the heavier fabric weight (160GSM) combined with the triple needle coverstitch means the collar will never stretch out. It's a recipe.
The other question is whether the fabric pills easily. The term pill refers to the fuzzy little balls you see develop on the surface of the fabric. Pilling occurs when the fibers break, fly up, and tangle into each other. Short, weak fibers are more prone to pilling.
To properly test whether a fabric pills easily, it would have to be sent to a lab, where they conduct a rub test similar to this. The machine makes sure all the rubbing is standardized.
IG shiftfashiongroup
The lab can also test for colorfastness by throwing the garment into the wash a few times. Colorfastness refers to whether the fabric holds its color or if it gets dingy and faded quickly.
IG shiftfashiongroup
When I look on eBay for StickerMule t-shirts, I see a lot of faded fabrics, stretched out collars, and some pilling. You can especially see the pilling in the last photo, as tiny balls appear in areas of high friction (the neck).
Compare that to these Bayside Apparel t-shirts, which appear to hold their color and have intact collars. No pilling whatsoever.
Of course, it's true that Bayside Apparel t-shirts are heavier and perhaps less soft to the touch when you take them out of the box. But does that mean they're "lower quality?" I don't think so. A soft, mushy t-shirt might feel great at first, but not age well over time.
Old Scottish cashmere sweaters—the ones you find in your grandpa's closet—don't feel like cashmere at first. They feel more like merino out the box. However, they last forever. The softness comes naturally from wear over time. Price is about $600 for a four-ply knit nowadays.
Compare that to many modern cashmere knits, particularly at the lower-end of the price spectrum, which are heavily milled (washed) to produce artificial softness. These are more prone to pilling, as The Washington Post showed with this $60 cashmere Quince knit.
Luckily, the price difference is not so severe with pure cotton t-shirts. Sticker Mule's $19 t-shirts are made in Nicaragua. Bayside Apparel's t-shirts are made from fiber to finish in the United States and printed at a Teamster union-run shop. Printed shirts are $27.
That's $8 more for US production. But you also get a t-shirt that you'll want to wear for longer, as the fabric will age better and the neckline won't stretch out. In the end, I think it offers more value. If you calculate this in terms of cost-per-wear, Bayside is even cheaper.
That said Bayside is not the only game in town. @ac132 tells me that he supports US manufacturing. For a consulting fee, I would love to help him move his production to the United States, where he can find the quality he likes while supporting US workers.
Any time I talk about a wealthy person's outfit, someone in the comments is quick to reply: "They're rich, you think they care?" No one has to care about my opinions or clothes, regardless of net worth.
But let's talk about the connection between wealth and aesthetics 🧵
About a year ago, Tucker Carlson told Chris Cuomo that "postmodern architecture" is intentionally designed to deaden the spirit. The clip was widely circulated online by people such as Benny Johnson, who seemingly agreed.
Postmodern architecture was actually a very brief movement that emerged in the 1960s as a counter-reaction to modernism's austerity and uniformity. Examples of postmodernism include Michael Graves's Portland Building and Guild House. Also Phillip Johnson's PPG Place.
Trump released a $250 fragrance (one for women, one for men).
Sometimes a fragrance can be expensive because it contains certain ingredients or involve artisanal, small-batch production. But with no note breakdown or even a description of the scent, what justifies this price?
I'm reminded of this 2016 blog post by Luca Turin, one of the best writers on fragrances. Even for niche perfumery he warns: "Niche perfumery stands a good chance of disappearing up its own rear end if it merely becomes yet another golden opportunity to rip off the customer."
If you're into fragrances, as I am, I encourage you to not support celebrity bullshit like this. Go to real perfumers. Some of my favorites include:
— AbdesSalaam Attar: He's a self-taught Sicilian Sufi perfumer who only uses natural ingredients. Many of his perfumes feel like you're walking through a Middle Eastern bazaar or spice market. Milano Caffe, Cuoio dei Dolci, and Tabac are worth a sniff. He can also do bespoke perfumes using your favorite notes.
— DS & Durga: David Moltz describes himself as doing "scent travel." He has an uncanny ability to transport you to far off places. I like Cowboy Grass, Debaser, Amber Kiso, and Burning Barbershop. If you can get a sample of his Pale Grey Mountain, Small Black Lake Sample (made part of his Hylands collection), it's really good with tailored tweeds.
— Anything by Jean Claude Ellena: One of the most famous perfumers in the world. His scents have been likened to watercolor paintings and chamber music because they're light, airy, and have a transparent quality. This makes them particularly good for spring/ summer. Check his scents from Hermes, such as Terre d'Hermes and Un Jardin sur le Nil, which are easy to find on discount. L'Eau d'Hiver for Frederic Malle is also great, but a bit more expensive.
— Tauer Perfumes: Andy Tauer is a chemist and self-taught perfumer who specializes in dry, spicy, woody scents. L'Air du Desert Marocain makes you feel like you're in the middle of the desert at night. Lonestar Memories is like being next to a crackling campfire while picking up on the scent of tobacco and leather. IMO, a must try if you're exploring niche perfumery.
Always try to get samples before buying a bottle. Check shops such as Luckyscent, Surrender to Chance, and The Perfumed Court. Also pick up a copy of Perfumes by Luca Turin and Tania Sanchez.
People think I'm biased against Jeff Bezos, but here's F. Caraceni Sartoria, widely considered one of the best bespoke tailoring houses in the world, commenting on Bezos's wedding suit.
"The most terrible, frightening, horrible tuxedo ever seen in my life. I'm really suffering"
Nothing to do with politics, only quality tailoring. F. Caraceni made suits for Silvio Berlusconi, who was hardly beloved by progressives. Many people don't know much about tailoring, which is fine, but this doesn't mean that rich or expensive = good.
Caraceni's work:
Here is a dinner suit F. Caraceni made for Yves Saint Laurent.
Let me make the case for why the NHL should abolish its dress code, which currently requires players to wear a suit and tie while heading to and from games. 🧵
The arguments I've seen for the dress code fall into one of two categories: players look better in a coat-and-tie (some use descriptions such as "classy"). Others say that requiring players to dress in this way shows respect for the game. I will address each argument in turn.
It's true that tailoring once played a larger role in sports. Basketball coaches, for instance, used to wear tailored jackets pretty regularly, even at games. Some even looked quite good in these outfits.
It's true that progressives valorize "ugliness." But I think this person doesn't interrogate this position enough and thus lands at the wrong conclusion.
Let me give you a new perspective on ugliness. 🧵
In popular discourse, the world was once good, people were virtuous, and all things were beautiful. Then modernity came along and destroyed everything. In this view, beauty is an objective standard that has been corrupted by liberalism.
I contend that beauty in personal appearance is subjective, not objective. In fact, its standards rest on the shifting tectonic plates of politics, economics, and technology. Let me give you examples.
Today, we think of these photos as the standard for male beauty and dress: