I would suggest everybody read up on the Casa Grande Valley Farms project. It really is fascinating. FDR tried building a communist farming community.
They invited a few dozen farmer families and gave them a house plus 40 acres to work. The land wasn’t enough to turn a profit, even given the engineering that went behind the crop selection and rotation schemes. So most of the big necessary farm equipment was held in common.
They would share the tractors, and the granary, the barn, and the livestock. Their crops would be sold together. All would be shared. And a supplemental income would be provided by the department of agriculture.
This dynamic took a few years to wear down. Disagreements over tractor use, sudden cuts to their pay, uneven contributions to the common crop yield. There were also strict rules about working hours, and days off. This chafed the workers.
When interviewed the families all said they would much rather have their own farm. They felt like tenants. “Property held in common is looked after by none.” Was once again proven to be true. The tractors and other machinery broke down, no one cleaned the communal buildings, eventually they stopped being used.
FDR’s experiment with communism failed. The families moved on, the fields went fallow. So FDR turned it into a concentration camp for the Japanese. Yes seriously that’s what they did with the land.
I will be keeping a list of books read this year, along with a short review about them, and a rating.
The rating is a 1-5 scale:
5: This is one of my new favorite books
4: I would include this book on a list for anyone who asks for a book recommendation
3: I would recommend this book, but it would come with heavy caveats
2: I wouldn’t recommend reading, but I didn’t regret having spent time with it
1: I regretted reading this
There are at least two special categories:
The first is overtly partisan books. These can only receive a 3/5 because any time I recommend them they come with a huge obvious caveat.
The second is what I call airport books. Those paperbacks you see on the kiosk in a terminal, that you’d really only pick up because of an unexpected layover. Entertaining for a few hours, made neither better nor worse from the experience. There’s only two ratings I can give these books. 3- yes pick it up to kill the time 1- leave it to rot on the shelf.
There’s a funny inverse they do here. Inherent in right wing ideology is the emphasized importance on starting a family, joining a church, becoming the type of person that can support a family and help in a church. They ask, well what are you doing from the top down? It’s an incoherent question, because a government official can’t force you to grow to become a father or provider. He can however, take money from providers and give them to people who are not fulfilling their duties to their communities.
Again the causation is all backwards. I clean my community by keeping my property and surrounding area clean. It’s a daily effort on my part to uphold my duties to my neighbors.
We continue the confused thoughts by claiming actively cleaning and looking after your property is doing nothing. I’ve done my part, you demand the collective step in and do your part.
The defendant has endless petty crimes as well. Driving without a license, giving false name to police, assaulting officers, possessing weapons as a felon, and lots of parole violations. What would possibly posses the judge to let this man back onto the streets?
Hoyos was appointed by governor Mark Dayton, who should answer for this as well.
When you pay attention you quickly realize how many of their arguments are disputes about framing disguised as disputes about facts.
“White flight” was a response to the crime wave American cities saw in the 1960s-1990s. Libs are taught this was white america being racist fleeing from black neighbors as segregation was formally ended. Point out that what the whites fleeing the cities really didn’t like was the violent crime and their governments inability or unwillingness to stop this crime, and they will start calling you names. You’ve recast their narrative’s illogical hateful villains as not only pragmatic reasonable citizens, but as victims.
You can throw a stone into any American conflict and hit some sacred cow that justifies the progressive hatred of this country and her people. By simply explaining the point of view of the villainized, exactly as they would have explained themself, the progressive reacts in horror.
“How can you say that? My Zinn inspired history book said the opposite!” This is when the insults come raining down.
Ask any of these guys why they moved to a nice neighborhood and they’ll say, ohh it’s safe, the schools are nice etc etc etc… then ask them why grandma and grandpa moved to their neighborhood to start a family and it’s, “ohh they just hated black people.” Like really? That’s what you honestly think? It’s just silly.
It’s a completely unexamined line given to them by authority figures when they were too young to recognize communist subversion.
In 1862 during the civil war the Sioux used the opportunity to attack undefended frontier settlements. They killed nearly 400 men women and children. They took as hostages 300 women and children. They drove some 30,000 settlers off their land.
The military took time to rally enough troops to respond amidst the civil war. When they did, they killed some 150 natives and captured hundreds more. The freed the hostages and hanged the leaders of the attack in one of the largest mass executions in U.S. history; 18 in total. Part of the unconditional surrender of the Sioux was moving westward, away from the border they attacked.
20 years later a Sioux cult emerged. The belief that Jesus Christ had returned to earth as an Indian. The Sioux believed he had returned to cleanse the land of the white man and would restore the lives of the Indians that had fallen. The cult developed a ritual known as the ghost dance, which included a black shirt many Sioux believed to be bullet proof.
The ghost dance was a prayer, a prayer of genocide. A prayer that the white man would be exterminated. It spread to every Sioux tribe.
Given the history of unprovoked attacks on undefended settlements this call to genocide was taken seriously by the citizens living near the Sioux. They pled with the government to take action.
The U.S. ordered the Sioux to disarm, turning over their fire arms. During the disarmament members of the tribe started performing the ghost dance. Soldiers were on edge. One Sioux refused to turn over his rifle firing at the soldiers. Several others revealed hidden guns beneath their cloaks and began firing on the soldiers. Unarmed tribesmen garbed in their “bullet proof” shirts grabbed blunt objects and axes and struck at the nearest soldier. The army opened fire. It was chaos. There were mass casualties on both sides.
The Sioux lost. They were forced further back from civilization. They were never able to fulfill their prayer of white genocide.
Thank God our government did not allow a band of genocidal tribesman to exist near our borders. Our world is a better place for removing that threat.
Think about the insane amount of social conditioning that it took to make people ignore the sacrifice your ancestors made to protect you from a genocidal threat, while sympathizing with the genocidal threat.